US Trump’s Bro-Whispering Could Cost Democrats Too Many Young Men - Struggling in the polls? Call for a draft!


Generation Z is poised to flex its growing political muscle in the 2024 presidential election, and in my surveys and focus groups with these voters, I’m seeing the strong potential for a turning point in American political alignment. Unlike other recent Republican presidential nominees, Donald Trump is making young men a central focus of his campaign. If effective, his effort could peel enough away from the Democratic Party to transform the country’s electoral math for years to come.

Recent data from the Harvard Youth Poll, a national survey I oversee for the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics, reveals an increasing political rift between young men and women under 30, two groups critical to Democrats’ success in recent elections. Almost exactly equal shares of young men and young women say they will definitely vote in this election or have already done so. But since the spring of 2020, the share of young men identifying as registered Democrats has dropped by seven percentage points, while those identifying as Republicans have increased by seven points — a net shift of 14 points in just four years. Young women, during the same period, shifted two points away from the Republicans.

Take one young Pittsburgh man I met in a recent focus group. A college graduate working part-time as a bartender, he felt weighed down by hopelessness, adrift in a country where rising costs, stagnant wages and lack of affordable housing have made even the modest ambitions of other generations feel out of reach for him. “Hope is great,” he told me, “but I see nothing for the future.”

The young man’s experience reflects a broader crisis of confidence and purpose, rooted in economic insecurity and social disconnection. The Covid pandemic exacerbated the alienation, with many first-time voters spending thousands of hours isolated and online in their formative years.

While these struggles affect the whole country, they weigh especially on young men of all educational, racial and ethnic backgrounds. Nearly three-quarters of Gen Z men report feeling regularly stressed by an uncertain future, stirring painful memories of the Great Recession they witnessed as children. These feelings erode self-esteem and diminish their interest in personal relationships and long-term planning, leading many to describe their future as “bleak,” “unclear” and “scary.”

Today’s young men are lonelier than ever and have inherited a world rife with skepticism toward the institutions designed to promote and defend American ideals. Men under 30 are nearly twice as likely to be single as women their same age; Gen Z men are less likely to enroll in college or the work force than previous generations. They have higher rates of suicide and are less likely than their female peers to receive treatment for mental health maladies. Most young men in my polling say they fear for our country’s future, and nearly half doubt their cohort’s ability to meet our nation’s coming challenges.

Mr. Trump has tapped these anxieties by weaving a hypermasculine message of strength and defiance into his broader narrative that undermines confidence in democratic institutions. And it’s working. Aware that boasting about “killing” Roe v. Wade drove away young women, Mr. Trump zeroed in on capturing a larger share of the young male vote. In four years, he cut what was once a 19-percentage point Democratic margin among registered young male voters (50 percent Mr. Biden, 31 percent Mr. Trump) roughly in half (48 percent Ms. Harris, 38 percent Mr. Trump) in our poll.

His playbook? A master class in bro-whispering: championing crypto, securing the endorsement of Dave Portnoy — the unapologetically offensive founder of Barstool Sports — and giving U.F.C. President Dana White, who embodies the alpha-male archetype that appeals to many young men, a prime spot at the Republican National Convention. Mr. Trump has also cultivated relationships with simpatico comedians, pranksters, influencers and Silicon Valley billionaires like Elon Musk — all while his team bombards podcasts and social media with misinformation and memes to rally his troops.

This shift in support for Mr. Trump among men is neither organic nor unexpected. It’s what happens when a well-coordinated political operation invests tens of millions of dollars to amplify Mr. Trump’s narrative and weaken confidence in the party in power. Compared with when Mr. Trump ran in 2020, young male voters are now less likely to support government-backed climate change solutions (down 15 points, according to our poll) and affirmative action for qualified candidates (down eight points). They are more likely to question immigration policy (up 12 points), free trade (up 10 points) and whether government stimulus leads to economic growth (up seven points). They are also more likely to believe that religious values should play a more important role in government (up six points).

Is this rightward drift among young men simply a short-lived, Trump-inspired episode or a more permanent transformation? The answer lies partly in Ms. Harris’s ability to connect with and motivate young voters as the campaign nears its end.

To be sure, she is doing better than Mr. Biden. Among men 18 to 29, her favorable rating is 44 percent, seven percentage points higher than Mr. Biden’s and thirteen points higher than Mr. Trump’s. While Mr. Biden’s age and traditional political approach often created distance with younger voters, Ms. Harris’s ability to engage across digital platforms and tap into youth culture sets her apart. Our polling also shows that while Mr. Trump has made significant inroads with young men, more still find Ms. Harris more relatable and competent. Mr. Trump still holds a narrow advantage on the economy, patriotism and strength, but Ms. Harris’s connection with young men continues to grow, suggesting she has yet to reach her ceiling with this demographic.

But to win more votes from young men, Ms. Harris must address their fears head-on and present a bold vision that speaks to their desire for purpose and strength. Of course, a clear economic vision that charts a pathway to financial independence is paramount, but it may not be enough to counter Mr. Trump’s appeal on this issue in the closing days. Ms. Harris needs to go big.

Here’s one way. To reignite the hope of the emerging generation, Ms. Harris should make a sweeping national call to both military and civilian service — name it the Generation Z Compact to Rebuild and Renew America. Such a plan would offer a sense of identity, community and patriotism, while providing economic stability and skill-building — things many young men feel they are missing.

Young Americans have consistently voiced support for national service programs, yet political action has yet to catch up. A 2021 survey revealed that 71 percent of adults under 25 were open to participating in a service program. Even more striking, a poll conducted last year found that about 75 percent of young people backed mandatory national service. These numbers tell a clear story: Our youth’s appetite for civic engagement is strong and growing.

From President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal Civilian Conservation Corps in 1933 to President John F. Kennedy’s Peace Corps in 1961 to President Bill Clinton’s AmeriCorps in 1993, national service has been a cornerstone of American resilience, transformation and progress. More than three decades after the last significant civic engagement initiative, Kamala Harris can frame national service as a pathway to rebuilding America’s strength from within, addressing growing concerns about military recruitment and bridging political divides with a renewed sense of shared responsibility.

Donald Trump has gained ground with Gen Z by systematically exploiting the fears and insecurities of young men, making them feel that their masculinity and future are under siege. Kamala Harris can counter that narrative by listening and recognizing their fears but also by offering something more profound: a vision of hope, strength and shared purpose.

John Della Volpe is the director of polling at the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics. He is the author of “Fight: How Gen Z Is Channeling Their Fear and Passion to Save America.” He was a pollster for Joe Biden’s presidential campaign in 2020 and runs a research firm that conducted polls for a PAC supporting the Joe Biden and Kamala Harris campaigns.
 
To reignite the hope of the emerging generation, Ms. Harris should make a sweeping national call to both military and civilian service — name it the Generation Z Compact to Rebuild and Renew America.
Grooming kids in school wasn't enough they're recommending Kamala's admin to groom young men in mandatory service.
rotc-heels1-600.jpg

I agree with the premise of forcing young men to become tougher but who the fuck would trust Kambla and whatever faggot managerial type they hire.
 
A college graduate working part-time as a bartender, he felt weighed down by hopelessness, adrift in a country where rising costs, stagnant wages and lack of affordable housing have made even the modest ambitions of other generations feel out of reach for him
What a racist. He should feel nothing but joy and optimism as sheboons and illegals get to climb ahead.

This shift in support for Mr. Trump among men is neither organic
Experts™ have no fucking shame...
 
Trump's path to victory has always been to mobilise (young) men because that's the voting block Democrats shit on. The fact that they are worried about that but do nothing to fix their rhetoric is hilarious and will be even more hilarious if that's what cost them their first female president again

It's also a needless self inflicted wound pushed be the cat lady tribe of the political left. Far left political movements did not have the problem of alienating men in the past. The slant to the right is a new phenomenon.
 
They can only come up with concepts and terms like 'bro-whispering' because they can't bring themselves to admit white men have political self interests and voting for your self interest is legitimate. This fag writes that Trump "tapped these anxieties" by "securing the endorsement of Dave Portnoy" because he can't or won't understand that it's Trump's policies not his podcast appearances that make people want to vote for him, and suggests outflanking the right on masculinity by sending young men to die for gay buttsex overseas, something the state planned on doing anyway, at a time when confidence in the US military is at an all time low. So many dem strategists are straight up retards, and the NY Times published this? This is why I get my opinion pieces and news sources from the youtube comment section.
 
The democrats are losing men, and young men especially, because they can't offer men anything without pissing off some other key demographic of voters. The single greatest "get the male vote" move the democrats could do is offer men financial abortion. The problem with this is of course that pro-abortion women and the older generations of democrats would scream bloody murder and threaten to abandon the party. There is no way the democrats can gain young men. They've played favorites for too long.

Men under 30 are nearly twice as likely to be single as women their same age;
The numbers of men and women under thirty is roughly equal. If a significant chunk of men aren't in relationships, it means the women aren't as well, but are instead in harems or "situation-ships" to put it nicely.

Here’s one way. To reignite the hope of the emerging generation, Ms. Harris should make a sweeping national call to both military and civilian service — name it the Generation Z Compact to Rebuild and Renew America. Such a plan would offer a sense of identity, community and patriotism, while providing economic stability and skill-building — things many young men feel they are missing.
Literally nothing but "suck it up and pull yourself up by your bootstraps." These people will never course correct until they ram headlong into the wall of unelectability.
 
Trump's path to victory has always been to mobilise (young) men because that's the voting block Democrats shit on. The fact that they are worried about that but do nothing to fix their rhetoric is hilarious and will be even more hilarious if that's what cost them their first female president again

It's also a needless self inflicted wound pushed be the cat lady tribe of the political left. Far left political movements did not have the problem of alienating men in the past. The slant to the right is a new phenomenon.
Democrats never actually sit and do any kind of self reflection on why large swathes of the country hate them and why younger voters specifically hate them.
 
For much of my adult life, the Dems have had two voter-outreach platforms battling for dominance: Gay race communism vs anti-war class communism.
One of these platforms won so decisively that downstream leftist groups explicitly founded to be anti-war or socialist don’t even touch their charter topics unless couched in the gay race equity rhetoric. This only appeals to women, gays, and client minorities.
I don’t think they can course correct anytime soon and it’s going to be interesting (in the Chinese sense) to witness the future political dynamics of a “whites, men, married women” coalition becoming explicit and focused. Good job making identity politics and in-group preference a matter of fucking survival, you idiots.
 
The Democrats are so utterly controlled by resentful cat ladies that they cannot find a way to sway young men because they institutionally hate masculinity.
Their plan to deal with young men is to send them to die in a war
To reignite the hope of the emerging generation, Ms. Harris should make a sweeping national call to both military and civilian service
 
Today’s young men are lonelier than ever and have inherited a world rife with skepticism toward the institutions designed to promote and defend American ideals. Men under 30 are nearly twice as likely to be single as women their same age; Gen Z men are less likely to enroll in college or the work force than previous generations. They have higher rates of suicide and are less likely than their female peers to receive treatment for mental health maladies. Most young men in my polling say they fear for our country’s future, and nearly half doubt their cohort’s ability to meet our nation’s coming challenges.
The establishment's response to this seems to be to keep doing the same shit that caused these problems. Self reflection is not their strong suit. Why would zoomers spend a fortune on a degree so they can interview with HR departments staffed with people trained to hate them and hire foreigners who attend third world diploma mills for pennies?
 
Grooming kids in school wasn't enough they're recommending Kamala's admin to groom young men in mandatory service.
View attachment 6549358

I agree with the premise of forcing young men to become tougher but who the fuck would trust Kambla and whatever faggot managerial type they hire.

Biden delegated to his oldest confidant aides who have been with him the past 27 years, who then delegated (because lbh, this work sucks), and re-delegated (to people way too enthusiastic to take this work), who then turned to "experts" who offered themselves up with the key selling point that Democrat players like to hear, which follows this pattern: "Anita Buttmuch is a key voice in the PissGoreABDL Community".

I used to be an active Democrat back in the day. This has NOT changed. The only thing that changed is that nobody vets any of these claims of these phony shamans who the Democrats turn to. Why the fuck do you think they had [RACIAL DEMOGRAPHIC GROUP] For Harris teams set up. It's this very same posture but now fully revealed. They have been doing this since Bill Clinton in 1992.

The Democrats are so utterly controlled by resentful cat ladies that they cannot find a way to sway young men because they institutionally hate masculinity.

There's not a single overarching "control group" demo with the Democrats as much as pissant rightwing radio/streamer grifters like to sell this point. It's not cat ladies who run the party. It's a bag of cats—and they're all fighting each other, ALL THE TIME.

Inside the party they use appeals to authority, credential dropping, I-know-this-celebrity, "she has this big network" between all the internal factions that are at war with each other. They clean this up and present "unity" to you that you see in their messaging, but behind these scenes these people are constantly on conference calls trying to build a consensus nugget. Actively political Democrats care very much about their "in-groups", an the elected ones their caucus groups.

It's only in these conference call meetings where they ever get to make a decision about anything. Republicans don't typically work in this type of chaos; they float political ideas mainly on the outside where it's far more visible to you, behind the lobby groups that individual Republicans listen to all the time.

Democrats never actually sit and do any kind of self reflection on why large swathes of the country hate them and why younger voters specifically hate them.

They actually do self-reflection after horrific losses but they never arrive at the obvious answers when they do a retrospective. It takes a growing pattern of losses for them to finally see it.

For instance: DEFUND THE POLICE. And again with the Soros DAs being evicted out of office.

> "Oh, people do care about having police in their community?"
>>"Yeah dipshit, the original issue was about reject retards in the police force who shouldn't have a badge. That was the whole issue all along.

> What can we do to fix that?
>> You have to get the Democrat mayors to fight their local police unions to open up their discipline clauses in their labor contracts.
> Oh.
>> Exactly. Let's go find some other issue to work on and sell, this one's dead.

Trust me, a LOT of Democrats were aware of where DEFUND THE POLICE was headed, but the thing they desperately did not want to do was launch a campaign to actively fight police unions nationwide, all in Democrat-controlled areas because that's who runs all the cities. Did any of them want to talk about that? Fuck no. They don't want to debate that where you can see it, since it reveals their real position: this is work we don't want to do.

"But make sure you support Black Businesses! We are doing the work!" <-- real goal is to avoid work at all costs.

That's how Democrats actually operate.
 
Last edited:
Here’s one way. To reignite the hope of the emerging generation, Ms. Harris should make a sweeping national call to both military and civilian service
‘Young men are worried and despairing about the future. They want to see a future where they can have meaningful jobs, homes, family and community, how can we do this? Should we build a hopeful economy?’
Hhmmmm…. Nah, draft them and send them to die somewhere?
 
Back