Debi Teter "Jackson", Trans-Parenting.com - Encourages transgenderism in children, Mother of the Kid who was on the Natl Geographic cover.

Basic psychology taught us that a child mind and personality is not fully developed until they hit puberty, a 4 year old child cant take a decision like this, his mind does not even understand reality, hell even at 11 or 12 years old they still have trouble understanding abstract concepts, this mum is basically developing mental and physical illness on her child.
Its like if my child says he wants to have swords instead of arms and I cut his fucking arms and replace them with sword proteses, I mean a child can think its pretty cool but when they see how the world and reality works shit is gonna hit the fan.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot, sylveons, cwcproquo and 31 others
George Costanza said:
Basic psychology taught us that a child mind and personality is not fully developed until they hit puberty, a 4 year old child cant take a decision like this, his mind does not even understand reality, hell even at 11 or 12 years old they still have trouble understanding abstract concepts, this mum is basically developing mental and physical illness on her child.
Its like if my child says he wants to have swords instead of arms and I cut his fucking arms and replace them with sword proteses, I mean a child can think its pretty cool but when they see how the world and reality works shit is gonna hit the fan.
Click to expand...

The worst part is if you call one of these parents on this subject all they'll say is that also means kids can't make the decision to be cis either. These freaks absolutely reject the idea preferring your natal gender is normal.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Male Idiot, ConSluttant, sylveons and 25 others
Replicant Sasquatch said:
The worst part is if you call one of these parents on this subject all they'll say is that also means kids can't make the decision to be cis either. These freaks absolutely reject the idea preferring your natal gender is normal.
Click to expand...
So in that case a responsible adult should decide its gender.
If I want my child to be an attack helicopter and replace his penis with a 70mm machine gun, his balls with missile launchers chopper wings things and all that shit will I be featured on nat geo too?
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Lexzilla, Daughter of Cernunnos, Red Dragon and 25 others
Replicant Sasquatch said:
The worst part is if you call one of these parents on this subject all they'll say is that also means kids can't make the decision to be cis either. These freaks absolutely reject the idea preferring your natal gender is normal.
Click to expand...
It's really sad because since he is on blockers, he won't go through puberty (unless his mom allows him to go off them, which I can tell you ain't gonna happen). If he never undergoes puberty and then starts taking estrogen when he is is 15 or 16 or so, his penis/testicles will never mature, and he is basically giving up having a normal male sex life when he is just a small kid and doesn't even know what sex is or feels like. His mom is taking that away from him. A 4-year-old kid is being made to throw that away (as well as his fertility), not even realizing what he is giving up. This crap definitely should be illegal.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Heckler1, Daughter of Cernunnos, Male Idiot and 32 others
The irony is that the original intention of using puberty blockers in children with gender dysphoria who were approaching puberty was to buy time to see if the desire to be a different gender persisted as the child matured and after other approaches to addressing any issues in their lives had been tried, so that options were kept open until the child was mature enough to understand the consequences. It was never meant to be the first step on the medical path to inevitable surgical transition.

Box of Shame said:
It's really sad because since he is on blockers, he won't go through puberty (unless his mom allows him to go off them, which I can tell you ain't gonna happen). If he never undergoes puberty and then starts taking estrogen when he is is 15 or 16 or so, his penis/testicles will never mature, and he is basically giving up having a normal male sex life when he is just a small kid and doesn't even know what sex is or feels like. His mom is taking that away from him. A 4-year-old kid is being made to throw that away (as well as his fertility), not even realizing what he is giving up. This crap definitely should be illegal.
Click to expand...

Won't even have adult genitals which can be inverted to make a fauxgina.

FWIW, Avery is not on puberty blockers yet but intends to take them upon reaching puberty.
 
  • Informative
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Mage Of The Patriarchy, Male Idiot, sylveons and 19 others
Jesus, 4 years old?! So basically he wanted to play with dolls instead of dinosaurs or whatever little boys are typically into, so his mom decided that he was actually a she? How else could that have possibly transpired?

Holy fuck lady, just let your son play with dolls. Don't hormonally castrate him.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, Male Idiot, ConSluttant and 35 others
George Costanza said:
So in that case a responsible adult should decide its gender.
If I want my child to be an attack helicopter and replace his penis with a 70mm machine gun, his balls with missile launchers chopper wings things and all that shit will I be featured on nat geo too?
Click to expand...

I know your statement is a joke but if you actually accomplished that, yes. I imagine there would be a documentary followed by a complete revision of how we understand medical science, grafting, and the fact you made a cyborg.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot, Kazami Yuuka, sylveons and 22 others
She should be cyberbullied to suicide and her son taken into custody.
Adult troons who ruin their lives and are overall lulzy and threadworthy are one thing, but this is a fucking kid who started being indoctrinated at the age of four years old. He won't be mature enough to understand what is being done to him until he's in his late teens. Anyone supporting this crazy bitch is a child abuse enabler too.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Daughter of Cernunnos, DoctorGonzo, Male Idiot and 27 others
Replicant Sasquatch said:
The worst part is if you call one of these parents on this subject all they'll say is that also means kids can't make the decision to be cis either. These freaks absolutely reject the idea preferring your natal gender is normal.
Click to expand...

That's idiotic. It's like saying a child is too immature to decide not to chop off his hands.

The default state of 99.9% of people is normal, not fucked up and deviant. The default treatment should be that which best serves the vast majority of the public, not what harms the vast majority of the public and only, maybe, benefits an infinitesimal minority.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Male Idiot, ConSluttant, sylveons and 16 others
AnOminous said:
That's idiotic. It's like saying a child is too immature to decide not to chop off his hands.
Click to expand...

These are the same fuckdrops who kick up a stink when royal births are announced as "it's a boy" or "it's a girl" (seriously, they spat the dummy when Prince George's birth was announced that way).

I can't be fucked looking through it tonight, but there are some inconsistencies in the Avery story which I want to check out tomorrow. Could just be bad reporting or it could be mum making shit up as she goes along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male Idiot, ConSluttant, Super Collie and 7 others
Exactly how badly do hormone blockers fuck up a developing child's body? Like I know it does, but to what extent?
 
IMG_20161218_065220.jpg

Apparently she has a gay son as well?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Male Idiot, ConSluttant, sylveons and 31 others
Pikimon said:
Exactly how badly do hormone blockers fuck up a developing child's body? Like I know it does, but to what extent?
Click to expand...

We don't actually know. Previously they were used for relatively short periods of time in children with precocious puberty, and even then only in fairly extreme cases. The intention there was for puberty continue normally at a more appropriate time, not to stop it dead and then artificially induce the secondary sexual characteristics of the opposite sex.

This is a relatively balanced article in that it admits that the effects are largely unstudied - it's less than 10 years since puberty blockers were first used in this particular manner.

upload_2016-12-18_21-16-31.png


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/a...ion-medical-risks-are-both-known-and-unknown/
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Male Idiot, ConSluttant, Tragi-Chan and 17 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back