/horror/ general megathread - Let's talk about movies and shit.

Finally saw Maxxine and it was...well it cleared the extremely low hurdle of being better than X and Pearl. Actually it was OK, and the only one of the trilogy I'd actually recommend watching, as it actually has some mystery and purpose to it.

That being said, it's not really a horror movie, much more of a thriller or avenging amgel than anything. It does have some gore, but that and its prequels are the only things that sell it as a horror.

X was utter shit that failed on EVERY level. Pearl was goofy, but it at least had an idea and went with it. It just didnt embrace anything fully enough (either the horror or the goofiness) to be actually decent. Maxxxine is the first one to actually seem like a whole real movie. Although its still a fairly weak one.

Spoilers follow, but i wouldn't bother avoiding them, since they're blatantly ovvious or don't matter.

It plays off of the Richard Ramirez (the night stalker) murders, but doesn't tie it into the movie. Like the prople killing Maxine's friends don't try to male them look like his murders or anything. It's just like oh, I guess there's two serial killers, but it's really not important becaus all that's going on is they're playing vintage night stalker news footage between some scenes.

I couldn't quit thinking of the movie Dragnet dueimg this. It's literally the same plot, except without the vocal evangelicals are actually satanists twist. I mean they twll you the "bad guy" in the first five minutes, and it's never fleshed out. It's just Tipper Gore and the PRMC who have decided to start killing everyone involved in porn or horror movies to save America. No, seriously, that's what it is. Yeah, I yawned too.

Mia Goth is utterly over-rated. She's fine, I guess. She shines much more in the previous movies because she's surrounded by trash. She is outclassed by Bacon, Debicki, Esposito (who is having a blast), and even the other British actress in the film within the film who is only briefly on screen. Also I dont get the smearing shit on her face to make her uglier thing. Like as far as I can tell she doesn't have that skin condition in real life, so making it so front and center is just puzzling and annoying.

Anyway, she plot armors and girlbosses it up, but it's still somewhat interesting because you want to see how it all ties together, and all the supporting cast are pretty great.

Skip X and Pearl, maybe wstch this if you're in the mood for a very mediocre vintage stalker movie. Like one gross set of titties, a great supporting cast (Kevin Bacon has some pretty good scenes), and a good gory gun battle to tie everything up. 2.5/5 seems high, but I think it's better than just a 2, so that's what it's getting.
 
RIP Tony Todd.

Candyman is still a tough watch for me, one of the only horror movies that makes me uneasy. Most horror movies I can casually watch or just throw them on as background noise, but Candyman really goes to places I don't think many other horror movies have. That whole scene with the baby in the apartment, oof.
 
So I got a chance to watch V/H/S Beyond and it is somehow even more dogshit than the previous lowpoint of Viral. Almost none of the segments actually followed the mechanical conventions of the supposed premise, the wrap-around segment was about Reddit posts and had the Corridor Crew cameo in it, and the theme of 'aliens' was not only lame, but not integrated into the segments.

I don't feel like going into details about each segment unprompted, and I'm not going to spoil anything about this shitshow. As I said, a big issue is that every segment has too many cameras that are way unnecessary, leading to a lot of jump cuts and lazy editing that seems schizoid. Additionally, in at least two segments the camera recording everything is sucked into a spacecraft and taken out of the galaxy, which begs the question of how did we get the fucking footage. Another big issue is the total lack of restraint or confidence in all the segments - every one of them showed too much of their (shitty) special effects/monsters, making them more of a joke than frightening, or they over-egged the pudding by going way past what they needed. Just about every segment felt really clumsy and artless, very amateur. The third issue was overall bad writing/direction, in most segments it was impossible to determine what was happening, why, who was doing it, and why we should care. Even segments with what should have been simple concepts were often overwrought, and one of them was just plain nonsensical.

The theme being 'aliens' was frustrating, because they've had several segments based on this theme that were done well, like Total Copy and Teenage Slumber Party Abduction. That they couldn't have some good ideas again and learn from their prior success is disappointing, and worse yet not even every segment went with the theme, so what was the point? It feels like every decision they made for this one was bad, starting from the jump.
The only good thing about it was James C Burns having a role. We Stan Sgt woods.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: John.Doe
RIP Tony Todd.

Candyman is still a tough watch for me, one of the only horror movies that makes me uneasy. Most horror movies I can casually watch or just throw them on as background noise, but Candyman really goes to places I don't think many other horror movies have. That whole scene with the baby in the apartment, oof.

They really hit it out of the park with the dreamlike, surrealistic tones to it and somehow managed to capture a lot of the original short story's essence. Something you'd think might be impossible to adapt, but they went and did it anyway. Tony Todd was one half of the amazing acting duo (Virginia Madsen) the other that anchored that film, it wouldn't have worked with any other actor and actress. Just amazing performances.
 
They really hit it out of the park with the dreamlike, surrealistic tones to it and somehow managed to capture a lot of the original short story's essence. Something you'd think might be impossible to adapt, but they went and did it anyway. Tony Todd was one half of the amazing acting duo (Virginia Madsen) the other that anchored that film, it wouldn't have worked with any other actor and actress. Just amazing performances.
Other than the basically perfect casting, two other inspired choices that make Candyman an all-timer were moving the setting from English council housing in the Barker short story to the hell on Earth that was Cabrini–Green in Chicago and Philip Glass's incredible score:

 
Other than the basically perfect casting, two other inspired choices that make Candyman an all-timer were moving the setting from English council housing in the Barker short story to the hell on Earth that was Cabrini–Green in Chicago and Philip Glass's incredible score:

Yes. Basically every choice the team made ended up being correct, which is pretty crazy. The final project is essentially flawless, both as a film in its own right and as an adaptation of The Forbidden. One of those lightning in a bottle type situations. A shame all the sequels and reboots were trash, but how could they be anything else? There was nowhere to go but down.
 
I know it's generally hated but anyone else like the Leatherface movie from 2017? I love the original Texas chainsaw massacre and not gonna say it's better but I feel like all the other remakes are the same and this one actually did something different while still being pretty damn brutal.
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Product Placement
Sorta watched Fresh while the wife had it on.
Seems like it would have been better about a half hour shorter, and if they decided on doing the stylish thing or the talky thing.

I feel like there could have been a good movie in there, but there was a CURRENT YEAR movie and a lifetime original movie that got in the way.
 
Ironically my fondest memory of Tony Todd isn't horror but as the main villain in Sabotage, one of my favourite action flicks from 1996.
Underrated role, very unhinged! Starring Mark Dacascos and Carrie-Anne Moss, but Tony steals the show. What a great presence he was.

465896007_1581954469087060_1626165964702286787_n.jpg
 
A new Silent Night Deadly Night remake has been announced and by the producers of the Terrifier franchise:

The producer behind the hit indie horror franchise Terrifier, Cineverse, is set to develop a new Christmas horror treat with a reimagining of the cult 1984 movie Silent Night, Deadly Night. It will be written and directed by Mike P. Nelson.

Silent Night, Deadly Night tells the story of “a child who is traumatized after seeing his parents killed by a man dressed as Santa Claus. Years later, he dons a Santa suit himself and gets bloody revenge.”

There was some controversy that followed the movie due to its hardcore graphic violence and advertising campaign. The posters and TV spots put an emphasis on the killer being dressed as Santa and the tagline read: “You’ve made it through Halloween, now try and survive Christmas.”

Parents actually gathered in groups and picketed outside of the movie theaters. They just weren’t happy with a Santa slasher movie. The National Parent & Teacher Association even fought to have the film removed from theaters.

Critics Siskel and Ebert even came out against the film. Siskel actually read the names of the production crew that worked on the film on air, and told them: “Shame on you.”

The studio behind the film, TriStar, ended up pulling all ads for the film six days after its release and it was taken out of theaters shortly after.

The movie actually had a strong opening and even made more than Wes Craven’s A Nightmare On Elm Street, which opened on the same day. The Santa slasher was only in theater for ten days and it made $2.4 million, which was three times its budget.

Cineverse Executive Director, Acquisitions, Brandon Hill said in a statement: “I have always been a huge fan of Silent Night, Deadly Night and can’t wait to bring Mike’s vision to fellow fans of iconic slashers.

“As we have seen this year, there continues to be incredible demand for independent horror films with bite, and we believe this can deliver strong audiences from theatrical to home entertainment and streaming.”

Nelson added: “The opportunity to work with producers involved with the original Silent Night, Deadly Night and to partner with the Terrifier 3 team is an honor. I’ll never forget walking into the video store at the mini mall when I was 5 and seeing that poster for the original film.

“I was in awe and started imagining what horrifying things would happen. To be a part of the film’s legacy many years later is insane! I’m looking forward to getting production underway, and unleashing my new take on this compelling story. Billy is back!”

What do you think about this 80s cult Christmas horror movie being remade?
 
I have watched the rest of the Evil Dead movies, and this is a fun series.

Evil Dead (2013) is pretty decent, with its only downside being some of the side characters, so its satisfying to see them die, but the main characters are good.

Evil Dead Rise (2023) is very fun, I like that its not in the cabin anymore and really gets to be more creative, its honestly my second favorite film in this series, and I hope if they do more of these films, they continue to vary the location.

As for how I'd rank them

Evil Dead II > Evil Dead Rise > Evil Dead = Evil Dead (2013) > Army of Darkness

I know there's a TV show, is it any good
 
1st season is okay. 2nd season is peak. 3rd season is trash aside from the ending. The 3rd season introduces Ash's long lost daughter and she's a completely worthless character.
iirc, the original showrunner left between season two and three. The reason being that he had planned on making Kelly (the hispanic chick) Ash's daughter, with the season two finale tying into that but for whatever reason the producers were completely against the idea. And yet they still gave him a daughter anyway.
 
1731607060880.jpeg

I watched this the other night, and two things about it surprised me. One is that it's a really solid movie, and two is that I somehow missed this in 2011 when it came out. There's only one scene I didn't like, where the lead actress over explains exactly what is going on in great detail because the film needs to be wrapped up, but I'll give it a pass because that was so typical of US/Canadian indie horror at the time. All in all, a really enjoyable movie.
 
I’m sure there’s mixed opinions here on the Terrifier movies, but the fandom is full of fucking freaks.
Or they’re a loud minority, but there’s something wrong with these people.
I guess it’s just people who are wayyy to into slashers and blood and dead women.

Thread tax: every appearance of Art the Clown. IMG_8430.jpeg
 
Back