Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Status
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
Their biggest name is Newsom. Who is hated by a good part of Californians and has SO MUCH woke shit on his resume.
There’s a chance they could sober up before 2028 and realize Kamala really was terrible, but hopefully not
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
False equivalency
You can make a drone that can do the work of a manned fighterjet
You'd be hard pressed to make a pistol that can fulfill the role of a tank
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
No, you absolutely cannot unless you’re conflating small quadcopter drones (what everyone is referring to when they’re talking about drones changing warfare) with plane-sized UAVs.
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2022
Roe set fetal viability at 28 weeks, Planned Parenthood v Casey reduced it to 23 weeks. Anything short of that 23 week mark is considered a loss for those types, not a compromise. This leaves out the fact that the most ardent types amongst them want abortion legal no matter the stage of pregnancy. They'll double down, and continue to lose as the window for abortion is reduced more and more as each future generation gets more pro-life.
Donald Trump isn't a conservative. He's a 90s democrat, and so are a large chunk of the people who voted for him. Unfortunately you, and I, are going to have to wait for the culture to shift right via births, and media to get back to conservatives who actually conserve.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
'Drone' doesn't imply rotary or jet propulsion. Its the object in question being unmanned and controlled remotely/autonomously. You can have a drone that's tracked and travels on the ground.
Drones change warfare at all levels from the ground to the air to the sea and underneath. Lookout for unmanned submersibles in the near future capable of firing torpedoes which are themselves also drones:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
I think there would be a combination of AWACS tasking the drones from afar in some circumstances and manned command fighters in others. If you're sending the drones in to do SEAD missions you might want to have them commanded by an AWACS well away from the danger and for air combat or less contested strike missions the manned combat command aircraft could use the drones as an extension of their payload capacity and sensors. This is just my armchair take on the matter.
Whoopsie Daisy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2023
Who will lead the democrats in 2028? I don't know, but I do know they're pretending to be republican for the next four years.
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2016
He's just gonna keep sperging until The World apologizes to him and says actshuallly he was right all along, isn't he?
What a maroon. His best bet would be to shut the fuck up, crawl in a hole for 3.5 years, and come back low key and hope most normies forgot how bad he fucked up.
Shit, even Frank Luntz managed a comeback of sorts, and for what ever reason, some people still listen to Karl Rove after "Is this just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better?"
He's making it worse. It's over, and he's making it worse.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
Those essentially already exist over Ukraine right now. They've obsoleted whole modern air forces. I'm not sure how anybody can look at where we were 15 years ago versus today and can't imagine what's to come 15 years from now not seeing this.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
Drone technology is not there yet. Right now, having a human in control of a craft is preferential over a craft that is controlled via electronics/satellites because opponents can interfere with this. It is speculated that the Iranians captured that Lockheed Martin RQ-170 drone in 2011 by basically jamming and/or spoofing its control systems.
Potatoherder
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2020
Thune showing his true colors. The democrats now control the senate.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
So you’re conflating things. Your whole post is completely irrelevant.
gachadegenerate451
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2024
Well, we don't trust AI or subroutines to make a convincing picture so why would we trust it to fly several thousand miles in an expensive airframe to perform a sensitive and high pressure mission from an airbase or carrier and come back? Drones are amazing things but right now and for the next generation, they're really most useful and best kept to frontline ground combat. There they can take out targets of opportunity under the general aegis of existing combined arms doctrine.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2017
Someone should snag his rug from his dome and demonstrate how the Sun works using a flashlight.
Seriously, how could anyone put any semblance of trust in someone who looks like that?
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2022
The party of losers is determined to go back to losing with dignity it seems. God, I hate rinos.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
You're the one saying "When everyone else says 'drone' they mean 'x'. "
You dont speak for everyone else.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
He also appointed McConnell to chair the Rules Committee.
The RINOs would have a lot less power if the Dems didn’t steal several Senate seats this election.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2020
This Lichtman guy is something else. It would be so easy to recover his grift for the future by just saying he misapplied a few of his keys due to the unique situation this election and with the keys plugged in properly his model would've actually predicted Trump. Voila, scam saved for next time. Instead he's gone into burn it to the ground mode. Baffling.
- Status