TheMeanOne
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2024
I really, REALLY want him to try and crowdfund this because it would be comedy gold.He's gonna need a loooooooooot of money if he plans to take it to trial
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I really, REALLY want him to try and crowdfund this because it would be comedy gold.He's gonna need a loooooooooot of money if he plans to take it to trial
That's a good point. Imagine threatening to kill your own kid. What a piece of shitNo unlike metokur, Patrick has a sordid history of threatening to kill his ex wife and newborn baby so they can’t take chances
I still think it might be premature. A denial of a qualified immunity motion is immediately appealable, as it's the definitive example of a collateral order under the doctrine outlined in Mitchell v. Forsyth. The grant of a stay on further trial proceedings pending the appellate decision is almost guaranteed, so we might not see any actual action in the trial court for a while.@AnOminous would you say that a legal thread would be now necessary given that motion to dismiss has failed?
Hey he's a class act. He said he'd wait for her to be born before murdering her along with her mother. What a major dude!She wasn't even born yet. Classy guy.
This is pretty de rigeur as an immunity argument can be raised any time it rears its ugly head. For instance, it could be raised again at the summary judgment stage or even conceivably during trial or after trial in the form of renewing it in a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict even if a jury finds against the defendant.Interestingly, the court mentioned that it will allow the defense to argue qualified immunity at a latter juncture.
Since most courts seem to apply qualified immunity unless there is another case with the exact same facts showing that the police's actions were clearly unreasonable, I get the feeling the case will end once it reaches that point. I'm not sure that Richardson is the kind of case that clearly establishes a right so as to overcome qualified immunity.Interestingly, the court mentioned that it will allow the defense to argue qualified immunity at a latter juncture
Dear God, please let him go pro se, it would be so, so funny.He's gonna need a loooooooooot of money if he plans to take it to trial
He talks super proabortion but he acts so prolife! That’s our Ricky.Hey he's a class act. He said he'd wait for her to be born before murdering her along with her mother. What a major dude!
Considering the track record of litigation being tracked by this very website, I can only conclude that such decisions are in fact par for the course, and examples to the contrary are simply exceptional.Personally, I think the decision is in error and on top of that it looks like a pile of dog shit and I'm wondering what went through the head of the judge who signed off on it, but whatever.
Whatever way the wind blows to get more Twitter likes. That's our Ricky.He talks super proabortion but he acts so prolife! That’s our Ricky.
He didn't anticipate an idiot like Patrick "Fatso" Tomlinson.as a much more intelligent and much less fat man once stated: if you repeat a lie often enough, it will eventually become the truth
It's less funny if we won't be allowed to see the filings going forward. Considering that the motion to seal got granted. Or is that not as bad as it sounds?And also, that if this goes forward, this is the funniest possible option.