Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:

GaeDLLkWcAAEX3u.png
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive

Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though. And it seems no one had time to properly archive the original nuked tweet.

EDIT:
Another user ("sneeddaywilliam") showing the tweet with his phone UI | Archive
 
Last edited:
I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:

View attachment 6549372
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive

Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though. And it seems no one had time to properly archive the original nuked tweet.
What the fuck?

Is he regretting being in Aaron's chat today, and is now trying to claim Sean was impersonating him?

Then thought better of making that false claim?

Oh, Nick’s scared. Lol.
He's fucking retarded is what he is.
 
I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:

View attachment 6549372
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive

Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though. And it seems no one had time to properly archive the original nuked tweet.
Was he really gonna try and pass off his sperging in Aarons chat as Sean pretending to be him?
Sean doesn't need to pull any gay ops for quick cash Nick. He has a real job you fucking mongoloid. :story:

EDIT:
This was Sean in his own stream chat 2 days ago. He doesn't have the verification checkmark thing. How would he even impersonate Nick?
1729579547121.png
 
Last edited:
Was he really gonna try and pass off his sperging in Aarons chat as Sean pretending to be him?
It sure as fuck looks like it.

Just FYI, his chats had the verification checkmark. So that's not gonna work. Maybe he had a "moment of clarity" and realized that.

rl1 (1).png

Sean doesn't need to pull any gay ops for quick cash Nick. He has a real job you fucking mongoloid. :story:
I wasn't kidding when I said earlier he doesn't really talk about Nick that much on his streams. He's not milking it like some others I can name.

Rekieta's not pissed at Sean because he talks about him the most. He doesn't. He's pissed at Sean because Sean has been talking the most truth. Sean is an actual practicing criminal defense attorney who knows what he's talking about. Nick has nothing legitimate to counter that.

Be careful my rotund Kiwi, there are apparently ops afoot. Ops of a homosexuality most foul.
 
Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though.

I think the tweet was real. If I were to fake something, I'd at least make it some embarrassing thing that makes sense. That tweet sounded like some paranoid, drug-fueled line of thought that escaped, and he then deleted.

Edit: I’m phone fagging. Initially quoted the wrong thing. And I’m just going to throw this unrelated information here too:
IMG_1008.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Larry is also a recovering addict and has posted about his sobriety journey and milestones on Twitter. He probably did not want to invite that kind of addict mentality closer into this life--especially when he has a new relationship with a woman after a long search.
Imagine. Former addict, trying to do a good thing for a former associate and all you see is total denial and lies on stream. Pretty much everything that happened after showed he was right, as Balldo was obviously calling the shots re his case
Nick came to Larry's defense I believe after he was ousted by the "lawtube community." Larry I'm sure had good faith to return the favour, but after seeing not just a smoking gun, but a still loaded gun, Larry knew there was no helping/winning the case.

As @Himedall All-seeing Waifu noted, Larry seems is open about his sobriety on X, something Nick has yet to accomplish or admit to in real life. Lying would definitely be a trigger for a former "user" of any kind.

So, criminally, there was only one real victim in Nick's crimes. A little girl. (The hunger, etc is a CPS issue.)
One victim, only on paper. Not on paper? Possibly an entire Minnesota county.

As for proving it, we may never know the real story but this thread did a pretty bang-up job proving that the testing lab is state-of-the-art, that multiple hair follicles are tested, that a false positive is almost impossible, and that she could have died. Meanwhile, Nick kept doing booze (and probably coke) for a week after being released from jail - by his own admission.
Your local doctors/pharmacists tell you even with a pregnancy test, 'false negatives' are common, false positives are beyond rare. I assume the same could be said for drug/hair tests.

When Nick tried to pivot to "the black defense" and how cocaine shows up more for blacks when his daughter his white, quite the chuckle.

I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:

GaeDLLkWcAAEX3u.png
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive
So I understand correctly, Nick accuses @Potentially Criminal of perjury and falsifying his identity as Nick in the STMS chat? I think the simple way to debunk is review the show chat times, then review Sean's practicing courtroom schedule.

Why did Bob & Celeste turn the internet back on?
 
Just FYI, his chats had the verification checkmark.
All an elaborate ruse by SEAN you really think he wouldn't know how to temporarily change his verified ✓ channel's name and profile photo? 🥃:really:
This was Sean in his own stream chat 2 days ago. He doesn't have the verification checkmark thing. How would he even impersonate Nick?
View attachment 6549441
Never said what channel he used. nickchip.png
 
Last edited:
I received a notification of a new Rekieta tweet, but by the time I clicked, it had already been deleted.
According to the account "ScareBruh", this was the deleted tweet:

View attachment 6549372
Link to @ScareBruh Tweet | Archive

Since I haven't seen the tweet, I can't confirm this, though. And it seems no one had time to properly archive the original nuked tweet.

EDIT:
Another user ("sneeddaywilliam") showing the tweet with his phone UI | Archive
I saw it too but when I clicked on the tweet he had deleted it and my chance to grab a shot was gone. Glad somebody got a screenshot
 
Let me make sure I understand correctly. Nick accuses @Potentially Criminal of perjury and falsifying his identity as Nick in the STMS chat? I think the simple way to debunk is review the show chat times, then review Sean's practicing courtroom schedule.
You don't even need to do that. It's got the verified checkmark. It's Nick.

Like I say, It's possible that he realized that being in Aaron's chat was a dumb move and is trying to do something about it.

Or maybe he's just trying to hurt Sean. He really wants to push this narrative that Sean is only critical of Nick for money.

Whatever it is, it's dumb though. And amazingly, even he seemed to think so enough to delete the accusation.

Why did Bob & Celeste turn the internet back on?
It's always been on. He's been tweeting and pay-pigging Melton. The theory some (including myself) have advanced is they don't want him streaming.
 
Just FYI, his chats had the verification checkmark. So that's not gonna work. Maybe he had a "moment of clarity" and realized that.

rl1 (1).png
Oh, I'm retarded and didn't even think of that when I made my edit.
The whole point of the verification is so people can't just pretend to be you. Even if Sean was verified he wouldn't be able to change his username and keep his verification. So Nick's master plan would never have worked.
 
Rekieta's not pissed at Sean because he talks about him the most. He doesn't. He's pissed at Sean because Sean has been talking the most truth. Sean is an actual practicing criminal defense attorney who knows what he's talking about. Nick has nothing legitimate to counter that.
Sean is just a nice person and acts like a well maintained man. The Balldo screeches at his very presence because hes very self aware of the contrast and it hurts him so he has to deflect instead of facing it.
 
Sean is just a nice person and acts like a well maintained man. The Balldo screeches at his very presence because hes very self aware of the contrast and it hurts him so he has to deflect instead of facing it.
Balldo is very upset that even normies know that everything he says is a lie.
 
Balldo is very upset that even normies know that everything he says is a lie.
Ive never been in the situation but I never understand why people like this can never come clean and just say a big sorry to everybody or at least acknowledge that they fucked up. Im not asking for a struggle session where he is publicly humiliated but its a lot better to apologize publicly than build a tower of lies. Same thing happened to Jack Murphy, Sargon and many others who had the exact same response as Balldo.
 
I never understand why people like this can never come clean and just say a big sorry to everybody or at least acknowledge that they fucked up.
The fact that you can never understand it doesn’t mean it can’t be understood. Stick around and take notes.
 
Ive never been in the situation but I never understand why people like this can never come clean and just say a big sorry to everybody or at least acknowledge that they fucked up. Im not asking for a struggle session where he is publicly humiliated but its a lot better to apologize publicly than build a tower of lies. Same thing happened to Jack Murphy, Sargon and many others who had the exact same response as Balldo.
Have you ever known a junkie in your life? They're all the fucking same.

Nick really isn't special in this way - everything he says, does, or lies about, is so typical.
 
struggle session
A struggle session is literally when an insane asshole is demanding people agree to lies.

That's what he did to SEAN SEAN SEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAN! in that insane video.

Nick is incapable of truth. He is a faggot. He is a joke. He lies as often as he breathes.

There is no possible struggle session for him. There is just the wall.
 
Back