US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
FlappyBat said:
Not including the Divine Mandate key really was a major oversight.

Blatant violation of civil rights and every supposed criminal justice reform advocate will be silent on it.
Click to expand...
Yes, again you would think God stopping the assassination of a particular candidate would somehow sort of negate all other "key" factors in his projection system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pocket_Sand!
The Last Stand said:
This whole 4D chess meme with Trump is beyond stupidity. Literally it's choosing another person and battling against institutions/factions that are subjectively worse than the other.

On another note, do I get an apology for my suspicions against Gaetz?
Click to expand...
Sure. Here's your apology photo.
Amsowwy.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, Pocket_Sand!, Prester John and 3 others
Hey Johnny Bravo said:
They argued second-degree murder. Had they argued manslaughter, which has fewer necessary components to prove, they may have had an easier case. That's my point, which you refuse to acknowledge because you're the kind of person who would shoot through the door at a Girl Scout and claim self-defense. If you have firearms, I suggest you disarm yourself before you kill an innocent person.

Also, go fuck yourself.
Click to expand...
That's not how any of this works, retard.
The level of charge doesn't matter to the defense as codified in law.
776.012 Use or threatened use of force in defense of person.—
(1) A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.
(2) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
Click to expand...
The Law
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: mitro, Pocket_Sand!, More AWS-8Q Than You and 9 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: DOUBLE_WHEEL, Sexy Peach Emoji, Pocket_Sand! and 9 others
Not Really Here said:
That's not how any of this works, retard.
The level of charge doesn't matter to the defense as codified in law.

The Law
Click to expand...
And prosecutors can argue that self-defense claims are unjustified, you dumbass. That's my point, which you seem intellectually incapable of understanding.

In any case, I'm done shitting up the thread arguing a decade-old case with you that has no relevance to any current stories.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: Spaceman Spud, mitro, Pocket_Sand! and 13 others
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: DOUBLE_WHEEL, Mojo Thief, Pocket_Sand! and 9 others
babadook said:
The US have updated their nuclear doctrine, with one of the focus points being "limited nuclear war"



Click to expand...
Well, given where it would take place the US must want to wipe the Ukraine off the map and thus, problem solved. Good old Joe, being so cavalier with the lives of people far, far away from the US.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
Reactions: DOUBLE_WHEEL, Pocket_Sand!, babadook and 2 others
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: DOUBLE_WHEEL, Sister Miriam Godwinson, Pocket_Sand! and 16 others
Capitulation to Putin after 10 + years of “I’m not touching you” bullshit and calling any resistance to calling everyone nazis or his separatist fomenting crap“goading” makes it clear they’ll just keep among this until stopped.

Might as well get it over with now, unless someone’s working on some icbm interception. Why give him a stronger position or drag out a nuclear exchange?

This is such bullshit. Nigger, we got nukes too. Find another way to be a big gay baby.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Loose Goose, Walrus and Carpenter 2.0, 0713 and 11 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back