Another translation by yours truly for the A&N audience. Source [A]
Update: 2024-11-12: Added another translation. Original source [A]
Readers pointed out this blog article to me: The end of the printed book comes closer - thanks to EU regulations
Soon, everybody who wants to publish a book needs to prove exactly in what time and place the trees that the paper was made from were grown, and that they're coming from a guaranteed deforestation-free farming.
At first I thought it was satire, a hoax. A mockery of the supply chain law.
But no, the [German] Federal Office for Agriculture and Food elaborates:
Now I hope that this gets blocked on YouTube when I link to it:
[Preservetube]
I guess this falls under bureaucracy pornography.
I don't know what that's supposed to look like, but everything you buy that's made out of wood now has to tell you exactly when and where it's been produced deforestation-free? And who wants to check whether that's true, and how?
Recently they took our plastic forks and drinking straws. I guess the wooden forks and paper straws are next. Basically you can't even use chopsticks at the Asian restaurants any longer.
Of course the point is that this is unenforceable in practice. Because how is a publisher supposed to print that in their books? At the time of the manuscript, they don't know yet where the book is printed and where the printing company is getting their paper from. Or do they leave a blank field in which the printing company prints in the certification?
Of course this is going to be another nail in the coffin of book and newspaper printing.
Which amuses me in some way, because the administrative court of Berlin stubbornly sticks to the interpretation that "press" is exclusively what is printed and distributed on a substrate - paper, but in the legal sense also a CDROM.
But the reality will be that we will only get digital newspapers, magazines, and books, and not as a download, but as a kind of subscription, access right, to access them using a phone, ebook reader, tablet. And the rule that, what you put in circulation remains in circulation, no longer holds. If, for example, you legally prohibit a book, only the sale of it gets prohibited and the existing stock gets destroyed, but the copies that were already sold won't get collected.
And as far as I know the German lawyers, it's guaranteed they'll try to censor digital books and newspapers in the same way they do social media, and then they get to enforce that passages from already-sold ebooks get deleted or changed, which will be possible. Then the books and newspapers which you have already bought get censored.
And because publishers and book companies are infamous for getting more left-wing and corrupt, it's also predictable that books get retroactively inserted with gendered language and queerness.
In that respect as well, we achieved Orwell's 1984, in which it's already been described that newspapers and books get retroactively changed and adjusted to the political situation.
Deforestation-free greetings!
PS: Damn, I didn't even think of that one. But a reader gave the fitting comment:
Fits like a glove.
A reader points at this article: The book is an endangered good - new declaration obligation in the EU
Apparently, there is a new hazardous material regulation according to which every product must declare who has put it into circulation.
Is this satire?
Actually, it's too stupid to be satire. This is so stupid that it has to be real.
But I'm thinking of something else. And apparently I'm not the only one who does:
I have written quite often that the intelligence agencies are currently working on a total opinion cartography, storing information on every citizen, what their political beliefs are, to put the people on black- and whitelists.
That way, you don't even need to bother looking at the content, open up the book or get it out of the shrink wrap, but you can immediately see where the person who put it in circulation stands politically and then sort it out, into the trash it goes.
Officially, it is obviously just about "deforestation-free" books.
The trend is going towards the electronic book, and that is subject to constant changes and metamorphosis.
Shamed be he who thinks evil of it.
Update: 2024-11-12: Added another translation. Original source [A]
The end of the printed book: The EU wants "deforestation-free products"
It keeps on getting more insidious.Readers pointed out this blog article to me: The end of the printed book comes closer - thanks to EU regulations
Soon, everybody who wants to publish a book needs to prove exactly in what time and place the trees that the paper was made from were grown, and that they're coming from a guaranteed deforestation-free farming.
At first I thought it was satire, a hoax. A mockery of the supply chain law.
But no, the [German] Federal Office for Agriculture and Food elaborates:
Now I hope that this gets blocked on YouTube when I link to it:
I guess this falls under bureaucracy pornography.
I don't know what that's supposed to look like, but everything you buy that's made out of wood now has to tell you exactly when and where it's been produced deforestation-free? And who wants to check whether that's true, and how?
Recently they took our plastic forks and drinking straws. I guess the wooden forks and paper straws are next. Basically you can't even use chopsticks at the Asian restaurants any longer.
Of course the point is that this is unenforceable in practice. Because how is a publisher supposed to print that in their books? At the time of the manuscript, they don't know yet where the book is printed and where the printing company is getting their paper from. Or do they leave a blank field in which the printing company prints in the certification?
Of course this is going to be another nail in the coffin of book and newspaper printing.
Which amuses me in some way, because the administrative court of Berlin stubbornly sticks to the interpretation that "press" is exclusively what is printed and distributed on a substrate - paper, but in the legal sense also a CDROM.
But the reality will be that we will only get digital newspapers, magazines, and books, and not as a download, but as a kind of subscription, access right, to access them using a phone, ebook reader, tablet. And the rule that, what you put in circulation remains in circulation, no longer holds. If, for example, you legally prohibit a book, only the sale of it gets prohibited and the existing stock gets destroyed, but the copies that were already sold won't get collected.
And as far as I know the German lawyers, it's guaranteed they'll try to censor digital books and newspapers in the same way they do social media, and then they get to enforce that passages from already-sold ebooks get deleted or changed, which will be possible. Then the books and newspapers which you have already bought get censored.
And because publishers and book companies are infamous for getting more left-wing and corrupt, it's also predictable that books get retroactively inserted with gendered language and queerness.
In that respect as well, we achieved Orwell's 1984, in which it's already been described that newspapers and books get retroactively changed and adjusted to the political situation.
Deforestation-free greetings!
PS: Damn, I didn't even think of that one. But a reader gave the fitting comment:
Fits like a glove.
The book is an endangered good
The next absurdity.A reader points at this article: The book is an endangered good - new declaration obligation in the EU
Apparently, there is a new hazardous material regulation according to which every product must declare who has put it into circulation.
Is this satire?
Actually, it's too stupid to be satire. This is so stupid that it has to be real.
But I'm thinking of something else. And apparently I'm not the only one who does:
I have written quite often that the intelligence agencies are currently working on a total opinion cartography, storing information on every citizen, what their political beliefs are, to put the people on black- and whitelists.
That way, you don't even need to bother looking at the content, open up the book or get it out of the shrink wrap, but you can immediately see where the person who put it in circulation stands politically and then sort it out, into the trash it goes.
Officially, it is obviously just about "deforestation-free" books.
The trend is going towards the electronic book, and that is subject to constant changes and metamorphosis.
Shamed be he who thinks evil of it.
Last edited:
