Aaron Imholte / Steel Toe Morning/Evening Show / "The Toe Boys" / r/steeltoeboringshow - Disgraced Minnesotan radio host turned racist Internet shock jock. Cuckold chef de Spaghetti-os, "2-2" boxing "coach". Has a legion of a-logs. Lost his wife to a coke addict he played "Strip Twister" with. Fined $50 for sharing nudes of Kayla Rekieta.

[Kosher Salt]

Are you perfectly happy with the law fucking with people because they are dicks? I would argue that´s pretty dickish of you...

Criminality and being a dick aren't always correlated, but it's a happy coincidence when they intersect.

 

[Sam Losco's Wife]

Yeah, but I'm looking for maximum funny, which means Nick seething.

Maximum funny is both of these losers seething. Mutually Assured Destruction is the only way forward!!

Are you perfectly happy with the law fucking with people because they are dicks? I would argue that´s pretty dickish of you...

When it's Aaron Imholte, yes.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Maximum funny is both of these losers seething. Mutually Assured Destruction is the only way forward!!

No, Nick will take pleasure in Aaron going down with him. Maximum funny is Aaron getting a slap on the wrist and doing better while Nick seethes about it. "I DESERVE THAT AUDIENCE OF A COUPLE HUNDRED! DON'T THEY KNOW I'M A NON-PRACTICING COMEDIAN!?"

 

[TurdThrower]

According to this Geno won't go to testify, but will he do it over Zoom?

He will testify if it is over zoom because Keanu will make him. He's about to learn that she wears the pants in the relationship.

*Reminder that ex-wife #1 (Ashley) currently has a 2-year HRO on April; and 'abusive' Aaron never lost custody of his kids (yet) through all this, including the Qover era.

I don't think Aaron ever will lose custody. He is a free babysitter for the better ex.

 

[repentance]

No authoritative source but what I've read multiple times here is that she can't have them.

The most consistent thing which has been posted is that she has one ovary, which is all she needs. I don't recall Aaron ever saying that she wants kids, though.

I know for a fact this is incorrect. My understanding is that *most* Telcos don't record calls due to wiretapping laws and the amount of data storage it would require, but most do in fact save text messages because it doesn't count as wire tapping and barely cost anything to store. I'm not sure about how common it is for a Telco to record MMS, which is what matters here, but I know that at least some do. I am 100% confident that there's at least one telco that records *everything,* or at least they did in the recent past.

You could be right and this could be jurisdiction dependent.

Our data retention laws here have expanded enormously over the last couple of decades but communications are not intercepted without specific legal authority being invoked, either by court order or by agencies issuing a demand/operating under their own authority (normal law enforcement doesn't have this authority here). Voicemails are also only kept for a relatively short amount of time.

So does no one have the actual image in question, any longer?
Or is it that the pornography aspect of the image would limit the ability to transmit it to LE? Maybe this is location dependent, but here in Chicago the investigating officer just provides the witness with an evidence submission link via Axon capture, which uploads the media into evidence.com, and that’s that.

You just upload it to a link in front of the police here, too, although in the case of more serious crimes they're probably going to want to examine your device to check for deletions/alterations as well.

MN won't have the jurisdiction to compel Geno to testify, no matter how easy they make that for him. It will be interesting if Keanu testifies and Geno does not.

 

[Goatchoker]

I don't think Aaron ever will lose custody. He is a free babysitter for the better ex.

Sometimes as a mom you need a weekend off.
He’s got a house, spaghetti-os and can’t do drugs, I bet she doesn’t sleep well at night when they are gone though.

He’s really not the worst person in all this still. IMO.

 

[filthypenguin]

You could be right and this could be jurisdiction dependent.

Our data retention laws here have expanded enormously over the last couple of decades but communications are not intercepted without specific legal authority being invoked, either by court order or by agencies issuing a demand/operating under their own authority (normal law enforcement doesn't have this authority here). Voicemails are also only kept for a relatively short amount of time.

I was talking about whether or not the telecom has a copy, not the police. My assumption is that the police wouldn't be able to get the photo without a court order of some kind if the telecom does indeed have it. My understanding as to whether or not the telecom has the photo in the first place probably depends partially on if there's some data retention law in the jurisdiction that would apply (probably not) and whether or not the telecom has decided to keep the MMS for whatever reason other than legal compliance (no idea).

What I know for certain is that very recently (and I have no reason to believe anything has changed) is that there's at least one telecom that keeps all audio data for a while (not terribly long at all, maybe a day?), keeps all MMS pretty much indefinitely, and keeps all voicemails until the individual customer hits a limit measured in disk space (which takes much longer than you'd think, for the average customer you'd be measuring in years).

I don't know what telecoms are involved with this case in particular, but there's a very real possibility that the police don't have the photo *today,* but the court can get it via a court order. There's also a very real possibility that the screencap no longer exists, and the only evidence is the two witnesses and that Aaron sent "something" via MMS.

I do not know how common it is for telecoms to save MMS messages, all I know is that there's at least one that does, and if they received a court order to hand over a the screenshot they would. Personally, I would guess that it's not common for telecoms to save MMS messages because there's not really any reason to save them, but we live in a world where telecoms do far dumber things than waste hard drive space on screenshots of naked ugly women.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

I was talking about whether or not the telecom has a copy, not the police.

That depends on what mode of sending the pictures was used. If it was an app like Signal then no, the telecommunication provider would not have the picture saved at all, since it was transmitted via P2P encryption.

If it was sent via MMS, then maybe there is a chance for it to have been saved on a server for a short duration to facilitate the transfer, but it would have been deleted shortly after since most data retention laws require the deletion UNLESS there is legal reasons that requires saving such data (i.e. a court order to do so).

The content of telecommunication is subject to privacy laws.

[EDIT] Where it will have been saved though, unless it was deleted automatically via settings pr manually by users, is on the phone of the people involved. But if Geno deleted it and Aaron deleted the message, then proving it was sent might turn out to be hard and require witness testimony.

 

[filthypenguin]

That depends on what mode of sending the pictures was used. If it was an app like Signal then no, the telecommunication provider would not have the picture saved at all, since it was transmitted via P2P encryption.

It was sent via MMS, because it shows up in the phone record. That's part of the document.

If it was sent via MMS, then maybe there is a chance for it to have been saved on a server for a short duration to facilitate the transfer, but it would have been deleted shortly after since most data retention laws require the deletion UNLESS there is legal reasons that requires saving such data (i.e. a court order to do so).

Could be that the laws in the area I'm familiar with are unusual, but my understanding is that data retention laws require things aren't deleted, as in, they're "retained." For that type of law, there's no limit to how long you keep them, you just can't delete them prior to a certain amount of time passing. For all I know, there's only one jurisdiction that doesn't require you to ever delete the messages, but it's the only one I'm familiar with.

The content of telecommunication is subject to privacy laws.

[EDIT] Where it will have been saved though, unless it was deleted automatically via settings pr manually by users, is on the phone of the people involved. But if Geno deleted it and Aaron deleted the message, then proving it was sent might turn out to be hard and require witness testimony.

My understanding (which I will admit is not strong) is that privacy laws don't stop court orders. For example, HIPAA protects your medical info from just about everyone except law enforcement. I would be surprised to find out there are jurisdictions with privacy laws that protect MMS messages more strongly than medical information.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

It was sent via MMS, because it shows up in the phone record. That's part of the document.

Oh sorry, I meant the message between Aaron and our wife was in Signal, so thats gone most likely.

That a message with a picture was sent is saved in the provider call logs for the MMS between Geno and Aaron, but the picture itself is likely not.

 

[KriegsZensur]

I thought it was interesting that Aaron said on Wednesday’s show that he has plenty of money to take this case in any direction he wants. I can imagine him fighting it if his lawyer thinks the case is weak enough.

Aaron can say whatever the fuck he wants.
With him I’ll believe it when I see it happen.

He gonna get offered to not become a felon and plead. Two years probation, expunge record after four years. That’s what I would put my dollar on.

He seems like a middle school dweeb who got in over his head and just wants to do what he has to, to get out of this and move on.

 

[USAroXX]

First:
According to Aaron and April Imholte Dissolution of Marriage Judgment, entered July 8, 2024, the stipulated and agreed upon CONCLUSION OF LAW Section, Number 11 PROVIDES that April Imholte had NO LEGAL Right to access Joint Cell phone Bills as of April 1, 2024....? At least according to the order she signed.

SECOND:
I recall Aaron Imholte telling us all that April refused to sign his divorce papers until he signed an NDA...but then the coke arrest negated that absurdity.....! Weird that an alleged Victim of DV wanted an NDA from the alleged abuser?

 

[repentance]

Imagine thinking that's an own.

 

[KriegsZensur]

First:
According to Aaron and April Imholte Dissolution of Marriage Judgment, entered July 8, 2024, the stipulated and agreed upon CONCLUSION OF LAW Section, Number 11 PROVIDES that April Imholte had NO LEGAL Right to access Joint Cell phone Bills as of April 1, 2024....? At least according to the order she signed.

SECOND:
I recall Aaron Imholte telling us all that April refused to sign his divorce papers until he signed an NDA...but then the coke arrest negated that absurdity.....! Weird that an alleged Victim of DV wanted an NDA from the alleged abuser?

Re First:
That’s between Aaron and the phone company. She was on his plan, I see enough reasonable scenarios in which she has the permissions on her account, set by Aaron, to see that. I’m gonna guess the phone company has that set up properly, and Aaron had just no OpSec in mind.

Re Second:
An NDA does not cover criminal activity. So it doesn’t apply to things that basically directly relate to the criminal activity.
If Nick is snorting coke with a firearm in his other hand whilst being pegged by April, it’s free game.
If Nick snorted a line in the kitchen and after 15 minutes Aaron and he walked to the bathroom, got butt naked and sensually touched tips before playing synchronized helicopter, I would say the latter would be covered by NDA, as it’s gay and not related to criminal activity.

 

[USAroXX]

Re First:
That’s between Aaron and the phone company. She was on his plan, I see enough reasonable scenarios in which she has the permissions on her account, set by Aaron, to see that. I’m gonna guess the phone company has that set up properly, and Aaron had just no OpSec in mind.

Re Second:
An NDA does not cover criminal activity. So it doesn’t apply to things that basically directly relate to the criminal activity.
If Nick is snorting coke with a firearm in his other hand whilst being pegged by April, it’s free game.
If Nick snorted a line in the kitchen and after 15 minutes Aaron and he walked to the bathroom, got butt naked and sensually touched tips before playing synchronized helicopter, I would say the latter would be covered by NDA, as it’s gay and not related to criminal activity.

So basically
NOT A LAWYER
Nor
A DV COUNSELOR

But definitely a Rekieta Sweeper.
Got it.

Did you think I said it was Aaron that wanted the NDA....??? Maybe ESL is the problem here.

 

[just Reading a post]

I have never seen such a glutton for punishment such as Aaron.
He got out of this drama looking mostly good, as he snaked all the deets.
Felted Ralph so hard he fled the state.
Then he went back in for more and caught charges.
Was it really that hard to not do revenge porn and give Nick and Ralph a win you silly fuck?

 

[Guntkvd]

Fatty is streaming

 

[Turbo Hornbag Hervez]

I was somehow gifted an NLO membership and holy fuck, this shit is grim. He’s talking about filing for an HRO against A-aron (for insinuating he is a pedo) and seems like he is on opiates or something

 

[TurdThrower]

He’s talking about filing for an HRO against A-aron (for insinuating he is a pedo) and seems like he is on opiates or something

A judge would have to laugh at him for over this right? I mean he is on record referring to children as fucking cup holders and makes his life all about Aaron.

 

[AltisticRight]

View attachment 6385213
Imagine thinking that's an own.

I hate this fat chomo more than I dislike Aaron.