Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Str8Bustah said:
>6 partners before starting university

😟
Click to expand...
It doesn’t take much to accumulate a large body count. A woman who remained single all throughout her twenties very likely has a body count well over a hundred. One new dick a month over a decade is 120. Add in spring break, her love of travel which is just poorly disguised sex tourism, etc.

Keep in mind none of these “count.” Women will often talk about how it’s been months since they last had sex yet they’re regularly hooking up. To women, sex is not always sex. You have to be literal with them: when was the last time a penis was inside your vagina? Suddenly eight months turns into last Tuesday.
 
  • Like
  • Horrifying
  • Winner
Reactions: GunCar Gary, Nigger Cobson, Male Idiot and 9 others
STARS158 said:
View attachment 6439343
Click to expand...
So, with 3 years of University in the states her body count increased by 72.5. This, is about 24 people a year, which equates to effectively a new lay every 2 weeks. Which, basically means she'd score someone knew every couple of "nights" out. I've known men and women to basically get with someone on this rota. Sure, it's more common for man whores who are gay but even still.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Wright, GunCar Gary, World Famous Quasi Payer and 1 other person
The Ugly One said:
Lesbianism isn't real
Click to expand...
After having just found out I've been banned from the lesbian thread (rigged; I was behaving perfectly and kept it squarely to asking thread-relevant questions and answering followups), I now (provisionally) agree with this.

Look at one of the responses from that thread (nothing against this person; generally cool and willing to talk; she's willing to advance people's understanding and I'm sharing this quote in that spirit):
I personally believe the "romantic" aspect is more important than the physical sexual aspect of sexuality. Physical stimulation is going to inevitably be pleasing because that's what sexual organs do, but I don't think you could do the same for emotional bonding, you can't force that,even if you tried to manipulate someone emotionally it would need time and effort to imitate an emotional bond. Sexual gratification is pretty much free. If you as a man only see women as a sexual object and dont even consider having a more long term relationship or at least some kind of formal responsibility with them I don't really think you are into women at all, what would be the difference between a woman and a fleshlight?. But again that's just how I see it and I have nothing to back this so take this last bit with a grain of salt. I am not a man and I don't know how attraction works in their case i can only speculate and assume things
Click to expand...

If a man spoke this way about attraction, and was telling you he was straight, you'd immediately assume he was deep in denial about not being into women. It's possible that the difference here is that women have a harder time divorcing sexual attraction from perception of personality than men do, which would explain why it's so odd-sounding as a man; that interpretation takes a lot of charity, though.

In general their descriptions of lesbian romantic attraction all sound like a deep friendship at most, which from what I've gathered may be harder for women to get into. I wouldn't be surprised if they're more inclined to interpret it "romantically" when it does happen, in the same way that they do that for their yaoi slop. I'm not sure if they've reached even that, however.

A part of the reason I was in there was that in the way I've been conceptualizing "romance", there didn't seem to be room for female homosexuality in the same way that there's room for male homosexuality. It really seems as though you need at least one man to make it work, no matter who the other person is. You also can't make fraternity incestuous when there's no fraternity. Maybe the rare ones who reach something like "fraternity" can go gay, but that's the generous interpretation.

I'm not sure what kind of bond women have that'd even be possible to sexualize.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Wright, Nigger Cobson, Male Idiot and 2 others
David Kirk Ginder said:
There needs to be a real life Death Note eye ability where instead of seeing exactly when they will die, you will see a number above their head that shows body count.

(did I use the right anime?)
Click to expand...
Yeah, that one's right, but the thing is that you can't really understand the numbers unless you are a shinigami. Funny that you used Death Note while having Byuu's pic and name
 
AgendaPoster said:
Maybe that's actually good. We don't really want sausage parties.
I think the male spaces became a thing because it was no longer fashionable or acceptable to bully women that came and were impolite, like moaning about sexism, rude jokes and stuff.
What we need to bring back is mixed spaces where women can come and act like women and have a laugh when the boys are being boys, and to make bullying triggered radfem types socially acceptable again.

Sorry for your loss.
Click to expand...
Women could go to his club it was just more formalized .... no cursing or acting like a drunk whore.. you had to be accompanied by a man who pays dues as well.

Thank you for saying that. It means alot I miss him.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gay Baby Jailer and World Famous Quasi Payer
STARS158 said:
View attachment 6439343
Click to expand...
You know, this gets worse the more you think about it:
>the ".5" implies that a good chunk of the remaining 68 men and 10 women are also .5's - meaning her actual body count has a good chance of being over 100.
>they found time to meet and fuck a new man or woman roughly once every two weeks, meaning almost all of these are casual one-night stands/pump-and-dumps
>they're bragging about this like it's an accomplishment
I don't get why you'd WANT to brag about being a whore on the internet. But I'm all for people wearing their red flags with pride, makes them easier to avoid.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Wright, Nigger Cobson, Male Idiot and 8 others
GumballFapper said:
You wanted to disagree with the lesbian feminists who blamed everything on men, but in the end you ended up circling back to blaming it on men? :story:

Militant feminists were the one that tore down male spaces, but... but... it's men's fault for not standing up to them!

Woman moment™
Click to expand...
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Iron Jaguar and GumballFapper
Toji Suzuhara said:
Yeah, that one's right, but the thing is that you can't really understand the numbers unless you are a shinigami. Funny that you used Death Note while having Byuu's pic and name
Click to expand...

Str8Bustah said:
>6 partners before starting university

😟
Click to expand...

I wish there was a way for society to confirm that the average teenage girl has accumulated magnitudes more sexual/romantic experiences than than the average 30-something year old male.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: World Famous Quasi Payer
fupaballs said:
Do you think I'm a retard for saying men need their own space? I watched my FIL die bc he didn't have his little social club to go to bc massachusetts said you need to let dumb dykes shit up ur club. Why do 20 y.o dykes want to chill with old dudes that hate them?
Click to expand...
Broaching the question of "spaces" in any context that's ostensibly opposed to Current Year brainrot is self-defeating whenever anyone does it because the concept as it's thought of now has itself been mutilated and poisoned by multiple generations of homosexual postmodernist Marxists in academia to the point where you're only playing their game by invoking it as any sort of useful framework. You're being programmed to think and even act a certain way whenever you use these words without questioning who popularized them in their current form and what their intentions were. That sort of intellectual laziness is what produces "based retards" who think they're edgy free-thinkers when they say faggot, nigger, kike, tranny, etc. but are in fact still 99% aligned with the status quo in ways they don't even recognize underneath these shallow (though admittedly fun) affectations and the one or two pet issues they have.

The scale and scope of these things goes so much further than one or two easily-understood problems or groups that anyone can directly fight in any quick, coherent, or satisfying way. It's a total civilizational shift as one century grinds into the next. It's not going to be pretty or clean and it'll take several decades for any semblance of sanity to slowly be restored.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Wright, quisquiliae and World Famous Quasi Payer
Unyielding Stupidity said:
I don't get why you'd WANT to brag about being a whore on the internet.
Click to expand...
Because women don't understand male sexuality at all. She thinks the more guys she fucks, the more men see her as "powerful" and "free" and "in control of her own sexuality." Feminists say we're intimidated by sluts. They don't understand that the sluttier you are, the more men see you as sub-human, just an ambulatory sex toy to be used at will.

fupaballs said:
Why don't men just overthrow and take over things.(in minecraft) I'm genuinely curious. Throughout history you have. What's stopping you? You are the stronger sex.
Click to expand...

Most men support female empowerment.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Wright, Gay Baby Jailer, Kalsarikännit and 9 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back