US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
He literally did say exactly what I said he did. Stop lying or trying to be disingenuous.
1:12:08

He's not big on it, it's not a big deal, move on. You don't have to suck every last drop of his cum.
Here's the thing you retarded faggot.
Rogan said, "Would your plan be to replace [windmills] with nuclear? What would you do?"

Trump replies, "Well, nuclear is better. I think there's a little danger to nuclear" and lists two examples in the US about ones that were done wrong. He even says, "They do them wrong" and goes on about how they build these huge plants and there's something slightly off and they get dinged and can't easily tear them down due to the concrete. Exactly as I said. He even gives an example of a place that does them right, France.

I'm not lying or being disingenuous.
I just decided not to be an autistic retard like you, who took one sentence out of a much larger statement, threw up your hands and said "Trump isn't big on nuclear!"

Taking everything he said into context (clearly talking about nuclear being better, but there being some cons too in terms of safety if built incorrectly, potentially being incredibly expensive) and interpreted it as he's not against nuclear, but he doesn't see it as a 1:1 replacement for windmills (the original context of the statement you based your entire opinion on) because he's also pro-gas, and clearly is indicating nuclear plants have to be done right if done at all.

I've seen him talk about nuclear multiple times and his biggest concerns appear to be the cost if not built correctly but is still obviously thinking about how it can be used.

Whenever he's not big into something or doesn't know much about it he just avoids the question entirely (he has done with the specifics of reducing government spending as an example).

This is something he has obviously thought about (likely because he thinks it's worth thinking about) and has a nuanced opinion on as a result.
 
I would like to friendly remind everyone that this is far from over and to be vigilant.

We are still 11 days away from election day, which is a lifetime in politics ( Trump's fist assassination attempt, the RNC, and Swapping out Biden for Harris was all within 8 days).
They absolutely will extend the counting pass election night, they will stuff the ballot box for weeks if we let them.
Even if Trump is announced the winner, they will try faithless electors and a contingent electoral college.
Hell the DEMs will even try their own J6 decertify the election.

Even if Trump honorable becomes President on Jan 20th. Expect impeachments, lawsuits, shenanigans, and backstabbing.
I voted early 2 days ago. I have my fingers crossed.
 
I know this is bait but

There is a pretty damn big difference between someone collapsing and being dragged off bodily and shoved into a van and when someone looks tired and worn down after 6 months of near constant campaigning.

Come on you aged meat fetishist you can do better then that.
I personally didn't care that she dropped like a Benghazi sniper was on the roof. She's an old woman and being a presidential candidate is extremely taxing. What fucked with me is that her campaign denied it and the media refused to acknowledge it when the video had been seen by tens of millions of people already. I've been iffy about the media for a while, but it was stuff like this that made normies start noticing.
 
I think there's a little danger to nuclear
Anyone who says that, with the tone he said it, about modern nuclear energy is "not big into nuclear" in my book.
To repeat myself: Modern nuclear energy tech is ridiculously safe. So to feel the need to say that, in response to Joe's question, the person must be ignorant and/or biased on the topic.
It's lunacy to listen to his response and to think he's enthusiastic about it.
 
Whatever’s going on, it sure isn’t boring.
its a semi-coup. look at Elon and a fuck load of the rest of silicon valley, Elon, as a sperg reveals a hilarious amount in his speeches. Near-Chris chan level accidental reveals behind the curtain. Enough people are standing up behind the scenes which is why we're seeing it so much more on the surface. Like i said when Hamas attacked on Oct 7th, its Crown Heights Riots 2.0 and a fuck load of rich and powerful people are sick of democrats forcing shit down the bad path.

Even the "proper" explanation of it just being Bezos putting his foot down is a bit odd, don't cha think? the fact that one of the richest men is finally telling the dems to fuck off, along with Zuckerberg and so many other rich people should tell you the purse strings have been cut, the donors are telling Dems to piss off, the taste makers are abandoning the party and only the most desperate are backing Kamala this time around.

And it feels like everyone is ready to lock up the thieves and the soros prosecutors and walk back the last dozen years of policy that got us here. As someone said the regulators are fucking bastards making investing in america more trouble than its worth compared to china and now enough people are standing up to the left and trying to get shit back on track. Honestly Elon deserves his old reputation, he's stupid enough to believe the bullshit he was told about America and its values and through a sheer ability to get people to believe in a better future became rich enough to fucking do something about it. there are plenty of billionaires out there, and many of them would rather sit on their ass than try to do something about the situations in this country.

from what it looks like, especially after the failed assassination people are sick of the left and they're going to be pulled kicking and screaming back towards the right just like in the 90s after Crown Heights, for better or for worse. We're going to get another internet boom style economic surge for about a decade before the left has someone that can win the nomination while also being right leaning enough for it to work. Newsome is just Gen X Moonbeam now, he won't be able to win the domination with his baggage because in 2028 they'll try another kamala-type and after trump's successor's 2 terms then things will finally be smooth enough for them to win.
 
Is there a single state trying to ban video games? These people can't even come up with plausible fantasy gotcha scenarios.
Orange Hitler Satan™️ Blumpf said video games cause school shootings like 15 years ago and hasn't said anything of the sort since, so that means he wants to ban all video games and publicly flog and execute all gamers!!!
Or something.
Just make sure to ignore his handful of remarks over the years about his grandson liking video games (and not saying anything negative about it).
 
WWE probably played a huge inspiration on how he ran his campaign from the bombastic walk outs, to how he works a crowd. Not to mention playing the heel perfectly with MSM.

Absolutely, Trump has the showmanship down perfectly

Trump is on Rogan speaking respectfully of Robert E. Lee, it makes my heart soar.

This will cause them to screech and scream like nothing else.

Lee is a man often misunderstood, when Lincoln was assassinated, he condemned it and was very much on board with the idea of reconciliation to heal America. He loved America, but he loved being Virginian too. I would envy neither him nor Lincoln when the Confederates fired on Sumter, war is a terrible thing, brother wars even more so.

I didn't even think about it like this, but he's right. I don't know if it was even intentional, but it was a great stroke of luck if it wasn't.

View attachment 6563032

The McDonalds visit happened on Kamala's birthday, totally eclipsing it, if Trump doesn't plan these sorts of things in advance, then he really is the main character and reality morphs at his whim.
 
If Trump actually replaces income tax with tariffs, I am going to lose my shit. I'll pay off my house in no time.
This alone should get someone elected no contest. For once in my life I want to know the feeling of taking home the whole check. Think it happened once during Covid, really should've been a huge wake up call to everyone about how much we're getting robbed every paycheck.
 
Yet when Hillary Clinton nearly collapsed in a limo, everybody railed on her. All I ask is SOME consistency.
Nigga, they chucked her in a van like a duffle bag! Luckily, some dude happened to be recording it because that event would have never seen the light of day otherwise. IIRC, that recording forced her to respond by claiming it was due to the oppressive heat. Then she was FACT CHECKED and it was only 78 degrees that day.
 
Here's the thing you retarded faggot.
Rogan said, "Would your plan be to replace [windmills] with nuclear? What would you do?"

Trump replies, "Well, nuclear is better. I think there's a little danger to nuclear" and lists two examples in the US about ones that were done wrong. He even says, "They do them wrong" and goes on about how they build these huge plants and there's something slightly off and they get dinged and can't easily tear them down due to the concrete. Exactly as I said. He even gives an example of a place that does them right, France.

I'm not lying or being disingenuous.
I just decided not to be an autistic retard like you, who took one sentence out of a much larger statement, threw up your hands and said "Trump isn't big on nuclear!"

Taking everything he said into context (clearly talking about nuclear being better, but there being some cons too in terms of safety if built incorrectly, potentially being incredibly expensive) and interpreted it as he's not against nuclear, but he doesn't see it as a 1:1 replacement for windmills (the original context of the statement you based your entire opinion on) because he's also pro-gas, and clearly is indicating nuclear plants have to be done right if done at all.

I've seen him talk about nuclear multiple times and his biggest concerns appear to be the cost if not built correctly but is still obviously thinking about how it can be used.

Whenever he's not big into something or doesn't know much about it he just avoids the question entirely (he has done with the specifics of reducing government spending as an example).

This is something he has obviously thought about (likely because he thinks it's worth thinking about) and has a nuanced opinion on as a result.
Anyone who says that, with the tone he said it, about modern nuclear energy is "not big into nuclear" in my book.
To repeat myself: Modern nuclear energy tech is ridiculously safe. So to feel the need to say that, in response to Joe's question, the person must be ignorant and/or biased on the topic.
It's lunacy to listen to his response and to think he's enthusiastic about it.
C'mon, sexy mamacita and... pink thing. We're all friends here! Mostly. Except that sock. He's a little weird.
 
The McDonalds visit happened on Kamala's birthday, totally eclipsing it, if Trump doesn't plan these sorts of things in advance, then he really is the main character and reality morphs at his whim.
He seemed genuinely surprised when someone said it was Kamala's birthday. He even confirmed twice or so.

Podcast talk: Him saying he wants to keep RFK Jr away from environmental because he's in disagreement is smart. That would be my concern as well. But is full on with having him part of the cabinet, specifically on relation to health concerns.

@Hey Johnny Bravo just because I call someone a retard and a faggot doesn't mean I dislike them. I could be wrong and Trump hates nuclear. That's just not my interpretation. Pink thing's view is anyone who mentions dangers isn't big on it. We'll see what Trump does if/when he gets into office.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back