US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Please explain why certain accounts are allowed to shit up this thread with obvious baitposting for literal months without any repercussions.
It's a combination of trying to give a benefit of a doubt and also, frankly, the threadshitters want to be banned from threads/the Thunderdome to fuel their attention-whoring crusade. Kind of puts one in a box.

I'm happy that most people have gotten to talking around the obvious bait instead of trying to engage or getting into a slapfight (which they also want). Makes it easier for cleanup and for providing an inarguable reason to boot them when there's no attempt at engaging in a conversation.
 
She has about 300k in Houston, pretty wild scene right now tbqh.
View attachment 6562447


Agreed, but I’m not the one wearing Depends to own the liberals.
View attachment 6562452
I'm going to be honest that's about 20k and realistically more like 14k in attendance people which is weak sauce considering she's pulling out all the stops and celebrity endorsements.
There’s always overflow at rallies, they just party outside the venue.
Ohh wait you're retarded, Bless your sweet little heart. Guys this man is slow can we get him some cookies.
Yes. I try to report every obvious stickerbait post I see.
I just stop giving them all the attention in the world to be honest.
You said some wild shit, well maybe. Jesus Trump is one funny mother fucker.
Yep, he's got a normal natural charisma.
 
Yeah, and much like with the Peterson lecture I posted last night, Rogan is much more positive than I thought. Even if he doesn't agree with Trump, he's pointing out why Trump's view is reasonable
Rogan just seems to be having a good time and is asking about stuff he's curious about. Note he repeatedly re-asked about what Trump's first day in the white house was like because he seemed genuinely curious and wanted to know.
He's talking to Trump like he's a person who might know something interesting. The window has shifted to where big names can talk to Trump without being fucking faggots about it.
We're more back than we've ever been before.
 
Yah this podcast is rather plain, no fireworks or anything so far but both Trump and Rogan seems to be having a good time.

In fact Rogan seems to be to be a little intimidated compared to his usual self. He's not interrupting or interjecting anything when Trump speaks. He waits for Trump to finish and then adds his 2 cents. Which for Rogan is really out of character, normally he won't shut the fuck up.
It is what you want. Trump comes across as quite human after over 8 years of them trying to dehumanise him. He is talking like a bro would, cracking jokes telling story's. I would rather not listen to him have a whine over how unfair it all is.
 
It is what you want. Trump comes across as quite human after over 8 years of them trying to dehumanise him. He is talking like a bro would, cracking jokes telling story's. I would rather not listen to him have a whine over how unfair it all is.
On the other side Kamala is like the kind of HR manager that would make you quit your job
 
You don't know history, his son dropped out of society long before his father's death. 3 of Lincoln's sons died aswell so could be simply getting a name mix up but even then he's still right depending on the context.
it feels like one reason it’s impossible to have a regular conversation with people these days is everyone’s glued to their phones and there’s always some faggot ready to go to wikipedia or snopes or imdb to live fact check everything everyone is saying instead of just going with the flow and double checking later
 
Matt Taibbi on the Washington Post non-editorial.

Sounds like there’s a major shakeup in the establishment.



Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Note On The Washington Post’s Non-Endorsement

The media ship be sinking.​

OCT 25
Around this time last night I read the Levitsky/Ziblatt New York Times editorial about the “Fifth Choice” for stopping Trump, which read like a clarion call to ignore coming bad election news. On the heels of weeks of other catastrophizing editorials, it came as a shock.
Now word comes about stunning industry news of another sort. The Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post have declined to endorse either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump, which in the case of the Bezos Post especially reads like a decision to surrender to coming bad election news. The Post has been the tip of the anti-Trump spear for years, and with the Times led the movement to openly politicize journalism via its insufferably self-congratulating “Democracy Dies in Darkness” campaign, so bowing out of the open advocacy game with publisher William Lewis promising a return to the paper’s “roots” is beyond surprising. Editor-at-large Robert Kagan, who penned last year’s million-word “Calling All Hinckleys” editorial comparing Trump to Julius Caesar, resigned in protest, presumably to spend more time snuggling with spouse Victoria Nuland.
The 16,000 or so comments under the Lewis editorial so far reveal two things. Post readers prefer the more traditionally British double-L spelling of “cancelled.” Also, many readers noticed with chagrin the contrast with the Times piece:
I’ve heard so many crazy things in the last weeks about behind-the-scenes maneuvering in Washington that it’s been tough to know what to believe, but it’s clear we’re headed for some kind of historic confrontation. I have trouble believing institutional America will really reverse course after eight years of dystopian lunacy, but Bezos and the Post just changed something, probably over the passionate objections of 98% of staff. Whatever’s going on, it sure isn’t boring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back