Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

I saw that as well. I thought the date was telling. It shows that people have been looking sideways at Shmorky for a long time.

It actually wouldn't surprise me if people on SA have been reporting Shmorky's creepy shit for years. After Aatrek was doxxed, goons came forward to say they had reported his sex offender past, and had been ignored or told to keep quiet by the mods they reported it to.
 
Last edited:
I saw that as well. I thought the date was telling. It shows that people have been looking sideways at Shmorky for a long time.

It actually wouldn't surprise me if people on SA have been reporting Shmorky's creepy shit for years. After Aatrek was doxxed, goons came forward to say they had reported his sex offender past, and had been ignored or told to keep quiet by the mods they reported it to.

As a decade+ SA poster I feel like after all the mad purges that went on back in the day, things settled into a DADT situation there on the forums as a whole. And that's fine to a point, but it seems to have gone beyond that to outright ignoring problems until they were too big to do so, path of least resistance etc.. I even sort of get that, extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence and whatnot, especially when it's one of your own; that's probably part of why his brother was in here refusing to believe any of this. People are just kinda naturally that way with family and friends, but it's not a great way to run your business. People with problems are always going to drag you into them if you don't cut them loose.
 
ok cool that's entirely reasonable. & yeah don't worry if this angle's been presented I haven't seen it

so I had some concerns because @Mandarys_Milan, I respect that you had some really bad experiences in your relationship & I respect that you acknowledge that sometimes you don't have your facts straight. By the way, if you prefer a name other than "mandarys" which I'm using for efficiency's sake, please let me know

Here's the sequence of events as I understand them, without the fluff - just sort of facts that can be proven? No motivations, inferred or not, is what I'm saying

1. mandarys is shmorky's fan
2. mandarys is invited to live in shmorky's apartment on west coast while shmorky works under lowtax
3. (carefully, another shmorky's fan, gets shmorky's skype after fbing shmorky for a while. feb 2014. my point is mostly about mandarys and shmorky so brackets because of relevance, not gravity. from feb to may 2014 there is exchange of written child pornography between shmorky, an adult, and carefully, a minor of age 17. this is illegal)
4. mandarys and shmorky start dating [what's the exact date when this takes? cause this will determine whether shmorky /cheated/ or not. not to say that invalidates the child porn just to set records straight]
5. three months after mandarys and shmorky start dating, they get engaged
[6. dk where to put this, again, depends on date of engagement, would be good to have] oct. 2014, after a period of no skyping, carefully finds out about mandarys, and asks shmorky about it on skype. they have no skype contact past this point.
7. mandarys doesn't have her pills (is there concrete evidence shmorky took them? i know lowtax said it too but who did lowtax get the info from? shmorky taking her pills is such a weird thing to me because I don't get the motivation)
8. mandarys has a psychotic episode, tells shmorky that shmorky wants her dead, pushes a knife at shmorky, screams. shmorky stands there and gives defensive, short replies. shmorky makes an audio recording of the episode and posts it on something awful. [what's the date on this? a time would help on context]
9. around feb 2016? mandarys wants to leave
10. shmorky calls the cops several times close to the time of departure, the last one resulting in mandarys having 1 month of jail time
11. mandarys moves back
12. shmorky moves


So @Mandarys_Milan could help me a lot by filling in some dates. There's just one thing I want to talk abt right now though which is that, Mandarys has been saying that shmorky was taking revenge on her by calling the cops. But um, we've already seen that Mandarys has episodes where there are knives involved. I'm just saying it seems a little bit more possible that shmorky had legitimate reasons for those calls? The fact that he's six feet tall isn't really relevant, since we know a lot of men are the victims of domestic abuse, and they're probably of variable heights. I think the cops would know that as well.

About the pills - Mandarys, can you tell me the reason why you think shmorky took them? Do you know how Lowtax knew that shmorky took your pills?

Regardless of anything I said above, shmorky broke the law by rping and sharing explicit material with a minor, some explicitly of underage individuals, so both of those things are crimes. What I'm calling into question is sort of the added accusation of abuse. I'm seeing more of a mutual abuse situation here. Unless Mandarys can provide me with more details that imply otherwise, of course.

idk if this forum tracks edits but any made are for clarification or ease of reading. edit: ok, it does. cool

Listen and believe, shitlord. Listen and believe.
Isn't that what they teach you in goon school?
 
About the pills - Mandarys, can you tell me the reason why you think shmorky took them? Do you know how Lowtax knew that shmorky took your pills?

I believe @Mandarys_Milan said it was because Shmorky was straight edge and didn't believe in "using drugs" and that psychiatry was for weak people. Your little writeup is completely tone deaf with regards to power dynamics in the situation. Dave was offered housing to a schizophrenic woman who was homeless and bragged about using that same situation before. He basically used her as a live in therapist and maid and screamed at her whenever she didn't keep things perfectly clean while he hoarded everything. He was/is a "well respected/popular" (in crazy fucked up SJW internet circles) artist and she was framed as just some crazy cissy that was constantly being transmisogynistic by his inner circle of narcissist trans friends.

Look at @Mandarys_Milan's post history and see the details she's shared about Shmorky. Even if everything she said isn't gospel, there is a clear pattern of control/manipulation & disenfranchisement from Shmorky. He is obsessed with being a victim & you defending his delusions of victimhood really makes me wonder what your angle is.
 
Last edited:
It's a fresh of breath air to challenge her story. Shmorky is gross but it's worth giving him a benefit of a doubt or at least consider that it might be a codependent situation.
Nah, it's funnier to go all SJW feminist on them and ask them why they refuse to believe women who say they've been violated. Live by the virtue signaling, die by the virtue signaling.
 
It's a fresh of breath air to challenge her story. Shmorky is gross but it's worth giving him a benefit of a doubt or at least consider that it might be a codependent situation.

I am not saying that his ex-girlfriends are without sin. They did the nasty diaper pedo erp with him and screwed that freak so there is something wrong with them, but it is our Klurfy pedo that did the "leading" if one believes the chatlogs are not super duper NSA-CIA-KGB photoshops.
 
Still awaiting the brothers return. Strange that he showed up here and then dropped out immediately. I can only assume Schmorky didn't want him involved. Because he really had his chest puffed out for a sec.
Has anyone messaged him privately?
He didn't provide much on what happened to Schmorky.
 
I am not saying that his ex-girlfriends are without sin. They did the nasty diaper pedo erp with him and screwed that freak so there is something wrong with them, but it is our Klurfy pedo that did the "leading" if one believes the chatlogs are not super duper NSA-CIA-KGB photoshops.

@rice didn't say that, they were establishing a timeline of events and questioning certain unverified details like withholding medication. Autism-tier fact checking is basically the definition of the Kiwi Farms, calm down.
 
Still awaiting the brothers return. Strange that he showed up here and then dropped out immediately. I can only assume Schmorky didn't want him involved. Because he really had his chest puffed out for a sec.
Has anyone messaged him privately?
He didn't provide much on what happened to Schmorky.

A) If that really was his brother, then he came and said his piece. He really didn't try to defend him much, only pleaded that we stop because he didn't want to lose his brother over this. Predictably, he was met with a flurry of challenging questions that showed pretty much everyone here was convinced Shmorky is a perverted individual who needs supervision and help (in varying degrees of tact and verbal aptitude). The few of us that did try to engage him in dialog were flooded out.

B) If it wasn't really his brother, good riddance.
 
@rice didn't say that, they were establishing a timeline of events and questioning certain unverified details like withholding medication. Autism-tier fact checking is basically the definition of the Kiwi Farms, calm down.

You are right. Just that Shmorky smells so guilty here, it is kind of hard not to expect the expected from him. So I would err on the side of caution here, but that is just me.
 
@rice didn't say that, they were establishing a timeline of events and questioning certain unverified details like withholding medication. Autism-tier fact checking is basically the definition of the Kiwi Farms, calm down.
I agree with you.
But replying to the goons with their own "räpe victims always tell the truth, but only if they're female" bullshit just feels so good. Feels deplorable, man.
 
Back