Opinion The DOGE Plan to Reform Government - By Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy

Following the Supreme Court’s guidance, we’ll reverse a decadeslong executive power grab.​

By Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy
Nov. 20, 2024 12:33 pm ET

1732147457069.png
Illustration: David Gothard

Our nation was founded on the basic idea that the people we elect run the government. That isn’t how America functions today. Most legal edicts aren’t laws enacted by Congress but “rules and regulations” promulgated by unelected bureaucrats—tens of thousands of them each year. Most government enforcement decisions and discretionary expenditures aren’t made by the democratically elected president or even his political appointees but by millions of unelected, unappointed civil servants within government agencies who view themselves as immune from firing thanks to civil-service protections.

This is antidemocratic and antithetical to the Founders’ vision. It imposes massive direct and indirect costs on taxpayers. Thankfully, we have a historic opportunity to solve the problem. On Nov. 5, voters decisively elected Donald Trump with a mandate for sweeping change, and they deserve to get it.

President Trump has asked the two of us to lead a newly formed Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, to cut the federal government down to size. The entrenched and ever-growing bureaucracy represents an existential threat to our republic, and politicians have abetted it for too long. That’s why we’re doing things differently. We are entrepreneurs, not politicians. We will serve as outside volunteers, not federal officials or employees. Unlike government commissions or advisory committees, we won’t just write reports or cut ribbons. We’ll cut costs.

We are assisting the Trump transition team to identify and hire a lean team of small-government crusaders, including some of the sharpest technical and legal minds in America. This team will work in the new administration closely with the White House Office of Management and Budget. The two of us will advise DOGE at every step to pursue three major kinds of reform: regulatory rescissions, administrative reductions and cost savings. We will focus particularly on driving change through executive action based on existing legislation rather than by passing new laws. Our North Star for reform will be the U.S. Constitution, with a focus on two critical Supreme Court rulings issued during President Biden’s tenure.

In West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (2022), the justices held that agencies can’t impose regulations dealing with major economic or policy questions unless Congress specifically authorizes them to do so. In Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024), the court overturned the Chevron doctrine and held that federal courts should no longer defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of the law or their own rulemaking authority. Together, these cases suggest that a plethora of current federal regulations exceed the authority Congress has granted under the law.

DOGE will work with legal experts embedded in government agencies, aided by advanced technology, to apply these rulings to federal regulations enacted by such agencies. DOGE will present this list of regulations to President Trump, who can, by executive action, immediately pause the enforcement of those regulations and initiate the process for review and rescission. This would liberate individuals and businesses from illicit regulations never passed by Congress and stimulate the U.S. economy.

When the president nullifies thousands of such regulations, critics will allege executive overreach. In fact, it will be correcting the executive overreach of thousands of regulations promulgated by administrative fiat that were never authorized by Congress. The president owes lawmaking deference to Congress, not to bureaucrats deep within federal agencies. The use of executive orders to substitute for lawmaking by adding burdensome new rules is a constitutional affront, but the use of executive orders to roll back regulations that wrongly bypassed Congress is legitimate and necessary to comply with the Supreme Court’s recent mandates. And after those regulations are fully rescinded, a future president couldn’t simply flip the switch and revive them but would instead have to ask Congress to do so.

A drastic reduction in federal regulations provides sound industrial logic for mass head-count reductions across the federal bureaucracy. DOGE intends to work with embedded appointees in agencies to identify the minimum number of employees required at an agency for it to perform its constitutionally permissible and statutorily mandated functions. The number of federal employees to cut should be at least proportionate to the number of federal regulations that are nullified: Not only are fewer employees required to enforce fewer regulations, but the agency would produce fewer regulations once its scope of authority is properly limited. Employees whose positions are eliminated deserve to be treated with respect, and DOGE’s goal is to help support their transition into the private sector. The president can use existing laws to give them incentives for early retirement and to make voluntary severance payments to facilitate a graceful exit.

Conventional wisdom holds that statutory civil-service protections stop the president or even his political appointees from firing federal workers. The purpose of these protections is to protect employees from political retaliation. But the statute allows for “reductions in force” that don’t target specific employees. The statute further empowers the president to “prescribe rules governing the competitive service.” That power is broad. Previous presidents have used it to amend the civil service rules by executive order, and the Supreme Court has held—in Franklin v. Massachusetts (1992) and Collins v. Yellen (2021) that they weren’t constrained by the Administrative Procedures Act when they did so. With this authority, Mr. Trump can implement any number of “rules governing the competitive service” that would curtail administrative overgrowth, from large-scale firings to relocation of federal agencies out of the Washington area. Requiring federal employees to come to the office five days a week would result in a wave of voluntary terminations that we welcome: If federal employees don’t want to show up, American taxpayers shouldn’t pay them for the Covid-era privilege of staying home.

Finally, we are focused on delivering cost savings for taxpayers. Skeptics question how much federal spending DOGE can tame through executive action alone. They point to the 1974 Impoundment Control Act, which stops the president from ceasing expenditures authorized by Congress. Mr. Trump has previously suggested this statute is unconstitutional, and we believe the current Supreme Court would likely side with him on this question. But even without relying on that view, DOGE will help end federal overspending by taking aim at the $500 billion plus in annual federal expenditures that are unauthorized by Congress or being used in ways that Congress never intended, from $535 million a year to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and $1.5 billion for grants to international organizations to nearly $300 million to progressive groups like Planned Parenthood.

The federal government’s procurement process is also badly broken. Many federal contracts have gone unexamined for years. Large-scale audits conducted during a temporary suspension of payments would yield significant savings. The Pentagon recently failed its seventh consecutive audit, suggesting that the agency’s leadership has little idea how its annual budget of more than $800 billion is spent. Critics claim that we can’t meaningfully close the federal deficit without taking aim at entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which require Congress to shrink. But this deflects attention from the sheer magnitude of waste, fraud and abuse that nearly all taxpayers wish to end—and that DOGE aims to address by identifying pinpoint executive actions that would result in immediate savings for taxpayers.

With a decisive electoral mandate and a 6-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, DOGE has a historic opportunity for structural reductions in the federal government. We are prepared for the onslaught from entrenched interests in Washington. We expect to prevail. Now is the moment for decisive action. Our top goal for DOGE is to eliminate the need for its existence by July 4, 2026—the expiration date we have set for our project. There is no better birthday gift to our nation on its 250th anniversary than to deliver a federal government that would make our Founders proud.

Mr. Musk is CEO of SpaceX and Tesla. Mr. Ramaswamy, a businessman, is author, most recently, of “Truths: The Future of America First” and was a candidate for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. President-elect Trump has named them co-heads of the Department of Government Efficiency.

Source (Archive)
 
Our North Star for reform will be the U.S. Constitution, with a focus on two critical Supreme Court rulings issued during President Biden’s tenure.

In West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency (2022), the justices held that agencies can’t impose regulations dealing with major economic or policy questions unless Congress specifically authorizes them to do so. In Loper Bright v. Raimondo (2024), the court overturned the Chevron doctrine and held that federal courts should no longer defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of the law or their own rulemaking authority. Together, these cases suggest that a plethora of current federal regulations exceed the authority Congress has granted under the law.

DOGE will work with legal experts embedded in government agencies, aided by advanced technology, to apply these rulings to federal regulations enacted by such agencies. DOGE will present this list of regulations to President Trump, who can, by executive action, immediately pause the enforcement of those regulations and initiate the process for review and rescission. This would liberate individuals and businesses from illicit regulations never passed by Congress and stimulate the U.S. economy.
Holy shit, they are using the nuking of Chevron doctrine as a way to cut regulation. Like fucking pottery.
 
Godspeed. All the retards talking about a civil war thinking it was going to be BLM getting taken to the next level or something. No, this is what will cause a civil war. Taking on 100 years of corruption and government overreach is going to provoke more unrest than some nignogs lighting cars on fire. The Beast will not abide this silently.

I honestly don't think much will be done, but I do hope.
 
God speed and good luck, you crazy diamonds.
It'll be like taking to a forest with a weed whacker, but if anyone can do it, its a space autist with a grudge and his pet jeet.

Remember, this shit is what keeps Musk's long term nerd plans hindered. He'll fight tooth and nail to remove them.
 
Our top goal for DOGE is to eliminate the need for its existence by July 4, 2026—the expiration date we have set for our project. There is no better birthday gift to our nation on its 250th anniversary than to deliver a federal government that would make our Founders proud.
This is actually a big statement. A self terminating agency. It has 2 years to get shit done. No time can be wasted. The boats have been burned behind them. Let's go bros.
 
Best of luck. Hope these guys understand that the system will throw everything its got to keep itself alive. Right down to its rotten tendrils.

Don't be surprised if Elon suddenly catches a case of 'found CP' on his servers which will throw the glowies at his doorstep alongside criminal syndicates that all of a sudden want protection money along with BLM and Antifa.

This is a problem that's going to require a ton of preparation and contingencies.
 
That could end up a smash hit or complete dud (just like DOGE overall), and that's exciting.
Vivek might singlehandedly shift my opinion on jeets if DOGE succeeds and it's making me feel some kinda way.

I dearly want this to hit and hit hard. I guess this goes along with a larger issue regarding Trump. No, I do not expect him to do everything he says he's going to do. He's not even ultra-giga based given that he is the Zion Don. That shit ain't changing.

What he does give me is hope. I got it in 2016 and despite things not going great, he left a legacy beyond his administration. The most important that I've seen was in the SCOTUS and federal judges. A number of postive wins in the judiciary have occured because of his appointments. This was important and didn't get media coverage because it was boring and actually meant something.

I mean fuck, he even killed the PATRIOT Act and nobody talked about it. Go back to Bush Jr.'s administration and look at how many liberals in the media were crowing about how it was the end of freedom and it was terrible. I'm not a sperg who talks politics amongst family and friends, but the PATRIOT Act thing is something I will bring out after doing my best to steer a political discussion if someone won't stfu about it. Not even Saint Obama himself took the PATRIOT Act on. He authorized US citizens to be arrested on US soil and held without trial ffs. "Biden" recently gave DoD pipehitters free reign to murder US citizens on US soil. Don't worry, they've all said they won't do it.

It looks like Trump learned some lessons from last time. I know I'm not going to get all my wishes fulfilled, but I'm more hopeful for this presidency than I've been in 30 years.
 
Are we sure Elon wrote this? Its relatively short and to the point, and bereft of the flowery words autists are often prone to indulging in.
This is actually a big statement. A self terminating agency. It has 2 years to get shit done. No time can be wasted. The boats have been burned behind them. Let's go bros.
To be fair Trump in general really only has two years to get shit done. Unless the Republicans can get some wins during the midterms he'll be a lame duck and need to start thinking hard about who to choose as his successor.
 
Are we sure Elon wrote this? Its relatively short and to the point, and bereft of the flowery words autists are often prone to indulging in.
It says both. To be fair a ghost writer probably did most of it.
To be fair Trump in general really only has two years to get shit done. Unless the Republicans can get some wins during the midterms he'll be a lame duck and need to start thinking hard about who to choose as his successor.
I mean the successor is Vance. He can go hard for 2 years at Super Sayain when before he couldn't because he had to worry about getting elected. It seems a lot of it though is going to be done through executive orders and using the ruling on Cheveron against the agencies- which in theory he can do, and do quickly
 
To be fair Trump in general really only has two years to get shit done. Unless the Republicans can get some wins during the midterms he'll be a lame duck and need to start thinking hard about who to choose as his successor.
Trump has all four years to gut federal regulations
 
I mean the successor is Vance. He can go hard for 2 years at Super Sayain when before he couldn't because he had to worry about getting elected. It seems a lot of it though is going to be done through executive orders and using the ruling on Cheveron against the agencies- which in theory he can do, and do quickly
We'll see about Vance, since you know, Bush 41 and Joe Biden were so good for the USA, right? As to Trump actually getting shit done, depends on how well he can actually force through implementation since its not like there's a whole lot of people in DC eager to follow the orders of the duly elected President.
 
We'll see about Vance, since you know, Bush 41 and Joe Biden were so good for the USA, right? As to Trump actually getting shit done, depends on how well he can actually force through implementation since its not like there's a whole lot of people in DC eager to follow the orders of the duly elected President.
I really like Vance tbh. In any case, if they're fired, they can't exactly impede him. That's what they're so afraid of right now. DOGE is going to cut ALOT of jobs. And this time, I think Trump is just going to fire anyone directly that gets in his way until he gets to someone who doesn't
 
Back