Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
I might be wrong and anyone that knows better is welcome to correct me, but there has to be a 0% chance that calling a judge names after she rules against you will have any bearing on appeals.

Judge rules against you? Just say she has pussy liquor and get a new judge. The next one rules against you? Just say he has dick liquor. Infinite do-over cheat code.
I'm pretty sure this would constitute contempt of court.
 

The following comment on the above video was pinned by @elb:

pinned_1.png
 
I might be wrong and anyone that knows better is welcome to correct me, but there has to be a 0% chance that calling a judge names after she rules against you will have any bearing on appeals.

Judge rules against you? Just say she has pussy liquor and get a new judge. The next one rules against you? Just say he has dick liquor. Infinite do-over cheat code.
The Donny Long strategy.
 
YES, it would be the smartest move.
YES, he might have a moment of clarity, not act like a complete retard for once, and plea out.

But NO, with Nick, that is far from a sure thing. I sure as hell wouldn't put money on it.
According to Nick himself, he has been studying so much and his case is so special and not straightforward.

Rekieta the best legal analyst said:
08:24 - The case is not straightforward anyone who thinks the case is straightforward, I'm sorry

He'll probably keep thinking his case is unique, like a special snowflake, and might end up doing more dumb stuff that's against his own best interest.

EDIT: By the way, LOCALS CHAT:
GYRUkoWWcAAt_lD.png
 
looks like barnes still hasn't tweeted despite having so much to say previously. really looking forward to his incisive legal analysis on this.
Viva and Barnes are probably done with it. They made no comment after Nate pointed out Nick used none of Barnes claims. There is a bigger grift going on now and Nick simply does not bring in the money. They were under the impression he was still at his Depp/Rittenhouse height when he hasn't been there for a long time.
 
Since everyone seems to think now's a good time to update their predictions on whether Nick pleas...

He's going all the way, for two reasons. The first reason is that there is no way Nick is going to take responsibility for his own actions, even if he could just spin a yarn in public afterwards about how he was set up and the county railroaded him so he had to plea. This motherfucker hates taking responsibility and he would be so obviously and indisputably owned by being forced to admit, even if just in a court, that he is guilty that I don't think his ego would allow him to do it. There would also be detractors and Kiwi Farmers there in-person to watch him plea and that would just be salt in the wound. The second reason is I think he assumes that he's not at risk of serving any meaningful amount of jail time, no matter how badly the judge and the legal system are biased against him (in his view), and so the consequences will be minor. After all, he's not some white trash heroin junkie, he's a lawyer! And wealthy, and an internet celebrity, and a white man. There's no way they can throw the book at him. From his perspective, he probably thinks the damage to his reputation is a bigger problem than any possible hard legal consequences and he thinks doing reputational damage control is a bigger priority than anything else. Except cocaine and threesomes.
 
I might be wrong and anyone that knows better is welcome to correct me, but there has to be a 0% chance that calling a judge names after she rules against you will have any bearing on appeals.

Judge rules against you? Just say she has pussy liquor and get a new judge. The next one rules against you? Just say he has dick liquor. Infinite do-over cheat code.
It’s something that will only work once. And will never work out in your favor. He can say every single vile thing about Steve that he wants. No one will care. The circumstances of the Cokestream are likely fairly unique.
 
There would also be detractors and Kiwi Farmers there in-person to watch him plea and that would just be salt in the wound
If that is a concern for him, he must know if this goes to trial, we get the bodycam footage; if not, the chances are slim. Also, Kiwis would be there for the sentencing as well.
He will be found guilty anyway since the warrant was upheld, not cutting a deal would be astronomically stupid. I also hope he goes to the bitter end tho.
 
Can't wait to see what all the sweepers are gonna say now....
Barnes: "This ruling is a violation of the U.S. Constitution! I'm still right! This judge is clearly corrupt! Always bet on Barnes!"

Juju (really loudly): "IT DOESN'T MATTER!!! NULL STILL CAN'T DO A SINGLE PUSHUP!!! REEEEEEEE!"

Basically, that, if I were to guess. I wouldn't expect anything of substance. Just cope, seethe, and possibly even dilating.

The following comment on the above video was pinned by @elb:

pinned_1.png
#PayMonty
 
Since everyone seems to think now's a good time to update their predictions on whether Nick pleas...

He's going all the way, for two reasons. The first reason is that there is no way Nick is going to take responsibility for his own actions, even if he could just spin a yarn in public afterwards about how he was set up and the county railroaded him so he had to plea. This motherfucker hates taking responsibility and he would be so obviously and indisputably owned by being forced to admit, even if just in a court, that he is guilty that I don't think his ego would allow him to do it. There would also be detractors and Kiwi Farmers there in-person to watch him plea and that would just be salt in the wound. The second reason is I think he assumes that he's not at risk of serving any meaningful amount of jail time, no matter how badly the judge and the legal system are biased against him (in his view), and so the consequences will be minor. After all, he's not some white trash heroin junkie, he's a lawyer! And wealthy, and an internet celebrity, and a white man. There's no way they can throw the book at him. From his perspective, he probably thinks the damage to his reputation is a bigger problem than any possible hard legal consequences and he thinks doing reputational damage control is a bigger priority than anything else. Except cocaine and threesomes.
All well and good, but you have overlooked a very relevant factor: Nick has no money of his own to finance a full trial as he wants. He's got a home on the market (which wasn't even cleaned, much less staged for showing) and his legal filings are definitely not proofread (and Crackets is most likely the author behind the Hail Mary motion that just died). He will plead. He can't afford not to.
 
Balldo Bros... THEY JUST DON'T STOP!
When will our dear Lord Nicholas Rekieta, Defender of innocence, be able to strike back against the evils of our world.
He fights against injustice and whores flooding the alcohol market! I have every faith he shall sally forth and set the world to rights with astream explaining how it's all false and that Sean is indeed Fat!
 
According to Nick himself, he has been studying so much and his case is so special and not straightforward.



He'll probably keep thinking his case is unique, like a special snowflake, and might end up doing more dumb stuff that's against his own best interest.

EDIT: By the way, LOCALS CHAT:
View attachment 6451895
A setup? These people still exist? I need to get in on grifting, it can't be that hard.
 
Back