US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
You are normally an alright poster but in this you are being unusually bad. But as a courtesy I will explain it to you in a less caustic way than the others.
I appreciate you laying it out in a less caustic way and... sort of complimenting me.
Self-Defense is an affirmative defense, as soon as he claimed it, it became the duty of the prosecutor to convince the jury that the case was -not- self-defense.
I have added my own bold here. I feel as though I made that point already and agreed with it: a person can claim self-defense and it is the job of the prosecution to prove to the jury that their situation was not self-defense. Prosecutors do this all the time. I did not say that Martin was an innocent dindu or that Zimmerman was an evil monster, but rather that both of them were idiots.
While you are technically right in that Manslaughter has a lower legal burden to murder, where you err is in thinking it even matters to this case.
This is, indeed, where I erred. I was also mistaken about Zimmerman getting out of his truck, rather than his house, but this case is from 2012 and I forgot. When I think of the Zimmerman trial, I think more about Jaffa Calling than where Zimmerman came from.
 
I swear some people just see the name Soros and immediately start yapping. Soros has his fingers in almost every investing pie. You don't operate in finance without operating alongside him. What is important to look for is what exactly he worked on him with, what he took away from that work, and how he views Soros himself. In Bessent's case the answers are, generic investing, that utilizing money the way Soros does is something the right should do, and that Soros himself is a decrepit evil lich
Soros is a huge money man. Huge. Its how he's able to fuck around with politics. He didn't inherent a horde, at least a large one, for the most part he made his own money because he's sharp as a tack when it comes to riches. That is who we need in charge of the treasury
 
I swear some people just see the name Soros and immediately start yapping. Soros has his fingers in almost every investing pie. You don't operate in finance without operating alongside him. What is important to look for is what exactly he worked on him with, what he took away from that work, and how he views Soros himself. In Bessent's case the answers are, generic investing, that utilizing money the way Soros does is something the right should do, and that Soros himself is a decrepit evil lich.
He worked with Soros for decades and was his Chief Investment Officer. Soros also invested billions in his hedge fund. He also brags about shorting the pound and yen in the bio Trump shared, which are two of Soros' most controversial actions. He's not some junior trader who happened to work for Soros.
 
Soros is a huge money man. Huge. Its how he's able to fuck around with politics. He didn't inherent a horde, at least a large one, for the most part he made his own money because he's sharp as a tack when it comes to riches. That is who we need in charge of the treasury
Are... are you arguing that Bessent is the one we need, or Soros? I know it's getting close to my bedtime, but your post could go either way.
 
1000020907.jpg

Liberals unironically pushing a technocrat eugenicist film will never not be amusing to me. I love how they don't see that the people who voted for Camacho have Mexican names and the latinification of the USA is presented as "ridiculous" in the movie. But nigger president and spics are bad am I right? Totally not racist at all. Camacho was alao the smartest guy around before he had Joe come along to help him fix everything.

Atleast conservatives understood what 1984 was about unlike the liberals who claim they understand Idiocracy.

Really, I can't see why they believe they are allies of the working class with their elitist bullshit besides utter delusion. I hope they keep going with it. I want to them to lose everything.
 
Liberals unironically pushing a technocrat eugenicist film will never not be amusing to me. I love how they don't see that the people who voted for Camacho have Mexican names and the latinification of the USA is presented as "ridiculous" in the movie. But nigger president and spics are bad am I right? Totally not racist at all. Camacho was alao the smartest guy around before he had Joe come along to help him fix everything.
Liberals will never watch Idiocracy because it stars a white man.
 
Isn't it funny that its been months and with all the billions we spend on intelligence and national security and supercomputers and armies of cryptology ph.ds and secret agents we still know next to nothing about the Trump shooter? This kid must have had opsec like Jason Bourne. What are the odds that the shredders are working overtime on every last trace of his footprint before the new admin takes office?

The media going balls-out with memory holing that shit from literal minute one was fucking unreal tbh. I can't remember which MSM outlet it was (probably CNN) that had it relegated to a tiny thumbnail in the bottom sidebar of the front page with some headline like "Trump falls at rally" or whatever the fuck. My nigger in Christ, you are a political news outlet and you're telling me that's the best you can do while it is currently breaking that the leading Presidential candidate just took a bullet to the head in the middle of a campaign speech while your reporters were in the front row of the press box filming it?

I have no idea what was up with Crooks, but I don't think anyone really buys the idea that the FBI has spent untold manhours and likely millions of dollars "investigating" him only to turn up jack shit other than one single Google search for "how far away was Oswald from Kennedy" a week earlier. That ain't any fucking Warren Report. Dude absolutely had the Columbine shooter phenotype happening though. He's exactly the kind of guy to groom into doing some shit like this, people will get one look at him and think "oh, makes sense" and he probably wasn't hard to convince. To be honest I'm more curious about seeing what's going to happen with that Ukraine sperg, that one almost seems weirder.
 
Since I bitched about nuke russia retard posting I will add kontent


archive.today
webpage capture
Saved from
history←priornext→
22 Nov 2024 02:48:34 UTC
All snapshots from host www.thedailybeast.com
WebpageScreenshot
sharedownload .zipreport bug or abuseBuy me a coffee
Skip to Main Content
The Daily Beast
SUBSCRIBE


Media

Rachel Maddow Takes Pay Cut With MSNBC’s Future in Jeopardy
STILL RICH
The star host will now make $25 million a year, a $5 million decrease.
Grace Harrington
Grace Harrington
Breaking News Intern
Published Nov. 21 2024 3:31PM EST

Rachel Maddow attends Variety & Rolling Stone Truth Seekers Summit at Second on August 02, 2023 in New York City.
Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images
MSNBC star Rachel Maddow is taking a $5 million pay cut amid growing uncertainty about the channel’s future, The Ankler reported Thursday.
Maddow, who currently makes $30 million a year at the network, renegotiated for $25 million a year for the next five years.
“This is a difficult time and they needed to keep her. No one else can do what she does. You can’t build a brand like it overnight,” one executive told The Ankler.


Comcast, the owner of NBCUniversal, plans to spin off several NBC channels— like MSNBC and CNBC— into its own company. NBCUniversal Chairman Mark Lazarus is currently heading the effort, expected to be completed by the end of 2025, called SpinCo.
The channel is currently at a crossroads following President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. According to Nielsen data, ratings dipped to 40 percent less than they were this time last year— though execs are counting on viewers to come back the way they did in 2016 once Trump’s administration gets underway.
ADVERTISEMENT
Producers are also grappling with how to platform conservative voices at the “only safe space for a liberal TV audience,” as one MSNBC insider put it.
“We were so Harris propaganda that when she lost, viewers were shocked,” one on-air pundit said. “It turned into one giant circle j--k and echo chamber. If MSNBC wants to be of service to its viewers, they can’t keep them in fantasy land.”
ADVERTISEMENT
During Trump’s first administration, MSNBC elevated “Democrats who speak Republican,” reported The Ankler, such as Hugh Hewitt and Nicole Wallace. Now, the network isn’t sure how to engage with the “Star Wars freak show” of Trump’s new appointees, one producer said.
“I don’t know if having these people on would put any useful information out,” the producer added.
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, viewers can expect to see plenty of Maddow, with one executive calling her “ratings Viagra.” Under her new deal, Maddow will continue to anchor her Monday night show, and also produce podcasts and documentaries. The network is also planning to deploy her as a “secret weapon” on other shows when there’s breaking news.
Along with Maddow, MSNBC relies on at least three other personalities to keep viewers tuning in: Wallace, who anchors Deadline: White House, and Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski’s Morning Joe, which recently came under fire when the hosts traveled to Mar-a-Lago to break bread with Trump.
Grace Harrington
Grace Harrington
Breaking News Intern
grace.harrington@thedailybeast.com
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Trending Now

Jon Stewart Knows Why Trump Is Picking All the Worst People for His Cabinet
Matt Wilstein

New Linkin Park Singer’s Secret Life as ‘Hardcore’ Scientologist Revealed
Sean Craig

Pollster Nate Silver Calls on Biden to Resign Immediately
Grace Harrington

CNN Host Abruptly Shuts Down Pro-Trump Guest Over Their ‘Condescending Tone’
Dan Ladden-Hall

Rachel Maddow Takes Pay Cut With MSNBC’s Future in Jeopardy
Grace Harrington
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
BACK TO TOP ↑
The Daily Beast
Cheat Sheet
Politics
Obsessed
Media
World
Culture
U.S. News
Innovation
Scouted
Travel
SUBSCRIPTION

CROSSWORD

NEWSLETTERS

PODCASTS
GET THE APP
app store badge
google play badge
FOLLOW US





About
Contact
Tips
Jobs
Advertise
Help
Privacy
Code of Ethics & Standards
Diversity
Terms & conditions
Copyright & Trademark
Cookie Settings
© 2024 The Daily Beast Company LLC
ADVERTISEMENT
0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%
 
Last edited:
He worked with Soros for decades and was his Chief Investment Officer. Soros also invested billions in his hedge fund. He also brags about shorting the pound and yen in the bio Trump shared, which are two of Soros' most controversial actions. He's not some junior trader who happened to work for Soros.
You have anything to support this claim? I am just asking because I am curious.
 
The media going balls-out with memory holing that shit from literal minute one was fucking unreal tbh. I can't remember which MSM outlet it was (probably CNN) that had it relegated to a tiny thumbnail in the bottom sidebar of the front page with some headline like "Trump falls at rally" or whatever the fuck. My nigger in Christ, you are a political news outlet and you're telling me that's the best you can do while it is currently breaking that the leading Presidential candidate just took a bullet to the head in the middle of a campaign speech while your reporters were in the front row of the press box filming it?

I have no idea what was up with Crooks, but I don't think anyone really buys the idea that the FBI has spent untold manhours and likely millions of dollars "investigating" him only to turn up jack shit other than one single Google search for "how far away was Oswald from Kennedy" a week earlier. That ain't any fucking Warren Report. Dude absolutely had the Columbine shooter phenotype happening though. He's exactly the kind of guy to groom into doing some shit like this, people will get one look at him and think "oh, makes sense" and he probably wasn't hard to convince. To be honest I'm more curious about seeing what's going to happen with that Ukraine sperg, that one almost seems weirder.
You know damn well they were fucking seething that they couldn't show Trump's brain getting splattered in 4K slow-mo. I'm thoroughly convinced that CNN at least knew that someone was going to be trying to kill Trump that day.
 
Thing is LEARNING from Soros and using his knowledge is not a bad thing. He left a long time ago. Why? Was there a falling out maybe? In any case, putting him in charge of the treasury ain't bad. Soros is evil but he knows how to make money. Exploit that.
Assuming that Soros prioritises the treasury over his personal finances.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: I Can Use Spaces?
Honestly it'd be the smartest move on their part. DEI and woke shit has soured hard and turned all but the most ardent (retarded) people against it. If WEF and co want to continue towards their goal they need to create a new strategy. And infiltrating MAGA would be the smartest thing on their part.
INB4 "DOOMER", I'm not dooming I'm simply saying it's smarter to adjust and refocus instead of running a ragged, dying horse. The DNC died, and now the eye of Sauron turns to MAGA. I simply hope Trump and co can realize this.
Yeah, it reminds me of that one /pol/ screenshot about how they're putting back white men in things like Army recruitment ads because they've torched their system so badly that whites are checking out of the system. That's really bad, since globohomo needs an army, so they're trying to increase buy-in. Not to mention consider that the global elite love transhumanism and shit. That's exactly what Elon Musk and Peter Thiel are into, hell Peter Thiel believes drinking the blood of teenage boys will help him live longer. Both have ample links to Bilderbergs, WEF, and the population control agenda, not to mention other weird globalist shit like importing millions of Indians to every Western country. There's some very suspicious stuff going on behind the scenes.
Several very rich and powerful Jews backed Trump this time. Not all of them. But enough. Also he has bloodline ties via his grandchildren.

Jews switched to "use all our might to push D" to "we support D but Trump is ok too" with a few outright backing Trump and countering some of the jewry going on.
Trump has always had huge Jewish backing like Adelson. This time he still only got 29% of the Jewish vote, about 2016 and 2020. I don't think he's swaying many Jews he didn't before, since the only Jews who might vote for him are ultra-Orthodox tunnel Jew types and maybe neocon Jews (swing demographic, they vote for whoever they think will start more wars for Israel). Most US Jews are still far-left.
 
Yeah, it reminds me of that one /pol/ screenshot about how they're putting back white men in things like Army recruitment ads because they've torched their system so badly that whites are checking out of the system. That's really bad, since globohomo needs an army, so they're trying to increase buy-in. Not to mention consider that the global elite love transhumanism and shit. That's exactly what Elon Musk and Peter Thiel are into, hell Peter Thiel believes drinking the blood of teenage boys will help him live longer. Both have ample links to Bilderbergs, WEF, and the population control agenda, not to mention other weird globalist shit like importing millions of Indians to every Western country. There's some very suspicious stuff going on behind the scenes.
The problem is that the Pandora's Box has already been opened about all of this and they're not going to get people to join the army instantly as much as they would love for that to happen.
 
The problem is that the Pandora's Box has already been opened about all of this and they're not going to get people to join the army instantly as much as they would love for that to happen.
The intent was that 2020 would have been an Arab Spring-tier Color Revolution that would've put this country firmly in the control of the Democratic Party (the most malleable and "on-board" wing of the Uniparty with the plan), which would have been able - with total control granted to it - been able to fortify this election and enable a "smooth" transition and push towards the 2030 Agenda. Trump would have either been dead or in prison, same with pretty much any of the MAGA advocates, and the people like us cowed into submission with flagrant abuses of the justice system. You can see a part of this plan attempting to play itself out still (regardless of radically changing currents) in Britain at the moment. The plan was to have already eliminated all opposition not just domestically but globally by now.

I'm not saying some RealRawNes trust-the-plan, white-hats-in-control shit happened in 2020 and beyond but it's clear that neither side came out of that year with what they wanted. Trump and the elite faction that is aligned with him are clearly opposed to this shit, in some way, and have derailed whatever plans they had in America.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back