US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Seeing as it's Columbus, it's probably not a Haitian and just some local black guy. But yes, Springfield is 25 miles from Dayton, so it isn't even the closest city. This is genuinely hilarious how adamant Republicans are about this.
The proper term of what you see there is "Skinny" or "Bulbhead," as there's just a ton of Somalis in Columbus. Haitians eat cats for cultural reasons and there is that police report about them grabbing Canada Gooses, so I suppose a Somali killing one is, I don't know, better in your estimation. Either way, if I did it, it would be a $5k-$15k fine, but since they're Haitians or Somalis it's all good.

If and when we do get hard evidence of Haitians killing and eating cats in Springfield, every single one of you smug leftists are going to be ground by paste by how hard it's going to be shoved into your face.

This whole thing is the clearest example of The Narrative mattering more the The Truth, even if the narrative is true, and I hope the rest of the Right is learning.
 
But they can't muck with the environmental rules to chase the trucks off the market, that would be admitting the Half Black King got something wrong, after all. So they're now going after them another way. After all, big trucks are scary, so they have to go! No one needs a fully loading assault truck, after all.
I love telling people I bought a 9000 lb pickup truck.

Oh my god, you're destroying the planet!

It's electric.

Head explodes.
 
When Trump says there will be no third debate, it he including the Joe Biden debate in that too? If he's really refusing to consider doing another debate with Kamala I think that could be a mistake and it surprises me to be honest considering Trump has previously said he wants to debate her three times.

I don't think doing another debate would harm Trump in any way and could even improve his base support. I know it's frustrating having to debate the mods as well as Kamala but that's something Trump can overcome, especially if he doesn't let Kamala's deflection tactic work again.

Art of the Deal.

Kamala talked big game earlier on in the race saying stuff like Trump was scared to debate her when he was pretty open about keeping the agreed to slots, but adding Fox as a 4th.

Kamala then complained about the Fox debate and I guess she pulled out of the 3rd or Trump said the original agreement was void because of Biden peacing out.

Kamala realised shortly after it hadn't gone as well as she wanted so she asked for a second. Trump will probably say no and Kamala's team will have to come back with a better offer for him to even consider it.

I imagine Trump might say yes. But Kamala isn't going to get any debates more suited for her than ABC gave.
 
When Trump says there will be no third debate, it he including the Joe Biden debate in that too? If he's really refusing to consider doing another debate with Kamala I think that could be a mistake and it surprises me to be honest considering Trump has previously said he wants to debate her three times.
Trump offered to debate Kamala three times. Kamala only agreed to one because she needed a knockout win. If she had gotten that, she would not be calling for another, you can be sure of that. Why should Trump agree to another debate just so Kamala has another chance at winning? The time for giving in to the likes of Kamala is over.

Edit: Its clear as it has been since 2016, that Trump will be forced to fight the moderators. He should agree to no more debates till a neutral moderator, who isn't going to "fact check" him is found. Kamala will never agree to such a moderator because she needs the protection the moderators gave/will give her in a debate. The chances of a second debate are less than half. The chances of a third are less than 10, in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
When Trump says there will be no third debate, it he including the Joe Biden debate in that too? If he's really refusing to consider doing another debate with Kamala I think that could be a mistake and it surprises me to be honest considering Trump has previously said he wants to debate her three times.

I don't think doing another debate would harm Trump in any way and could even improve his base support. I know it's frustrating having to debate the mods as well as Kamala but that's something Trump can overcome, especially if he doesn't let Kamala's deflection tactic work again.
why should he? There's no need to do a repeat of the ABC debate, so Harris will have to concede to some of his terms for a Town hall and a neutral moderator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blah de Blah
Lmao, that's right, I forgot that the PS2 was almost 100% backwards compatible with PS1 games and memory cards
Not just that but there were instances where PS2 games would utilize PS1 memory.

DDRMAX was one of them. if you had a Konamix save file (which was a PS1 game) that had step edit data on it of songs that were also on DDRMAX, you could import those edit steps from the PS1 save file to the PS2 game.

Truly we got more for less, and when you look at what game companies have to offer now, the difference is night and day, and it's any wonder why people want to go back to those past times.
 
Her internal numbers must be horrible. She has been ignoring the press but is now out there begging.
View attachment 6409123
As I've stated before, her internals have her losing, and more post-debate polls have come out mixed. 2 dem pollsters have Kamala going up, but several others have Trump doing the same as before. Trump's team also posted internals that have him up by 2 and that the debates had no impact. (A)
1726181657068.png
As I've said several times, it's been an open secret that Kamala is losing in her internal polling, and given their lack of transparency on the matter, this accusation is probably correct.
 
why should he? There's no need to do a repeat of the ABC debate, so Harris will have to concede to some of his terms for a Town hall and a neutral moderator.
imo we have not heard enough from Kamala and there should be at least one more debate to allow her to clarify why people should vote for her. I have a sneaking suspicion that Kamala will not be capable of doing that which is why I think it would be fun to see another debate. Kamala had a very rigid and calculated strategy that was 100% meant to guard against her having to talk about her past, policies, and performance as VP and this strategy would definitely not work in another debate, even with mod assistance. At a certain point the mods interfering with the debate would just be suicide.
 
If he really wanted to skip on it. I think it would have been better for Trump to have challenged Kumholla to a debate on Fox. When she rejected it the onus would have been on her. Rejecting another debate outright just makes him look weak. Framing is everything. Now this may or may not matter in the grand scheme but it seems like a misstep.
He's going to make her squirm and beg for it because he knows she needs it.
So, how long do you think Trump will string her along to get concessions like host and audience?
Considering all the skilled staffers left a while ago for Harris? Quite a while.
And then finally Joe puts on a Trump hat and looks happier than he has in years. There’s no damn way that wasn’t Biden giving a clear “FUCK YOU” to Kamala and the Democrats that ousted him.
There's no way he signed that willingly.
 
Guys I know I said some not so positive things about Haitians in the past but today on Twitter I saw this post and man, we really should just let them all in. I mean this guy did well right? Who am I to judge?
View attachment 6409380
A handy picture for those types:
NAXALT.jpg

"NeoCons for Harris" may be one of the strangest flexes in the history of American politics.
Yet, here we are.

View attachment 6409502
I had a soylennial send my Paleo-con ass link to a David Frum article about Trump once. Like I'd see that as a positive or something. Not that she knows I'm a Paleo-con or even what that is, but it was hilarious. "Remember when you called those guys Hitler?"
 
Im curious about the potential fallout if that early report of Kamala given the questions before the debate was true as it could change nothing or have a massive negative impact on ABC (Regardless) and on Kamala. The report is supposed to come out sometime tomorrow and would serve as both undeniable proof of a 3 on one debate and a repeat of what happened to Hillery in 2016, significantly hurting her reputation.
 
I regretably went back and sat through the debate. Was a pretty retarded waste of time on my part, and probably everyone else's. My only stand out take away was Harris was really reaching for blue-collar workers in PA with supporting fracking and not being super anti-gun. In actuality I doubt they mean any of it, it's the customary shill to the area but was more conservative based which leads me to think they must really be pessimistic about PA if they are aiming at a demographic they've turned their back on so harshly.

Outside that it was the predictable retardation on all parts.
 
This makes me want to buy an obnoxiously big truck but I can't afford it thank you Bidenomics.
Every time I buy a used car that's old as fuck I spit in the faces of current UAW workers and piss on their future pensions.
And you're implying doing illegal shit is the only option, publicly, where any glowie can see you, while calling others delusional and thick :story: I can't even with you sullen manchildren
It is a great American Tradition to do things that the goverment calls "Illegal" and then tell them to fuck off. As a matter of fact, the first one of that was around 1776....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back