Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

Looks like that highway needs some more exits.

View attachment 6446629
Here we go.
It also goes to show the root of the problem - they deem the city as good in itself and the desirable outcome; everyone sees the city as a necessary evil, a blight on the landscape.

A highway through suburban hell is easily widenable and so it gets done; it's only in the city does doing anything take forever and cost everything.
 
To be fair to the kei truck, I think it should be classified as a deformed motorcycle + sidecar; as those are already deathtraps since they can do 100+ MPH and, well, they're called organ donor cycles for a reason.
I think before they started recognizing them as cars some states basically classed them as farm or offroad vehicles similar to side by sides.
 
I think before they started recognizing them as cars some states basically classed them as farm or offroad vehicles similar to side by sides.
Here in Florida they were being used on private property long before they were street legal. I believe that Disney and Universal Studios both have permission to import keis that are much newer than 25 model years old to use on their properties.

A former co-worker of my brother's won an older kei in a radio station contest. The guy currently uses it as his daily driver (central Florida).
 
The irony is, there isn't any research to support that taking away lanes for bicycles and public transportation is going to solve any issues. They're so dead-set on "muh induced demand" that they forget that the paper mentioned more public transit wouldn't help. And then what, say that the paper is wrong? That introduces a whole can of worms because it would invalidate the whole idea.
they tried that in Sheffield during the Wu Flu, on one of the busiest junctions in the city, no less
it was a complete disaster - not only did it turn peak-time congestion into all-day congestion, it caused delays on the trams (which have to cross between central reservation and the other side of the road at that junction) and fucked all the bus services right in the arse, causing such long delays that most buses had to terminate early at Hillsborough, effectively withdrawing all bus services from the northern suburbs
after six weeks of absolute bedlam, it was reverted back to its original form
 
I think before they started recognizing them as cars some states basically classed them as farm or offroad vehicles similar to side by sides.

I believe they were classed as "heavy motorbikes" for the few years they were legal for US sale in the late 60s and early 70s, prior to the ban.

(Which they got away with due to having sub 1-litre powerplants, the BIGGEST one available for the OG Subaru 360 was only 423 cc By comparison? A "small" modern car/engine is something like, say, 1.8L (1,800cc) that's how tiny we're talking)

And safety of the driver was just the public excuse, the real safety issue was those tiny engines and lack of a high enough final drive gear in the transmissions made them incapable of sustained highway speeds, as they were never designed with typical American driving in mind, in either speed, frequency or conditions.

They were designed to drive in flat, slow, narrow streets, and that was it.

On any US freeway, it was a question of when, not if, they'd get catastrophically rear ended as they'd always be doing 10-20 mph below the flow of traffic.

Grades were an issue too, they were more liable than not to stall out just trying to go up a moderately sized hill.
 
Last edited:
What these people don't understand is increasing population density is just encouraging more potential causalities from a nazi mass shooter. Its like they want black/brown LGBTQIAP+ bodies harmed!
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Markass the Worst
It also goes to show the root of the problem - they deem the city as good in itself and the desirable outcome; everyone sees the city as a necessary evil, a blight on the landscape.

A highway through suburban hell is easily widenable and so it gets done; it's only in the city does doing anything take forever and cost everything.

I've stated before that there's nothing inherent about walkable areas or downtowns or whatever, and even now downtowns are generally shit unless you have to be there. (Some are nicer and more tourist-oriented, but even then it's a burden to go there). Apart from heritage sites and distinct landmarks, pretty much everything from cities have been copied to the suburbs, and they have.
 
Last trip there I saw exactly two cyclists who stopped at red lights. They were also the only two non-spandex wearing cyclists I saw wearing helmets.
While not strictly related to the video of the cyclist running a red light and hitting a car, it does make me wonder if any of the urbanists have discussed the Idaho stop in any detail. Based on a quick YouTube search, the major urbanists are mostly concerned with how stop signs are evil and you should simply be expected to navigate a roundabout at every intersection, which of course diverts more space from their famous shopping centers that are worth infinite money if only roads didn't exist to eat up valuable land use potential.

Anyway, back to the Idaho stop. I personally implemented it while living in a major city and biking exclusively as my transportation, and it's a pretty good idea. I was safer knowing that no cars would be confused about the right of way at a stop sign, and if I "ran" a red light after coming to a full stop, I'd be on a predictable trajectory when the light changed and the cars behind inevitably passed me due to having engines. Also, wool bike jerseys are actually useful in summer, but spandex ones and "bibs" are disgusting.

More generally, it seems kind of haphazard for these guys to just say that bikes are better without any real explanation of the complex road etiquette that accompanies having multiple classes of vehicle share the same streets. Bikes are vehicles after all, and it's crazy that lacking things like helmets, mirrors, and lights isn't a criminal offense.
 
Pardon the double post because I can't edit my last post. I did find a reasonably informative video free of jargon and bullshit that, while largely concerned with a deceased autist on the subject, accurately reflects my personal experience with a variety of transportation methods. It's pretty obvious that real bike paths are best but not every street in the world has them, so cyclists inevitably have to stop playing pretend and realize that they drive actual vehicles.

I've also been pulled over in a moped for "driving too slow" and told to drive in the (randomly disappearing) shoulder despite my state's driving handbook explicitly saying that doing so is illegal and that it's safest to occupy a full lane and force cars to pass on the left, but at the same time, driving too slow is also a crime. I'm not entirely sure what the solution is beyond firing boomers and breaking the knees of spandex faggots, but that's probably a good start.
 
My dad taught me very early on that you could be “dead right” - or in other words, you could be completely in the right with regards to the law, but still splayed out dead on the road.

We live in the real world with its failings and faults. We can autistically argue about what perfection should be, and even work to fix things, but in the end you have to have responsibility for yourself and keep your head on a swivel no matter what the laws or designs say.

And the surest way to get things improved is to get people to use them - a street that sees two pedestrians and four bikes and five thousand cars a day - that’s going to be built for the cars. But once there’s a bike every few minutes, you’ll see the bike infrastructure improve tremendously. Even in the most chud redneck center of car loving.
 
We can autistically argue about what perfection should be, and even work to fix things, but in the end you have to have responsibility for yourself and keep your head on a swivel no matter what the laws or designs say.
That's pretty much my stance, having seen some insane shit like someone trying to pass in the shoulder in a construction zone on an interstate highway. It's all about situational awareness, and this applies whether you're speeding on the highway, making a right turn and neglect to check for bike traffic, not using a rearview mirror on a bicycle (real game changer, by the way), crossing a street while playing on your phone, etc. It's safe to assume that everyone on the road is retarded and to act accordingly.

The urbanists, left to their own devices in an echo chamber and with their own distinct lack of awareness, have hilariously constructed a fantasy reality where Amsterdam is the mecca of transportation and everyone in an SUV is out to murder children. The only reasonable channel I've found is Oh the Urbanity, which is a nice change from Not Just Bikes sperging out about fire trucks of all things, complete with an "um, ackchyually" moment about how fire trucks and fire engines are different things.
 
The only reasonable channel I've found is Oh the Urbanity, which is a nice change from Not Just Bikes sperging out about fire trucks of all things, complete with an "um, ackchyually" moment about how fire trucks and fire engines are different things.
I'd say Road Guy Rob is good if you count him. From thumbnails, Oh the Urbanity looks decent. Will have to check them out later. Also, that's twice now where they insist that two words used mostly interchangably are ackshually super diffrent things that totally aren't our own autistic definitions
 
Road Guy Rob is actually informative - I've learned shit from him, and gone from hating traffic circles with a perfect hatred to being more ... ok, let's try some more.
It's safe to assume that everyone on the road is retarded and to act accordingly.
True zen is realizing this is true - including you. You (and I) are just as retarded.
 
I'd say Road Guy Rob is good if you count him. From thumbnails, Oh the Urbanity looks decent. Will have to check them out later. Also, that's twice now where they insist that two words used mostly interchangably are ackshually super diffrent things that totally aren't our own autistic definitions
OTU is the one that went to the bike lane town hall and seethed about it, only adding his commentary afterwards.
 
I'd say Road Guy Rob is good if you count him.
Thanks for the recommendation. I'm not autistically focused on transportation and such, more like vaguely interested in things like how the fonts of road signs are designed for maximum legibility, and somewhat amused by the verbosity of America's road signs, e.g., "no parking on this side of the street." It's a whole science to get slow-in-the-minds to react to a large amount of information in real time.
True zen is realizing this is true - including you. You (and I) are just as retarded.
For sure, defensive driving is also about defending against your own retardation. I'm generally pretty chill on the road, but I do get annoyed at times and have a long list of "retard tells" warning me about other people's possible danger. Some are irrational heuristics, like having numerous or any political bumper stickers, while others like visible body damage are more sensible as to another driver's potential danger.
OTU is the one that went to the bike lane town hall and seethed about it, only adding his commentary afterwards.
To be fair, they are firmly in urbanist circles and had personally biked in the neighborhood where the boomer think tank gathered to dismantle the unspeakable evil of the bike lane. Also, when they talked about things like how it'd make some car trips more convoluted and parking a bit harder, they didn't autistically screech but we more like, "makes sense." I'd say that counting every stop sign on an errand for ammo in the neighborhood meeting is more autistic than producing urbanist content that's an alternative to ranting about suburbs.
 
I'd say Road Guy Rob is good if you count him.
Road Guy Rob is actually informative - I've learned shit from him, and gone from hating traffic circles with a perfect hatred to being more ... ok, let's try some more.
RGR is good because Jason Slaughter calls him a car apologist. (Despite him being more of an urbanist than the insult "car apologist" would have you believe.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Markass the Worst
Actually not an irrational heuristic. although note this is from the pre-replication crisis era so it is very likely to be complete nonsense.
Classic, thanks for sharing. I do have a political sticker on my older car, but it's period correct and for a fringe candidate, and it's on the glass so I don't fuck up the paint. Maybe the reasoning that people with lots of bumper stickers are wearing their heart on their sleeve so to speak, and are likely to be more irrational on the road, was a good gut feeling.

I caught this before and after your edit and am aware of the replication crisis. I can't really back it up, but in my experience, people with lots of bumper stickers on their cars aren't necessarily more aggressive. I just assume they're kinda dumb. The study's entire premise is impossible to verify, because how can you be sure that someone with a Clinton/Trump 2016 sticker on their car is capable of giving honest information about their driving habits?

Also, it's not breaking news or anything, but I gotta post a W here for Oh the Urbanity. They did a whole video on how the blocker to suburban cycling isn't distance but arterial design without saying "stroad" once, and a nice dig on Not Just Bikes moving to Amsterdam that's basically a longform "cool story, bro." It'd be pretty chill if the supermarket did something as simple as install a bike rack.
 
Anyone commented on the new James Rolfe YKWBS? It's about Parking Lots. Even he's getting in on the action.
Doesn't seem to be pushing an urbanist viewpoint according to summarize.tech:
In the YouTube video "You Know What’s BS!? Parking Lots ," the speaker voices his annoyance towards the confusing and illogical design of parking lots. He characterizes them as intricate mazes, where finding a parking space and maneuvering into it can be a daunting task for drivers. The speaker further criticizes the segmentation of parking lots among neighboring businesses and the mandatory diagonal parking, which compels drivers to adhere to narrow lanes and avoid wrong turns. He proposes a solution by suggesting that parking lots should be designed with a grid layout and be interconnected to facilitate smoother and more efficient parking experiences.
But there are still car-hating fags in the comments:
ykwbs1.png
ykwbs2.png
ykwbs3.png
ykwbs3.png
ykwbs4.png
ykwbs5.png
ykwbs6.png

At least some people are pushing back on the retardation. Let's see if the urbanist will acknowledge that horses existed (likely not):
ykwbs7.png
 
Back