State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Gobermental Supervisor]

When I woke up like 12 hours ago I checked Kiwi Farms expecting for sure it would be a repeat of May where I'd see "Nick Rekieta has been arrested..." on the top of the site. I still think that's likely in the next few days since this is like one step below the cokestream. And if he doesn't get popped for it, that's just more proof that Nick and Barnes are retards and there is no government conspiracy out to fuck him over.

Yesterday was a federal holiday in the US.
Nothing happened.

Today a lot can happen, or at least things will be set in motion.
The real question is who will be knocking at the door, state or feds.

 

[Canard]

Remember this type of stuff takes some time. They are not in hurry to immediately arrest. Unless they are really worried about destruction of evidence.

Basically what needs to happen is someone to subpoena Google possibly any other company for access records and that will take bit of time. And then some expert needs to go over the records find IPs and then do same for the ISPs involved. And only then can ball really start rolling. That is kicking the door in and grabbing every device in the house and maybe the other house too...

Which can lead to worst punishment for them, no access to internet until they get new devices...

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

And only then can ball really start rolling. That is kicking the door in and grabbing every device in the house and maybe the other house too...

They have public admissions and a reasonable fear of evidence being destroyed.
I think they already have enough for a judge to issue a narrow scope search warrant that aims at electronic devices.

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

They have public admissions and a reasonable fear of evidence being destroyed.
I think they already have enough for a judge to issue a narrow scope search warrant that aims at electronic devices.

Not to defend Nick, but do you believe every word that comes out of crackheads? I'm not sure a judge would sign a warrant on the basis of "coke addict said thing"

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Remember this type of stuff takes some time. They are not in hurry to immediately arrest. Unless they are really worried about destruction of evidence.

Yeah Nick had a sex fueled crackhouse for months before they had enough to nab him. At least we get content while we wait for his retardation to blow up in his face

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Not to defend Nick, but do you believe every word that comes out of crackheads? I'm not sure a judge would sign a warrant on the basis of "coke addict said thing"

I do not have to be 100% convinced, for a search warrant I just need reasonable suspicion.

Do you think it is fair to say that there is a reasonable suspicion that Nick and Melton conspired to extract private information and confidential communication as well as intimate videos from Aaron's google account? Considering that they BOTH talked about doing exactly that and that Melton said he would be publishing more of it soon?

It does not matter if they actually have anything, they are clearly pretending as if they had and threaten the publication.

That should be good enough for a reasonable judge to sign a search warrant targeting ONLY the electronic devices and their online accounts.

[EDIT] To commit a crime they do not actually have to possess any of the things they claim, just pretending as if is already enough to violate laws.

 

[All becomes gunt]

I do not have to be 100% convinced, for a search warrant I just need reasonable suspicion.

Do you think it is fair to say that there is a reasonable suspicion that Nick and Melton conspired to extract private information and confidential communication as well as intimate videos from Aaron's google account? Considering that they BOTH talked about doing exactly that and that Melton said he would be publishing more of it soon?

It does not matter if they actually have anything, they are clearly pretending as if they had and threaten the publication.

That should be good enough for a reasonable judge to sign a search warrant targeting ONLY the electronic devices and their online accounts.

[EDIT] To commit a crime they do not actually have to possess any of the things they claim, just pretending as if is already enough to violate laws.

You are confusing things a little. If they act as if they do is going to give a reason enough for a search warrant yes but if a crime is committed is yet pending the execution of the search warrant and the appropriate findings. But again "acting as if they do" is also kinda murky. That "acting" needs to give enough to the judge for a reasonable suspicion in order to get an investigation going in the first place. Now with their recent arrest and findings in that household it's probably gonna be way easier than usual though to execute search warrants.

 

[Not Really Here]

Remember this type of stuff takes some time. They are not in hurry to immediately arrest. Unless they are really worried about destruction of evidence.

As soon as the State learns of an allegation of witness tampering, they will bring the hammer down with the quickness.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

You are confusing things a little. If they act as if they do is going to give a reason enough for a search warrant yes but if a crime is committed is yet pending the execution of the search warrant and the appropriate findings. But again "acting as if they do" is also kinda murky. That "acting" needs to give enough to the judge for a reasonable suspicion in order to get an investigation going in the first place. Now with their recent arrest and findings in that household it's probably gonna be way easier than usual though to execute search warrants.

They posted screenshots online, claimed they were from Aaron's Google account, explained he had forgotten to log out, said they retrieved data from it.
All this was done by:
a) Nick, who is the defendant in two cases Aaron is a witness in AND who is a witness himself in a criminal case against Aaron for revenge Pornography which he and his wife initiated with a complaint
b) Melton, who made sexually harassing and demeaning comments about the 10yo daughter of Aaron (against whom a restraining order might or might not exist at this time)

Data and files they claim to have retrieved and threatened to share with the public, or claim to have already shared partly
a) Browser history (screenshot, legitimacy?!)
b) private videos and picture from Aaron's cloud (insinuating they retrieved nudes)
c) Access to home security cameras from Aaron's house (Melton having access to videos of Aaron's children?)
d) "so much more and worse" (as per Melton)


Data and files they would also have had access to.
a) Confidential communication between the state and a state witness in two cases against Nick (if the CHIPS case still exists, else its one)
b) Confidential communication between Aaron and his lawyer in the RP case that Nick is a witness in AGAINST Aaron
c) Confidential communication between Aaron, his lawyer and his ex-wife and step-father of his children, in regards to a potential restraining order and legal strategy against MELTON (who harassed Aaron's daughter, potentially in coordination with Nick to intimidate Aaron into not testifying)


If the above is not enough reason to get a search warrant for at least both the retard's electronic devices I would be very very surprised. Especially since timely execution matters, because at some point Melton will get scared and try to delete the evidence.

[EDIT] Fixed retard spelling errors.

 

[Not Really Here]

Remember frens, this is the same court that issued a nationwide arrest warrant for the Ralphamale, 'nothing ever happens' bros need to slow their roll.

 

[All becomes gunt]

They posted screenshots online, claimed they were from Aaron's Google account, explained he had forgotten to log out, said they retrieved data from it.
All this was done by:
a) Nick, who is the defendant in two cases Aaron is a witness in AND who is a witness himself in a criminal case against Aaron for revenge Pornography which he and his wife initiated with a complaint
b) Melton, who made sexually harassing and demeaning comments about the 10yo daughter of Aaron (against whom a restraining order might or might not exist at this time)

Data and files they claim to have retrieved and threatened to share with the public, or claim to have already shared partly
a) Browser history (screenshot, legitimacy?!)
b) private videos and picture from Aaron's cloud (insinuating they retrieved nudes)
c) Access to home security cameras from Aaron's house (Melton having access to videos of Aaron's children?)
d) "so much more and worse" (as per Melton)

Yeah that's easy search warrant there. When is the trial ? Did he not take plea deal and take trial by jury ?

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Yeah that's easy search warrant there. When is the trial ? Did he not take plea deal and take trial by jury ?

Nick has filed for review by the next higher court regarding the denial of his Frank's motion, based on the same bullshit made up reasons he was denied over the first time.

Check the OP for a link to the appeal's court website and documents.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Nick has filed for review by the next higher court regarding the denial of his Frank's motion, based on the same bullshit made up reasons he was denied over the first time.

Check the OP for a link to the appeal's court website and documents.

Thing is he isn't a criminal lawyer, he is a criminal, lawyer. The comma makes all the difference. The fact that he chose to represent himself is absolutely fucking retarded and his arguments show it. These are some really serious charges. Just like sovereign citizen do not understand, PLAYING SEMANTICS GAMES ISN'T GOING TO SWAY OVER ANYONE, IF ANYTHING IT JUST ANNOYS PEOPLE FURTHER. BECAUSE TO HIS FUCKING RETARDED ARGUMENT ABOUT THE AFFIANT FOR EXAMPLE AN EXPERT WILL TESTIFY AGAINST HIM AND SAY THAT THE VIDEO HASN'T BEEN ALTERED IN ANY MEANINGFUL FORM. I CAN SEE THAT WITHOUT EVEN BEING A LAWYER.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

The fact that he chose to represent himself is absolutely fucking retarded and his arguments show it

He is represented by one of the biggest and most expensive 1st Amendment lawyers in the country in the Montagraph case, and by an otherwise good firm in his criminal case.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Thing is he isn't a criminal lawyer, he is a criminal, lawyer. The comma makes all the difference. The fact that he chose to represent himself is absolutely fucking retarded and his arguments show it. These are some really serious charges. Just like sovereign citizen do not understand, PLAYING SEMANTICS GAMES ISN'T GOING TO SWAY OVER ANYONE, IF ANYTHING IT JUST ANNOYS PEOPLE FURTHER. BECAUSE TO HIS FUCKING RETARDED ARGUMENT ABOUT THE AFFIANT FOR EXAMPLE AN EXPERT WILL TESTIFY AGAINST HIM AND SAY THAT THE VIDEO HASN'T BEEN ALTERED IN ANY MEANINGFUL FORM. I CAN SEE THAT WITHOUT EVEN BEING A LAWYER.

Dude, please go to the beginning of the thread and read it.

He is not representing himself.

 

[All becomes gunt]

He is represented by one of the biggest and most expensive 1st Amendment lawyers in the country.

I thought he represented himself. he must have changed his mind somewhere in the thread. I AM JUST CATCHING UP MAN. Yeah the OP doesn't say who represents him man. It just says about the hearing and that he represented himself and his wife and almost his sidehoe. So i assumed he was still gigaretarded

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I thought he represented himself. he must have changed his mind somewhere in the thread. I AM JUST CATCHING UP MAN.

He represented himself for the original omnibus hearing. On the 13th of June he hired Francis White Law PLLC (he had hired them prior to that for his CPS hearings) to represent him.

 

[All becomes gunt]

He represented himself for the original omnibus hearing. On the 13th of June he hired Francis White Law PLLC (he had hired them prior to that for his CPS hearings) to represent him.

Anyway he seems to be in pretty deep shit from what i am reading through the thread. And there seems to be more charges stacking up. Do we have a trial date yet ? If not, when approximately will we with the current speed of the proceedings ?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Do we have a trial date yet ? If not, when approximately will we with the current speed of the proceedings ?

The next date is the settlement conference due 26th of this month. It is likely Nick's final chance to plead out.

 

[St. Alia of the Knife]

So I have a question for prosecutors. Would Nick's antics/ behavior the last few days cause you to revoke a plea deal you had offered?

Conversely, for defense atty's: I realize that firing a client is not all that easy, but it seems like the Barneswalker has lost all control of his client (if he ever had any control). Would his behavior the last few days get you to seriously consider firing him? If you decided not to, or couldn't fire ihm, what would/could you do to try and salvage this mess? (I mean in general terms, not to give them any ideas of how best to proceed.) Or is this ration of shit all par for the course for a defense atty?