Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.1%

  • Total voters
    293
I know I'm not as well-versed in retardation as many people out there, but never before have I seen someone have to openly brag about getting their CPS case closed. It's almost like the withdrawal is manifesting as him trying to solidify and run with his new white trash persona.
Also note how little mention the kids or Qayla get. Only Nick suffered through this, he had to get his pee checked for god's sake! What an ordeal! He's a modern day martyr
 
It was a jab at Nick, not Tolkien and his characters.
Still his attitude towards the ring (I know it destroys everybody who has it, but I'm special and I can control it) is close to Nick's attitude towards drugs and booze.
Nick being more like Saruman also tracks with becoming like a Balrog/ Balldo of Morgoth. Balrogs are Istari who have fallen to the shadow, unlike Istari (wizards) like Gandalf who stayed true to the Valar & their mission. Always thought that was neat that Balrogs are the dark counterpart to wizards in Tolkien’s works. So, even if Nick is more like Saruman, rather than a full fledged Balrog/ Balldo of Morgoth, he’s still the same race of creature, regardless of which. My only concern is that Nick being of a powerful race like the Istari isn’t really believable. Nick is more like a human wastrel, someone like Gríma Wormtongue, a stooge of Saruman who thinks he’s more powerful & important than he is. But Balldo of Morgoth was too funny & clever (for LotR nerds,) so it works well.

More Nick chats from PaedoMelts live show going on today:
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
7.jpg
That’s all I caught. Can’t stomach listening to PaedoMelt as he watches every word Aaron says on his SteelToe show, plus PaedoMelt talks as slow as a Down’s syndrome patient on Quaaludes. Nick seems really excited that his kids are back by spending his time watching the stalker of the man who got away. To add a little context, Melton was smack talking April, & the Shady beach guy in PaedoMelts chat asked Nick if he was ok with PM shit talking April. Looks like Nick tried to make it about Aaron though anyway because the guy is obsessed with the Toe who got away.
 
View attachment 6666929

I am monummetally behind, but here is something to discuss.

I forgive you all for adding 30 pages to my backlog...
So what are the chances hes actually just lying? It could be that the agency has said they WILL grant full custody depending on the outcome of his court case. It also could be that hes been so felted the last few weeks hes just straight up lieing.
 
If i've learned anything from this thread, and it follows the usual pattern, he'll be charged for the Aaron google shit within a week or so. He'll then sperg either on stream or on xitter. and then he'll do or say something else incriminating. as far as I know he hasn't commited beastiality yet, so look out for that I guess. This is pure bs speculation, btw.
 
Nick REALLY wants that arrest footage hidden. I wonder just how damning the footage is.

On another note, I want to see Nick from 2017-2019 talking to Nick Today. His rants at Ron Toye, and Maddox's lawyers apply entirely to him - hence my thinking that all he yells at people for is projection.
 
I'm so fucking pissed off and grasping at straws but here's a thought:

Kristen Pierce is the prosecuting attorney in BOTH cases. She may have agreed to close the CPS case because she knows the plea deals that are coming. They will require drug testing and strict oversight.

Thoughts?
That’s probably the correct answer, since it balances the least amount of effort with the largest possible disaster in the future.
 
I'm so fucking pissed off and grasping at straws but here's a thought:

Kristen Pierce is the prosecuting attorney in BOTH cases. She may have agreed to close the CPS case because she knows the plea deals that are coming. They will require drug testing and strict oversight.

Thoughts?

I have no idea how feasible it is, but mandatory drug testing for the entirety of his probation and having to plead guilty to the child endangerment charge are two things I want to see out of a plea deal.

When you're on probation, is it like bail that you have to be law-abiding? Would his "hacking" Aaron stunt mean that - if they charge him after he pleas to the drugs etc - that he's violated that stipulation? Or does it not count as the crime was committed before he pled?
 
If i've learned anything from this thread, and it follows the usual pattern, he'll be charged for the Aaron google shit within a week or so. He'll then sperg either on stream or on xitter. and then he'll do or say something else incriminating. as far as I know he hasn't commited beastiality yet, so look out for that I guess. This is pure bs speculation, btw.
As far as we know, Nick has no regard for the life of cute fuzzy creatures, but no sexual attraction toward them.

Yet.
 
If i've learned anything from this thread, and it follows the usual pattern, he'll be charged for the Aaron google shit within a week or so. He'll then sperg either on stream or on xitter. and then he'll do or say something else incriminating. as far as I know he hasn't commited beastiality yet, so look out for that I guess. This is pure bs speculation, btw.
As far as we know, Nick has no regard for the life of cute fuzzy creatures, but no sexual attraction toward them.

Yet.
Welfare check on the dog(s) please.
 
I won't bother doing a bunch of quoting here, but I agree with the kid testing positive being legit. They will retest an 8 year old. This isn't gonna be some shit where they just do one quick test and wing it. Nick claiming he wouldnt face more serious charges is bullshit, because it would be rolled into endangerment or something else. Why? You can't really prove how the kid got the drugs, but you can prove that it was a result of negligent parenting. Nick has a big fuckin mouth too so if there was another test and anything ever came back anything besides positive, he would be swearing up and down all over the place about it.
Why would they retest if they had no path to criminal charges? I think the only reason they tested the kids was to determine what medical treatment they need. A positive test just triggers an eval for drug treatment. If the children suffered a serious injury from drugs (i.e. OD or addiction) I can see them going down the criminal route with criminal testing protocols. But just to determine treatment, a single positive test triggers a psych eval not retesting. No need to retest. If I'm the GAL, a positive test triggers med treatment. A followup test whether it's pos or neg isn't going to change that plan. A false neg is more likely than a false pos so retesting with conflicting results triggers a 3rd test. It becomes analysis paralysis when all I want is a doctor to determine if drug treatment is needed for the kids. I don't really care how Nick feels about the positive test.
 
Back