Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.1%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 59 16.6%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.5%
  • Total voters
    356
IncelLaw said:
Could Balldo Man's comments in his Locals stream end up being admissible during sentencing?
Click to expand...
The recovery program is almost certainly a CPS matter, so no "sentencing" is involved.

Could his statements be used in the criminal case? Sure. But only by a bloodthirsty DA. I do hope Detective Pomplum, et al, have found this thread.

It's far more likely that Kristen Pierce will defer to the easiest option: Nick's Franks motion will be denied, Nick and Kayla will take a plea for +/- 2 years suspended, and Nick will play nice and get custody of the kids back within a year.

Epilogue: Nick will keep drinking. He'll stream to 400-500. Polycule will continue. Perhaps a divorce arc. Kids will muddle through until they don't.

God Bless America.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: USAroXX, koos koets, The Motorizer and 21 others
Melty Butter said:
The recovery program is almost certainly a CPS matter, so no "sentencing" is involved.

Could his statements be used in the criminal case? Sure. But only by a bloodthirsty DA. I do hope Detective Pomplum, et al, have found this thread.

It's far more likely that Kristen Pierce will defer to the easiest option: Nick's Franks motion will be denied, Nick and Kayla will take a plea for +/- 2 years suspended, and Nick will play nice and get custody of the kids back within a year.

Epilogue: Nick will keep drinking. He'll stream to 400-500. Polycule will continue. Perhaps a divorce arc. Kids will muddle through until they don't.

God Bless America.
Click to expand...
The criminal matter does not care if he is recovering or using or drinking at this point. Getting straight and sober may be an element of a plea deal, and the judge likes to see it. But they have no reason to be urine testing Nick at this time. The crime is possession not use.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: USAroXX, 6thRanger, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 7 others
The Internet Dick said:
Some rehab centers are shady operations ran by unscrupulous con artists, but I would guess those are a small minority. Most of the people involved in that industry are well-intentioned. The central, core problem in most cases isn't type of provider or methodology employed.
Click to expand...

I don't know about this. The line between unscrupulous con artists and dimwitted ignoramuses isn't a very clear one, but if you include both I think it's probably a majority.

The central core problem is that they avoid the research evidence and staff the places with unqualified, barely trained staff who simply regurgitate the ideology they were force-fed when they went through the program. And that's the core qualification for most of these places. Having done the program yourself.

It's changing. Things aren't as bad as they were twenty years ago. Perhaps because it's harder to find insurers who'll stump up unlimited amounts of money for endless in-patient treatment to the tune of hundreds of thousands per patient. And hey, at least they've stopped putting snakes in the mailboxes of their critics.

But the buyer still needs to beware.

As Addiction Deaths Surge, Profit-Driven Rehab Industry Faces 'Severe Ethical Crisis'​

 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: USAroXX, The Motorizer, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL and 15 others
The Internet Dick said:
Some rehab centers are shady operations ran by unscrupulous con artists, but I would guess those are a small minority. Most of the people involved in that industry are well-intentioned. The central, core problem in most cases isn't type of provider or methodology employed. The problem is the nature of addiction itself. Approximately 6% of those who drink alcohol will progress to the point they become addicted to it. I would guess (without knowing the statistics for it) a similar percentage of drug users become addicted to their drug of choice. Of those chronically addicted drunks and druggies, over half will take it all the way and drink or drug themselves to death. Why? Because they make a choice to keep going even knowing where it leads. They're the slaves who have learned to love the massuh, the hookers who love their pimp, the battered wives who stand by their man and will never leave him even though he's using them and killing them.

And no, relapse isn't a normal part of recovery. I contest that assertion every time I encounter it. Relapse means whatever the drunk or addict was doing to stay clean and/or sober wasn't working. Don't do what doesn't work.
Click to expand...
Most addicts go to rehab 7 or 8 times before finally being able to kick and something like less than 10% are ever able to. Steve-O has talked about the statistics a bunch.

RodgerDodger said:
The criminal matter does not care if he is recovering or using or drinking at this point. Getting straight and sober may be an element of a plea deal, and the judge likes to see it. But they have no reason to be urine testing Nick at this time. The crime is possession not use.
Click to expand...
It might make a difference for sentencing but not for the guilty/not-guilty phase.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: USAroXX, 6thRanger, often puzzled and 4 others
This is the only rehab that Nick Rekieta will be going to 7 or 8 times:

1727110206127.png
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: USAroXX, koos koets, marbury and 27 others
The overwhelming problem with the "does rehab work?" (or any other kind of treatment for that matter) is that people don't stop using drugs unless they want to.
If someone gets court ordered into rehab, they're going there to stay out of prison, not to stop using drugs.
No kind of treatment will ever be effective for that person.

It's the same thing with jail. People typically get sober in jail and jails have people come in and do 12 step programs or whatever.
But people leave jail and immediately start using drugs again because they only became sober because they had to, not because they wanted to.

tldr: you cant stop people from doing what they want to do. and drug addicts want to do drugs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: USAroXX, koos koets, DopeAddictKittenV2 and 22 others
bookers said:
The overwhelming problem with the "does rehab work?" (or any other kind of treatment for that matter) is that people don't stop using drugs unless they want to.
If someone gets court ordered into rehab, they're going there to stay out of prison, not to stop using drugs.
No kind of treatment will ever be effective for that person.

It's the same thing with jail. People typically get sober in jail and jails have people come in and do 12 step programs or whatever.
But people leave jail and immediately start using drugs again because they only became sober because they had to, not because they wanted to.

tldr: you cant stop people from doing what they want to do. and drug addicts want to do drugs.
Click to expand...
Dont think is a "want" issue, they are hard coded as addicts, the only thing they can do is to avoid the triggers that kick in what is hard coded into you. Nick may have social anxiety - even if he is not spiking his drinks, he continues to drink shit while engaging with his audience; he tried coke and MDMA in, in theory, new scenarios for him - I gather he was not much of a clubber or a swinger before - he seems to be eating often in his streams as well.
For him to have a chance to kick it, he will probably need to retire from streaming and focus on his family. I REALLY doubt he is off because of the April thing since, for what Aaron said, they seemed to be enabling each other. This chick will probably fuck whatever is left of this husk of a man, that´s why I argue Kayla is the dumbest bitch in all of this every chance I have.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: USAroXX, Accidental Protege, gmax alcremie and 4 others
200MB said:
According to Aaron, Nick's licked his face on 3-4 separate occasions including the first night they met.
Nick has a taste for Toe!

1:00 - 1:42 is the relevant part, the rest is him talking about his car insurance and the goal.
Click to expand...
Man went from licking the booze off the bottle to licking the booze off other people's faces
 
  • Like
  • DRINK!
  • Agree
Reactions: USAroXX, suspended animation, The Motorizer and 15 others
200MB said:
According to Aaron, Nick's licked his face on 3-4 separate occasions including the first night they met.
Nick has a taste for Toe!

1:00 - 1:42 is the relevant part, the rest is him talking about his car insurance and the goal.
Click to expand...
If one of my friends licked my fucking face I'd punch him right in the mouth and would expect any of them to do the same if the roles were reversed.

The fuck is wrong with all of them?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX, koos koets, Long-time Lurker and 32 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back