What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

FASD is underdiagnosed, not because of a lack of awareness, but because of assumptions of who is more likely to have it. It’s easy to believe that a Russian adoptee has it, but a person born to a wealthy family raised by their birth parents is harder to believe.

Also, only 10% of FASD cases have the facial features associated with the disorder. And the behaviors of FASD overlap with ADHD and ASD. So FASD is underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed to a large extent.
 
Going full retard isn't always their fault. Tight production schedules and deadlines is often an issue. Another issue is that they get too comfortable and relaxed writing a show. The writers don't question themselves and their instincts as much.

Look at It's Always Sunny. That used to be a full-time job for those guys. Now every couple of years they slap together a writer's room. Even including non-screen writers. Just crank out 8 scripts in a month or two. A couple of good episodes, the rest feel under baked, like first drafts. It's not so much they are lazy, they just think they know how to do it, that they don't question themselves or put the effort in.

Not to derail this into Screamer's screen writing rant. One of the big reasons most things suck these days is that back in the past there were lots of shows cranking out 20+ episodes a year. In the 60s it wasn't uncommon for over 30 episodes a year. The entire run of the old Adam West Batman show was 104 weeks from the first episode airing to the last. There were 120 episodes.

Back when they cranked out episodes they needed to be skilled writers. You got into the industry on these shows. Learnt and got mentored in story telling and character. It was a trade, it was a craft. That's not how it happens these days. You just need to have been on a writing staff for a show doing a small run season for a couple of seasons and get hired on your social justice pitch. Then write an 8 episode season with less story ideas than what would have been a single episode of Stargate Atlantis.
Also on this note: often a first season is fantastic, because the creator starved while he honed his idea for years, distilling it into a fantastic story (looking at you, True Detective S1) executed brilliantly… at which point the suits say “that was awesome, we start shooting season two in twelve weeks. Enjoy the suitcases of cash!” And they have to start over but they really only had genius strike for the first season.
 
You're right, but in the UN document they use more flowery terms like "replacement migration"

The Spanish PM recently gave a speech on this (worth noting that Spain has one of the lowest birth rates in the world) so they're not exactly trying to hide it:

View attachment 6551858

It’s crazy to me how bringing in hundreds of thousands of immigrants to a nation with a stagnant birth rate isn’t considered replacement. Literally what else would you call that?
 
Literally what else would you call that?
Short sighted economics?

This one isn't really a conspiracy theory to anyone with an IQ higher then 90 but "replacement theory" or the planned demographic replacement of Europeans and European Americans is pretty clearly not a conspiracy theory. There are multiple documents from the United Nations talking about low birth rates and bringing in people from the third world to compensate for it.
The conspiracy theory here I believe is less that it is happening - that's already as obvious as sunshine - but more so that it is a deliberate grand strategy of "the powers that be" (the Western banking cartel, the Zionist occupied government - depending on who you ask) to wipe out Europeans and mutate them into a bastardly, rootless race easily corralled by the regime.

Personally I believe in this conspiracy theory to an extent. The entire affair certainly rings of a capitalist orthodoxy that put short term growth over long term stability, and is now desperately trying to avoid the necessary contractions induced by technological advancement.

A given population over any period tends to an equilibrium, contracting or expanding given its needs and ability. Due to rapid advancement in technology and quality of life - I would say that going into the 2000s Europe's population was above its equilibrium. Hence its tending downwards. However, this contraction reciprocated into the market. The line went down instead of up, a bone chilling horror to modern finance. The answer to this should have been automation. Europeans have the wits and the tech to compensate the contraction with machines so that the equilibrium can be reached and dignified society maintained. However, such a move is costly and not immediate, so naturally the next best course is to import the third world to be the local untouchables. Nevermind that this sort of thinking resulted in Haiti and sabotaged the foundation of America. Remember, line must go up!

Another element I personally believe is the racial motivation. I find that the driving force behind much of the West's machinations is the Western banking cartel - a cabal of financial power whose central imperative is to make a world where only it can exist. A large element of that is manipulating its subjects. The banking cartel has no real power over those people who root their values in land, tribe, nation - tangibles written in blood and history. It can only ever rule over bastards, who have none of these things and thus submit by default to the godlessness of consumerism and money. The banking cartel knows this, and seeks to make all of its subjects bastards - in blood and in being - so that the only collective they know is the banking cartel's regime, to which resistance is impossible as any alternative is unthinkable.

I disagree with the Jewish attribution in things like ZOG however. While it is true that the relationship between America and Israel resembles more a hostage situation than a friendship, I find that Jewish authority largely only cares about two things: (1) protecting Israel at all costs and (2) keeping the goyim down and the Jewry up. They are like any other foreign tribe in this sense - like Indians (akin to Jews but retarded) and the Chinese (akin to Jews but can't turn white). One finds Jews in finance like one finds sex pests in Hollywood, so it is natural that many would think that there is a Zionist conspiracy afoot, but this is inaccurate. The real issue is the cancerous power and institutional rot that the West has induced within itself by blind faith in capital and progress. It is less so a cold as one might expect if it truly only were Zionists and more so a pestulence upon the very foundations of the body.

Oh no it's the Isreali jew here to tell us "um actually jews have never done anything wrong" yet again. You can tell it's the truth because the results never benefit jews nor Isreal over anyone else.
Here's a word of advice: Never argue with a Jew. Arguing is their religion. They debate with their God about the fineprint of divine contract like a lawyer.

House of Cards: We know what happened, it wasn't the intentional killing of the show. Spacey was accused, they ditched him and went full retard.
The death of House of Cards was worth it if only for those Christmas videos we got from Kevin Spacey as well as him larping the role in interviews with people like Tucker Carlson lol. I think it's also one of those shows that died just about when it needed to. Shame we won't get more Kevin Spacey kino.
 
Last edited:
It’s crazy to me how bringing in hundreds of thousands of immigrants to a nation with a stagnant birth rate isn’t considered replacement. Literally what else would you call that?
The idea is to make it more about replacing lacking birth rates, and not replacing the actual people(s). Since all people are basically interchangeable, just bringing in more people from all over the world will simply fix the stagnant birth rates, and any deviation from the previously established homogenous culture is good because it's diversity. But most immigrants will be indistinguishable from the "native" population, as the notion of peoples being somehow distinct from each other aside from language is racism.
That is the official line, at least.
The conspiracy theory would be that there's a deliberate avoidance of fixing the demographic crisis in favour of replacement migration and thus introducing more diversity. Diversity, well, divides population, makes it harder for them to unify when they barely speak the same language, and brings in more people who are content with a lower standard of living.
 
The conspiracy theory would be that there's a deliberate avoidance of fixing the demographic crisis in favour of replacement migration and thus introducing more diversity. Diversity, well, divides population, makes it harder for them to unify when they barely speak the same language, and brings in more people who are content with a lower standard of living.
I'd go further and say that the idea that there is a "demographic crisis" is itself the conspiracy. The general outcome afterwards is the same, so it might feel like a semantic quibble, but it fundamentally alters your view of the whole situation. If you accept a priori their premise that population shrinkage is a "crisis" in and of itself, your only arguments against their fixes for the crisis will necessarily be in terms of alternative ways to maintain or grow the population. This is why automation was never seriously considered as a solution for population contraction in the west; the entire debate is deliberately premised on the false belief that population size must maintain or increase for society to be healthy.

Every institution accepts this belief for its own selfish reasons. Unions accept it because more workers means more power for the union leaders even if the power wielded by individual workers is reduced. Bankers accept it because an increasing population stabilises inflationary pressures by spreading the money supply across a larger population base. Business owners accept it because more people means more buyers, and also accept it because more workers means wages are suppressed. Politicians accept it because larger populations, even without the divisions caused by immigration, are more easily divided into factions and turned against one another. And of course, they all accept immigration as a solution because it's fast and simple, and the down-stream effects only happen after they're all dead, or retired to barbados.

Except some of the younger ones are starting to see those downstream effects happening while they're still in a position to be affected by them, which is why I think we're starting to see these fumbling moves to stem the tide; they are facing the serious prospect of spending their twilight years in the loving hands of Mbeatu Tode'tho and Ali Yustufsmin, with no recourse to the escape plans of their superiors. The only problem is, they're still trapped in the "population must grow" mindset, so they can't tackle the issue without stumbling at the first hurdle and revert to "what if we just import the right immigrants?"
 
Here's a word of advice: Never argue with a Jew. Arguing is their religion. They debate with their God about the fineprint of divine contract like a lawyer.
I've never lost a debate with a jew because they employ the exact same lame linguistic tricks and lies every time because they are autistic schizo retards who hate the truth. It's the easiest thing in the world, all you have to do is hold themselves to their own words and standards and watch them fall apart.
 
I'd go further and say that the idea that there is a "demographic crisis" is itself the conspiracy.
Yeah, that's kinda what I wanted to say. Demographics are a problem when it comes to certain economical models and particularly pensions, and the dependency factor is growing due to that. But instead of accepting declining birth rates and thusly shifting demographics and trying to find ways to deal with that, the only allowed solution is changing the demographics, and basically only through increased immigration instead of incentivising starting families among the native population.
 
Personally I believe in this conspiracy theory to an extent. The entire affair certainly rings of a capitalist orthodoxy that put short term growth over long term stability, and is now desperately trying to avoid the necessary contractions induced by technological advancement.
I can give you an even simpler one.

Infinite Immigration is just another way to set up NGO Slush funds to launder Government money into people's pockets.
 
FASD is underdiagnosed, not because of a lack of awareness, but because of assumptions of who is more likely to have it. It’s easy to believe that a Russian adoptee has it, but a person born to a wealthy family raised by their birth parents is harder to believe.

Also, only 10% of FASD cases have the facial features associated with the disorder. And the behaviors of FASD overlap with ADHD and ASD. So FASD is underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed to a large extent.
I also think this is true. FASD is a wide spectrum and mainly only the actual full on FAS cases have the typical facies. I was pretty shocked by the number of women I knew who drank quite a lot during pregnancy. There was a real sense that you could and should drink up to the government limit (used to be higher than it is now) and they also underestimated units. Or they’d ’save up their drinks’ and have them all at once. It was quite an eye opener. Also ‘it doesn’t count until x number of weeks’ I heard a lot. These were all ‘nice middle class’ mummies. I do wonder about some of their kids.
The problem with alcohol is that it seems to be quite variable in its effects and I suspect it’s worse during specific time windows as well. So you do get women who drink quite a bit and have kids who are fine and that combined with British booze culture gives everyone a false sense of security.

An odd but related one is that the number of families I know with kids with serious birth defects varies massively by where they live. The most are in London the middle are city based and the least are out in the countryside - the difference is stark. That’s also made me wonder why. I know more country kids than city, it’s not that they were aborted because the country lot are catholics and the city lot are dangerhaired libs. Cities are toxic.
 
One thing I have come to learn is that many people have very different ideas of what a conspiracy theory actually is. Which I am sure is on purpose. I once got into a real world conversation with someone about replacement theory where they thought it was some invasion of the body snatchers type thing. Leftist, unhinged, unthought-out but passionate about things they barely know about.

They had some strange idea it was about replacing existing people. As in, they'll just take an adult and replace them with a brown person. What I think happened is they just uncritically believed something retarded. Had no critical thought. The second I pushed back and started explaining what it was. They realised what they thought made no sense and so ended talking about it.

On immigration, if it was about low birth rates, why do we need an influx of adults right now? Dropping birth rates is still a two decade lag before it starts to hurts the working age population.
 
On immigration, if it was about low birth rates, why do we need an influx of adults right now? Dropping birth rates is still a two decade lag before it starts to hurts the working age population.
Because between 2025-2036 the space aliens/underwater aliens/interdimensional travelers will come and cause a human extinction event and somewhere along the line someone said, "Aight, you can take everyone below the 30th parallel" and now they're trying to get as many humans north as possible to promote genetic diversity after the great collection.
 
One thing I have come to learn is that many people have very different ideas of what a conspiracy theory actually is. Which I am sure is on purpose. I once got into a real world conversation with someone about replacement theory where they thought it was some invasion of the body snatchers type thing. Leftist, unhinged, unthought-out but passionate about things they barely know about.

They had some strange idea it was about replacing existing people. As in, they'll just take an adult and replace them with a brown person. What I think happened is they just uncritically believed something retarded. Had no critical thought. The second I pushed back and started explaining what it was. They realised what they thought made no sense and so ended talking about it.

On immigration, if it was about low birth rates, why do we need an influx of adults right now? Dropping birth rates is still a two decade lag before it starts to hurts the working age population.
I don't think it's 100% about birth rates. We have a bunch of globalists that have been thirsting for a 1 world government for a long time. We've got third world countries that would be down with that just for the plentiful food, electricity, and clean running water, so they're easy. But then, we've got a bunch of uppity, 1st world white folks who think they've got rights and everything, and they've already got food, water, and electricity. They're not down with the 1-world idea, and they're hard to deal with.

The first rule of a 1-world government is, you have to treat everybody the same. You can't have one rule for this country and another rule for that country or the rules will get too unwieldy and people will start complaining about unfairness and preferential treatment.

Somehow, you've got to bring the standard of living up in those third world countries, educate them a little, make it so they can be players on a level playing field. But building things is hard and expensive. Plus, even if 3rd world countries were brought up to 1st world economic levels, the original 1st worlders would still believe in freedom and shit, and wouldn't consider the former 3rd worlders as equals just because someone gave them some money. What to do?

It comes back around to levelling the playing field. if you tear the 1st world down, inflict a bunch of poors on them to commit crimes and generally terrorize them, constantly harp on how privileged and -ist they are until they feel guilty to be alive, and wreck their economies, well, you've brought them down quite a bit. You won't need to bring those 3rd worlders up that far, if you bring the 1st worlders down to their level. And if you deal enough chaos, 1st worlders will stop worrying about rights and shit and beg daddy government to stabilize things so they can eat every day and not have to be worried about being raped by niggers, no matter the cost.

THEN the 1-world government will have a level playing field, everyone depending on them for survival, and nobody crying about their rights and shit. They can roll out one set of laws for the whole globe, no special treatment for anybody, and everybody is not only on the same economic level, but the same social and cultural level. Can't have the ethnics complaining about grandpappy's religion and traditions either, so importing 3rd worlders into foreign 1st world countries fucks all that up too. After a few generations, you've only got 1 race-beige-and only 1 god-the government.
 
A good 35% of jobs are just people pushing paper around absolutely doing nothing
I have a bong friend in England that was telling me a game him and his dad play when he goes to the hospital for a check up. They count how many "Paper Zombies" you can spot. What's a paper zombie you ask? A member of staff walking around with a single piece of paper in their had.
 
The conspiracy theory would be that there's a deliberate avoidance of fixing the demographic crisis in favour of replacement migration
T1OI5dSfylu5ir1hvBQMQEcQYK9euhj-zwER61Ny6lU.png
 
Back