Liz Fong-Jones / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

God I hope he doesn't unmask me, I see him at least 3 times a week and I'd hate to lose my HR job at google
I recently joined up at honeycomb a few months ago, same. This guy is absolutely nuts, it's good he stays away from the people actually doing the work.

Edit:I've been getting some PMs from users, it was the 401k matching and 6 figs. Troon companies never die, cope and sneed.
 
Last edited:
Cow crossover:
Coomermander Consent.png
 
The best part of all of this is that we have to do absolutely nothing but exist to profit from this conflict.
  1. Be Kiwifarms
  2. Exist
  3. Laugh at troons who hate us
  4. ?????
  5. profit
Kiwi-be-gone© spray
website's principal office
forbidden depleted kiwifarmium ammo
troon-on-troon violence
this is the funniest goddamn thread on the internet
Just move the fuck on and recognize the fact that YOU were the one who admitted to possible sexual assault on your public social media.
never happen
 
I'm sure this exact comment has been made dozens of times in this thread.... But like..... what if LFJ just never acknowledged KF or any of the allegations and just moved on? I feel like people would just forget about them.

And imo recent events show that this is giving Streisand Effect vibes. I mean no one would be talking about consent accidents on Bluesky if it wasn't for ENM.

Just move the fuck on and recognize the fact that YOU were the one who admitted to possible sexual assault on your public social media. Ya fucked up. Move on. Don't blame everyone else for your own words.
or just react like this: https://bsky.app/profile/bebx.bsky.social/post/3lbejnuhr3c2s
 
Here's a link to a summary of the bill he's talking about (includes a PDF of the full thing). It's a bit broader than just doxxing, but as regards that subject, it seems to define it as publishing the personal information (defined as data "that enables the individual to be identified, contacted or located") of an individual or group with the intention of enabling targeted harassment, carrying a potential prison sentence of 6 or 7 years depending on if it's an individual or a group. IANAL, but that could perhaps hypothetically include publicly identifying an individual as having an account on a certain website and publicly calling for people to cease associating with them.

Link archive (archive.ph)
PDF archive (archive.org)
consultations.ag.gov.au_integrity_doxxing-and-privacy-reforms_consultation_published_select_re...png
1732274378144.png
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/3M4uk)

consultations.ag.gov.au_integrity_doxxing-and-privacy-reforms_consultation_view_respondent_uuI...png
(https://ghostarchive.org/archive/5Kl4Q)

LFJ gave their thoughts on Australia's anti-doxing bill when the Australian government asked for public consultation.
 
LFJ gave their thoughts on Australia's anti-doxing bill when the Australian government asked for public consultation.
"I think this new law should let me do whatever I want, whilst specifically targeting people I don't like who I'm going to specifically mention to make sure you get the message, capisce?"

I wonder if this is what a Girl Talk from Elliot is like. He's so clearly used to people rolling over for him.
 
Glad to see DingDongGoneJones back out in the open being a retard.

View attachment 6672523

Sounds like BlueSky is a Block Button Pushing simulator
View attachment 6672530
View attachment 6672531View attachment 6672533

View attachment 6672534
These people are unwell.
Fucking libshits and their precious "blocklists".
They are so emotionally fragile they have to proactively prevent themselves from being exposed to anything that might unfuck their warped worldview.

Although in Dong Gones case "Blocklist" is an ironic term. It could be describing the inhuman proportions of his skull.
 
A law is a law is a law, Erriot. It applies to all or no one. Anarcho-tyranny only works for you if you're the client class, which can change very suddenly.
Normalisation of exclusionary laws, like you want, will ensure that you're the one excluded one day.
Reality isn't as malleable as all you clowns seem to think, and when it snaps back it'll be a painful experience for those that pushed these things.
Turnabout is fair play, after all.
 
LFJ said:
De-anonymising (unmasking) is not a form of doxxing, unless it associates an individual with a protected characteristic.
Of course, it's "protected characteristic". I was wondering how he'd justify the "it's good when I do it", that sure works. I didn't know being a rapist counted as a protected characteristic though!
LFJ said:
I would also ask that Commonwealth agencies examine whether the owner and operator of Redacted text should face criminal charges.
lol, lmao even. he really can't go five minutes without seething about us
 
Of course, it's "protected characteristic". I was wondering how he'd justify the "it's good when I do it", that sure works. I didn't know being a rapist counted as a protected characteristic though!

lol, lmao even. he really can't go five minutes without seething about us
He's not sneaky, it literally says, he's associated with End KiwiFarms.
Which is wrong, of course, it's now End Networked Harassment.
He needs to submit his homework again
 
Fucking libshits and their precious "blocklists".
I don't have any problem with blocking dumb shit I don't want to see, but why would I want someone else in charge of who I read or don't? "Blockchains" (in addition to stealing a word that already had a meaning to make it mean something stupid as fuck) are also epically dumb.

There are plenty of reasons someone might follow someone I don't like that have nothing to do with them being fellow travelers or even liking that particular guy. Maybe they follow him just to troll the fuck out of him.
 
Back