State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
In this moment I just want to sit back and think about how incredibly smug Nick got after the omnibussin' hearing.

I always figured it was his hail Mary. He was going to see if he could get out of this stuff without a single convention. Will he choose now to beg for mercy from the prosecution and try to get a plea deal?

I really doubt it.

GO TO TRIAL NICK.
Trial is inevitable. It's gonna happen. Nick IS INNOCENT. HE JUST HAS TO EXPLAIN WHY SNORTING COKE IN FRONT OF KIDS IS WHOLESOME CHUNGUS.
 
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)


View attachment 6450448
Daddy nooooooo
 
Probable Cause Challenge
Defendant made a vague, passing reference to a probable cause challenge on page 8 of Defendant’s reply memorandum filed September 6, 2024. This probable cause challenge is untimely and was not properly noticed or raised at the hearing.
lmao, they failed to notice the challenge of probable cause at the Omnibus hearing and therefore it is entirely thrown out.
hahahahahaha, they are so incompetent.

[EDIT]Formatted the quote for better readability.
 
Last edited:
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)


View attachment 6450448
SUFFA BALLDOMAN, SUFFA !!!
 
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)


View attachment 6450448
FELTED AGAIN!
1721195039589.png
Wasn't Nick a self proclaimed master in Frank's hearings? :story:
I can see him coping about how you have to try everything even if it doesn't end up working. But he was so smug and confident that this should work.
Edit: Might make a quick edit of him saying that the Franks would work with the documents overlayed and clown music.
 
The analysis from the Kiwi Farms Law Couch was correct after all, truly shocking!
Surpsingly just about anyone can tell that "I deleted Daz evidences, so you can't use it against me" is not an argument that would succeed, much like the rest of his pedantic complaints.
 
Back