State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?

  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Kandinsky said:
Very possible I’m late and gay, but this YouTube video was suggested to me, which gives a brief overview of the criminal case (plus a mention of the Montagraph case). It mentioned Kiwi Farms as a source several times without any negative connotations. As the site continues to repair the damage made by Keffals and others through disseminating misinformation about the site, I was pleased to see the site referred to as a source and not a harassment website. @Null had recently mentioned on a recent Mad at the Internet building the reputation of the site in this direction so things like the current Wikipedia page can be updated/changed. I’m poorly paraphrasing, but that’s the gist of what was said.
Click to expand...

1727132810629.png

1727132964011.png
I swear it seems like all members who joined in 2022 are mentally stunted.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, Kandinsky, Thoughtcrime84 and 19 others
Kandinsky said:
Very possible I’m late and gay, but this YouTube video was suggested to me, which gives a brief overview of the criminal case (plus a mention of the Montagraph case). It mentioned Kiwi Farms as a source several times without any negative connotations.
Click to expand...

I find it interesting that the video was suggested to you, since it seems like the term 'Kiwi Farms' isn’t shadowbanned by the algorithm, at least not entirely. I didn't hold back from mentioning Kiwi Farms in the video description either.

The NotebookLM podcast thing sometimes described Kiwi Farms neutrally, and other times called it 'infamous.'
My favorite instance was when it referred to Kiwi Farms as 'the digital anthropologist’s playground.'

And calling Rekieta a 'wet brained coomer'

Unfortunately, this version of the podcast didn’t make the cut for other reasons.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, Bill Evans 45, Kandinsky and 20 others
Catgirl Tyranid said:
Out of curiosity, are you taking bits and pieces of different podcast generations to build out the one you posted or did you generate until you found one you deemed suitable and go with that?
Click to expand...
I generated several versions until I found one that felt right.

The creative process is always a balance between the ideas you have for a project and the time you can put into it.

With the time I had, I couldn’t stitch together multiple versions of the 'Podcast' to create a more complete narrative. It seems the 'Audio Overview' feature in NotebookLM has a limit on the topics it can cover. That’s why I couldn’t get them to talk about the Montagraph case. If I do something like this again, I'll probably combine several iterations for a better result.

I don’t want to derail the thread, so if anyone has questions, feel free to DM me or ask on my profile. I’d be happy to answer and help out if you want to try something similar.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, Clem Fandango, Permanent Resident Cope and 7 others
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)

order-01.jpgorder-02.jpgorder-03.jpgorder-04.jpgorder-05.jpgorder-06.jpgorder-07.jpgorder-08.jpgorder-09.jpgorder-10.jpgorder-11.jpgorder-12.jpgorder-13.jpg

rekita-thumb.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: some racist username, Hongourable Madisha, ChadBrazilian and 139 others
Truly beautiful. Hope he enjoys paying that lawyer he's hired to lose for him on every point.

1727196367418.png

Was this previously known? That's interesting that Rekieta offered a STMS clip for evidence.

EDIT: Having read the whole thing now (IANAL), I believe it's talking about when Nick tried to argue that they had more than a falling out and offered proof to that end.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Oliver Onions, koos koets, DSP's Tax Lawyer and 21 others
Balldo's Gate said:
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)

View attachment 6450437View attachment 6450436View attachment 6450435View attachment 6450432View attachment 6450431View attachment 6450430View attachment 6450429View attachment 6450428View attachment 6450425View attachment 6450423View attachment 6450422View attachment 6450421View attachment 6450420

View attachment 6450448
Click to expand...
He pulled a Bossman and LITERALLY lost it all. Nick just got pegged by the legal system, OOF
Screen_Shot_2020-01-14_at_10.34.57_AM.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Oliver Onions, make_it_so and 38 others
Balldo's Gate said:
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)

View attachment 6450437View attachment 6450436View attachment 6450435View attachment 6450432View attachment 6450431View attachment 6450430View attachment 6450429View attachment 6450428View attachment 6450425View attachment 6450423View attachment 6450422View attachment 6450421View attachment 6450420

View attachment 6450448
Click to expand...
You beat me by 10 minutes. I was reading the document before uploading and then I scrolled up after making my post and there it is.
The order is glorious, Nick lost on every count, like every analysis predicted.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu, Oliver Onions, ThatDumbPhilosopher and 29 others
In this moment I just want to sit back and think about how incredibly smug Nick got after the omnibussin' hearing.

I always figured it was his hail Mary. He was going to see if he could get out of this stuff without a single convention. Will he choose now to beg for mercy from the prosecution and try to get a plea deal?

I really doubt it.

GO TO TRIAL NICK.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Simp Biscuit, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 54 others
Balldo's Gate said:
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)

View attachment 6450437View attachment 6450436View attachment 6450435View attachment 6450432View attachment 6450431View attachment 6450430View attachment 6450429View attachment 6450428View attachment 6450425View attachment 6450423View attachment 6450422View attachment 6450421View attachment 6450420

View attachment 6450448
Click to expand...
So does this mean we will FINALLY get the video?
 
  • Feels
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: keklmao, Father Balldo, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back