Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama had no achievements either. That was literally the appeal, he was a blank slate with no actual accomplishments. He went to Harvard and was President of the Law Review, but basically did nothing. That was basically what he everywhere. He didn’t do much of anything. Even as a Senator, he was just first black guy. He did that up until he was President and fucked up, but had the media to run cover for him.Unlike Hillary, the conditions for Kamala being the nominee were only there because of her sex and race. Whatever you think about Hillary, she’s a very accomplished individual who acheieved a lot of what she has today because of meritocracy. This is also true of her husband. None of them wouldn’t gotten this far in life if they didn’t cunningly climb their way to the top.
Compare that to Kamala, a woman who has tried to market herself as the female Obama—only without the achievements. She got her start by sucking the right people and fucking her way to the top. She was literally DEI-selected as the VP. A male Kamala wouldn’t be possible because the system no longer favors men, but even a black or brown man would still need to have a track record. Kamala has none. I think Kamala’s loss is related to her gender but only in that a catastrophically bad nominee could only be selected for being a woman.
Fun fact boys and girls. There was a time when if you had y chromosomes and a penis you were a man.No they didn't. Stupid dickhead. His Sex is male.
His "gender" doesn't exist. Gender is a made up fantasy that we're all getting tired of pretending we agree with under threat of social assassination. His is male. He might like pretty dresses, the cross dressing faggot, but he's male. Gender, Gender Identity, everything to do with it? It's unscientific bullshit created whole cloth out of the research of pedophile madmen like Dr. John Money. Sorry he found out when the DEEP RED state he moved to refused to pander to his childish demands that they play pretend with him, but someone should have told his stupid ass that 10 years ago.
"But I identify as" -- then you're fucking wrong. You're male. You get to decide what being male means to you, but we're tired of pretending that sex roles in society are fixed in stone and sex is malleable, when it's the exact fucking opposite in reality.
I reject this. This is one big reason the right is so prone to loserdom. Conservative by its very name is a negative vision. What is the position of the conservative other than the damn progressives are driving too fast?Unfortunately you, and I, are going to have to wait for the culture to shift right via births, and media to get back to conservatives who actually conserve.
When it comes to Europe the upper class there still sees Americans as a bunch of dumb vassals that are only good for their ability to hit shit. You have to realize they have bars far older than the 13 colonies to start to understand their mindset.Yeah cause they can never answer why it's bad for othrr countries to pay their share
They want their slave labor damnit.aaahh i see. I still don't get why the left has an issue with American workers getting paid. Is it cause they can't waste money on ukraine once the conflict ends?
And have the entire LGBTQ edifice called into question? Its double down, or grant that the right is correct on something. The left will never admit the right was correct on anything because that brings into question over a hundred years of social engineering.They're really going to double down on troons, huh?
I agree with what you said about having a vision, and not being speed limit liberals; but how is having a movement with a vision any different than what I said? You wish to preserve/go back to a time before the current epoch politically/economically/socially. That is conserving, or at this point really, restoring the pre-existing order. What your advocating for is reconquista.The best thing the right can do in these 4 years is continue crafting a positive vision and start gatekeeping.
Being able to buy a product doesn't matter when companies would much prefer you rent from them now.You can't have consumers without workers and outsourcing every industry to other countries means you have no workers and therefore no consumers.
To give something to Elon, he’s a fool (lolcow), but in an era where everyone wants to look wise. You need the fools who are willing to look foolish to learn. People who ultimately can fail a test, but be more interested in learning about a subject more than passing.Tesla. Though definitely overhyped the technology put into it has absolutely advanced electronic cars and batteries.
Paypal. Again, definitely issues but it pioneered digital exchanges.
Starlink unironically is becoming a massive network of easy and relatively cheap internet.
Neurolink has some amazingly high potentials for curing and treating a range of diseases and conditions for which there are no treatments at all.
The man isn't the one who actually invents things. What he is, is the one who envisions them -and- a path towards them. Vision is the first step to real technology. And thankfully Musk knows his limits enough and is good enough at getting the right people on the job to realize a fair chunk of his vision. Most importantly, he aggressively tries to innovate. Yes, sometimes you get the stupid as fuck tunnels. But even those are at least novel and new, and you can learn from the failures. Too much of the entire worlds technology is just... stagnant. Iteration upon iteration but never innovation.
How many new versions of the same Iphone have come out since Musk started trying to create -new- things?
The mans a lolcow, don't get me wrong, but you can acknowledge that and acknowledge he is practically the only person actually trying to push actually new technology into the world
You’re right, much of it is framing and presentation. But I do also believe that the right needs to evolve to make rediscovering traditional values more attractive.I agree with what you said about having a vision, and not being speed limit liberals; but how is having a movement with a vision any different than what I said? You wish to preserve/go back to a time before the current epoch politically/economically/socially. That is conserving, or at this point really, restoring the pre-existing order. What your advocating for is reconquista.
Imagine having a dinner table that your family has rented for many generationsBeing able to buy a product doesn't matter when companies would much prefer you rent from them now.
Is that why the Catholic Church came out with a waifu?You’re right, much of it is framing and presentation. But I do also believe that the right needs to evolve to make rediscovering traditional values more attractive.
The big thing is the rejection of the liberal worldview and challenging Enlightenment values. That’s a long, complicated road.
Reagan showed us exactly what happens if the crackdown doesn't happen first. Or if that isn't enough look at California in presidential elections after Reagan passed amnesty with the worthless promise to secure the border after.Musk supports, as far as I know, a simplifying and streamlining of an honestly overly burdensome and insane immigration process on one end, and a massive crackdown and securing of the border on the other. Effectively, carrot and stick.
He's the only Western man in power that's actually pushing forward space exploration too and that's enough for me. I don't want China to gain space superiority because they will use it as a cudgel to make sure nobody else gets there. All I have to do is look at the mess that's the South China Sea to know where that leads.The mans a lolcow, don't get me wrong, but you can acknowledge that and acknowledge he is practically the only person actually trying to push actually new technology into the world
Aw sweet, a new copypasta just dropped!Listen up, MAGA fucktards. Let me make this crystal fucking clear: Don't you dare fuck with me or my followers for the next four years. You're in for a world of fucking pain if you do. We won't back down, we won't be silenced, and we sure as hell won't let you fuck with us.
You think you can intimidate us? Think again, you pathetic, small-minded fucks. We're ready for you. We're ready for your bullshit, your hate, and your fucking ignorance. And we'll fight back—every fucking step of the way.
So bring it on, you fucking cowards. Bring on your best shot. We'll be here, standing strong, fighting for what's right, and giving you a mouthful of fucking reality. You can't handle the truth, and you sure as hell can't handle us. Remember this: We're not alone. We're a fucking army of people who believe in justice, in equality, and in a better future. And we won't let you fucking destroy that. So keep your fucking hands off us, and prepare to face the consequences if you don't.
Now, go fuck yourselves and think about what you're really fighting for. Hint: It's not freedom, it's not democracy, and it's sure as hell not the American way. You're fighting for hatred, for division, and for your own fucking selfish interests. And we won't stand for it.
Fuck you, MAGA. Fuck your hatred, fuck your ignorance, and fuck your pathetic attempts to silence us. We're here, we're loud, and we're not going anywhere. Deal with it.
The Chinese finger trap that is progressivism is that you can't undo it. "What do you mean, you want to go BACK to being racist?!" "Be MORE sexist? Wow, I'll have to sue to stop you then!"They're really going to double down on troons, huh?
The Adults are back in charge, to stop Drumpf.Susan Collins?
Ah, fuck. I can't believe they've done this.
not every mascot is a waifu...Is that why the Catholic Church came out with a waifu?
Obviously she's Jesus's Waifunot every mascot is a waifu...
if you really wanna fuck it better get ready for the woodchipper
They have three: Newsome, Whither, and Warren.I think it's more that there's just no one else in the party right now that has any positive name recognition. There's probably some good centrist Democrat somewhere in the house or senate, but I couldn't tell you their name off the top of my head, and the Democrats that I could name are for all the wrong reasons. Maybe they can run Newsom finally, but I don't know if Kingmaker Obama approves of him, and I don't know if he can hide his psychopathy well enough for a national run, and I'm not sure if the Democrats are willing to run an honest primary to figure that out, plus who knows if a centrist candidate (hypothetically, I know Newsom is anything but centrist) can even get enough support from their base with how radical the far left is right now.
They've kind of fucked themselves in a bunch of ways, and God knows how they untangle it at this point outside of taking an election or two to just work on de-radicalizing their far left wing, and stop playing kingmaker to let any up-and-comers up-and-come.