US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
The crowd (liberals) and Oprah didn’t seem to like that one. I’m guessing this will hurt especially among the dindu crowd. Even Kamala regrets saying it immediately after, but reassures Oprah that her handlers will fix it later.
It fails on two fronts.
To anti-gun hysterical people it makes her look like a violent gun nut who will shoot innocent people who dindu nuffin.

But equally as bad is her backtracking makes it seem like she's either insincere in this sentiment or that she feels like publicly defending and standing up for people defending their own property isn't kosher. Which makes her look weak on 2A compared to someone who says "yeah I'd use my guns to protect my family as is my right" (which would still lose the first group).

As always Kamala’s waffling loses her support on both sides. Fencesitters never learn.
 
Nixon is one of the better presidents we've had, and the demonetization of him is a hard nut to crack. You'll have spergs seize on the opening a relationship with china, or "losing" vietnam, or the gold standard being replaced, or hell I've seen some people so foolish they attack him for the EPA. All of this is silly and fairly simple to refute, but it's hard to change a made up mind. I believe in a 100 years time, if the US is still a thing, Nixon and Trump will be looked at through a very favorable lense. I put them next to Andrew Jackson as top 5. I expect Lincoln and FDR will be rightfully at the bottom with Carter and Biden.
Lincoln kept the Union intact, so I doubt he'll ever go towards the bottom. Carter is already disliked by Democrats because his fuck-ups led to an era of Reagan. Nixon was not a perfect man and the fact that he kept Kissinger close is telling, but he gets unfairly trashed. There has been a lot of Nixon revisionism in recent years focusing on his foreign policy successes like the SALT treaties and detente with China.
 
I wonder if ACK-ACK-ACK-ing after every single sentence is an indicator of low intelligence or something. I know that sometimes people who are uncomfortable smile or joke but she takes it to a whole new level.
Its usually a sign of nervousness. Not intelligence.

There is no real evidence that Kamala is below average intelligence and some that is above average.

Everything about her points to someone who barely passed the bar which is a real test and its probably impossible for someone below average to do unless you think she paid someone to do it for her. If you watch the YSL trial and the prosecutors there you will realize how low standards for lawyers are. Especially when you learn some of them teach law classes.

She was then smart enough to be exactly whatever the person around her wanted her to be for her to advance. She has no actual values other than what is expected of her to get what she wanted at the time. Her nervousness is because she knows she is out of her depth. Her "positivity" is classic "fake it till you make it" energy.

In short Kamala Harris is the almost perfect ur archetype of a modern woman in almost all aspects.
 
Last edited:
Nixon is one of the better presidents we've had, and the demonetization of him is a hard nut to crack. You'll have spergs seize on the opening a relationship with china, or "losing" vietnam, or the gold standard being replaced, or hell I've seen some people so foolish they attack him for the EPA. All of this is silly and fairly simple to refute, but it's hard to change a made up mind. I believe in a 100 years time, if the US is still a thing, Nixon and Trump will be looked at through a very favorable lense. I put them next to Andrew Jackson as top 5. I expect Lincoln and FDR will be rightfully at the bottom with Carter and Biden.
Nixon was so great he resigned in disgrace to avoid being thrown out by his own party. Such awesomeness. "He turned the CIA and FBI against his political enemies! BASED!"
 
Nixon is one of the better presidents we've had, and the demonetization of him is a hard nut to crack. You'll have spergs seize on the opening a relationship with china, or "losing" vietnam, or the gold standard being replaced, or hell I've seen some people so foolish they attack him for the EPA. All of this is silly and fairly simple to refute, but it's hard to change a made up mind. I believe in a 100 years time, if the US is still a thing, Nixon and Trump will be looked at through a very favorable lense. I put them next to Andrew Jackson as top 5. I expect Lincoln and FDR will be rightfully at the bottom with Carter and Biden.

If Nixon was so bad, why'd they get rid of him? You're telling me that the Deep State would get rid of a bad President?
 
I reached the conclusion this gayop is yet another political distraction much like Loomer; imagine how many features they will get and then Trump almost dies AGAIN afterwards? That'd be funny with the various users here. There's something about the way people argue about things thats funny in modern political discussions.
The timing of the Robinson story not long after the latest on Diddy is sus.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: CEO of Gay and 0713
Now Russia on the other hand is bullshit. Putin wants trump in to end the war in Ukraine and the glowies to stop flirting with WW3. Victoria nuland implied as much when she subtly said something was going to happen to Trump.
Vladimir Putin wants Kamala Harris in because she's an idiot trump is a war hawk he's just a piece through strength hawk which is if you don't stop what you're doing I'm gonna come over there and I'm gonna clobber you.
The Z need to realise something trump is more of a war hawk when it comes to Russia Ukraine more than anybody else he was the one who sent all the javelins and all of the stuff they were using to hold the Russians back to begin with he also threatened to nuke Moscow if tanks started rolling
 
Dumb bitch wearing her turkey neck protector doing a dated google search thing people don't even like anymore:


Archive:
View attachment 6436147

The bots are in force in the comments, but it's still fake and gay. Only 30,000 views in 2 hours, India is sleeping right now or activating Google Play cards.
This is so fucking fake and gay. I assure you the "searches" are also fake. She repeats the same spiel over and over again. She's a charisma black hole.
 
I reached the conclusion this gayop is yet another political distraction much like Loomer; imagine how many features they will get and then Trump almost dies AGAIN afterwards? That'd be funny with the various users here. There's something about the way people argue about things thats funny in modern political discussions.
It's in our best interest to pretend it's working lest they try more desperate tactics
 
"He turned the CIA and FBI against his political enemies! BASED!"
That’s exactly why he was based. The CIA and the FBI don’t work for the interests of the American citizens. There’s a reason why the CIA killed JFK. If these agencies leave a president alone, it tells you all about who that president is.
 
Thomas Matthew Crooks update

one of the senators trying to do an investigation, who has complained about being stonewalled about this topic before, says the stonewalling continues (A)
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., described the level to which the Department of Homeland Security and the Secret Service have prevented the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (HSGAC) from obtaining crucial materials to investigate the failures that led to the assassination attempts against former President Trump.

“Things like the autopsy report, you know, the House has it under subpoena. We don’t have it,” he told reporters.

“[The] toxicology report; we don’t have any of the trajectory reports. So, where’d the bullets go? We don’t even know how they handled the crime scene,” said Johnson, ranking member of the HSGAC Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI).

The senator pointed to the amount of time that has passed since the July 13 assassination attempt against Trump, noting, “There’s just basic information we should have right now, and we don’t have it.”

“We haven’t been able to interview the sniper who took out [Thomas] Crooks,” Johnson said.
Johnson described that the few documents which had been provided to the lawmakers were “heavily redacted.”

“And in this case, unusually. I’ve never seen this,” he remarked of the redactions.

Noting that it wasn’t his “first rodeo,” Johnson recalled that redactions are normally black, blocking out certain parts of text. “These are just whiteouts.”

“So, I don’t know. Was it just a single word?” he asked.

America First Legal is suing the DHS and Secret Service over unfulfilled FOIA requests (A). this is reminiscent of this thread where the air force refused to hand over documents related to their DIE policies until they were sued
A conservative legal watchdog group is heading to court to get the U.S. Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to explain how gunman Thomas Matthew Crooks had been able to "fire a relatively simple shot that came within an inch of killing President Trump and struck fellow Americans."

In a lawsuit filed Thursday, America First Legal (AFL) alleges that the Secret Service and DHS illegally concealed government records related to the attempted assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13. The organization claims it submitted multiple public records requests about the incident but still has not received any documents.
AFL requested documents pertaining to the Secret Service's staffing shortages, hiring and employment standards and all communications to or from Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and two senior DHS officials, Kristie Canegallo and Jonathan Davidson.

According to AFL, the Secret Service said it would not process their expedited public records' requests because there was "no threat to the life or safety of anyone" and that there was no urgency to grant their request.

chance of anything being revealed about government asset Thomas Matthew Crooks before the election stands at 0%, i'd guess
 
So basically, "YEAH OKAY WE ADMIT IT WE COLLUDED TO KILL ORANGE MAN, FUCK OFF. WHY DO YOU CARE SO MUCH, HE'S A THREAT TO OUR DEMOCRACY!"

I dunno, guys. Things aren't looking too good for the glowies right now from any standpoint. Seems like to me that they're on a timer and they're fighting a losing battle against everyone, no matter how quickly they try and kill Donny.

As a late reminder for this post: Those FBI and USSS hearings regarding the Crooks Assassination Attempt? When people weren't sperging about Blumpf and gun control, they were PISSED. AOC and MTG were basically tag team wrestling and beating the shit out of the guy they were grilling. And there's still NO answers.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back