Opinion DEI Isn't Working. Inclusive Economics Might - DEI 2.0 is here. Now with more retardation and GIBSMEDAT.

Grow the table.

In a world of disruption, the traditional approaches to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are no longer sufficient and have become something to attack. It is time for businesses to embrace a more comprehensive and impactful strategy: something I call Inclusive Economics (IE). This next stage goes beyond ticking boxes and complying with rules and regulations; it is about integrating diversity into the core of our economic systems and for purely good business reasons. For those who have long admired the goals of DEI, IE is the natural evolution, transforming social justice ideals into economic realities.

The history of DEI efforts has been noble and necessary. These initiatives have opened doors, raised awareness, and set benchmarks for inclusion. However, to truly drive change and realize the full potential of these efforts, we must view diversity through the lens of economics. This is where Inclusive Economics comes in, focusing on economic participation and empowerment. It is about ensuring that diverse individuals have real opportunities to contribute to and benefit from the economic systems in which they operate.
The business case for IE is compelling. A diverse and inclusive economy is not only a more just economy but a more prosperous one. By fully integrating diversity into our economic practices, we create a robust and resilient economy capable of innovative growth and sustained success. IE fosters an environment where all individuals, regardless of their background, have the opportunity to succeed and where businesses can thrive by tapping into the full spectrum of human potential.

When people from different backgrounds and experiences come together, they bring distinct perspectives and ideas. This diversity of thought leads to more creative solutions and more effective problem-solving. Companies that embrace IE will find themselves better positioned to innovate, adapt, and grow in an increasingly competitive market.

Studies have shown that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. McKinsey & Company’s research consistently finds that companies with greater gender and ethnic diversity in their executive teams are more likely to outperform on profitability. This is not merely correlation but causation. Diverse teams challenge each other, push boundaries, and avoid the pitfalls of groupthink. In a world where the pace of change is faster than ever, the ability to innovate and adapt is critical. IE equips companies with the tools they need to stay ahead of the curve.

Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the value of DEI, there has been growing pushback against these initiatives. Critics argue that DEI efforts are often performative, costly, and ideologically driven, rather than rooted in practical benefits. Some see DEI as a form of reverse discrimination, suggesting that it unfairly prioritizes certain groups over others. This criticism has led to efforts to disband DEI programs in a growing number of companies and institutions, driven by a belief that these initiatives are divisive and detract from the primary business objectives.

However, Inclusive Economics offers a pathway to address and put aside these concerns. IE is not about imposing quotas or making token gestures. It is about creating genuine economic opportunities for all. It is not charity; it is a strategic business approach that recognizes the value of all human capital. By focusing on economic empowerment rather than symbolic gestures, IE moves beyond the ideological debates that often surround DEI. It reframes the conversation around shared prosperity and the practical benefits of inclusion for everyone involved.

DEI programs which can trace their roots back to the Civil Rights movement in the 1960 were reactive to the social inequities that exist in society. Companies committed significant financial and human resources to unsuccessfully try to fix these problems. In doing so, they unintentionally created a significant backlash from both employees who weren’t included in these programs and by investors who viewed DEI as unnecessary and added expenses that negatively impacted financial performance and returns.

In contrast, Inclusive Economics is proactive, impacts a much wider group of employees, enhances productivity, attracts more customers, and drives revenue growth. As a result, IE efforts increase corporate profitability, stimulate economic activity, increase tax revenues, and strengthen the financial well-being of individuals, companies, communities, and America.

Or said another way, DEI was seen by some as “costing the company money,” and inclusive economics will undoubtedly “make companies more money,” through a simple case of expanded, deepened emerging market engagement. Better employees, better communities, and more customers make for better brands. Inclusive growth. Social justice through an economic lens., as we say here at Operation HOPE.

Inclusive Economics is also a powerful driver of employee engagement and productivity. When employees feel valued and included, they are more motivated and committed to their work. They bring their whole selves to the job, which leads to higher levels of productivity and creativity. IE creates a culture of respect and belonging, where employees are encouraged to share their ideas and perspectives.

This culture of inclusion is particularly important for attracting and retaining top talent. The workforce of the future is more diverse than ever before, and employees are increasingly seeking out companies that reflect their values. Companies that prioritize IE will not only attract the best and brightest talent but will also retain them. By fostering an inclusive environment, businesses can reduce turnover, lower recruitment costs, and build a more stable and committed workforce.

Inclusive Economics is not just about internal dynamics; it is also about external opportunities. A diverse workforce enables companies to better understand and serve a diverse customer base. As the demographics of the world continue to shift, the ability to connect with and serve diverse communities will be a key differentiator for businesses.

By embracing IE, companies can expand their market reach and tap into new customer segments. They can develop products and services that resonate with a broader audience, enhancing their brand and driving growth. This approach is not just about doing the right thing; it is about doing the smart thing. In a globalized economy, diversity is a strategic advantage.

At its core, Inclusive Economics is about achieving social justice through economic empowerment. Social justice for all though an economic lens. It is about creating an economy that works for everyone, not just a select few. By focusing on the economic aspects of diversity, we can drive meaningful change and create a more just and equitable society.

This approach aligns with the broader goals of DEI but goes a step further by directly addressing economic disparities. It recognizes that true equality cannot be achieved without economic opportunity. By empowering diverse individuals economically, we not only improve their lives but also strengthen our communities and our economy

The case for Inclusive Economics is clear. It is a win-win for businesses and society. By integrating diversity into the fabric of our economic systems, we can drive innovation, enhance productivity, expand market reach, and achieve social justice. It is time for businesses to move beyond traditional DEI initiatives and embrace the power of IE.

By adopting Inclusive Economics, businesses can respond to the criticisms of DEI by demonstrating that inclusion is not about political correctness or ideological battles but about real economic value and opportunity. Let us build a more inclusive, prosperous, and just economy for all.

 
Last edited:
Remember. The BRIDGE initiative is trying to embed this garbage into your work so you spread woke shit even if you don't want to.

BRIDGE as discovered by Kirsche.jpg

God bless the brain damaged Foxu in trying to get people to be aware of this crap out to turn the USA into the USSA.
 
Studies have shown that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. McKinsey & Company’s research consistently finds that companies with greater gender and ethnic diversity in their executive teams are more likely to outperform on profitability. This is not merely correlation but causation.
Is this the same study that the underlying data was never revealed and that no one else has been able to replicate?
 
This approach aligns with the broader goals of DEI but goes a step further by directly addressing economic disparities.
So literally "we're doubling down even harder".

How much fucking longer will it take for the actual investors (the ones who are in it to make money) to realize these people are deranged ideologues and are perfectly happy to sink a billion-dollar corporation if it means advancing their political agenda one more yard?
 
When people from different backgrounds and experiences come together, they bring distinct perspectives and ideas. This diversity of thought leads to more creative solutions and more effective problem-solving.
Yes, but that doesnt include female or lesser races...

To design a car you want an Italian person for design, a german person for engineering and an american to keep streamlined.
a totaly italian team builds a car that doesnt drive a pure german team builds a monstrosity like my beloved weekend car (the W12 is the most sane part in it) and a pure American team builds a ford.
 
"...we identify, dismantle, and rethink the structures in place that currently contribute to the gap in belonging, representation, inclusion, diversity, and equity (BRIDGE is an acronym for these)."

So just in that fragment we have a salad of buzzwords, gradeschool level over-explanation, and also just flat out being wrong (where's the "G" in BRIDGE supposed to come from you retards).

And I'm sorry but WHAT? Storytelling workshops?? What fucking business does fucking story time have in a business environment? These fucking retards really are just a bunch of children who never grew up, and think that "life's not fair" so they have to do something about it.
 
Diverse teams challenge each other, push boundaries, and avoid the pitfalls of groupthink.
Members of a diverse team fight among themselves, cannot agree on a common goal, while the more capable members have to pick up the slack of the diversity hires. This wastes the precious time and energy for the sake of diversity, rather than productivity.

"DEI isn't working, so here's the new and improved snake oil!"
I don't even know what the fuck is the author advocating, but "consultant services" that sell empty buzz words, such as these, charge you tens of millions.
 
When people from different backgrounds and experiences come together, they bring distinct perspectives and ideas. This diversity of thought leads to more creative solutions and more effective problem-solving. Companies that embrace IE will find themselves better positioned to innovate, adapt, and grow in an increasingly competitive market.
Citation very much needed.

Studies have shown that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. McKinsey & Company’s research consistently finds that companies with greater gender and ethnic diversity in their executive teams are more likely to outperform on profitability.

No, no, no, no, and I fucking knew this was going to be the sole justification for this entire retarded concept.

That McKinsey study is debunked garbage. It doesn't replicate, they won't reveal their methodology, they revised it 3 times after the initial headline and STILL can't get it to show what they want. Even with all the bullshit in social science research, they can't get that effect to show up. The entire narrative that DEI helps business is "supported" by that single study's headline, and everyone is careful to ignore the controversy that dethroned it.

Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the value of DEI,
THERE IS NONE, neither evidence nor value. Read the article, they repeatedly assert that evidence exists, that science is proving things, that studies agree with them, but they don't cite any of it. They can only point to the McKinsey garbage, and studies or articles relying on that garbage. Everything else is a naked assertion that what they want to believe is somehow, somewhere happening in reality. But it's not.

Any time somebody tries this line on you, ask them a simple question: if you didn't have that one study to talk about, could you prove that DEI boosted business, productivity, or profits on your own? Not speculate, not assert, not reddit-logic your way into believing, but prove?
 
Studies have shown that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. McKinsey & Company’s research consistently finds that companies with greater gender and ethnic diversity in their executive teams are more likely to outperform on profitability. This is not merely correlation but causation. Diverse teams challenge each other, push boundaries, and avoid the pitfalls of groupthink. In a world where the pace of change is faster than ever, the ability to innovate and adapt is critical. IE equips companies with the tools they need to stay ahead of the curve.
The C-Suit is often so removed from day-to-day operations, they really have no idea what's going on. They get reports that show if number is going up or down; at which they give each other congratulatory handshakes for being so smart, or immediately start calling consulting companies to determine how to reverse the trend. I'm open to being wrong, but I find ego and greed to be a more pressing issue with the C-Suite than any sort of group-think or homogenity. I know they won't link, but I'd like to look at these studies and see how fucking horribly they compare apples to oranges to show that applies are the superior product.

Despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the value of DEI, there has been growing pushback against these initiatives. Critics argue that DEI efforts are often performative, costly, and ideologically driven, rather than rooted in practical benefits. Some see DEI as a form of reverse discrimination, suggesting that it unfairly prioritizes certain groups over others. This criticism has led to efforts to disband DEI programs in a growing number of companies and institutions, driven by a belief that these initiatives are divisive and detract from the primary business objectives.
Ignore the numerous reports of struggle sessions and a whole new office/position of people earning six-figures when all they do is look for problems (see: create problems) with the labor force. Believe us when we say this is good for you and the company, and anyone who voices otherwise is wrong, and stupid, and probably a Nazi.

However, Inclusive Economics offers a pathway to address and put aside these concerns. IE is not about imposing quotas or making token gestures. It is about creating genuine economic opportunities for all. It is not charity; it is a strategic business approach that recognizes the value of all human capital. By focusing on economic empowerment rather than symbolic gestures, IE moves beyond the ideological debates that often surround DEI. It reframes the conversation around shared prosperity and the practical benefits of inclusion for everyone involved.
A novel concept, but no doubt they'll selectively focus on certain groups in the name of equality and equity. The problem being, even if we weren't favoring one group over another; if you have to create economic opportunities for another, you're either gonna be forcing these on people who are probably not cut out for it, or will have a very small selection pool for ideas that may actually succeed. People love to scream about Trump's several bankruptcies, but tend to ignore that most businesses go out of business within like 5-7 years. So if you want to spend money to make opportunity, that's cool, what are your long-term plans to ensure these stay successful and are not just a money-sink / write-off? Answer this question before we start opening up Salon-Liquor store hybrids.

DEI programs which can trace their roots back to the Civil Rights movement in the 1960 were reactive to the social inequities that exist in society. Companies committed significant financial and human resources to unsuccessfully try to fix these problems. In doing so, they unintentionally created a significant backlash from both employees who weren’t included in these programs and by investors who viewed DEI as unnecessary and added expenses that negatively impacted financial performance and returns.
The Civil Rights Act destroyed black business. I'm not looking for a moralization about separate but equal and all that; but the fact remains that for blacks to have shops, theatres, construction companies, etc; they needed blacks who were keen enough to be able to operate a successful business. Once integration was forced, everyone just went to the white stores and a lot of possible upward mobility for blacks who had ambition and drive died out. There are also other factors, like the War on Poverty, but I'm staying focused on the business idea. Integration cut black businesses down; moralize however you want, fuck you, I'm right.

In contrast, Inclusive Economics is proactive, impacts a much wider group of employees, enhances productivity, attracts more customers, and drives revenue growth. As a result, IE efforts increase corporate profitability, stimulate economic activity, increase tax revenues, and strengthen the financial well-being of individuals, companies, communities, and America.
When there's only positives, and that many of them, you're being lied to; the only question is how big and bad the lie is. Even if it weren't a lie, it also entails everyone in the entire line to conduct themselves to the highest standards and make absolutely no mistakes. Because if there's a contradictory statement I see, it's anything related to corporate profitability and increased tax revenues. Because companies just fucking love paying their taxes, don't they; as long as strengthening the financial well-being of individuals... so they're gonna pay top fucking dollar to their employees, as well as their full taxes? Well gee golly willickers, this is a fucking miracle cure isn't it?!

I got a lot more to say, but I'm pretty sure I'd be preaching to the choir; race hustler is changing their grift because the old one's become unpopular. I'll just leave it with even Amazon had an internal memo about wanting a diverse workforce, because diversity counters cohesion, which stops workers from organizing and shit like that. Now apply that line of thinking to, whatever fucking snake oil these people are trying to sell.
 
Studies have shown that diverse teams outperform homogeneous ones. McKinsey & Company’s research consistently finds that companies with greater gender and ethnic diversity in their executive teams are more likely to outperform on profitability. This is not merely correlation but causation.
Superb!
Send infinity niggers to Latin America. Send infinity SEA Chinks to Africa. Send infinity Poos to Mexico.
Send infinity Haitians to Somalia. Let's fix these countries and raise them up!!!
 
That McKinsey study is debunked garbage. It doesn't replicate, they won't reveal their methodology, they revised it 3 times after the initial headline and STILL can't get it to show what they want. Even with all the bullshit in social science research, they can't get that effect to show up. The entire narrative that DEI helps business is "supported" by that single study's headline, and everyone is careful to ignore the controversy that dethroned it.

This is no different than the vaccines cause autism or literally anything by John Money. Once the genie is out of the bottle there's no way to get it back in because so long as a single speck of it is exists the web somewhere there's gonna be desperate gullible idiots who find it, cite it, and cling to the affirmation of their ideology.

If DEI was so effective it wouldn't have to be pushed because it'd happen organically. If something is overwhelming positive, especially in business, you're going to adopt it. This is just race hustling or other activism, they're trying to forcibly make jobs for themselves because they're such insufferable cunts that they know they'd not be tolerated otherwise.
 
Back