Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

[Dentontx]

Here's a bunch of photos of what happened at Rainfurrest 2015, in case anyone is interested.

I have just now found out what "crinkle" means, and now I want someone to kill me with napalm.

 

[Wafflehaus]

I feel like if shmorky were sandypants this doll would be as beloved as that klurf toy and we'd see it somewhere

 

[LiliZanotto]

I feel like if shmorky were sandypants this doll would be as beloved as that klurf toy and we'd see it somewhere

View attachment 170617

I agree. But he's quite secretive about his living space both according to his ex and the limited photos he already posts. It looks like he wouldn't want anything attaching him to the Sandypants handle let alone the furry shit at this point in time. His ex talked about his room being a huge mess, wouldn't be surprised if there was some lock box filled with the Sandy shit.

But we should still chalk them up to be different people that share the same insanities until there's solid evidence.

It shouldn't be too hard to approach Sandy if it's still an active account, that is if people really want to know.

 

[Megapiss]

I don't think Sandy is Shmorky, but considering that they have the same fetishes and run in the same circles, I'm certain that they've interacted with each other. Shmorky is so thirsty for klurf piss rp that he tries to force it on random people who want nothing to do with it. Imagine what he does when he finds someone who's actually into it. I would not be surprised if Sandy was one of Shmorky's e-gfs.

She (?) also sounds underage in the youtube video that was posted a few pages ago.

 

[bottomfeeder]

I feel like if shmorky were sandypants this doll would be as beloved as that klurf toy and we'd see it somewhere

View attachment 170617

It's kind of cute but my god, the flushed, fleshy hooves. They look like they're designed for a hoof-suckler/fuckler. I hate this.

 

[Big Nasty]

I feel like if shmorky were sandypants this doll would be as beloved as that klurf toy and we'd see it somewhere

View attachment 170617

That is one motherfucking ugly doll.

Why does it have asscracks for feet?

 

[Tard]

http://www.cracked.com/personal-exp...stop-living-with-addiction-to-child-porn.html

I used to like Cracked but shit like this, constant shilling for feminists like Anita and Zoey and the constant barrage of hatred against straight white men made me turn and never look back.


My friend is a FtM tranny and is one of the normal ones. He's still pretty spergy and a little weirdo but no way near the level of Tumblr fruitcakes.

Look at the asshole who wrote it

Spoiler

if you look as all these weirdos like Dave Kelly, kc green, this motherfucker. Literally all have the look that screams "I look at child porn"

 

[Pickle Inspector]

Look at the asshole who wrote itView attachment 170625if you look as all these weirdos like Dave Kelly, kc green, this motherfucker. Literally all have the look that screams "I look at child porn"

I still keep hoping KC Green has just been mixing in unhealthy web artist circles thanks to his time on SA.

 

[rice]

hey so question, what is the white knighting rule exactly. is it just i can't disagree with you guys or what

 

[widowspiderling]

hey so question, what is the white knighting rule exactly. is it just i can't disagree with you guys or what

White knighting, in it's simplest definition, means rushing to the aid of another poster for whatever reason. An accusation typically reserved for when a poster is being hammered by another poster(s) and the accused leaps in to defend them, usually without thinking things through as to why the person is being attacked. (source UD)

You can defend people if you have substantial proof or a good reason but sperging out and being like "NO THATS WRONG YOURE LYING REEEEEEEE" isn't cool.

For example, if somebody was talking on a thread about a person I liked and I just started going "NOO YOU CANT SAY THAT SHES A GODDESS AND PERFECT YALL ARE FAGS" etc is white knighting.

If I instead had proof of how a fact or point made was false and said, "Hey, so I did some research and it looks like X isn't correct", that's way better.

 

[Polexia Aphrodisia]

White knighting, in it's simplest definition, means rushing to the aid of another poster for whatever reason. An accusation typically reserved for when a poster is being hammered by another poster(s) and the accused leaps in to defend them, usually without thinking things through as to why the person is being attacked. (source UD)

You can defend people if you have substantial proof or a good reason but sperging out and being like "NO THATS WRONG YOURE LYING REEEEEEEE" isn't cool.

For example, if somebody was talking on a thread about a person I liked and I just started going "NOO YOU CANT SAY THAT SHES A GODDESS AND PERFECT YALL ARE FAGS" etc is white knighting.

If I instead had proof of how a fact or point made was false and said, "Hey, so I did some research and it looks like X isn't correct", that's way better.

Also saying things like "I'm sure none of you have ever done anything wrong or looked at anything bad in your lives....that was sarcasm, you have no right to judge people for their fetishes, she was only 16 and that isn't that bad, they never met up in real life, you're invading his personal space", things of that nature.

 

[Curt Sibling]

I posted my Shmorky sketch on DA, and it seems the drama fallout is spreading, here's a quote:

"Jesus Christ on a bicycle... This guy was one of my favorite artists, and I loved watching him and Lowtax play bad horror games together... But after a bit of info gathering... Holy crap, man. I mean HOLY CRAP. D:"

 

[MysteriousStranger]

hey so question, what is the white knighting rule exactly. is it just i can't disagree with you guys or what

If you've come to defend Shmorky, you'd better have an amazing new and interesting angle, because we've heard all the standard bullshit.

 

[rice]

ok cool that's entirely reasonable. & yeah don't worry if this angle's been presented I haven't seen it

so I had some concerns because @Mandarys_Milan, I respect that you had some really bad experiences in your relationship & I respect that you acknowledge that sometimes you don't have your facts straight. By the way, if you prefer a name other than "mandarys" which I'm using for efficiency's sake, please let me know

Here's the sequence of events as I understand them, without the fluff - just sort of facts that can be proven? No motivations, inferred or not, is what I'm saying

1. mandarys is shmorky's fan
2. mandarys is invited to live in shmorky's apartment on west coast while shmorky works under lowtax
3. (carefully, another shmorky's fan, gets shmorky's skype after fbing shmorky for a while. feb 2014. my point is mostly about mandarys and shmorky so brackets because of relevance, not gravity. from feb to may 2014 there is exchange of written child pornography between shmorky, an adult, and carefully, a minor of age 17. this is illegal)
4. mandarys and shmorky start dating [what's the exact date when this takes? cause this will determine whether shmorky /cheated/ or not. not to say that invalidates the child porn just to set records straight]
5. three months after mandarys and shmorky start dating, they get engaged
[6. dk where to put this, again, depends on date of engagement, would be good to have] oct. 2014, after a period of no skyping, carefully finds out about mandarys, and asks shmorky about it on skype. they have no skype contact past this point.
7. mandarys doesn't have her pills (is there concrete evidence shmorky took them? i know lowtax said it too but who did lowtax get the info from? shmorky taking her pills is such a weird thing to me because I don't get the motivation)
8. mandarys has a psychotic episode, tells shmorky that shmorky wants her dead, pushes a knife at shmorky, screams. shmorky stands there and gives defensive, short replies. shmorky makes an audio recording of the episode and posts it on something awful. [what's the date on this? a time would help on context]
9. around feb 2016? mandarys wants to leave
10. shmorky calls the cops several times close to the time of departure, the last one resulting in mandarys having 1 month of jail time
11. mandarys moves back
12. shmorky moves


So @Mandarys_Milan could help me a lot by filling in some dates. There's just one thing I want to talk abt right now though which is that, Mandarys has been saying that shmorky was taking revenge on her by calling the cops. But um, we've already seen that Mandarys has episodes where there are knives involved. I'm just saying it seems a little bit more possible that shmorky had legitimate reasons for those calls? The fact that he's six feet tall isn't really relevant, since we know a lot of men are the victims of domestic abuse, and they're probably of variable heights. I think the cops would know that as well.

About the pills - Mandarys, can you tell me the reason why you think shmorky took them? Do you know how Lowtax knew that shmorky took your pills?

Regardless of anything I said above, shmorky broke the law by rping and sharing explicit material with a minor, some explicitly of underage individuals, so both of those things are crimes. What I'm calling into question is sort of the added accusation of abuse. I'm seeing more of a mutual abuse situation here. Unless Mandarys can provide me with more details that imply otherwise, of course.

idk if this forum tracks edits but any made are for clarification or ease of reading. edit: ok, it does. cool

 

[X68000]

Mandarys actually explained that Shmorky made up accusations of domestic abuse on her part. He wasn't afraid of her, or he wouldn't have recorded himself prodding her during a psychotic break for the entertainment of his fanbase and asspats.

 

[NavyGuzzler]

"I don't get the motivation" wut lol

I don't get the motivation for shitting yourself either but welp

 

[somewhereelse poster]

I think the most convincing piece is the one below:

Spoiler

Whether or not that's Dave/Shmorky klerfself, it is the same kind of waste-of-talent bullshit. Remove all the piss-fetish and dating older men creepo shit and what you have remaining is the sort of thing that gives (((network executives))) a cash-on. Cute and precocious character that is somehow both bi-racial (bi-special, whatever) and still inoffensively and non-threateningly white, and simple enough that it could be cheaply animated by slave-wage Koreans for suburban mothers to plop their wee bairns in front of the TV to watch and learn all the important lessons about inclusiveness and not bullying and wearing a helmet when you ride your bike and whatever other garbage kids get these days. And of course slap all over merchandise.

Probably better for the world that kids are spared that, but a big potential financial loss for the creator.

 

[NavyGuzzler]

Also nobody is denying that both Mandy and Shmorky are nutso

 

[nyess]

 

[Pickle Inspector]

His Patreon donations continue to fall:

Spoiler

Also I had a look at the SA thread about Shmorky and found this interesting post they linked to:

So, I finally saw that “problematic artists” post, and I am infinitely proud of the people I follow for not reblogging that shite.

I didn’t look through the evidence–by which I mean, each person on the list has links to Tumblr posts to prove the list of accusations against them; I can’t speak for the credibility of that list. Some have long lists next to their name, others just have a rant followed by one source.

What pisses me off about that post is how it absolutely appallingly deals with “Tumblr problems” and “real problems”.

So you’ve got rape, pedophilia, and zoophilia accusations on there. Those are pretty shocking crimes that should be reported to the police, and not reported to Tumblr users so you don’t reblog art, what the goddamn Christ is wrong with you people.

But do you know what’s posted as equally as wrong and offensive on that list?

Being anti-sjw. Being anti-otherkin. Being religious. Being a brony. BEING A CAPITALIST. Being a fucking vegan. Those are all crimes that are equally as offensive as being a rapist, apparently.

Do you know who’s on that list?

Shmorky. Shmorky is accused of pedophilia, cheating, manipulating partners into sex, and being emotionally abusive. Not a single goddamn scrap of evidence, but Shmorky is being accused of these things.

And there’s gonna be tens of thousands of fucking dumb as shit Tumblr kids that will lap this shit up without even questioning it, believing 150% that this “problematic artist” list is very real and valid, that you don’t need proof to make such accusations, and that the only course of action is to smear artists.

I’m gonna say it again:

Shmorky is being accused. If you don’t know who that is, this is Shmorky’s blog.

This callout culture needs to goddamn stop.

Just for fun, I checked out the very first source. It goes to a Tumblr post where people are saying ___ is a rapist/abusive/bad. There’s no proof beyond their word.

Is this considered acceptable proof now? Someone just saying “this happened, an anonymous person was abused and reported it to me for some reason, not the police, not a big blog, just me” is proof enough to say that someone is a rapist?

Jesus H. Christ.

The interesting part is it was posted on 18 August 2015.