US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
That guy who's housing 20-25 Haitans per home for $250... is that for the whole, or per individual?

Each one gets $1000 neetbux for existing, homeowner shaves 1/4 of that which translates to ~$5000 rent per house. I knew they do this shit in Canada but nice to know USA has the same thing. Transfer of taxpayer money to landlords.

I mean, you can either rent to some yuppie couple for $3000, without guarantee they won't move out next month or keep their jobs, or rent to 20 bums for $5000 with guarantee of payment because they're not going anywhere and get free money. You're not using these homes for anything so even if they trash it, it's not your problem. Brilliant scheme.
Yeah that was my thought. When I read $250 I assumed he was getting $250 from them and then a payment from some federal assistance program, but then I saw he was having them 20-25 to a house and realized no, he's making $4-6k per month off of them. Basically he's making what should probably be the better part of a year of mortgage payments on those houses every goddamn month

How the fuck are americans supposed to compete?
 
Last edited:
Demanding more options in an open election is an ego? Being tired of partisan bullshit where both sides happily throw you under the bus to make a few extra dollars is an ego? Expecting your representatives to represent you is a selfish thing now?

I’m sorry you still have the establishment cock in your mouth. don’t get mad at me that I don’t. You sound just like the losers at college who said I wasn’t voting in my best interests and looked uneducated for not voting Clinton.

I’m glad you don’t have a sister since

The rest of the political world is being retarded as well but it’s only wrong when I am?

I’m sick of these people not practicing what they preach. If he were not on the ballot I would likely write him in. You know you are allowed to do that. We could all write in a name and they would be given the chance to accept. I’m willing to bet that if RFK won he would accept. So him pulling this now implies there’s a deal on the table and I vehemently oppose the notion that these deals should be allowed to occur prior to the election. If Trump wants him on the cabinet that’s fine. Make that decision after the election not before when it can cause an influencing of votes. There is no harm in RFK finishing out his campaign, collecting a small percentage of the votes and making the argument that we should not stifle third parties in the crib every election season.

I can’t fathom why there are retards that get so angry at someone wanting to preserve freedom of choice and a greater amount of ideological voices at the table.
Being forced to run for office against your will is freedom of choice. I, too, will be voting for Kamala Har- I mean, RFK Jr, sister!
 
I'm not sure when Biden's team gave up on him, was it before he was on Stern and the whole thing was a trap to get him out? Did they ever really think a debate was a good idea? They all kept their jobs and moved to the Kamala campaign, so they didn't stand to lose anything by stabbing him in the back.

Running interference for Biden was not something TPTB wanted, because it also proved that the "Biden is NOT senile, he's sharp as a tack" narrative for the last four years crumbled overnight. Putting Kamala Harris in as front-runner seemed by the seat of their pants when there were more ambitious/competent/better-polled Democrats that could've been considered. Had Biden had a second term, it would mean 2028 is fair game for anyone, meaning Whitmer, Newsom, and others are all ready, and likely primed for showtime. Trump winning would also have the same effect. If Harris wins, then 2028 would be out the window for them because Harris would likely run for a second term unless she dies/destroyed by a scandal that the media couldn't run interference for/so unpopular that it would be suicide for her to run again.
 
Told her not to come over tonight. I don’t want her to see me like this. Drinking a modelo in my boxers, screaming at the TV, alone in the dark.


My parents are very conservative and in their fifties. I saw my dad get tricked by an AI Donald Trump voice. Theyre deep in the conspiratorial rabbit hole that the Russians set up for people like them. I’ve seen them be duped by the most obvious things. Its sad to see. This world is not kind to people like them. At least theyre voting, I guess.

I also have personally heard of an inordinate amount of people that are not going to vote. They claim to not be informed enough to make a decision, and too busy to educate themselves — its fair, I guess. There is a fog of war over everything and the MSM, which is supposed to be even handed, has proven themselves to be untrustworthy. If you’re raising kids and working, you don’t have the time to autistically dissect and second guess everything you see.

I’ve even heard from people I would expect to vote blue that theyre not going to vote. They see Kamala as a genocidal maniac and they can’t bring themselves to support the war in the Levant.
 
Trump was nuts to go with ABC. They are absolutely going to try to fuck him over. Look at this shit.


As previously reported, Kamala Harris leads Donald Trump by a slight 4 percentage points, 50-46%, among all adults and registered voters alike, and by 6 points, 52-46%, among likely voters in the latest ABC News/Ipsos poll.
You're not wrong about ABC but you may be wrong about his judgement because if they're outrageously partisan people will see that, people expect that, and he can use it. CNN were so afraid of looking partisan when he blindsided them by actually agreeing, that they went to the other extreme and that was partly what hurt Biden - just watching him fumble along without interruption. It'll look bad if Trump struggles against partisan hosts, but it will look amazing if he succeeds against obviously partisan ones. It'll just reinforce what his supporters believe, that the media is against him.

The worst interview I've seen Trump give in recent years was one against a fairly neutral audience of business people who just wanted answers about things like the national deficit. His pat answers about "nobody would have believed..." just fell flat against neutral people who just asked for genuine information. Not that I expect anyone to have a good answer to what to do about the USA's titanic debt (or should that be Titanic debt), but that's besides the point.
 
Even when unverified, the suggestion of Haitians eating cats does not come close to the egregiousness of Dems (including Tim Walz) spreading the lie that JD Vance fucked a couch. Which was clearly not a mere joke, but an honest attempt to fool others into believing it's true as evidence of Vance being "weird".
And Trump totally disrespected dead soldiers and had an altercation with Arlington Cemetery staff.
 
Even when unverified, the suggestion of Haitians eating cats does not come close to the egregiousness of Dems (including Tim Walz) spreading the lie that JD Vance fucked a couch. Which was clearly not a mere joke, but an honest attempt to fool others into believing it's true as evidence of Vance being "weird".
Liberals always lie. Suck one cock, you're a cocksucker for life.
 
If people not voting is a negative to Clinton, then by the same logic, it was a negative to Clinton. People not voting does not add votes to the opposing party. Tens of thousands of votes could have been as much for Trump as it could have been for Clinton
This has been one of the talking points that's been coming up when people mention all the black support Trump has been getting recently. We're seeing a lot of black people, primarily men, say that they're not on the Biden/Kamala shit, and that they want Trump back, which I thought was cool. That was until I saw someone say "Yes they're coming out in support for Trump, but will they vote? Historic trends point to probably not".
 
Because he literally doesn’t want to be on the ballot? They are forcing him to stay on the ballot while at the same time removing Cornell west off the ballot, if you can’t see how that is blatantly designed to hurt trump and help the dems I don’t know what to tell you. If you cared about freedom of choice you should care more about the people who actually want to be on the ballot and being denied access
Where did I say people should be kept off? I’m not the one making that argument. If there is someone showing a legitimate campaign get them on the ballot. RFK ran a completely legitimate campaign up until an article came out saying trump was think about making him head of the FBI.
I think the problem here is that you sound a bit aggressive and sperging out at others that laugh at you for throwing your vote away.
Just vote rfk if you want it's not like you matter, but your little pissant resistance will be seen as just another uninformed tard.
It’s not throwing away a vote though. That’s just the shittiest thing you can say to someone. Regardless of how you use it you are using it. Using that argument is just attempting to force someone to change their vote to suit you. It is your vote and your vote alone. You should not be pushed to change it because it’s “wasted” on someone.

I’m informed on the issues. That’s why I pick the person I choose to vote for. Interestingly there are things I disagree with RFK on but overall I felt he was a decent candidate with polices I could agree on, and some that I didn’t. But if you’ve found someone you agree with in every single way you might be dense. I will continue to advocate for people to seek alternatives and will not care if I get pushback. In 2016 I was called a Nazi for voting 3rd party, that I wasn’t voting in my best interest, and that I should think about others before “wasting” my vote. That translated to people calling me a Nazi for wanting options, that I don’t know what my own interests are, and that *my* voice doesn’t matter compared to others.

RFK has chosen to be a politician. That means he is a representative of the people and should be working as hard as he can to represent them. What happens to his donors? To the people that have been pushing his name? I want these people held accountable to do the job they said they were going to do. RFK said he was in this as an alternative: and so he should be.
 
Part of me wants to watch in case it's like the last debate. But my first instinct is to ignore it and go do something else. May go shooting, or to the batting cages, or play Space Marine II, then come and see the wreckage later.

I just want this bullshit to be over. I've been dreading it all year and have been considering this year the last year I get to do anything enjoyable, before it all goes to hell.

I hate politicians of basically all stripes, and want them out of my mind and life. I've wasted too much of my finite time on this mortal coil on them and worrying about shit that never happens. The only reason I'm voting for Trump is because he pisses off people I hate.
 
Surfer Mommy just spoke up about the Cheney endorsement: "A vote for Kamala is a vote for Dick Cheney."
I don't know how Dick Cheney's endorsement benefits the Democrats. "Hey, remember that warmonger that was evil incarnate, even well into the Trump era? He's voting for Kamala!" is not exactly a flex, nor is there a big GOP arm that supports Cheney (Liz got voted out), and it proves the "Cheney RINO" theory back when Liz Cheney was seen as a hero by the left as "protecting the GOP from Trump".
 
So are we all posting here or happenings?

The mob was working for the gov't from WW2 until later to kill Castro. The CIA wouldn't let the FBI do much about the org as a whole. Hoover also liked to blackmail pols with their mafia connections as well. That isn't tinfoil hat stuff, it's well documented in official histories of the CIA (Legacy of Ashes - highly recommend)
The mob was tighter with the CIA then most know. They were essentially the bagmen for the money the three letter agency had in the Vatican. Why the Vatican? Because they are a nation within a nation that has its own bank that answers to no one. Legit, Italy has no authority over them. They also sold the drug money The CIA used to finance it's existence and prevent transparency from Congress funding them. The mob fell out of favor because they kept getting caught doing stupid shit and building notoriety. They still keep money in the Vatican but they've switched to foreign Hispanic enforcers as opposed to Italians.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back