Your 推し is くそ Rev says desu / Louis Testone Jr. / "The Lolicon King" - A lolicon Vtuber with a 700k sub Youtube Channel, Grown Ass Man into drawings of little girls getting fucked, married to a fat bitch that thinks "loli pussy hits different".

In other news Rev is panicking about the block button getting neutered
View attachment 6535944

He's talking about rights lol. Bro it's a block button. Which as we all know is for cowards. And for you, because your a lolicon that doesn't want certain people to see your shit.
That's true honestly but since Twitter has such a massive bot problem, the block button would be necessary when the site is infested with bots who are scamming people. However, this is just a fucking pussy move by both Louis and Alexis.
 
That's true honestly but since Twitter has such a massive bot problem, the block button would be necessary when the site is infested with bots who are scamming people. However, this is just a fucking pussy move by both Louis and Alexis.
It's not that there's not a block button anymore, but that the people you (emphasis on you) blocked can now still see your posts
 
That's true honestly but since Twitter has such a massive bot problem, the block button would be necessary when the site is infested with bots who are scamming people. However, this is just a fucking pussy move by both Louis and Alexis.
This:
It's not that there's not a block button anymore, but that the people you (emphasis on you) blocked can now still see your posts
What Rev is afraid of is now the people he blocked can screenshot his shit now and talk about it on their own. There's still a wall, but it's made of glass now instead of brick. I suspect a major Rev spergout in the future if his blocklist, now allowed to see his posts, starts talking about how much of a freak he is. Time will tell.
 
Basically he is afraid. And I find it so nice how much of a sophist he is being, coating his argument with fake libertarian bullshit. "Freedom of assoaciation, shutting the metaphorical front door", you fucking kike, you have it, people will be able to see you, that is all. You are disingenuous. Fucking nigger.
 
Basically he is afraid. And I find it so nice how much of a sophist he is being, coating his argument with fake libertarian bullshit. "Freedom of assoaciation, shutting the metaphorical front door", you fucking kike, you have it, people will be able to see you, that is all. You are disingenuous. Fucking nigger.
Before I was banned on Twitter, I never used the block function. I liked and reposted whatever the fuck I wanted and if people weren't happy I just posted slurs until they blocked me
 
Before I was banned on Twitter, I never used the block function. I liked and reposted whatever the fuck I wanted and if people weren't happy I just posted slurs until they blocked me
On the farms I've blocked exactly one person for being spam. That person then got banned lol. Other than that I basically treat that button as if it doesn't exist. Because if you can't face what you've said and answer for it, get off the internet.
 
On the farms I've blocked exactly one person for being spam. That person then got banned lol. Other than that I basically treat that button as if it doesn't exist. Because if you can't face what you've said and answer for it, get off the internet.
I simply block all open fags and dykes on here. I don't need to know the opinions of someone who willingly takes it up the ass
 
In other news Rev is panicking about the block button getting neutered
Screenshot_20241018_075017_X.jpg
Your posts are public. smug_anime_girl.bmp
As a nitter user, I don't get that argument. Posts are still available as long as you're not signed in, block or no block. Association in that manner is akin to the right to be forgotten and the Streisand effect, which I wouldn't exactly consider important. Right to privacy (distinct from association because your front door is private property) makes less sense because you can literally set yourself to private. If you want a proper angle on it, you can try:
a) i block so people can't report me
b) i want the gratification of triggering the snowflakes and the You are Blocked screen encapsulates that
c) bots would be able to scrape more, unfettered

a is fair enough I guess, but it's pending clarification on what "not be able to engage" entails.
b always results in "it's OK when I do it" and it's kind of tedious.
c is more of a concern for Elon. Scripts that do this would generally stay quiet so you're not blocking them anyway.
it's meaning change, at least in western anime circles
My definition is draw an X say it's a Y. Draw a girl, say it's a boy. Draw a child say it's a prehistoric entity of the void. If you get bogged down with in-universe banter it's easy to go off track.
I'm not inherently against lolis in anime, but the pedo-jacking of Illya annoys me.
illya.png
 
Your posts are public. smug_anime_girl.bmp
As a nitter user, I don't get that argument. Posts are still available as long as you're not signed in, block or no block. Association in that manner is akin to the right to be forgotten and the Streisand effect, which I wouldn't exactly consider important. Right to privacy (distinct from association because your front door is private property) makes less sense because you can literally set yourself to private. If you want a proper angle on it, you can try:
a) i block so people can't report me
b) i want the gratification of triggering the snowflakes and the You are Blocked screen encapsulates that
c) bots would be able to scrape more, unfettered

a is fair enough I guess, but it's pending clarification on what "not be able to engage" entails.
b always results in "it's OK when I do it" and it's kind of tedious.
c is more of a concern for Elon. Scripts that do this would generally stay quiet so you're not blocking them anyway.
That's a big point. If he cares so much, set his account to private. No one can see it then. He won't though because he's addicted and craves interaction.
 
My definition is draw an X say it's a Y. Draw a girl, say it's a boy. Draw a child say it's a prehistoric entity of the void. If you get bogged down with in-universe banter it's easy to go off track.
I'm not inherently against lolis in anime, but the pedo-jacking of Illya annoys me.
I would broadly agree I think, and it's why I used instances of actual adults being called "loli", those being characters that act reasonably within the expectations of adults, don't look like children, but are still called "loli" in universe and out. Though I do like seeing pushback against "loli is a body type" talk again and would certainly like loli to be child again. I just find the absolute refusal around here to even admit that a lot of people do use loli to mean a body type retardedly pathetic, seriously it hinders any sort of talk about the topic if you can't even admit that people do infact use it that way. That's why I chose the Rebecca post, it fits perfectly, all the talk about her is about how she's a "loli", and weather that fits the Cyberpunk setting, yet nobody thinks she's a child, and refusing to admit that people use the term like this is stupid. Even if using loli as a body type is also stupid.

Rev, and many others, seem to use this change in meaning as a shield, because he's clearly a lolicon that gets off to drawings of children and would probably fuck a child if given the chance or at least sit in the corner and watch someone else do it. But hey what do you expect, we've seen the same thing with the slow erosion of "pedophile". It's not rare to see people saying some crazy shit about adults liking other adults being pedophiles because there's an age gap or the woman is too short/flat. Or even the more controversial idea that late teenagers can be physically attractive to adults.

Is Illya a popular character for lewd/porn shit or something? I googled the name and got both ages 8 and 18, but only pictures of a child is she one of those ageless children tropes? I don't like the Fate series so rarely interact with its fans or discussion, and avoid the porn side of anime because it's so horridly degenerate.
 
Is Illya a popular character for lewd/porn shit or something? I googled the name and got both ages 8 and 18, but only pictures of a child is she one of those ageless children tropes? I don't like the Fate series so rarely interact with its fans or discussion, and avoid the porn side of anime because it's so horridly degenerate.
The fact that almost all depictions of Illya (the Prisma Illya version, to be fair) are banned from the FGO subreddit should give you an idea
 
The fact that almost all depictions of Illya (the Prisma Illya version, to be fair) are banned from the FGO subreddit should give you an idea
Technically 18. Depends on the version if we're being real. Fate/ stay night, yeah, it actually makes sense when you get deep enough into it, especially the VN. Prisma illia: fuuuuccck no. Lore wise she should be the same, parallel world bullshit and all... but she's not. It's very clear she isn't.
 
Is Illya a popular character for lewd/porn shit or something?
So it's basically something that Nasu specifically avoided and gave her something akin to Yotsuba status. It was a joke in itself that it would never happen.
Then the Prisma doujin (officially licensed, mind) came along with some sketch parts, but overall was fine. Off the top of my head, Shirou's nine lives bladeworks was phenomenal.
And then its anime with decent quality but naked onsen wrestling. It still leaves a bad taste. It was like Komodo no Jikan tier.
 
This is a situation where I kinda hate everyone involved. Still it is Rev being smug.
rev tourist 1.png
pics in tweet
GaNZns8WgAABl9I.jpg
GaNZns8XQAA1C91.jpg
and this is where fat wife opines
Rev tourist 2.png

Rev calls the guy a tourist because he likes Gawr Gura. Which is the loli shark. Unfortunate that the guy defended said loli shark. That said I agree with his original statement. Thoughts anyone?
 
Maybe that's why he's a lolifag, because deep down he wants a partner that he can be the one bullying?
I've been wondering about something lately: that bisexuality, beastiality, pedophilia as well as a myriad of other things arise from pornography consumption. I do believe there is a scientific paper somewhere. Anyway - I believe if that "Lowie Testie Junior"'s case where his wife is the one that wears pants in the relationship, where he subcontiously wants to be in control - I could easily see himself wanting to "dominate" the weaker ones, and thus that is manifest in children - even if they are only """virtual""".

Two great videos by PaxTube:
 
There is too much goat fucking in the middle east in order for this theory to stand.
 
Back