Love the part where the terrorist asks them for a cigarette only to get a sarcastic answer
But But the kikes and the Irish don'tcha know the kikes always lie
However effective or ineffective the peacekeepers are, I don't see the benefit of threatening or shooting at soldiers from third party countries that do not antagonize the IDF.But But the kikes and the Irish don'tcha know the kikes always lie
It's standard operating procedure (whether official or otherwise) to shoot for the dome if you see the blue helmets. UN Peacekeepers are arguably the most corrupt, perverted, greedy, cowardly and useless "military" force ever assembled by human beings. Think the UN itself is bad? Now imagine how god-awful their armed forces are.
The IDF keeps asking the UN to get out of the way so they don't accidentally hit them. The UN refuses to budge because The UN mandate states that Hezbollah can't be there, not Israel, but they're retarded so they think Israel can't be there. so after while it kind of falls on them if they want to die in a stupid manner.
no idea but THAAD batteries are considered the best of the best, and While Iron dome is good against katuskias, mortars, home made rockets and the like Israel doesn't have the production to repell 150 ballistic missiles all at once in waves. It has to choose it's targets.
The UN didn't give them a State, the UN doesn't give anyone anything, hell they trade donated relief supplies for sex with children.
This seems like directly targeting them, not "collateral damage because they sat on top of legitimate targets and refused to get out of the way."
In case my subtlety didn't convey the point in my previous post, UN Peacekeepers are legitimate targets. That may not be explicitly written down or stated in any government's "official" policies, but it's absolutely an unspoken rule among every nation's armed forces.
