Are you lost needing femoid advice post here - For the poor bastard's who dare or are just curious

[pork and beans]

This isn't really advice but I'm curious: I've been reading the "What are some of your "warning sign" bands" thread and started wondering if femoids use music taste to filter moids and if so, what are your filters?

Latefagging but USUALLY it's more about the attitude one has towards music than the music itself. I mean, I guess if you only listen to burzum or Christian Latin chanting or something you'll raise some eyebrows LOL but the music that generally gets deemed as "male manipulator music" is honestly really popular music a lot of women also like.

what it's definitely a turn off is guys who never stop talking about how they just got into music and have such deep tastes (unlike other guys, or you, is implied) and then they show you, like, the most widely known Aphex twin song. Which is great and all, but acting like liking music is this such deep thing when you're just listening to it, not even making it, is painful. Almost everybody likes music, it's not a defining character trait.

this might be personal but I find it a turn off people that say that they "just got into music" and are trying to speedrun it LOL. Reeks of consoomerism. Not all, but most people who say that always guide their tastes by the numbers instead of what they actually like. Ironically these people end up being way less open minded to music discussion or recommendation than you would think.

I also think it depends on the woman's own taste. If music isn't something she feels strongly about, she might be weirded out by anything out of mainstream or not care at all. If she does feel very strongly about music, she might be either really open minded and lax or might easily feel disappointed if you don't match that level of passion.

 

[NoReturn]

Everything your girlfriend did was a positive for her health, and there are a number of reasons why all of them together would have made her periods easier.

no processed foods,

• Decreased seed oil consumption
• Fewer simple carbs
• Decrease intake of food fillers

high amount of veg

• Increased fiber
• Increased vitamin and mineral intake if the veggies are replacing simple carbs like bread

and daily deficit of at least 200kcal

• Decreased liver workload

and started to supplement with fish oil

• Increased omega-3 intake

iron

• Supplemental iron helps anemia

and magnesium

• Supplemental magnesium helps with cramps

She also stopped smoking tobacco and switched to vaping for a couple of months now, maybe that also plays a role. The difference is really night and day.

One wonders what smoking straight-tobacco from a pipe (or stopping entirely) would do. If she's not smoking charrettes, she's also not breathing in the fillers and additives. If she's vaping, though, she has more control over how much nicotine she's taking in. More nicotine has been tied to more menstrual pain and worse PMS symptoms. Metabolism of nicotine in the body is also influenced by estrogen and progesterone, so that's a factor, too.

 

[ElHijodeDeficienciaCogni]

Do girls get the ick if you like space stuff?

 

[Susanna]

Do girls get the ick if you like space stuff?
View attachment 6595653

Depends on the girl I guess. I love astronomy and astrophysics, a guy who can talk about space as enthusiastically as I can would be off to a great start, but I guess I’m nerdier than most.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I had an ex girlfriend who was on something like that and i always wondered if it really can be healthy to radically alter the process of the female cycle like that.

No impact to most women, except the minor potential for breakthrough bleeding (a convenience issue that, if it ever occurs, tends to evaporate after a year). And you can also take bc continuously just fine.

https://www.news-medical.net/health/The-Effects-of-Continuous-Contraceptive-Pill-Taking.aspx

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2621397/

https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/birth-control/in-depth/womens-health/art-20044044

 

[The Feline Solution]

for breakthrough bleeding

Ex girlfriend had that, very mildly. I just found it quite baffling back then, "Wait, you don't get your period every month?". Put it down to male ignorance.

 

[Big Miss Steak]

Do girls get the ick if you like space stuff?
View attachment 6595653

No

 

[Meursault's gun]

No impact to most women, except the minor potential for breakthrough bleeding (a convenience issue that, if it ever occurs, tends to evaporate after a year). And you can also take bc continuously just fine.

No impact that they can notice. There are so many things that happen in the body that we have no way of noting without extremely invasive and/or rigorous testing - the kinds of testing that most women will never have access to. Those same things can have vague impacts way down the line that women may misinterpret in a million different ways. This type of reasoning is just

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

No impact that they can notice. There are so many things that happen in the body that we have no way of noting without extremely invasive and/or rigorous testing - the kinds of testing that most women will never have access to. Those same things can have vague impacts way down the line that women may misinterpret in a million different ways. This type of reasoning is just

Sorry you hate science.

No one has criticized not doing x or y, and it is a valid option that includes many benefits, especially for those with severe menses-related symptoms. None of this is new; it's been commercially available for 30 years. Feel free to find studies that prove there are high-likelihood impacts to women with problems outside the ones noted in what I cited.

Lol @ "but maybe everyone is wrong and something vague is ackshually caused by eating bananas." Solid "reasoning."

 

[Hubelublub]

No impact that they can notice. There are so many things that happen in the body that we have no way of noting without extremely invasive and/or rigorous testing - the kinds of testing that most women will never have access to. Those same things can have vague impacts way down the line that women may misinterpret in a million different ways. This type of reasoning is just

And too, bodies are complex systems. Absolute height of arrogance to believe we can fully understand and predict the impacts on a complex system.

 

[Meursault's gun]

Sorry you hate science.

No one has criticized not doing x or y, and it is a valid option that includes many benefits, especially for those with severe menses-related symptoms. None of this is new; it's been commercially available for 30 years. Feel free to find studies that prove there are high-likelihood impacts to women with problems outside the ones noted in what I cited.

Lol @ "but maybe everyone is wrong and something vague is ackshually caused by eating bananas." Solid "reasoning."

Nigger, you posted a study that is almost 20 years old - one that is inherently not going to be taking into account the knowledge that we have acquired since then OR the knowledge that we still desperately need. You also posted two random articles that are incredibly generalized. Both of these, I wager, you found on the second or first page of Google. And you are not even correct about how long birth control has been available. Quality work there.

I will not do grunt work for you. I'm not interested in retarded article-throwing slap-fights. My point is that if you are too lazy or willfully ignorant to look into things that are this complex and interdisciplinary, then you should not be trying to inform people on decisions that are this huge. Have you considered the effects birth control has on our microbiomes? Our hormonal axes? Our immune systems? Our choice of mate? What about the society-wide impacts it has? The ecological impacts? Can you even begin to grasp how much time goes into studying things like this?

We don't even have the exact mechanism for how our sense of smell works, you ignorant nigger. The ego you must own to try and inform people on shit like this, fail, and then give such an ape-headed response. I suggest walking away from your keyboard the next time your fingies start tingling with excitement at the sight of someone asking for knowledge that is entirely out of your depth.

 

[Thé au lait]

Why is @Lidl Drip so desperate for moid attention that she couldn't last two days before coming into genchat and talking to the moids?

Why are you so desperate for sexual attention you facedoxed to another man?

Sorry you hate science.

No one has criticized not doing x or y, and it is a valid option that includes many benefits, especially for those with severe menses-related symptoms. None of this is new; it's been commercially available for 30 years. Feel free to find studies that prove there are high-likelihood impacts to women with problems outside the ones noted in what I cited.

Lol @ "but maybe everyone is wrong and something vague is ackshually caused by eating bananas." Solid "reasoning."

We also know research on women's health is garbage, though. I don't trust much of it, especially if the conclusions are "nah don't worry the principles of reality don't apply in this case, just keep trusting the doctors!"

Perfect example, the current "research" says not to do self-exams for breast cancer. Gee, I wonder who would profit from that awful advice?

 

[Hubelublub]

the current "research" says not to do self-exams for breast cancer

"Please come to us for yearly exams instead. Our expensive machines and fancy techniques have not shown to successfully reduce mortality from breast cancer, but boy do we sure need those insurance dollars."

 

[Thé au lait]

"Please come to us for yearly exams instead. Our expensive machines and fancy techniques have not shown to successfully reduce mortality from breast cancer, but boy do we sure need those insurance dollars."

"Don't worry goyim ladies, just let it develop and then we can take care of it once we finally catch it and stop blaming it on your period or a pregnancy you don't have! Be sure to take your hormonal birth control!"

 

[The Feline Solution]

Perfect example, the current "research" says not to do self-exams for breast cancer. Gee, I wonder who would profit from that awful advice?

I read that article in A&N and immediately thought "That sounds fucking retarded", the article even listed the percentages of women who found malignant growths in their breasts via self-examination, why the fuck would anyone tell women to stop doing that? Makes zero sense, i remember learning about it in high school sex ed (both moids and foids share that class here, no gender segregation like in other countries) a million years ago. Really makes you think .

 

[Hubelublub]

"Don't worry goyim ladies, just let it develop and then we can take care of it once we finally catch it and stop blaming it on your period or a pregnancy you don't have! Be sure to take your hormonal birth control!"

Technically, later stage breast cancers earn a lot more money if you're a pharmaceutical or health care company, than those easily curable early stage tumours, so they're doing their bit to keep your 401k productive.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

you posted a study that is almost 20 years old

That was the point.

You also posted two random articles that are incredibly generalized.

That was the point.

Both of these, I wager, you found on the second or first page of Google.

Yes, that was the point.

And you are not even correct about how long birth control has been available. Quality work there.

You misunderstand. I was referring to commercially available extended birth control (which I said), which has been around 30 years.

I will not do grunt work for you.

Lol, as if.

I'm not interested in retarded article-throwing slap-fights. My point is that if you are too lazy or willfully ignorant to look into things that are this complex and interdisciplinary, then you should not be trying to inform people on decisions that are this huge.

I know wtf I am talking about, thanks.

Have you considered the effects birth control has on our microbiomes? Our hormonal axes? Our immune systems? Our choice of mate? What about the society-wide impacts it has? The ecological impacts? Can you even begin to grasp how much time goes into studying things like this?

We don't even have the exact mechanism for how our sense of smell works, you ignorant nigger. The ego you must own to try and inform people on shit like this, fail, and then give such an ape-headed response. I suggest walking away from your keyboard the next time your fingies start tingling with excitement at the sight of someone asking for knowledge that is entirely out of your depth.

Displace your shit elsewhere. You've done nothing but say "I disagree," with nothing behind it.

Here's a concept: offering up something to consider does not equal saying "this is what you must do."

Perfect example, the current "research" says not to do self-exams for breast cancer.

I've not been given that advice from any practitioner, ever (nor would I ever accept it, having absolutely seen women who did feel something dismissed by doctors...leading to the diagnosis being too late to avoid metastasis), so I'd be interested in seeing that "research." I'll go find that article.

 

[Mandy Stroyer]

No impact that they can notice. There are so many things that happen in the body that we have no way of noting without extremely invasive and/or rigorous testing - the kinds of testing that most women will never have access to. Those same things can have vague impacts way down the line that women may misinterpret in a million different ways. This type of reasoning is just

The horrors my body went through on risperdal and still suffers from have nearly zero answers except "yeah it fucks up your hormones maybe probably" but the men who grew boobs while on it get studies and lawsuit payouts. I go to the gyno and get birth control thrown at me as though fucking up the same hormones isn't what made this 10x worse. It must be poor diet and exercise that converted 10hr overnight pads to 4hr on-a-good-day pads. At least I'll never get my hopes up that they'll look into it because who cares what women on psychiatric medication say about how it fucked them up, they're clearly hysterical.

 

[Perun]

i think it doesn't make much sense to just trust any research, considering every year we have drug recalls and evidence of pharmaceutical companies knowing something they were selling was harmful but still going ahead with pushing it to market, how many stories are there of them paying researchers off, twisting the data etc. Hormonal birth control is very profitable, sure it gave women more options but everything has a cost. Just because there aren't studies that show something has x effect yet doesn't mean we should disregard all the women that report said effects, they have a vested interest in hiding that, and this shouldn't be even controversial given how often we see just that. It's a weird attitude in our culture to treat science as infallible and honest, rather than recognizing more and more it has become a business, as have academic institutions. It's also really hard to get anything published when it goes against the status quo, if a study shows something different it might never see the light of day, and it will be picked apart much harder than one that already confirms the current consensus. There's also been several scandals when it turned out some studies were complete nonsense, poorly done, etc etc and those go unquestioned and cited for years by others.

 

[Meursault's gun]

Displace your shit elsewhere. You've done nothing but say "I disagree," with nothing behind it.

Here's a concept: offering up something to consider does not equal saying "this is what you must do."

I am not a gynecologist. I do not pretend to know the definitive truth when even they do not have access to it yet, which is why I don't shove my nose into topics that I am not well-versed in. And I won't pretend to be just for e-points. I offered plenty areas for you to research for yourself and see just how much shit you are ignoring in order to push your outdated ideas. I am not interested in engaging in Reddit-level "d'you got an article for that, mate?" arguments when you have displayed that all you do is Google shit that is favorable to you. It is embarrassing and careless of you to make generalized statements like you have when the subject takes years of studying to be even near-proficient in.

I didn't reply to you to change your mind because only you can do that for yourself, especially considering how egotistical your posts have been, I replied so that it'd be apparent to anyone who reads them that what you said is disingenuous and/or just plain stupid. You are trying to fuck around with people's entire reproductive systems AND their entire bodies. Simmer the fuck down with what you should be giving Googled opinions on.