Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 30 2.6%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 307 26.3%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 829 71.1%

  • Total voters
    1,166
5.png
link
 
the guy who keeps blowing up rockets
Falcon Heavy: 100% Success Rate
Falcon 9: 98.97% Success Rate

If you're referring to Starship/Superheavy, you forget that these are test articles that are meant to fail. That's the whole design ethos: "Push it until it breaks, find out why it broke, and change it for the next test." And even at that they've gone from blowing up before staging to a successful catch and successful splashdown in 6 launches. All broadcast to the public.


and has never launched anything out of LEO
Oh yes, never. Nothing launched by SpaceX has ever gone beyond LEO.

Except for, you know:
  1. SES-8
  2. Thaicom 6
  3. AsiaSat 6
  4. DSCOVR
  5. ABS-3A / Eutelsat 115 West B
  6. TurkmenAlem / MonacoSAT
  7. SES-9
  8. JCSAT-14
  9. Thaicom 8
  10. ABS-2A / Eutelsat 117 West B
  11. JCSAT-16
  12. EchoStar 23
  13. SES-10
  14. Inmarsat-5
  15. BulgariaSat-1
  16. Intelsat 35e
  17. SES-11 / EchoStar 105
  18. Koreasat 5A
  19. GovSat-1
  20. Elon's Roadster
  21. Hispasat 30W-6 / PODSat
  22. TESS
  23. Bangabandhu-1
  24. SES-12
  25. Telstar 19V
  26. Mera Putih (Telkom-4)
  27. Telstar 18V / Apstar-5C
  28. Es'hail 2
  29. GPS III-01
  30. Nusantara Satu (PSN-6) / Beresheet S5
  31. Arabsat-6A
  32. STP-2
  33. AMOS-17
  34. JCSat-18 / Kacific 1
  35. GPS III-03
  36. ANASIS-II
  37. GPS III-04
  38. SXM-7
  39. Turksat 5A
  40. SXM-8
  41. USA-319 / GPS III-05
  42. Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART)
  43. Turksat 5B
  44. Nilesat-301
  45. SES-22
  46. Danuri (Korea Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter)
  47. Galaxy 33 & 34
  48. Hotbird 13F
  49. USSF-44
  50. Hotbird 13G
  51. Galaxy 31 & 32
  52. Eutelsat 10B
  53. Hakuto-R / Emirates Lunar Mission / Lunar Flashlight
  54. O3b mPOWER 1 & 2
  55. USSF-67
  56. USA-343
  57. Amazonas Nexus
  58. Inmarsat-6 F2
  59. SES-18 & 19
  60. Intelsat 40e
  61. O3b mPOWER 3 & 4
  62. ViaSat 3 Americas / Aurora 4A / GS-1
  63. ArabSat 7B
  64. SATRIA
  65. Euclid
  66. Jupiter 3 (EchoStar-24)
  67. Galaxy 37
  68. Psyche
  69. O3b mPOWER 5 & 6
  70. USSF-52
  71. Ovzon-3
  72. IM-1 Nova-C Odysseus Lunar Lander
  73. Telkomsat HTS 113BT
  74. Eutelsat 36D
  75. Galileo-L12
  76. Astra 1P
  77. GOES-19
  78. Turksat 6A
  79. ASBM 1 & 2
  80. Galileo-L13
  81. Hera
  82. Europa Clipper
Are you sure your name isn't Phil Mason, by any chance?


And in the end, there were like what, six or seven shuttles, one a non operable demonstrator, and three of them broke up in reentry? Broke up in reentry from low earth orbit, even.
Two were lost. Challenger when the SRB had a gas leak and burned through a strut, causing it to swerve into the tank, and Columbia on re-entry after damage to the leading edge of the wing during launch.
 
Last edited:
No, Musk won a contract he didn't deserve. He's far from the only game in town. Truly the guy who keeps blowing up rockets and has never launched anything out of LEO is the only hope for space!
Absolute reddit post, don't know what the fuck you're talking about when it comes to rocketry or probably anything.

You probably think people float around when they're in LEO.
 
They still have mass, but they do float, unless their vehicle is under acceleration or they have an "artificial gravity" (not really) wheel or tether. Comes with the whole "falling in a circle" thing.

No they don't float they fall. It's not microgravity.
 
No they don't float they fall. It's not microgravity.
That's almost exactly the same thing. Yeah, the solution in General Relativity (GR) enforces "spaghettification" (and a lot of uglier things if you want something closer to a real-world solution), but it's unnoticeable to a human in LEO. Simplifying to Special Relativity (SR), there's no difference in your frame.
 
That's almost exactly the same thing. Yeah, the solution in General Relativity (GR) enforces "spaghettification" (and a lot of uglier things if you want something closer to a real-world solution), but it's unnoticeable to a human in LEO. Simplifying to Special Relativity (SR), there's no difference in your frame.

No don't try and use your Jew science on me.
 
I genuinely think elon musk is too autistic for politics and his involvement is a net detriment to the campaign

Regardless of which candidate you support; I think I Elon Musk has done more to objectively hurt Trump's odds than help.
Elon Musk has the same god ordained plot armor that Donald Trump has. Born winning, and will die winning, it’s not for us mortals to question, only witness.
 
Oh yes, never. Nothing launched by SpaceX has ever gone beyond LEO.
Even if it were true it's not a meaningful criticism anyways. Getting into LEO (and reentry) is the most expensive, difficult and dangerous part of the mission and SpaceX's advances there are transforming commercial space flight.

These were the two stages where the Challenger and Columbia were destroyed and most if not all failures of rockets/craft in history have occurred.
 
No, he was cringe.
Awww, Josh there’s room for both of you on the internet and you’ll always be our favorite autistic weirdo that provides a platform for other autistic weirdos.

Now go play outside but be back before dark.

Edit: I’m not even on Twitter and haven’t seen any of this so I agree it wasn’t Musk that won him the election. Anyone who believes that is clueless about the real world and needs to log off.
 
Last edited:
Back