Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

The left did made Chris-Chan a LGBT icon
What an icon.
  • "brony"
  • committed incest
  • crappy health and hygiene
  • extremely delusional
  • fanatically egotistical
  • fat
  • "furry"
  • lies a lot
  • "made the honor roll" (below average intelligence)
  • thinks adultery is "okay, well, and good"

It's like he's a personification of Clown World: he even dresses like a freakshow clown.
 
Last edited:
Nigresses yelling at whites while wearing the hair of other women will never not be funny to me. This Nigerian living in Texas is happy whites are becoming a minority. Predictably, she has no plans on returning to Nigeria anytime soon.
Screenshot_20240917-182741_(1).png
This one thinks she's a redhead:
Screenshot_20240917-182658_(1).png
If we all returned to Europe, your nigger ass would be right behind us because you wouldn't know how to keep the water and lights on.

Saying the quiet part out loud:
Screenshot_20240917-182152_(1).png
It has always been about racial revenge.

This nigress got upset a cracker called her a nigger:
Screenshot_20240917-182257_(1).png
"You wanna be a victim sooooo bad"
"WE HAVE LIGHT STRAIGHT HAIR TOO YOU FUCKING RACIST!"

This was a great one:

Screenshot_20240917-182004_(1).png

This nigress says we all have disgusting hair:
Screenshot_20240917-181238_(1).png
Kowalski, zoom in:
Screenshot_20240917-181210_(1).png
Ah, the boot lipped Bantu with shit makeup and dandruff filled braids. Least we can wash our hair, nigga.

Best part? This was the OP.
Screenshot_20240917-181727_(1).png
"Natural hair" my fucking ass. Bitch will do anything to get our hair.

However, when asked to pack up and leave, they never do.
Screenshot_20240917-181006_(1).png
They can never answer.

This was from another tweet, but is still relevant.
Screenshot_20240917-183828_(1).png
A Jew is asked if she would return to Israel. Her answer is typical:
Screenshot_20240916-230826_(1).png
"Maybe you should leave this colonized land."
"I can't and won't, but I'll just raise awareness."
 
Get ready for some of the most half bright academic jargon you have ever read:
glumcore1.png
handmaidens tale apparently fine if it's brown men doing it

but don't worry he (I'm assuming this is a man) doesn't support the Taliban, though he does think no one should ever criticize it:
glumcore2.png
"bothsidesing" the Taliban, twitter rules
glumcore3.png
"man" and "woman" are racist categories now

commenter asks good question, gets nonsense response:
glumcore4.png
idk how these people manage to rationalise their support of the Taliban with the knowledge that the Taliban is a successor organisation to the same US backed forces that kicked the Afghan communists and their vaguely feminist politics out.

replies also insane:
alaska.png
 
yelling at whites while wearing the hair of other women
"Maybe you should leave this colonized land."
"I can't and won't, but I'll just raise awareness."
What is it with wannabe commies "woke" thinking that intangible culture itself can somehow be owned like physical property (and in perpetuity at that), and that all of an "oppressor" group are inherently responsible for the bad actions of some of their kind in the past -- in a commie "collective punishment" mentality (again in perpetuity)?
 
What is it with wannabe commies thinking that intangible culture itself can somehow be owned like physical property (and in perpetuity at that), and that all of an "oppressor" group are inherently responsible for the bad actions of some of their kind in the past -- in a commie "collective punishment" mentality (again in perpetuity)?
Also the oppressor group is somehow responsible for the actions of a faction of the oppressed group against a weaker faction of the oppressed group. Afghan men being violent to Afghan women somehow the fault of the USA, but not Afghan men, heaven forbid they be capable of making their own decisions.
 
Ben has a great response as to why Haiti's a shit hole:
Screenshot_20240911-181241_(1).png
"We spend a lot of money to destabilize their country!" Let's say for arguments sake that's true, what exactly would be the point? If democrats are destroying Haiti then why are you voting for the party that destabilizes these 3rd world countries? If you blame republicans then what would there be to gain? Its not like Haiti itself would every be this powerful rich country that'll match the U.S, so again I ask what would be the point? Also how come America isn't doing the same for the Dominican Republic? That country seems to be doing ok.
 
"We spend a lot of money to destabilize their country!" Let's say for arguments sake that's true, what exactly would be the point? If democrats are destroying Haiti then why are you voting for the party that destabilizes these 3rd world countries? If you blame republicans then what would there be to gain? Its not like Haiti itself would every be this powerful rich country that'll match the U.S, so again I ask what would be the point? Also how come America isn't doing the same for the Dominican Republic? That country seems to be doing ok.
Politisperging here, back in the 90s Clinton strongarmed Haiti into removing import tariffs on rice, this flooded the market with foreign (mostly US grown) rice and destroyed the local rice industry, which was a disaster because that was about the only productive sector their economy had. But US rice farmers are subsidized by the federal government (farm subsidies are incredibly corrupt and there is a very deep rabbit hole to go down there) so it ended up being cheaper than locally grown rice. Do you want to take a guess which state produces 45% of all rice grown in the US? It's Arkansas, and where is Bill Clinton from? Arkansas Democratic party politics used to have a reputation as being woefully corrupt, I mean more than is usual for US politics, and the Clintons basically introduced that to the national level Democratic party. Chances are he owed favors to Big Ag back in Arkansas.

As for why progs insist on voting Democrat even though it has been Democratic presidents pushing shit on Haiti. I think they just don't think about it too hard. Whenever you point out the flaws of the Democratic Party they just tell you that the Republicans are LITERAL FASCISTS and anything is better than that. Bill and Hillary had their honeymoon in Haiti by the way, which is an insane detail. I'm guessing the Arkansas branch of the Democratic Party had been eyeing the country up for a while.
 
As for why progs insist on voting Democrat even though it has been Democratic presidents pushing shit on Haiti. I think they just don't think about it too hard. Whenever you point out the flaws of the Democratic Party they just tell you that the Republicans are LITERAL FASCISTS and anything is better than that. Bill and Hillary had their honeymoon in Haiti by the way, which is an insane detail. I'm guessing the Arkansas branch of the Democratic Party had been eyeing the country up for a while.
I've always seen this argument whenever a democrat run city is collapsing or has serious issues. I remember the mass homeless problem San Francisco faced (and maybe still does.) and democrats were literally blaming Trump for not helping the city because he was president. I've also seen them blame republicans for why dem run cities have huge issues. Their excuse? Back when republicans ran the cities they fucked it up so badly to the point where democrats have a hard time repairing the city. Its literally the colonialism excuse all over again.
 
SJWs may claim that those who object to "woke" are "REEing idiots" and "clowns" as well. That is a textbook example of "projection" if I ever saw one -- the "woke" are delusional and deranged, they're constantly offended, and have you seen how they can look? And of course it has been SJWs who have tried to assassinate Trump -- twice.
 
SJWs may claim that those who object to "woke" are "REEing idiots" and "clowns" as well. That is a textbook example of "projection" if I ever saw one -- the "woke" are delusional and deranged, they're constantly offended, and have you seen how they can look? And of course it has been SJWs who have tried to assassinate Trump -- twice.
Why do you keep putting the buzzwords in quotations. Your form of doublespeak?
 

Lady Gaga Never Spoke Out Against Rumors Claiming She’s a Man ‘Because I Didn’t Feel Like a Victim With That Lie’: ‘I’m Used to Lies Being Printed About Me’

Lady Gaga appeared in the second episode of “What’s Next? The Future With Bill Gates” and explained her decision not to speak out against the rumors that dominated headlines early in her career and claimed she was actually a man. The pop icon famously shut down a question about the rumors by telling CNN in 2011: “Why the hell am I going to waste my time and give a press release about whether or not I have a penis? My fans don’t care and neither do I.”

“When I was in my early 20s there was a rumor that I was a man,” Gaga told Bill Gates. “I went all over the world. I traveled for tours and for promoting my records and almost every interview I sat in they said … there was this imagery on the internet that had been doctored … they’d say, ‘There’s rumors that you’re a man. What do you have to say about that?'”

“The reason why I didn’t answer the question is because I didn’t feel like a victim with that lie and I thought: What about a kid who is being accused of that who would think that a public figure like me would feel shame?” Gaga continued. “I’ve been in situations where fixing a rumor was not in the best interest of the well being of other people. In that case, I tried to be thought provoking and disruptive in another way. I tried to use the misinformation to create another disruptive point.”
How long until the trannies fume that she said "a man" and not "a woman of valid trans experience"?
 
Speaking of which, with this election, how would the result affect the state of wokeness? Would it be the unoffical religion of the United States? Would it start to dissipate? Or would the be no difference?
 
Speaking of which, with this election, how would the result affect the state of wokeness? Would it be the unoffical religion of the United States? Would it start to dissipate? Or would the be no difference?

If Trump wins, then it would probably be one of the final nails in the coffin for wokeness. You have to remember that these people are very mentally unstable and some would probably kill themselves if Trump wins. On top of that, people across the world are waking up to the harm that wokeness has done, so there is indeed a light at the end regardless.
 
If Trump wins, then it would probably be one of the final nails in the coffin for wokeness. You have to remember that these people are very mentally unstable and some would probably kill themselves if Trump wins. On top of that, people across the world are waking up to the harm that wokeness has done, so there is indeed a light at the end regardless.
>implying that the people have any real say in our democracy
 
If Trump wins
I've heard the claim that the "alt-right" would REE If Trump "loses" (or really loses) -- the implication being that the "alt right" are collectivist idiots. That BS sounds like projection to me: if Trump manages to win, it'll be the delusional and cult-like SJWs who have a collectivist meltdown over that. Just like back in '16 all over again.

Hopefully this time it does not lead to a surge in "woke" BS like the 2016 election did. It does seem like more are getting sick of the endless "communist revolution" 24-7.
 
Last edited:
Back