Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It's just an unfocused rant and the chapter list explains everything he says in the video:

I'm actually going to transcribe the entire "what should we do about it" section because it essentially reads as his overarching manifesto and it really goes to show why these people get laughed out of every room they enter as soon as they present their ideas.

Jason Slaughter:

So it seems what we really need is not driver-less cars, it’s car-less drivers. We need to limit where cars can go and that includes autonomous vehicles. We need fewer cars in cities, so we should definitely tear down urban freeways that divide neighborhoods and turn the space into parks, shops, and houses. Cars should go around cities, and not through them. We should make it impossible to drive through the middle of the city by car. The most direct route should only be accessible by walking, cycling, and public transit, enforced by modal filters. We also need to lower speed limits now, to make the streets safer today, but also to reduce noise and pollution. Lowering speed limits can sometimes be controversial, but after it's done there is nearly universal support to keep them low. So let’s do it now, before AVs take a foothold. We need to remove parking, especially surface parking lots. We’re never going to be able to charge for parking once cars can drive themselves, so let’s start removing parking spaces now, and turning them into something more useful. And let’s stop building any new parking garages too. After all, they tell us they won’t even be necessary once we have autonomous vehicles, right? So let’s not build them at all. Instead, let’s build more mixed-use walkable neighborhoods, so that the places where people live, work, and shop are closer together, making it easy to get to where you’re going without needing a car at all. And safe sidewalks and bike lanes should be part of the standard street design guidelines, so that they're built automatically with every new construction. We need to invest in functional and viable public transit, especially infrastructure that is difficult to remove. History has shown us that bus routes will get overrun by cars, so we need more trams and trains, and a lot more dedicated transit lanes. And we have to ensure that public transit remains under democratic control, so that it can never be captured by private corporations. And most importantly of all, and I cannot stress this enough, we need to put a price on driving. The gas tax is going away as cars transition to electric anyway, so let's replace it with something better. Cars should be charged based on how much they drive, but also when they drive too, with a higher price during periods of peak congestion.

Let's just take a moment to be thankful that even if some of these ideas get traction, this one specific wannabe dictator will never be in any position of power in a country that actually matters.
 
"at least we're not living on top of each other"
what does this even mean? all those people have y
I've made the comment before here, but a lot of these people are unironic commies with fantasies of being centralized planners. Their mindset of thinking they know what's best for people, instead of people knowing what's best for themselves, leads to this type of anti-car, anti-people mindset.
I have 2000 hours in cities skylines I think I know what is best for you fucking ants.
 
Let's just take a moment to be thankful that even if some of these ideas get traction, this one specific wannabe dictator will never be in any position of power in a country that actually matters.

It doesn't need to be said that the Dunning-Kruger effect is in full force for Jason and the rest of the urbanist crowd, but what does "through the middle of the city" even mean? The downtown area? The city limits? Hell, you can make an argument that most freeways avoided the downtown area altogether. What is an actual functional example of a 24-7 area that is car-free, people living in it (and not moving out en masse), and has working logistics?

What is "difficult to remove" infrastructure? Elevated tracks? I mean, most of these things can be reused or demolished anyway, especially if you're crying about "urban freeways". Rail tracks and power poles are trivial to remove, and even if they aren't removed, they can be paved over or simply ignored. This street in Austin, Texas has had a bike lane added, with the most of the car lane being on a long-dead freight spur.

The "we have to ensure that public transit remains under democratic control, so that it can never be captured by private corporations" is a curious take, though. They get big mad when "the people" reject transit taxes or when any moves within the agency get cockblocked by the "suburban interests", while the streetcars of old they idolize were all corporations. Is it just a seething hatred for Elon Musk?
 
Let's just take a moment to be thankful that even if some of these ideas get traction, this one specific wannabe dictator will never be in any position of power in a country that actually matters.
Is it too much to say I hope Jason gets Isekai'd by a Kei Truck while riding his faggoty little e-bike? It'd be extra funny if he was teleported to a world of Wacky Racing.
 
Let's just take a moment to be thankful that even if some of these ideas get traction, this one specific wannabe dictator will never be in any position of power in a country that actually matters.
A lot of his demands are already present in North American cities: it's hard to drive downtown, there's no parking, the traffic is super slow and some goddamned bus or streetcar is always in the way. The result isn't flourishing downtowns and dying suburbs but the exact opposite. Businesses can't get enough customers to pay their exorbitant rents and they move out of the downtown area to the suburbs where their customers can go easily. The whole thing shrivels up and dies and junkies swarm over the corpse.
 
A lot of his demands are already present in North American cities: it's hard to drive downtown, there's no parking, the traffic is super slow and some goddamned bus or streetcar is always in the way. The result isn't flourishing downtowns and dying suburbs but the exact opposite. Businesses can't get enough customers to pay their exorbitant rents and they move out of the downtown area to the suburbs where their customers can go easily. The whole thing shrivels up and dies and junkies swarm over the corpse.
One of the fundamental problems when they talk about car-free areas is they have things backwards. If a car-free area is popular, it's car-free because it's popular (if crowds are packing sidewalks, why not give them space...though apparently that doesn't work in reverse), it's not popular because it's car-free.

I think I talked about how "closing downtown streets" has actually been tried--in the 1970s and 1980s, several cities with dying downtowns decided to close off several blocks to vehicular traffic, but because they were dealing with a handful of dwindling businesses, there wasn't really a reason to go there. Sometimes they did try harder with actual enclosed malls and unique businesses and that worked for a while, but they still had to deal with the fact that it didn't have a good "local" base to draw from and there was usually parking/access issues so by the 2000s these were mostly just food courts for the daytime crowd.

The Galleria in Houston is somewhat similar to "urban" malls in the fact that it's a built-up area with office towers and parking garages, but they're also adjacent to some of the highest-income neighborhoods in Houston, people that will actually frequent stores like Nordstrom, Saks, and Neiman Marcus. And of course malls themselves are a good lesson in pedestrian areas—one of the reasons many malls declined and closed over the years was that it was never really about being a mall itself, it's what they had to offer.

This is why mixed-use is so annoying, developers will charge a premium to residents for the potential with no guarantee that tenants will come or stick around.
 
The Galleria in Houston is somewhat similar to "urban" malls in the fact that it's a built-up area with office towers and parking garages, but they're also adjacent to some of the highest-income neighborhoods in Houston, people that will actually frequent stores like Nordstrom, Saks, and Neiman Marcus. And of course malls themselves are a good lesson in pedestrian areas—one of the reasons many malls declined and closed over the years was that it was never really about being a mall itself, it's what they had to offer.
Jason gushed about Shinjuku station, which is just a Japanese version of the Galleria.
 
Jason gushed about Shinjuku station, which is just a Japanese version of the Galleria.
Right, that was the "car-free" area with the parking garages just out of view, right? But either way, it's still the same as any other successful pedestrian area...it's successful because it has something people want, not because it's car-free.
 
Hahahahaha.

1731433385165.png


Gym of life has nothing on gluten it seems. Also for now it seems as though this has been his only reaction to the election:

1731433464300.png


Source 1, 2
Archive 1, 2

But it turns out before the election he put up a short video where he talked about why he voted for Kamala and why he expected her to win:





I unfortunately wasn't able to get inside, and I also really didn't want to because it was honestly a super long wait to see both Kamala and to see Lady Gaga, cuz a lot of people were there for to see Lady Gaga at least for the two sets or two songs that she was going to do.

This might be the most self-aware one. But then he goes and predicts the Dems will win president and both chambers of Congress so then that all goes down the crapper.
 
Last edited:
Gym of life has nothing on gluten it seems. Also for now it seems as though this has been his only reaction to the election:

If he was an actual celiac disease sufferer he would've known to get GF soy sauce which is common. This dude probably pays extra for the cauliflower crust knowing it has wheat contamination.

Also reading between the lines he thinks people like RGR get paid off while he gets no funding. Even if left-wing groups did fund these transit videos (which would ruin what little credibility they have), why should he expect any of the cut?
 
I'm fine with public transportation or mass commute, but this meme is disingenuous. Not everybody may want to ride with 70 random people on a pre determined path. Some places don't even HAVE public transportation.
It’s worse because the average bus has something like five passengers. It’s elsewhere in the thread but cars beat busses in passenger miles per CO2 because so many buses are basically empty.
 
Busses and trains are for people who don't value time.
That's the true cost.
I was in the promised land in the last year (the Netherlands). There was one day trip I took, with an estimated time of 45m by car. Because we has no car we took public transit and it took over 2 hours (there and back for a total of 4 hours) and cost about 25€. There was 4 of us so that's 100€. It would have been cheaper and quicker with a car.
Also the trains were broken on one line that day.
 
Back