Disaster Rape crisis centre CEO stands down after report into failings - J. K. "The Ten Ton Terror of the Trannies" Rowling just can't stop winning


Copy of the review also archived locally and attached.

The chief executive of a sexual assault support service has stood down after a review found it failed to protect women-only spaces.
Mridul Wadhwa – a trans woman – resigned after a Rape Crisis Scotland report found she failed to behave professionally while head of Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC).
The investigation, carried out by an independent consultant, also found Ms Wadhwa “did not understand the limits of her authority” and the needs of survivors were not prioritised.
In a statement, the ERCC board said it was implementing recommendations from the review, but felt the “time was right for a change of leadership”.

The review was sparked after an employment tribunal found a counsellor with gender-critical views had been unfairly constructively dismissed.
Former worker Roz Adams believed that those using the service should be able to know the sex of the staff that deal with their case.
The charity has paused new referrals to the centre and said it was "extremely concerned" that women-only spaces had not been provided for 16 months.
An ERCC statement said: "Mridul has stood down from her role as CEO of ERCC. Recruitment of a new CEO will happen in due course.
"We are committed to delivering excellence while taking on board the recommendations from the independent review to ensure we place survivors voices at the heart of our strategy.
"We are in daily communication with Rape Crisis Scotland, have met their urgent demands, and are currently implementing the recommendations in the report.
"We will continue to work alongside RCS to ensure our services not only meet but exceed the National Service Standards."

However, For Women Scotland - which has campaigned against changes to transgender rights - accused the board of "ignoring its own culpability".
In a statement posted on X, they said: "This is the very least that they can do. It seems the board are intent on ignoring their own culpability.
"It's not good enough.
"They, and Rape Crisis Scotland, are making a sacrifice. But they created the problem."
Tribunal row
Ms Adams' tribunal, which concluded in May, centred on a disciplinary process that began after she repeatedly sought clarity on how to respond to an abuse survivor who wanted to know if a support worker who identified as non-binary was a man or a woman.
Some people who do not consider themselves to have a solely male or female gender identity describe themselves as non-binary.
Ms Adams' view was that people using the centre should have a choice over who they received support from on the basis of sex, and that sex was binary and "everyone is either male or female at that level".
The tribunal found that an investigation into Ms Adams' conduct should not have been launched and “was clearly motivated by a strong belief amongst the senior management and some of the claimant’s colleagues that the claimant’s views were inherently hateful".

Ms Wadhwa was highlighted in the outcome of the case as she appeared to believe that Ms Adams was transphobic.
It said Ms Wadhwa was “the invisible hand behind everything that had taken place.”
The review into the charity, which was published on Thursday, also concluded that Ms Wadhwa “did not understand the limits on her role’s authority”.
Ms Adams has since gone on to work for Beira's Place - a women-only support service for victims of sexual violence, partly funded by JK Rowling.
'High quality services'
The review found the charity had experienced a number of difficulties including a restructuring of the service during the pandemic and a series of board and trustee changes.
It said that some basic systems were not robust which "did not help the organisation manage situations well".
This included a strategy "which did not put survivors first" and a failure to protect women-only spaces.
In its recommendations, the review said the Edinburgh centre should take advice from Rape Crisis Scotland on the definition of "woman" and publicise this within the service.
Women-only spaces and times "must be protected and clearly publicised", it said.
But the review also acknowledged it continued to "deliver high quality services to a significant number of people".
Survivors are still able to self-refer to the charity.
Scottish Conservative MSP Sue Webber accused the charity of "imposing a militant gender ideology" under Ms Wadhwa's leadership.
She said the organisation required a "change of ethos" rather than a change in leadership if it was to re-earn the trust of women.
She added: “While the ERCC board have been forced, by the independent review, to accept that a change of leadership is necessary, the perfunctory apology in their statement suggests they still don’t grasp the magnitude of the offence and upset they have caused."
 

Attachments

Someone recently pointed out it's the same case with groups dedicated to menopause, cervical cancer, and loss of pregnancies/newborns, things which by definition are the realm of actual females.
They get off on the institutional power that put them there and secretly hope for the chance to destroy any woman who dares to speak about the deviant apparatchik.
 
So you've just been raped, you're scared of being around men and feeling very fragile. So a man in a dress tells you he's not a man or a woman and you should call him They/Them. That's how you cure PTSD isn't it?

How would any one respond positively to this? Rape victims in these situations often have identity issues and feeling disconnected from their own bodies as a form of self protection. Introducing tranny garbage is nothing but grooming of extremely vulnerable adults, who are often looking for a way to destroy their attractiveness. Thinking it will prevent further rapes and tranny ideology gives them a straight path to butchering themselves.
 
Reading between the lines, it appears that the CEO had allowed other troons to get employment there.

Given that Roz Adams won her dismissal case against ERCC, it should follow that women seeking assistance from the ERCC *should* be able to insist on being told the real gender of those people without facing purile sanctions when they are at their most vulnerable.
 
Indian, trans, in Scottland, and in a position of power for female victims? At what point do we not just let them reap what they sow lmfao. Imagine a furry starts a day care and then puts their shelter pitbull in charge of watching the infants, is anybody supposed to feel bad for the parents who knowingly sent their kids there?
 
They redeemed too late. They clearly did not do the needful.

There really are foxes in the henhouse. This Wadhwa will go on to infiltrate another shelter and the gov't will let it happen because it protects the problem by nature. If you're a vulnerable person, of any demographic, you are fucked. You are cooked.
 
I'm absolutely convinced this deluded tranny loves rape porn and that's why he was involved. I cannot see a good faith reason why this person would want to be in charge of a rape crisis center. He certainly doesn't seem like someone who just cares a whole lot about rape victims. His hard drive 100% needs to be looked at.
 
I'm absolutely convinced this deluded tranny loves rape porn and that's why he was involved. I cannot see a good faith reason why this person would want to be in charge of a rape crisis center. He certainly doesn't seem like someone who just cares a whole lot about rape victims. His hard drive 100% needs to be looked at.
Imagine being sent to such an org and when telling your story you see the skirts rising.
 
Quotes from the The Times article:
The report also questioned the values adopted by ERCC which were not “fully consistent” with national service standards. Accepted criteria such as “survivor-centred”, “trauma-informed” and “gender-informed” were augmented by two new approaches, “loving” and “brave”.
Stunning and brave!!!
Under Wadhwa, ERCC’s internal inquiry was “reminiscent of the work of Franz Kafka”, according to Ian McFatridge, the employment judge.
“Certain autonomous services are too scared to speak out and the most vulnerable women have been failed. Aberdeen Rape Crisis Centre were holding up trans flags on the day of the tribunal. It is culturally toxic.”
Kind of off topic, but a long time ago I remember seeing a short documentary about a woman who had been sexually assaulted so badly that she had a service dog specifically to warn her of the presence of men and to keep them away from her by creating a barrier between her and men. I can’t find a source for it online for the fucking life of me, but this thread has me thinking about how the dog and it’s owner would probably be considered transphobic these days…
 
Quotes from the The Times article:

Stunning and brave!!!


Kind of off topic, but a long time ago I remember seeing a short documentary about a woman who had been sexually assaulted so badly that she had a service dog specifically to warn her of the presence of men and to keep them away from her by creating a barrier between her and men. I can’t find a source for it online for the fucking life of me, but this thread has me thinking about how the dog and it’s owner would probably be considered transphobic these days…

And then the service dog fucks her.
 
So you've just been raped, you're scared of being around men and feeling very fragile. So a man in a dress tells you he's not a man or a woman and you should call him They/Them. That's how you cure PTSD isn't it?

How would any one respond positively to this? Rape victims in these situations often have identity issues and feeling disconnected from their own bodies as a form of self protection. Introducing tranny garbage is nothing but grooming of extremely vulnerable adults, who are often looking for a way to destroy their attractiveness. Thinking it will prevent further rapes and tranny ideology gives them a straight path to butchering themselves.
>get stabbed
>fucking lame
>can't even go into the kitchen because scared of knives
>get counselling
>turn up for first session
>it's some guy fondling a knife
 
Rape victims are very fragile emotionally, they're going through some of the worst trauma a person can go through. They're the ideal victim if you're a lazy rapist who doesn't want to put in the effort to find a victim who isn't mentally broken/can't put up a fight. The insistence on males being allowed to be in rape crisis centers is such a obvious plot by trannies to rape real women.
 
Indian, trans, in Scottland, and in a position of power for female victims? At what point do we not just let them reap what they sow lmfao. Imagine a furry starts a day care and then puts their shelter pitbull in charge of watching the infants, is anybody supposed to feel bad for the parents who knowingly sent their kids there?
Because the victims don't deserve to be punished for their government being crazy? If your mother got raped would you think it's funny a tranny was put in charge of her mental health management?
 
Rape victims are very fragile emotionally, they're going through some of the worst trauma a person can go through. They're the ideal victim if you're a lazy rapist who doesn't want to put in the effort to find a victim who isn't mentally broken/can't put up a fight. The insistence on males being allowed to be in rape crisis centers is such a obvious plot by trannies to rape real women.
By the same logic we will soon have male tranny teacher inspecting the changing rooms of preteen girls.
Some spaces need to be protected tooth and nail against the invasion of mentally ill gender-swapper.
 
Weird how the Brits can manage to push back against tranny rapists, but not muslim rapists/stabbers/terrorists.
It is because someone championed this thing and personally stood behind it and saw it through, accepting all the fake outrage and #MeTranny backlash that came with it.

There are a lot of situations in which people have their rights violated by Trannies, but they avoid pushing the issue because the current climate is toxic to a realistic debate in which over-reaching men in women's clothing can walk into women changing rooms and beat them up in a boxing ring.

The social media mob will lynch you (metaphorically), get you fired, dox your address, and watch your house and follow you in public if you dare to stand up for yourself.

(If you try the same with the brown stabby bois, you get shanked in the subway)
 
Reading between the lines, it appears that the CEO had allowed other troons to get employment there.
Right, that stuff about getting rid of employees who thought rape victims should be able to specify the sex of those treating them means this dude was intentionally sending male fetishists in to provide "treatment", either getting off on the women's discomfort or daring them to complain and be labeled "transphobic".

Making everyone everywhere play along is a core part of the fetish, and there is apparently no line they won't cross in chasing that "validation".
 
Back