Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 85 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 49 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 110 35.3%

  • Total voters
    312
In severe cases, the psychological aspects become a lot worse with people even developing delusional parasitosis and literally thinking there are insects under their skin, and then the scratching and picking get crazy.
Meth is a huge problem in my state (maybe usurped by fent nowadays), and this was one of the big things they talked about when anti-drug campaigns were a thing in my schools growing up. Always reminded me of The Mummy.
 
Nick is again suggesting that Null (or others from the thread) are touching the cow
1731354462166.png
Archive,Nitter
I wonder if this retarded cuck is trying to build a narration in which it's only the Farms making fun of him (as we do, in our little corner of the Internet) or he genuinely believes it because acknowledging that everybody is laughing at him is too much for his ego to handle.
 
I think one aspect of this entire "Nick had access to Aaron's google data" has not been discussed properly yet.
And that is the fact that Aaron is a witness in the case against Nick and Kayla, and that confidential communication between the state and Aaron will have gone through the google email and potentially phone messenger services, which could also be tied to the google account and accessible from other devices if you control the email address.

This means Nick has not just been reading the correspondence between Aaron and his lawyer.
As the defendant in a felony criminal case he could have been reading the confidential communication between the prosecutor and a witness in that case.

This is mindblowing.
Does it matter at all how Rekieta got access to Aaron's data? Didn't Aaron admit it was because he had logged into his account on Rekieta's computer? If so, that means that Rekieta was essentially "given" access to Aaron's account.
There could be an argument made that he is under no obligation to sign out of Aaron's account, which essentially means he's got access until the browser clears it's history data, and that any information he received was just looking through what is essentially an open window.

Then again, since he did post private account information on the web in what is more or less an attempt to harass Aaron, and especially if he sent emails from Aaron's account, this will probably put any legal leeway that might have been granted in the trash.
 
What one of you said they're waiting for her to get mad?
See, for a moment I thought Nick is still throwing her some scraps because he realizes she's nuts and wants to keep her calm. But then he started talking about making her bleed and how much he loves having sex with her and misses it and I think this retard just genuinely likes having her around and thinks it's a win that she's so crazy about him.
 
This retard can't cook simple food. How is he supposed to cook meth?
I've known some pretty dumb people who can cook meth (maybe not good meth, but meth nonetheless). I think Nick would most likely buy it, though, because he's lazy and I assume the precursors are tracked in the US as they are here which makes obtaining them a bit of a pain in the ass.
 
Does it matter at all how Rekieta got access to Aaron's data? Didn't Aaron admit it was because he had logged into his account on Rekieta's computer? If so, that means that Rekieta was essentially "given" access to Aaron's account.
There could be an argument made that he is under no obligation to sign out of Aaron's account, which essentially means he's got access until the browser clears it's history data, and that any information he received was just looking through what is essentially an open window.

Then again, since he did post private account information on the web in what is more or less an attempt to harass Aaron, and especially if he sent emails from Aaron's account, this will probably put any legal leeway that might have been granted in the trash.
This is a Rekieta-tier legal argument, without explicit consent Nick is obliged to not willfully access Aaron's private information. The ease of access to info doesn't nullify a person's rights. It's like if I left my health records on your table, it being in your home is in no way an indication of my consent to you reading them.
 
Yea I wouldn't be surprised if this latest spiral over the past week was due to something he read in Aaron's emails about some testimony or something in the criminal case. This is probably why no one knows what happened that caused the spiral, because no one is supposed to know due to it being testimony in the case that isn't public yet.
If that's the case I expect him or someone in his circle to spill. They're all loose lipped retards.

I have a feeling April is out of the loop though, because her lips are the loosest.
 
It might be more related to the CPS case.
He might have actually testified in that case in some capacity and been told not to talk about it.

Or it could just be Skelly's drug-induced psychotic rage. It's hard to tell when his brain is so fried.
Remember how nasty he got with Vic.
I was watching that at the time and it seemed uncharacteristic. Probably, though, it was just the first major mask slip.
There could be an argument made that he is under no obligation to sign out of Aaron's account, which essentially means he's got access until the browser clears it's history data, and that any information he received was just looking through what is essentially an open window.
He's not necessarily obligated to take affirmative measures to log it out but he definitely is obligated not to go rooting around in it like a rat looking for blackmail material, attorney/client shit, etc.
 
Last edited:
Nick is again suggesting that Null (or others from the thread) are touching the cow
View attachment 6635098
Archive,Nitter

He also claims to spend only one hour per day tweeting.
View attachment 6635124
Archive,Nitter
FYI he has tweeted 113 times (by my count) in the last 24 hours
You realize there's 23 hours left in every day. I spend almost all of them with my keedz it's been great 🥃:really:
1ony4msfllc71.jpg
 
Does it matter at all how Rekieta got access to Aaron's data? Didn't Aaron admit it was because he had logged into his account on Rekieta's computer? If so, that means that Rekieta was essentially "given" access to Aaron's account.
As I understand it, it's like I forgot to lock my door and you allowed yourself in and rummaged through my stuff. You would still be breaking the law, even if it was only possible because of my negligence.
 
I don't remember this clip being posted here, but:

A very hot winter in Minnesota, huh? Makes you want to scratch a lot. Not WEIЯD at all. Maybe some ice can help alleviate this heat?
View attachment 6635046
Source: Twitter
You know what else isn't WEIЯD at all? Streaming in front of a picture of your daughters in their dance outfits after befriending alleged pedophiles, then walking away so the picture is not obstructed. Just a FUNNY and WEIRD coincidence or mistake. Sometimes these things just happen.
 
This retard can't cook simple food. How is he supposed to cook meth?
I think I recall reading somewhere they might have actually been making crack at some point. Wasn't there coke residue all over some pots, pans, and cooking utensils?

In any event, he doesn't have to make meth. He could just buy it.
 
April posted 2 new pics to IG, pining about her future with Nick using deep thoughts and metaphor.
WARNING, DRESS AUTISM INCOMING: I wanted to point out that, unlike last time, April is most likely wearing one of Kayla’s dresses in the new Lamborghini pictures.

This dress is from the same wholesale dress brand (Banjul) as the dress that Kayla wore to Mar-a-Lago. My assumption is they were purchased by Nick and Kayla at the same time.
Just for fun, I did a little digging. I found the same exact dress Kayla wore to Mar-a-Lago on Poshmark, and upon closer inspection, the tag says "BANJUL." Banjul is a luxury wholesale (lol) made-in-China dress brand.
IMG_0122.jpeg

IMG_0123.png
IMG_0127.jpeg

It’s difficult to tell from these pictures, but it looks floor-length rather than a cocktail dress. Here is a Poshmark listing (archived here) for a Banjul dress that matches the beading exactly.

IMG_0125.jpeg
IMG_0126.jpeg

Also, the same dress in a shorter version is on Banjul’s Instagram, albeit on a much, uh, larger model and with a little extra rhinestones in the center (for slimming effect lmao).

IMG_0121.jpeg

I have no doubt April will spin this like she did last time. “My evil abusive ex left me destitute with no pretty dresses, but a dear friend was kind enough to let me borrow this one in my moment of need!”

The reality is that April loves skinwalking as wife #1 and gets smug satisfaction out of wearing the dresses that Nick bought her.
 
Last edited:
This time the children are going to open it and say “he and his girlfriend are over there behind mommy on the couch. Please come on in.”
The "Police need to call in a drug dog" bingo space will be invalidated by one of the older kids saying "Follow me officer, I know where the meth is. Also you should check my former childhood home turned whorehouse, I think there's more in there."
 
As I understand it, it's like I forgot to lock my door and you allowed yourself in and rummaged through my stuff. You would still be breaking the law, even if it was only possible because of my negligence.
Yeah it's not how you access the device or accounts that matters, just whether or not you were authorized to do so.
 
Back