Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Incels.is is full of hilarious fucked up copypastas with titles such as: "how Stuffing women is NOT immoral"
The Hardest R said:
Lame. You need to fully commit to the bit, instead of this mealymouthed bullshit at the end.
Click to expand...
I agree, but it was part of the original post. I wonder if the one who wrote it was serious or not... nah.
 
kiwifarms.st said:
Incels.is is full of hilarious fucked up copypastas with titles such as: "how Stuffing women is NOT immoral"

I agree, but it was part of the original post. I wonder if the one who wrote it was serious or not... nah.
Click to expand...
There was a guy in here earlier, Merry Schizoid, who posted unironically about how his only spank material was autopsy videos of young, Korean women because foids had forced him to. Don't assume something you post is too retarded or sick to be taken seriously.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Toothp!ck, World Famous Quasi Payer, Netizennameless and 7 others
kiwifarms.st said:
Taxidermy for human women is illegal, but I'd argue it shouldn't be. When women die, I see no reason why they can't be stuffed to preserve their bodies as sex dolls for men. This wouldn't harm anyone. The woman is already dead, and she wouldn't feel any pain, therefore this not hurting anyone.

This would only be a net gain for the world. Lonely sexless men can purchase these female skin puppets to have sex with, and this would increase their happiness. Anyone who opposes this is basically against increasing happiness on the planet with no downsides. I mean, you'd have to be a real piece of shit to not want struggling people to be happy.

Let's say some young prostitute was killed because of gang violence. Instead of throwing her body in a hole or burning her corpse, why not stuff her and sell her as a realistic fuck toy? I'd probably have to buy a few though cause of all the irreversible damage I'd inflict on their bodies. If I slit one of their throats or take a bite out of one, they wouldn't exactly heal like a living person, so I'd need to get a new one probably every month or so.

Idk maybe Costco could sell them in bulk. I could get myself a variety pack of some kind.

btw I didn't say anything that promotes violence. Objectively speaking, there is virtually no difference between a dead woman's body and a sex doll. They are both equally unfeeling and lifeless. Just in case though I'll state this is mostly a joke. Imagine the smell.... I'd be better off with just a regular sex doll.
Click to expand...
Join date: November 12th 2024.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: code123
@kiwifarms.st to clarify, what I'm saying is, if you see some really sick, insane post on incels.is and post it here without attribution, most likely outcome is people will just assume it's original to you, and you'll just get banned. "I was just pretending to be a necrophile" isn't a clever prank to play. A decent chunk of posters in this thread outed themselves as insanely sick and got redlined. Don't assume we all read the same schizoid forums as you. Put that shit in a quote box and link the source.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: World Famous Quasi Payer, Netizennameless, Biggie Smalls' Taint and 6 others
kiwifarms.st said:
Taxidermy for human women is illegal, but I'd argue it shouldn't be. When women die, I see no reason why they can't be stuffed to preserve their bodies as sex dolls for men. This wouldn't harm anyone. The woman is already dead, and she wouldn't feel any pain, therefore this not hurting anyone.

This would only be a net gain for the world. Lonely sexless men can purchase these female skin puppets to have sex with, and this would increase their happiness. Anyone who opposes this is basically against increasing happiness on the planet with no downsides. I mean, you'd have to be a real piece of shit to not want struggling people to be happy.

Let's say some young prostitute was killed because of gang violence. Instead of throwing her body in a hole or burning her corpse, why not stuff her and sell her as a realistic fuck toy? I'd probably have to buy a few though cause of all the irreversible damage I'd inflict on their bodies. If I slit one of their throats or take a bite out of one, they wouldn't exactly heal like a living person, so I'd need to get a new one probably every month or so.

Idk maybe Costco could sell them in bulk. I could get myself a variety pack of some kind.

btw I didn't say anything that promotes violence. Objectively speaking, there is virtually no difference between a dead woman's body and a sex doll. They are both equally unfeeling and lifeless. Just in case though I'll state this is mostly a joke. Imagine the smell.... I'd be better off with just a regular sex doll.
Click to expand...
I appreciate the foward thinking and efficient bussines mindset. reminds me off that one rpg maker horror game about dolls and that guy chasing you around with a chainsaw. The wild part is that you could definetely sell them and there will be atleast one sex deprived incels.is slaanesh worshipper who fucks troons willing to buy one. Maybe even add some servo motors into their joints so they can flail around a bit? Like simulated rape rp or something?
 
ENDTOPII said:
Pentalties in a legal system are proportional to the damage and consequences the crime has caused (to the ones involved) and what was lost in total value. ...
Click to expand...
Bad idea. What if gay men rape other men? Under this new framework that would just be par for the course. Get AIDs or some other loathsome disease, well there is a drug for that, so you have no legal recourse. Drugs aren't prefect and it's better not to have the problem then to desperately try to cure it. Currently assault and battery is assault and battery whether is sexual or otherwise. The problem with women crying rape is that judges don't require concrete evidence of a crime, so the accusation is a weapon women can use at any moment whether rape genuinely occurred or not. Your entire argument is a rationalisation of rape being sell heinous because technology is more advanced then in the past and there fore lack of technology should be balanced to match the crime of rape. Your argument ignores the genuine problems with legal representation for rape accusations and your argument makes you seem like a thirsty rape-happy incel.

Tax evasion is a bad foil argument because the taxes collected will never cover the Government's debt. If you think there is a direct relationship between the money the Government takes from you and public roads and fire department, then you are sadly very wrong about how money and Government actually works.

Women's criticism of the legal system as not be deferential enough to them is an illegitimate claim made by women and feminists. Women get their power from being a victim, so constantly claiming that they are victims in every part of life and the legal system only server to give women more power and deference. It matters not that it's dishonest because women are a higher caste and are not subject to logical inquiry, as such.

Government employees are dumb slaves who are either kept controlled with simple trinkets or blackmail. There isn't much thinking going on other than, "I do what the money printers tell me to do, and I don't get murdered." Yes they act avariciously to gain money and power, but that happens in every country and in every Government even before fractional reverse banking. Everything the Government does to the population isn't grounded in any real theory of balance, it is all just a humiliation ritual to achieve compliance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: There Is Light At The End and JoseRaulChupacabra
stares at error messages said:
Under this new framework that would just be par for the course. Get AIDs or some other loathsome disease, well there is a drug for that, so you have no legal recourse. Drugs aren't prefect and it's better not to have the problem then to desperately try to cure it. Currently assault and battery is assault and battery whether is sexual or otherwise.
Click to expand...

It's not a "new framework", it's just how shit works in general. There are liberals that are pushing for STDs "laws" to losen up, the legality of you having to disclose that you have it and even make it not illegal to spread said STDs. Their argument is unironically that "it's not thad bad" and "muh discrimination". This is the slippery slope I'm talking about.
We call it "smittskyddslagen" in Sweden, I'm pretty sure other nations have similar laws related to STDs.

stares at error messages said:
Your entire argument is a rationalisation of rape being sell heinous because technology is more advanced then in the past and there fore lack of technology should be balanced to match the crime of rape.
Click to expand...
Exactly! But you are neglecting that it is infact something people are making decisions upon.

People don't say it or think it because they don't want to admit that this is the case, because they think they are "moraly above" that. But people that are in charge are making decisions on this "logic" and it is reflected on how resources are distributed towards these cases. This is why FBI/IRS are going after a few bucks in a tax return, but doesn't give a shit about some groomers.

Most people have never seen any real consequences of rape, and it has made people "softer" to it. Porn has also contributed messing up the mental image of what rape actually is. Hence, this generation of judges and politicians (that actually directs money) are neglecting rape penalties. There are zero logistical reasons for it and they are too disconnected from nature to know how bad it really is. In a world of "science" and where everything has to be "logical", you will have a hard time arguing for harsher punishments.

You can also see this in immigration policies as well, they know that statistically some groups are more prone to violence and other crimes, and instead of preventing it (reducing risks), they focus on patching up the consequences instead (reducing damage). They are even so fucking confident that this system "works", that they can place pedos in schools as teachers now, importing hoards of niggers and so on... because you won't do shit and if something does happen they got methods to "patch it up".

People need to stop thinking that "muh liberals retarded", no, you are watching too much TikTok/Xitter and breadtubers! The ones that are actually in charge know damn well what they are doing, it's a very well balanced logistics to this, and I'm tired of people meming this away.

You are more affected by the visually suppressed consequences of crimes than you think. It has numbed down our mental image of what rape actually is, and it shows in how we prioritize things politically.
stares at error messages said:
your argument makes you seem like a thirsty rape-happy incel.
Click to expand...
It's not my argument, it's me explaining how a politician would balance out the logistics on this topic.

Politicians might thirsty rape-happy tho...
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
  • Disagree
Reactions: Party Hat Wurmple, The Hardest R and The Ugly One
ENDTOPII said:
Most people have never seen any real consequences of rape, and it has made people "softer" to it.
Click to expand...
That's because nobody's ever met anyone who was actually raped. I've been on this planet for a long fucking time and you know how many people I've met who were raped? Just two. Sure, plenty were "raped", but it's not rape when you're swallowing his jizz and spread your legs open like a banana split and decide it was somehow against your will later. It's not rape when you go to Chad's house, down half a bottle of vodka or box wine and let him turn you into a human pretzel but regret it because he never called back. I don't give a rats fucking anus, if you went to Bill Cosby's and took the funny pills he gave you and wound up choking on his pudding pop, you weren't raped; you're just a drugged up whore. You don't do fucking drugs or heavy booze drinking with a guy alone in a room unless you're expecting him to feed you his salami stick. I don't care if it's the law, I'm tired of the law coddling stupid people. This shit is the equivalent of warning labels on hair dryers telling consumers not to stick them up their twats or asses while hot.

People who were actually violently raped usually don't fucking talk about it and it comes out in other ways. They don't go online and milk it for attention. They don't demand gibs for it. They don't tell you to like and fucking subscribe. The reality is, most people have not met a woman who was violently raped against her will.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Minion Facebook Memes, babadook, 6thRanger and 22 others
Party Hat Wurmple said:
That's because nobody's ever met anyone who was actually raped.
Click to expand...
When I was 9 I knew a girl on Limewire IRC that had been raped at knifepoint by her biological father. She had a mental breakdown in the time I was using the IRC, because he was struck by a car in a traffic accident and there was this really tormenting mixture of sadness and relief.

Generally speaking most people do not talk openly about times they were raped. I'll leave it to your imagination why that is.

Party Hat Wurmple said:
Sure, plenty were "raped", but it's not rape when you're swallowing his jizz and spread your legs open like a banana split and decide it was somehow against your will later.
Click to expand...
You're really fucking gross and I don't like you. Just letting you know.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Minion Facebook Memes, Foghotten, Hermann von Salsa and 32 others
Null said:
When I was 9 I knew a girl on Limewire IRC that had been raped at knifepoint by her biological father. She had a mental breakdown in the time I was using the IRC, because he was struck by a car in a traffic accident and there was this really tormenting mixture of sadness and relief.
Click to expand...
Horrifying if true and karmic justice delivered. Nobody supports this shit happening and I hope this girl went on to live a long and fulfilling happy life.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: babadook, World Famous Quasi Payer, fake farts and 5 others
Party Hat Wurmple said:
Sure, plenty were "raped", but it's not rape when you're swallowing his jizz and spread your legs open like a banana split and decide it was somehow against your will later. It's not rape when you go to Chad's house, down half a bottle of vodka or box wine and let him turn you into a human pretzel but regret it because he never called back. I don't give a rats fucking anus, if you went to Bill Cosby's and took the funny pills he gave you and wound up choking on his pudding pop, you weren't raped; you're just a drugged up whore. You don't do fucking drugs or heavy booze drinking with a guy alone in a room unless you're expecting him to feed you his salami stick. I don't care if it's the law, I'm tired of the law coddling stupid people. This shit is the equivalent of warning labels on hair dryers telling consumers not to stick them up their twats or asses while hot.
Click to expand...
Why are you so passionate about the boundaries of what defines rape and whether women are really innocent in it?
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Trombonista, AwfulWillow, World Famous Quasi Payer and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back