US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6537021

Is Orange Man not bad anymore?
They're all just realizing what the next 4 years of their lives looks like and they're going to try and get on his good side.

They spent the last decade eroding personal freedoms and the legal system to go after this guy and now they're going to have to hand it back to him. I'd be scared too.

Hope it hurts. Don't run a DEI hire.
 
If (let's be honest—when) Trump beats a woman again, savagely pummels her into the ground, slaps her into her place etc. etc., it really should be the last nail in the coffin for woman presidential candidates. They're just unelectable for anything serious. They can be representatives, senators, and governors all they want—who cares? But let one of 'em be the Big Man? Nuh-uh. Ain't happenin'.

The three kinds of Office already mentioned are what we in the Gamer Community call "support" positions. Women are really good at being supports: being told what to do by people (men) higher up the food chain. Usually this kind of participation in the Gamer-torial process is gussied up by being some kind of caretaker character like a healer, medic, cleric, housewife and so-on. But you need broad shoulders and testicles and also a dick to be the "tank", the President in this case. Even the word "President" is manly. First-off, it starts with "P" just like a uh, you-know-what. Then it follows with a lot of hard dental consonants. I would have no problem naming my son "President". Would I name my daughter "President"? No, of course not. I might name her "Secretary of Education" or something like that. But never "President".

Anyway, four dollars a pound.
View attachment 6536925
I'll probably get called an incel over this but I think (most) women just don't have what it takes to be the leader of a country like the USA. I am all for equal rights and all that, but something something too impulsive and emotionally motivated.
 
My prediction:
Trump will win. The dems and their allies will make a huge fuss about it. Say they're gonna leave the country. Antifa will start some shit in blue cities. But the political elites betters, read jews and the other financial elites, will tell them to certify the election or else their dirty laundry will be aired out. These financial elites are the ones who will start shit. Not before or after.

My uncle, who is conspiratorial minded, thinks Hillary has some big October surprise up her sleeve. and Kamala will win by cheating.
 
I will vote for a female candidate when she shows the same level of confidence, gusto, and swagger as Donald .J Trump. Being competent and having a track record wouldn't hurt either. Also not gay. Last thing we need is a dyke as President
I will vote for a female candidate when I don't hear about how I should vote for her because of the fact that she's female. Kamala's entire campaign is basically "Vote for me because I'm not Trump, and vote for me because I'm a black woman." Nobody even can tell me what her plans are and what the fuck she has been doing as vice president that can make me want to vote for her over Trump. If people want a woman to be in charge then talk about her policies and why you think she would be a good president. Sadly though, America is too obsessed with identity politics that they'll see someone who not white, straight and even trans and will vote for them based off those things.
 
I'll probably get called an incel over this but I think (most) women just don't have what it takes to be the leader of a country like the USA. I am all for equal rights and all that, but something something too impulsive and emotionally motivated.
source, all of modern history. Look at arden in new zealand, merkel in germany, truss in the UK. Its all shit, they arent' mentally capable of leading, aside from a legendary woman like joan of arc, and even she was a little crazy.
 
I think the Harris campaign is fucked. Not that they won't win thanks to the vast amounts of money they can toss into the contest or the already intact fortification network Biden built.

They can't attack Trump on his policies because his policies are HER polices now. So they lose on that front. All they can do is screech over and over about Hitler, about Fascism, racism, criminal ect ect

The trouble with that is the MSM rating are in the toilet and the trust in both the media and government is at an all time historic low so no one care when MSNBC hosts break down into tears because Trump is "going to put all Democrats into camps" (not shitting here. Joy Reid actually said exactly that live on air)

I dunno what's going to happen in November but it will be interesting for sure.
It's really something that they are still running the same "stop Trump" playbook from 2020. I don't think even senile Joe would have made that elementary mistake. It took until the debate against Harris for the website to actually have any sort of policy section, but we still haven't heard shit about policy coming from her own mouth. It's the same tired "we need to stop cheeto Mussolini" bullshit that only worked in 2020 because of unprecedented circumstances due to the pandemic. Was she just in a boozed up stupor for the last 3.5 years? She doesn't even know her own policy stances, how the hell can she claim to know Trump's?
 
Kamala is the dumbest bitch I've ever seen try to make it as a politician.
Someone in the crowd yelled "Jesus is lord!" and Kamala replies "I think you're at the wrong rally".
On the same day she ditched the dinner.
She has zero tact or she's just given up and is raging now.

 
Kamala is the dumbest bitch I've ever seen try to make it as a politician.
Someone in the crowd yelled "Jesus is lord!" and Kamala replies "I think you're at the wrong rally".
On the same day she ditched the dinner.
She has zero tact or she's just given up and is raging now.

View attachment 6537163
well, she _is_ right
 
source, all of modern history. Look at arden in new zealand, merkel in germany, truss in the UK. Its all shit, they arent' mentally capable of leading, aside from a legendary woman like joan of arc, and even she was a little crazy.
And, as I brought up earlier in the thread, Margaret Thatcher. They call her The Iron Lady for a reason. She also could have chosen to nuke Argentina and did not. Or given up the Falklands and did not. Both of those would have been the easy way out. But she trusted the Royal Navy and all the other branches of the armed forces to make Argentina regret fucking around by making them find out.

Fun fact about that war: The SAS was ready and willing to do a suicide mission by landing planes at an Argentine airbase to destroy all the exocet missiles stored there.
 
Kamala is the dumbest bitch I've ever seen try to make it as a politician.
Someone in the crowd yelled "Jesus is lord!" and Kamala replies "I think you're at the wrong rally".
On the same day she ditched the dinner.
She has zero tact or she's just given up and is raging now.

View attachment 6537163
What an idiot. You could have thrown in an Amen or something. But no, you told them to go to another rally. That's not a good look. Nor is making fun of Christians when you're hemorrhaging voters.
 
source, all of modern history. Look at arden in new zealand, merkel in germany, truss in the UK. Its all shit, they arent' mentally capable of leading, aside from a legendary woman like joan of arc, and even she was a little crazy.
I'm okay with crazy. Crazy got us to the moon. Crazy and incompetent- no thanks. Terrible combo.
 
Kamala is the dumbest bitch I've ever seen try to make it as a politician.
Someone in the crowd yelled "Jesus is lord!" and Kamala replies "I think you're at the wrong rally".
On the same day she ditched the dinner.
She has zero tact or she's just given up and is raging now.

View attachment 6537163
You could caption this video on her fivehead in 72pt Impact Bold font
 
I will vote for a female candidate when I don't hear about how I should vote for her because of the fact that she's female.
Christ, I'm tired of the concept of women having some sort of innate virtue just because "woman". And not just "woman", but uniquely female. Like, even Hillary knew better than to portray herself as a "joyful warrior", as if we'd believe she was a warrior because she said so, and as if joy is a characteristic I want in the leader of the free fucking world.

I don't want a woman whose aesthetic appeals to the fucking Oprah crowd: the most shallow, emotional, brainless demographic on the planet whose brains run on yoga, brunch and wine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back