Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

Conventions are a hotbed for sexual assault and harassment but furry conventions are the worst of all of them.
This doesn't even just apply to weird fandom conventions. Cons for doctors and lawyers and other professionals also often feature Caligula levels of drunkenness, drug abuse and degeneracy, it just isn't right in public.
 
This doesn't even just apply to weird fandom conventions. Cons for doctors and lawyers and other professionals also often feature Caligula levels of drunkenness, drug abuse and degeneracy, it just isn't right in public.
I have consistently over the years been told dentists are the worst. Rich enough to not care and most of them have chronic pain issues from the necessary poor posture of their profession.
 
This is seriously why it needs to stop being a thing that people pretend furry cons are EVER going to be some kind of "family friendly" event. Even when the con runners are acting in good faith and not covertly encouraging it themselves, they do a piss poor job of keeping out malefactors, who are enormously disproportionately present in the con population.

Children are quite literally at serious risk in these events, every goddamn time.

I'd say the same for Discord, in its entirety, too.
I think Dragoncon actually did a good job with this. They had all the sex weirdoes splinter off and form their own con (Frolicon, for the improbable demographic of people who simply need to mix dildoes with table top gaming), and made the main con become more family friendly by adding a kid's track (which I've heard good things about). Dragoncon has been going for like 40 years so a lot of long-time attendees have kids and families now.
Furry cons will never be family-friendly because the fandom has been a weird sex thing since day one.
 
I think Dragoncon actually did a good job with this. They had all the sex weirdoes splinter off and form their own con (Frolicon, for the improbable demographic of people who simply need to mix dildoes with table top gaming), and made the main con become more family friendly by adding a kid's track (which I've heard good things about). Dragoncon has been going for like 40 years so a lot of long-time attendees have kids and families now.
Furry cons will never be family-friendly because the fandom has been a weird sex thing since day one.
And the one time someone tried to do similar with furry cons, Anthrocon/Kage did a whisper campaign against them and got them shut the hell down for 'making everyone look bad'.
 
I think Dragoncon actually did a good job with this. They had all the sex weirdoes splinter off and form their own con (Frolicon, for the improbable demographic of people who simply need to mix dildoes with table top gaming), and made the main con become more family friendly by adding a kid's track (which I've heard good things about). Dragoncon has been going for like 40 years so a lot of long-time attendees have kids and families now.
Furry cons will never be family-friendly because the fandom has been a weird sex thing since day one.
this does make me wonder if it's possible to have a convention that's adult but not super sex happy
the line between "kids are literally participating in their own little kiddie section" or "orgies in the hallways" is thicker than we all dare to admit, is there no way to create a convention that really is purely adult where you can drink and party and crack crass jokes but not overrun with butt plugs strewn about the halls, or are furries up there with negroes in the category of demographics that cannot behave themselves unless the law intervenes
 
Cons for doctors and lawyers and other professionals also often feature Caligula levels of drunkenness, drug abuse and degeneracy, it just isn't right in public.
I really do think furries are the worst ones though. The Greater New York Dental Meeting doesn't have a "Mommy Milkers Meetup" and a bunch of teenagers running around as far as I can tell.
Also I know that J.K. Rowling is a notorious war criminal, but LeakyCon (a Harry Potter fan convention) hasn't had any reports of diaper malfeasance.
And the one time someone tried to do similar with furry cons, Anthrocon/Kage did a whisper campaign against them and got them shut the hell down for 'making everyone look bad'.
These men who jerk it to cartoon dogs are the dumbest dudes alive. This would have made them look better!
I mean I shouldn't expect much from an alcoholic who pretends to be a cockroach but come on.
How will acknowledging a seedy element then working to contain or remove it make you look bad?
 
These men who jerk it to cartoon dogs are the dumbest dudes alive. This would have made them look better!
I mean I shouldn't expect much from an alcoholic who pretends to be a cockroach but come on.
How will acknowledging a seedy element then working to contain or remove it make you look bad?
It wouldn't, really. They just hated the guys who were putting it on.
 
this does make me wonder if it's possible to have a convention that's adult but not super sex happy
No, it is not.

Conventions are already "sex happy" to begin with (away from home/spouse if any, excitement of being somewhere new and meeting new people, socializing, minimal chance of cheating getting back to your partner, ease of finding private space and excuses to disappear for a little while for sex, ease of access to alcohol (and drugs), etc.), and furries have proven themselves to be astonishingly horny. Combine them and you're swimming in a petri dish, and there's really no way around it.
 
I saw this on Twitter. This has to be one of the most eye-searing takes I've seen about the Bomb Voyage guy:
1725755101215.png
1725755110021.png
archive

This guy actually made a parody of the "bike cuck" comic to complain about mass shootings at furry conventions. The problem with this argument is that there has never been a mass shooting at any furry convention since these events started (at least in North America; I'm not sure about worldwide stats). In other words, they're inventing an event that never happened and made a comic about how terrified they are of this nonexistent traumatic scenario. Absolute lunacy.
1725755529368.png
 
I saw this on Twitter. This has to be one of the most eye-searing takes I've seen about the Bomb Voyage guy:
View attachment 6392217
View attachment 6392219
archive

This guy actually made a parody of the "bike cuck" comic to complain about mass shootings at furry conventions. The problem with this argument is that there has never been a mass shooting at any furry convention since these events started (at least in North America; I'm not sure about worldwide stats). In other words, they're inventing an event that never happened and made a comic about how terrified they are of this nonexistent traumatic scenario. Absolute lunacy.
The parody would actually be pretty funny if it wasn't rooted in genuine GUNS REEEEEEEEEEEEE.
 
It's pretty sad when furry cons are even more degenerate than a con founded by a literal convicted child molester (Ed Kramer).
Dragoncon did eventually split from Ed Kramer due to his crimes, even though it took a long time due to extremely drawn out legal and financial shenanigans. I think they did the right thing. If the furries booted all the boylovers would there be anyone left though? After Rainfurrest and the Running of the Pampers is their reputation just too far gone?
I kinda think it is, really. They would need a ground-up re-brand.
 
I saw this on Twitter. This has to be one of the most eye-searing takes I've seen about the Bomb Voyage guy:
View attachment 6392217
View attachment 6392219
archive

This guy actually made a parody of the "bike cuck" comic to complain about mass shootings at furry conventions. The problem with this argument is that there has never been a mass shooting at any furry convention since these events started (at least in North America; I'm not sure about worldwide stats). In other words, they're inventing an event that never happened and made a comic about how terrified they are of this nonexistent traumatic scenario. Absolute lunacy.
Credit where credit's due, don't forget that Polybun mass shooter furry who took out a group of antifa scum. Some army sergeant furry in Texas got one too. There was the Brony mass shooter and possibly the one in Buffalo who was watching Martha Speaks porn. The best one of all was the Magnus Doridian chlorine gas fest.
 
I saw this on Twitter. This has to be one of the most eye-searing takes I've seen about the Bomb Voyage guy:
View attachment 6392217
View attachment 6392219
archive

This guy actually made a parody of the "bike cuck" comic to complain about mass shootings at furry conventions. The problem with this argument is that there has never been a mass shooting at any furry convention since these events started (at least in North America; I'm not sure about worldwide stats). In other words, they're inventing an event that never happened and made a comic about how terrified they are of this nonexistent traumatic scenario. Absolute lunacy.
I can one up you on this.
1725783701623.png

I do not have a archive due to being unable to use twitter at this moment.
 
I can one up you on this.
View attachment 6393223
I do not have a archive due to being unable to use twitter at this moment.
They also further tried to help cancel them in the comments because they allegedly follow some racist guy.

f687e5ef94041f36f66acbc88a8f8df2.png
media_GWuk2odWcAA724h.pngmedia_GWuknFibUAAzImw.pngmedia_GWulIHVXoAAFiqW.pngmedia_GWulZ0Ya8AESmNi.png

But more importantly their art looks like $30-$50 art and they charge $100-$200

Edit: Also, I missed that they are continuing to melt down over this.
60e521247b20a934476a710bff11d33c.png
0584d7b76a033be869642c8298df97d1.png
Bro has never heard of open carry. I mean I guess they aren't toy guns.
ebe5a5a768037f2a28d7de64761fd763.png
f28f8375ca9cac6a8dee5afd1bdcbc12.png
66c56edaabed9d9372c4b1e39907a725.png
 
Last edited:
This guy actually made a parody of the "bike cuck" comic to complain about mass shootings at furry conventions. The problem with this argument
>argument
you're seriously telling me a statement being made here? you're gonna look me in the eye and tell me this isn't a shitpost? is there context missing you're not giving us, or are we not looking at the right comic?
it's clearly a joke, it has to be, come on...

EDIT: upon reread i'm starting to think it's not a joke
but i'm gonna continue to lie to myself and assume it is because the inverse is a human sized headache

god i can't stand passive agressive "i feel unsafe but like, that's ok i guess... i'll just suffer in my fear i guess... woe is me, abloobloblooo, but like, don't get up for me tho, i guess... ): audible sad face" behavior
 
Back