Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
As a tactic, it's meant to be as excruciating as possible since you have to parse it point by point to counter it.
You don't, really. I mean we nitpick his every utterance to death because that's just our tism of choice, but anyone dealing with a narc really just has to learn to say shut the fuck up faggot I've had it with your dumb shit, or if you don't even want to give them the pleasure of having annoyed you, just dismiss what they say with some okay boomer tier response.
 
That appears only to be the record of the hosting, not the content that was hosted?

Of course, you can be on the hook for a discovery hold that would only end when the litigation does, but that's not an across the board, hodl everything, for a decade. You are in aircraft type documentation and nuclear power plant territory for records retention, not cat memes.

There is no law that demands customer content be held for ten years. I suggested that someone may be confusing requirements for business or financial records with hosted content requirements. The only data that I can think of that is even preserved on the scale of a year or more is communications metadata. Nobody is blanket holding on to years worth of deleted customer videos.
 
You don't, really. I mean we nitpick his every utterance to death because that's just our tism of choice, but anyone dealing with a narc really just has to learn to say shut the fuck up faggot I've had it with your dumb shit, or if you don't even want to give them the pleasure of having annoyed you, just dismiss what they say with some okay boomer tier response.
Exactly.
Junkie is arguing a "chain of custody" argument
Which, to put it bluntly, is simply InApplicable to his set of facts. Trying to claim online videos fall into CHAIN OF CUSTODY, at the warrant stage, is just lame. Does not apply.

It's not a smoking gun, or a bloody knife, where providance and subsequent custody chain is integral to the case.
THIS in an ONLINE video to be compared to other existing online videos, or junkie's original. I hope the junkie's Boomer lawyer is actually charging junkie for these inapplicable arguments that should get soundly slammed.

Born to cope
FORCED to Sneed
 
Honestly I've always despised Chunk. Imagine being a German, and "ironically" calling your libcuck commentator group "The Young Nazis" while unironically denying the lollercoaster. You'd be crucified. But apparently it's okay if you're brown to be a genocide denier and name yourself after a genocidal regime. I mean yeah it was of Armenians, but still.
As much as I hate that fat fuck, I’m going to defend him for the name of the show.

Young Turks doesn’t just refer to his ethnicity but to the concept of overthrowing the existing order.

The term “Young Turk” refers to an insurgent person or group that seeks to overthrow established authority or take control of a situation or organization by force or political maneuver. This concept originated from the mostly young Turkish officers who overthrew the Ottoman rulers after World War I.

I mean as far as clever names go it’s a hell of a lot better than “The Tim Pool Show” or whatever.
 
Detective Pomplun caught LYING, red-handed! He is COOKED! ANOTHER RACKETS W!!!
rackets2.png

I GOT A BALLDO WITH YOUR NAME ON IT, MR. POMPLUN!
 
Young Turks doesn’t just refer to his ethnicity but to the concept of overthrowing the existing order.
It's still dumb and gay.

Let's start a show called The Blackshirts. It's literally the same thing. Young army officers and other youth overthrowing the kingdom of Italy. Ridiculous.

If Nick started a paramilitary cult, what would the name be?
 
Even as a master of the form, while Clinton managed to avoid perjury or breaking one of the specific RPCs, he still managed to make the profession look so bad he lost his license under the Arkansas version of [link=[URL]https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_8_4_misconduct/]RPC[/URL] 8.4[/url], a rule rarely used on its own, which among other things makes it an ethical violation to cast the profession into disrepute.

Technically, he surrendered his license voluntarily, but it was a quit or we fire you thing.

Contemplate this when you're considering darkweb sites for illegal shit.

You're giving:
  • someone you don't know
  • who is a criminal
  • your personal home address or at best a shipping address with someone else
  • information on your drug of choice
  • your likely net worth (which could be at least guesstimated from your address)

There is just no way that isn't full retard.
Dang it off to watch Mr robot again....
 
There is no law that demands customer content be held for ten years. I suggested that someone may be confusing requirements for business or financial records with hosted content requirements. The only data that I can think of that is even preserved on the scale of a year or more is communications metadata. Nobody is blanket holding on to years worth of deleted customer videos.
Google/Youtube does not say how long the deletion process will take, but they quiet clearly state the video WILL be permanently deleted and not be recoverable.
They are, by law, forced to delete the content since its customer/user data they do not own.
So I highly doubt that, outside court orders that put a hold on content deletion for legal reason, that any videos are kept saved on an alternative dark-youtube server farm.

So Nick could have, in theory, deleted the video from all platforms before police searched his house, and pray the court order is slow enough for the video to actually be deleted before they can serve Youtube/Google.
 
Exactly.
Junkie is arguing a "chain of custody" argument
Which, to put it bluntly, is simply InApplicable to his set of facts. Trying to claim online videos fall into CHAIN OF CUSTODY, at the warrant stage, is just lame. Does not apply.

It's not a smoking gun, or a bloody knife, where providance and subsequent custody chain is integral to the case.
THIS in an ONLINE video to be compared to other existing online videos, or junkie's original. I hope the junkie's Boomer lawyer is actually charging junkie for these inapplicable arguments that should get soundly slammed.

Born to cope
FORCED to Sneed
It gets worse. The key question regarding the video and probable cause is "is this in fact a video of the subject of the warrant?"

Shithead has argued cases in front of the judge. She at a minimum knows what he looks like enough that the video would be sufficient for her. Regardless of who's channel it was posted on.

And no this would not require that she recuse herself from signing the warrant. Even if she knew about the Pussy Liquor. (I so want to see the DA ask the defense in open court "you would prefer we played the ENTIRE video for her?"
 
Even as a master of the form, while Clinton managed to avoid perjury or breaking one of the specific RPCs, he still managed to make the profession look so bad he lost his license under the Arkansas version of [link=[URL]https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_8_4_misconduct/]RPC[/URL] 8.4[/url], a rule rarely used on its own, which among other things makes it an ethical violation to cast the profession into disrepute.

Technically, he surrendered his license voluntarily, but it was a quit or we fire you thing.

Contemplate this when you're considering darkweb sites for illegal shit.

You're giving:
  • someone you don't know
  • who is a criminal
  • your personal home address or at best a shipping address with someone else
  • information on your drug of choice
  • your likely net worth (which could be at least guesstimated from your address)

There is just no way that isn't full retard.
No more or less retarded than trying to find a local dealer who could just decide to rob you and take your vehicle, be part of a sting, or who knows what else.

The safest way to get substances is obviously convince a doctor to give you the legal equivalent of whatever it is your after. I don't recommend getting addicted to anything, to anyone, fwiw. However, no doctor is going to prescribe DMT or pure methamphetamine to you.

With the proliferation of fentanyl it's pretty retarded to be taking any illicit chem these days. If you're going to insist on it, use test kits, and let your SO know what you're doing so he/she can administer Narcan to your retarded ass if you OD.
 
Back