Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Folgers Can]

Everything will come out eventually

Unfortunately the only thing more horrifying than a CSA case is the fact that there is a plausible scenario in which not one shred of it would ever become known publicly:

Rule 4. Accessibility to Case Records
Subdivision 1. Accessibility. Subject to subdivision 4 of this rule (Records Referring to Information in Non-Public Documents) and Rule 8, subdivision 5 (Access to Certain Evidence), the following case records are not accessible to the public:
...
(m) Minor Victim Identifying Information. (1) Where Applicable. Except as otherwise provided by order of the court, information that specifically identifies a victim who is a minor at the time of the alleged offense or incident in the following cases:
(A) criminal... cases involving a... complaint[] or indictment issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 609.322, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.3451, or 609.3453;
...
Subd. 4. Records Referring to Information in Non-Public Documents. Generally, a rule or law precluding public access to an entire document such as a report or medical record shall not preclude the parties or the court from mentioning the contents of the document in open court or in otherwise publicly accessible pleadings or documents such as motions, affidavits, and memoranda of law where such discussion is necessary and relevant to the particular issues or legal argument being addressed in the proceeding. Except as otherwise authorized by the presiding judge in a particular case, this rule permitting mention of otherwise non-public information shall not apply to:
...
(b) Identity of a minor victim of sexual assault under Rule 4, subd. 1(m), except that unless otherwise ordered by the presiding judge, such victim may be referred to by initials and year of birth
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/ra/id/4/

Rule 25.03 Restrictive Orders
Subd. 1. Scope. Except as provided in Rules 25.01, 26.03, subd. 6, and 33.04, this rule governs the issuance of any court order restricting public access to public records relating to a criminal proceeding.
Subd. 2. Motion and Notice.
(a) A restrictive order may be issued only on motion and after notice and hearing.
(b) Notice of the hearing must be given in the time and manner and to interested persons, including the news media, as the court may direct. The notice must be issued publicly at least 24 hours before the hearing and must afford the public and the news media an opportunity to be heard.
...
Subd. 4. Grounds for Restrictive Order. The court may issue a restrictive order under this rule only if the court concludes that:
(a) Access to public records will present a substantial likelihood of interfering with the fair and impartial administration of justice.
(b) All reasonable alternatives to a restrictive order are inadequate.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/cr/id/25/

Now that's not to say that Nick would ever have done such a thing to his coke-addled "favorite," and is only to point out that if he had, you can be damned sure he would have paid through the nose for every bit of eleventh-hour motion practice it'd take to ensure that the gayylawgs miss their 24-hour window to ever even catch wind of it. In that scenario the only way that such a swiftly sealed fourth criminal file would ever become public is in the uncertain event of a conviction, which could help to explain why it's so critical to throw every last appellate kitchen sink at voiding the search warrant when simply taking a plea deal for a pissant first-offense drug charge would have amounted to a slap on the wrist. Perhaps he had to fight to the bitter end because other, nonpublic branches of the proverbial poisonous tree stemming from that warrant left it where there was truly was no choice.

That's just a hypothetical and who the hell knows, but the point is that we need to be ready for the very real possibility of never even being allowed to know.

 

[Harm]

I'd rather hold doubt that any of their children was abused in that manner than wrongfully jump to the conclusion there was abuse of that nature.

 

[Cousin Eddie]

I think this is a result we don't want to think about. It makes sense about the sa testing, but it is so hard to wrap my mind around it.

Same. Even with all his pedo talk, his pedo paypigging, his defense of Cuties, his never shutting the fuck up about American Beauty. I remind myself, "Normal people don't aspire to build a sex dungeon." It's still hard to comprehend.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

I'd rather hold doubt that any of their children was abused in that manner than wrongfully jump to the conclusion there was abuse of that nature.

Am I wrong to think that we'd see more family scuttlebutt coming to the forefront than what we have if that was the case?

All we have right now is the "typically, kids being regularly exposed to drugs equals abuse" idea and Aaron vaguely claiming something "Big" has yet to be revealed that will piss us off more when it does.

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

Unfortunately the only thing more horrifying than a CSA case is the fact that there is a plausible scenario in which not one shred of it would ever become known publicly:

I have no idea how victim anonymity works in Minnesota, or the US for that matter, but surely this would have resulted in the entire CHIPS case being sealed because identifying information for the child that tested positive was accessible. If there was a CSA case rumbling on in the background, then if and when they made it to court the publicly available documentation in effect allows us to identify who the victim is.

Additionally, the discussion around the intention of CHIPS to return the children to the home at the earliest safe opportunity did not sound like they were worried about the intentions of the parents - just the state of the home, the sobriety of the parents and the potential presence of drug residue.

 

[not william stenchever]

Warhammer is hilarious. Especially fantasy.

I have a soft spot for the dwarves and their great book of grudges.

 

[Harm]

Am I wrong to think that we'd see more family scuttlebutt coming to the forefront than what we have if that was the case?

Problems stem from so many moving parts in this that it'd be impossible with our limited view as outsiders to make those judgments. Did they really interpret the one child testing positive as a sign of CSA? If so, did they really give these follow-up examinations and tests? If so, did they turn up positive? If so, who did they suspect as the abuser? It's such a string of stringent, yet baseless theorization that it's detrimental to even begin to entertain those things, especially when based upon a tweet alleging a supposed phone call between this dude and some supposed expert.

That's a longform way of saying that this is outside of our wheelhouse as gossipers, and even if someone posting here has some relevant expertise, without the full records of the case they can only speculate so much.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I have a soft spot for the dwarves and their great book of grudges.

Fantasy was never my thing. I remember when part of 40k fun was finding the cultural references and trying to insert new ones into batreps.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

The comments on addiction in this thread have been more revealing than any "power leveling" could be.

Some of us here are addicts.
Some of us here have been raised by addicts.
Some of us here have lost family and friends to addiction
And some of us here are sweet summer children.

May you never know the pain, shame and destruction of addiction.

Spoiler: Roll Call

Nick seems so terribly offended at being branded an addict, but he’s just angry the jig is up

A drug problem would somewhat excuse him from this his terrible behavior.

Nick's fucked up explanation, because he can exert a degree of control sometimes he isn't an addict. Like he is the first one to pull that shit. It's literally what every "addict" says.

The minute he admits he might have a problem, then he’s got everyone on his back and monitoring his behavior and looking for signs of intoxication forever.

It really does. He's a cokehead. He's a drug addict. That's both the beginning and the end of the story and nothing he does or says isn't explained by it. There's no mystery. There's no enigma. He's just a drug addicted piece of shit and that's all he'll ever be.

I don’t think anybody could’ve predicted this outcome for Nick. I have to admit, It’s a little disturbing to see him go from a seemingly dorky harmless guy, to endangering his children and getting into hard drugs, particularly at his age.

Most Narcissists are incredibly fragile emotionally, and either get diagnosed when they have legal issues (often due to drugs) or seek help dealing with comorbid depression or anxiety. Stimulants, especially, are appealing since they feed into the person's grandiosity.

Addicts can be kind, generous loving people.

Nick isn’t, because he’s not just an addict he’s also a cunt, a cuck and a narc.

Even when you see addicts relapse immediately, before they do they usually at least express an understanding of what their addiction did to them and their family.

Determining whether their cuntish behaviour is a product of the drug use or the personality disorder is a fool's errand. Best to just cut them out of your life whenever possible.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

lol wut. I mean, mind you, trying to explain Rakets to someone not in the know and not sounding crazy is pretty hard. But they were talking about the email "hack". Nicks coke and weapons charges are also another avenue by which he could be disbarred.

Also, I can't wait for Melton's PC to be taken in a search warrant, and they arrest him for CP.

Nick's trust structure, identifying the brown substance, Melton HDD content, Juju's HDD content, and Nick's DM's are on my Christmas list for discovery in a legal case.

One last thing, Noah was never mocked for building the Ark. Something April would know if she had ever read the Old Testament.

This is an oft repeated extra-Biblical inference.

tussled the daughter's hair

Word sperg: 'Tousled', not -tussled'.

As a mandated reporter, I have seen it happen too many times. The state/country is too overwhelmed, and cases slip, even ones like this.

I'm sure the drug test was accurate. I wouldn't be surprised if the child saw something no child should see. I sincerely doubt the child was intentionally molested or sexually assaulted. Nick is a scum but I doubt even he would sink this low and have the gall to look people in the eyes.

I don't think there's any way the kids would be in the house at the same time as the parents if the kid were molested. The CPS isn't that retarded.

There is a dedicated thread for this dark theory-crafting. Please use it.

 

[AntiSchwuletteAktion]

The Spectre Report shared this on X: (X/A)
View attachment 6659687

Spectre is this larping faggot, right?

 

[Folgers Can]

This isn't correct. Nick received 4 separate citations with a total of 9 violations within a 12 month period.

Yeah, I must have glossed over 73-VB-24-3114 only because its expired tabs charge under Chapter 168 doesn't factor into suspension and because its insurance charge is the sort of "fix it" ticket that any drooling retard can get dismissed by just showing up at the court clerk's counter and showing an insurance card that wasn't handy at the time of the stop, but looking back now I see he was sub-retard enough to let even that one go to conviction, so that makes 4 convictions that should have grounded him for 30 days.

I still refuse to believe that each conviction's underlying offenses aren't treated as running concurrently though, because if they did then the 7 non-registration offenses would have dinged him for 90 days. For 30 days he could fly under the radar maybe, but with every deputy within 30 miles on a first-name basis with him by now and with so many hundreds of miles a week that he drives the kids to 1AM underwater nyckelharpa lessons or whatever, there's no way in hell we wouldn't be seeing multiple driving-after-suspension misdemeanors piling up by now.

 

[RotPockets]

Now that's not to say that Nick would ever have done such a thing to his coke-addled "favorite," and is only to point out that if he had, you can be damned sure he would have paid through the nose for every bit of eleventh-hour motion practice it'd take to ensure that the gayylawgs miss their 24-hour window to ever even catch wind of it.

Nick was on Step Three when those goddamn meddling Scandinavian incel prudes from the local police force ruined all of his hard work.

 

[USAroXX]

Has Nick made any indication of SA testing done on any of the children? Futhermore this (sadly) makes sense, considering how Nick keeps hanging around and supporting known pedos.

Why is Maori
And
Spectre

Posting similar ODD claims
[both seem to excuse nicks crimes].
1. [Maori says] Cyber-crime is not illegal if... and
2. [Spectre says] Kids would not be given back to actual junkie parents.

I Talked to a lawyer friend who said...
I Talked to a MA drug lab tech friend who said...

Nobody finds this a HUGE Co-ink-A-dink

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Around the time Aaron later said Nick was pressuring him to buy the house Nick was rambling on stream about how he was about to do something to finally get the extension to his house started, he had some sort of weird setup in his head where the room would have multiple "sets" and his desk would be mounted in the middle of a room on top of something that would spin around based on whether he was doing a normal stream or a Locals stream or whatever. I don't think he had legal expenses in mind.

Why not just make the fucking desk spin? That would be far easier from an engineering standpoint.

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

@MNPublicRecords, come back....we miss you. The kids miss you. It's time to come home.

Please help us verify the authenticity of Spectre's sperging, if any of that holds up.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Why not just make the fucking desk spin? That would be far easier from an engineering standpoint.

Cocaine is a hell of a drug

 

[TherapyMan]

The Spectre Report shared this on X: (X/A)
View attachment 6659687

No person should rely on a second-hand account of a supposed expert, let alone one relayed by fucking Spectre of all people.

 

[Folgers Can]

I have no idea how victim anonymity works in Minnesota, or the US for that matter, but surely this would have resulted in the entire CHIPS case being sealed because identifying information for the child that tested positive was accessible. If there was a CSA case rumbling on in the background, then if and when they made it to court the publicly available documentation in effect allows us to identify who the victim is.

Additionally, the discussion around the intention of CHIPS to return the children to the home at the earliest safe opportunity did not sound like they were worried about the intentions of the parents - just the state of the home, the sobriety of the parents and the potential presence of drug residue.

No - the only reason that the CHIPS case was public for as long as it was is precisely because there was not (or was not yet) any CSA accusation or any other item on a long list of codified triggers that can upend its being presumptively public. The moment that CSA first becomes alleged is the moment that the above-quoted Rule 4 would come into play for all cases generally and the above-quoted Rule 25.03 could come into play for any unknown ancillary criminal case in particular. Until that time the governing rule in the CHIPS case would have been the below that fortunately made so much available until it wasn't, and it too notably includes very similar exclusions as triggers for when to seal the file:

RULE 8. ACCESSIBILITY OF JUVENILE PROTECTION CASE RECORDS
Rule 8.01. Presumption of Access to Juvenile Protection Case Records.
Except as otherwise provided in Rule 8.04 of these rules and the Rules of Public Access to Records of the Judicial Branch, all juvenile protection case records relating to any juvenile protection matters, as those terms are defined in Rule 2.01, are presumed to be accessible to any... member of the public for inspection and copying. ...
...
Rule 8.04.Juvenile Protection Case Records Inaccessible to the Public, Parties, or Participants
...
Subd. 2.Confidential Documents and Confidential Information.The following juvenile protection case records are confidential documents or confidential information and are accessible to the public, parties, and participants only as specified in subdivision 3:
...
(b) audio or video recordings of a child alleging or describing physical abuse, sexual abuse, or neglect of any child;
...
(j) the identity of a minor victim or perpetrator of an alleged or adjudicated sexual assault;
...
Subd. 3.Access to Juvenile Protection Case Records by Public, Parties, and Participants.
(a) Public. The public shall have access to inspect and copy all juvenile protection case records in the court file, except those listed in subdivision 2(a)-(p) and subdivision 4 of this rule.
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/court_rules/ju/subtype/rjpp/id/8/

There’s also a 0% chance he wouldn’t have a child sexual abuse charge added to his list of charges already.

It's at least non-zero if for no other reason than that the drug case's procedural steps like Brady disclosures and omnibus motions could have been too far along for an "amended" complaint to be practical or convenient. There has never been anything standing in the way of the state instead issuing a wholly separate complaint with a separate court file number alleging offenses for which the relevant facts don't have much Venn overlap with facts relevant to offenses in the pre-existing court file. That is common practice and would be strategically appropriate for the state in this instance.

Again I'm not saying it happened here; I'm just saying that in light of the privacy rules involved, everyone's assumption that there would be any public trace of whether it happened is pure folly.

 

[Goofy Logic]

Spectre is going to get a shower call soon because of that.