- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
National Defense Advocate
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2024
They always ban these platforms for super fucking gay and retarded reasons.
"Oh you can't use discord, you might besmirch the Prophet Mohammed/Glorious Leader Putin!" and not the super obvious one like the rampant pedophilia.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
The shopping cart issue is complete slander. I see moids standing in the way with complete lack of self awareness way more often. You probably notice more women because more women do the grocery shopping for their family.
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2021
I CANT BREATHE I CANT BREATHE I CANT BREATHE. I wonder if the niggers and troons on Twitter got mad at that lmao
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
@Null you asked about shortwave again on MATI. Allan Wiener at WBCQ is a big supporter of free speech and access to the air waves. He once built a pirate radio ship and got raided by the feds.
He has had to put up with a lot of shit because of the people he platforms. The SPLC is a big fan of the station. Review Brah has used them before and they let you buy small blocks of air time. You can send them an mp3 or direct stream live.
http://wbcq.com/ (boomers can't figure out https)
wbcq@wbcq.com
He has had to put up with a lot of shit because of the people he platforms. The SPLC is a big fan of the station. Review Brah has used them before and they let you buy small blocks of air time. You can send them an mp3 or direct stream live.
http://wbcq.com/ (boomers can't figure out https)
wbcq@wbcq.com
indomitable snowman
Can't stop, won't stop (unless it gets above 32°F)
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
Mohammad was a pedophile, so they don't see anything wrong with that part.
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2021
@Null you have impeccable taste in potato chips. Ruffles cheddar sour cream is S tier
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
The chips you were talking about are Tostitos Scoops, and yes they're still around. I see them in every supermarket snack aisle.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2022
It appears that Dick and Vito were at Comic Con and Vito has been hanging out with this thirteen year old girl.
Like, the most suspect situation there could be.
Like, the most suspect situation there could be.
- Joined
- May 24, 2024
I guess it's a good thing he didn't show it on screen, because I see now the tie is inside the shirt.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
- Joined
- May 1, 2024
Todays MATI for October 8, 2024 has been archived on the youtube
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
You could opt out of phone books.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
You're also not required to register to participate in the farce we call a vote these days. In fact, it's an opt in situation.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2021
My favorite ruffles are the Mexican queso ones. I’ve had the American versions and the ones sold in mexico. They’re really good
Left Mexican market, Right American Market
Left Mexican market, Right American Market
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Little known fact: The Mexican chips are made with queso. The American chips are made with "kwesso".
Two TOTALLY different things. Do not recommend.
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
Wish granted unless being used for blackmail
article is morale postering & fear tactic.
Betting on google will give or DOJ already has Click & query data.
article is morale postering & fear tactic.
Betting on google will give or DOJ already has Click & query data.
The U.S. Department of Justice late Tuesday made recommendations for Google’s search engine business practices, indicating that it was considering a possible breakup of the tech giant as an antitrust remedy.
The department said in a filing that the remedies necessary to “prevent and restrain monopoly maintenance could include contract requirements and prohibitions; non-discrimination product requirements; data and interoperability requirements; and structural requirements.”
The DOJ also said it was “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search and Google search-related products and features — including emerging search access points and features, such as artificial intelligence — over rivals or new entrants.”
In August, a U.S. judge ruled that Google
holds a monopoly in the search market after the landmark case from the government filed in 2020, alleged that Google has kept its share of the general search market by creating strong barriers to entry and a feedback loop that sustained its dominance. The court found that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which outlaws monopolies.
Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, said the company plans to appeal the ruling and highlighted the court’s emphasis on the high quality of Google’s search products, which the judge also noted in his ruling.
The most likely outcome, according to some legal experts, is that the court will ask Google to do away with certain exclusive agreements such that it has with Apple. They also believed the court may suggest that Google make it easier for users to try other search engines. However, a break-up seemed less likely, the experts said at the time.
In the second quarter, “Google Search & Other” accounted for $48.5 billion in revenue, or 57% of Alphabet’s total revenue. The company holds 90% of search market share.
The recommendations are still far from being decided.
Judge Mehta said he’ll aim to rule on the remedies by August 2025 and Google will likely appeal, drawing out any final impact potentially years. In a separate antitrust case this week, a U.S. judge issued a permanent injunction that will force Google to offer alternatives to its Google Play store for downloading apps on Android phones.
A judge just wrapped a trial for a separate antitrust case brought on by the DOJ — though this one homed in on Google’s ad tech business.
The department said in a filing that the remedies necessary to “prevent and restrain monopoly maintenance could include contract requirements and prohibitions; non-discrimination product requirements; data and interoperability requirements; and structural requirements.”
The DOJ also said it was “considering behavioral and structural remedies that would prevent Google from using products such as Chrome, Play, and Android to advantage Google search and Google search-related products and features — including emerging search access points and features, such as artificial intelligence — over rivals or new entrants.”
In August, a U.S. judge ruled that Google
holds a monopoly in the search market after the landmark case from the government filed in 2020, alleged that Google has kept its share of the general search market by creating strong barriers to entry and a feedback loop that sustained its dominance. The court found that Google violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which outlaws monopolies.
Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, said the company plans to appeal the ruling and highlighted the court’s emphasis on the high quality of Google’s search products, which the judge also noted in his ruling.
The most likely outcome, according to some legal experts, is that the court will ask Google to do away with certain exclusive agreements such that it has with Apple. They also believed the court may suggest that Google make it easier for users to try other search engines. However, a break-up seemed less likely, the experts said at the time.
In the second quarter, “Google Search & Other” accounted for $48.5 billion in revenue, or 57% of Alphabet’s total revenue. The company holds 90% of search market share.
The recommendations are still far from being decided.
Judge Mehta said he’ll aim to rule on the remedies by August 2025 and Google will likely appeal, drawing out any final impact potentially years. In a separate antitrust case this week, a U.S. judge issued a permanent injunction that will force Google to offer alternatives to its Google Play store for downloading apps on Android phones.
A judge just wrapped a trial for a separate antitrust case brought on by the DOJ — though this one homed in on Google’s ad tech business.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
That change starts when men stop referring to the targets of their lust as "girls" in their standard language usage. So that's not happening ever, no matter how much it should.
Agreed. I had to be up my husband's ass for years about getting the fuck out of the way on occasions when he's got the cart and still occasionally have to tell him. Every man I've ever shopped with has been like this aside from my dad. At the store, we see (white and asian) women pay special attention to staying out of the way while there are constantly men with the most vacant, braindead stares on their faces, carts in the middle of the aisle, their fat ass to one side to make certain at least 2/3 of said aisle is blocked, and a look as though they've just snapped out of a waking nightmare brought on by the hypnosis of whole wheat bread flour when addressed to kindly get the fuck out of everyone's way. All of the major stores I've been to are full of men and brown women doing this shit. Maybe Josh's brain isn't parsing between 'women' and 'brown women', and that's combining with the fact that women do most grocery shopping.