Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
Watching April sperg about how she’s TOTALLY her own woman, and super empowered, WHILE superchatting some pedo streamer who has her ex-boyfriend talking about her pussy, is so cute and clueless I’m almost getting a little hard.

(Don’t worry @Captain Manning , my heart is still set for Kayla!)

April is the kind of chick who got attention in High School because she put out, and never grew out of it.

The smart move would be to shoah all her socials, move to somewhere she isn’t known as the county ho, and land some wagie husband with a decent job before she smashes into the wall.

Instead she’s fishing for attention from retards and degens and flaunting the fact that she’s totally cool with being smashed by coke heads, and is the COOL kinda lay, who will let you do all the stuff you see on Pornhub.

Never change April!
 
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime. He hopes to use that letter to get the neglect charges dropped.
He goes on to say people conspired to tell lies to the preacher to have him relay those lies to the cops. Says he 'has recordings of the people conspiring to tell the lies to the preacher' from discovery and he gets to use them to defend himself not just in court but also in public.

I don't see why he wouldn't release these now that he has disclosed this evidence short of releasing the original material. He knows the witness list (including the people the preacher mentioned) and the accusations they told the preacher are out there.

Would these witnesses get called at trial?
 
You guys want some more funny?

Ralph threatened @Potentially Criminal, called him fat, and then IMMEDIATELY afterwards his chair broke under his weight.

View attachment 6624036

You can't make this up! You have to see it!

Clip courtesy of Legal Seagull via Twitter.
>Trump wins
>immediately bad things happen to bad people

We are so back. Nick is going to get passed around in prison like currency.
 
I can’t archive things because I am suck screen grabbing Melton’s stream. But really interesting things are happening on Twitter between Rekieta and April. Especially April’s twitter.

EDIT: April is tweeting about how she wonders how the Balldo feels like. She tweets how Rekieta unreasonably did not check on her. How someone is coming for her faster than she expected. How she would like to talk with Nick, and how she likes to talk about sex. Amongst other things.

I am mobile fagging. Please someone archive this.
 
Last edited:
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime. He hopes to use that letter to get the neglect charges dropped.
He goes on to say people conspired to tell lies to the preacher to have him relay those lies to the cops. Says he 'has recordings of the people conspiring to tell the lies to the preacher' from discovery and he gets to use them to defend himself not just in court but also in public.
View attachment 6624271
I don't see why he wouldn't release these now that he has disclosed this evidence short of releasing the original material. He knows the witness list (including the people the preacher mentioned) and the accusations they told the preacher are out there.

Would these witnesses get called at trial?
I get that the muppet is that one fat faggot's pfp on X... but can I get a tldr on wtf he's doing here? He looks like a retarded psycho. Pic related.
 

Attachments

  • Kanye-Alex-Jones-Benjamin.jpg
    Kanye-Alex-Jones-Benjamin.jpg
    179.3 KB · Views: 25
[referencing April Imholt] Some Fag: "She has two little cupholders at home."

Melton and his freak friends should all be crucified or burned alive or something.
It becomes abundantly clear the more this guy speaks that Nick's interest in this guy revolves around the way in which he sexually harasses children. I find it harder and harder to set out a reasoning as to why Nick is buddy buddy with this guy, that isn't "Nick is glad there's someone to sexually harass Aaron's kids on his behalf, saving Nick the liability."

Nick, Melton and his little posse all belong behind bars. If they're not I believe there's a chance there will be a victim of physical sexual abuse if there is not already. Where's the line on what they won't do? If they're willing say sexually harassing things about kids, how long before it's sexually harassing actions.
 
I'm gonna guess they'll claim that the Safe Belonged to Aaron and that he left without giving over the passcode, the coke in the safe and the coke being used outside the safe were completely unrelated and completely coincidental. It's desperate but it's a way of kicking down the amount seized substantially. Of course this won't work if Nick purchased it and it's in his bank records.
Nah, I'm betting the safe was open.
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime
That is from the request to stream the omnibus. Nick claimed there were pedos from KF farms trying to see his kids. The prosecutor said there were no victims and the children were unlikely to testify. The prosecutor is correct.
 
Here's Nick saying he has a letter from the district attorney saying there is no victims in this crime. He hopes to use that letter to get the neglect charges dropped.
He goes on to say people conspired to tell lies to the preacher to have him relay those lies to the cops. Says he 'has recordings of the people conspiring to tell the lies to the preacher' from discovery and he gets to use them to defend himself not just in court but also in public.
View attachment 6624271
I don't see why he wouldn't release these now that he has disclosed this evidence short of releasing the original material. He knows the witness list (including the people the preacher mentioned) and the accusations they told the preacher are out there.

Would these witnesses get called at trial?
Just a wild guess: The witnesses “conspiring” is an email from someone sharing their concerns about the kids, with someone else and discussing whether they should bring it up with the priest first, or call children’s services directly.
 
Nah, I'm betting the safe was open.
It obviously was. Nick is not the kind of cokehead who wants to type in a passkey or spin a combination any time he wants to do a line.

You may wonder why someone like Nick would even bother to have a safe to protect his valuables but then his valuables are something he needs to snort every couple minutes.
 
>”anyone have any other questions for Nick?”
>”wait I don’t want to leave, I want to stay and diss on Aaron with my friends!”

Nick, you pathetic retard, they aren’t your friends. They’re using you for content against Aaron.
Imagine being farmed for content by retarded pedos while under the influence. How embarrassing.
 
Does that mean they're dropping the endangerment charge or he is misreading the 'no victims' part.
The particular charge against Nick is not a crime that has actual victims. The complainant is the state itself. So in standard Technikieta style, there are no actual victims. He hasn't been charged with a crime that requires a victim. So since actually having a victim isn't an element of any criminal count against him, he can claim not to have any victims of his crimes, even though people of normal intelligence obviously can understand that he actually does have victims. His entire family.
 
Does that mean they're dropping the endangerment charge or he is misreading the 'no victims' part.

It just means this retarded non-practicing lawyer didn't have enough firing synapses left to read that letter in the context for which it was intended, namely to point out in response to @Null's motion that there was no personal "victim" likely to testify in livestreamed proceedings because the specific statute under which he was charged is one of strict liability, whereby the mere fact of drugs being in the vicinity of children is itself a criminal act even if none of them were harmed, i.e. even if there exists no personal "victim":

NoPersonalVictim.jpg


IIRC he crowed on xitter that day too about how that letter was one of two pieces of great news for him that day, when in reality the state admitted nothing new and merely acknowledged the nature of the offense charged at the time. But nobody tell him that, because watching his big-brained motions waving around that letter all getting DENIED DENIED DENIED would be too funny.

Edit: ninja'd, oh well
 
Last edited:
It becomes abundantly clear the more this guy speaks that Nick's interest in this guy revolves around the way in which he sexually harasses children. I find it harder and harder to set out a reasoning as to why Nick is buddy buddy with this guy, that isn't "Nick is glad there's someone to sexually harass Aaron's kids on his behalf, saving Nick the liability."

Nick, Melton and his little posse all belong behind bars. If they're not I believe there's a chance there will be a victim of physical sexual abuse if there is not already. Where's the line on what they won't do? If they're willing say sexually harassing things about kids, how long before it's sexually harassing actions.
The way he very clearly got giddy about the prospect of the kids finding out what he was saying about them when the mom and stepdad were in contact with him is disgusting. He clearly gets off on the idea of the child knowing he's saying this shit about her. I can only hope he's stupid enough to say something in the future that gets his computers seized and searched.
 
Back