🐟 Fishtank Sam Hyde's Fishtank.live General - Jet Neptune's Little House of Horrors

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Official KF Fishtank livechat here!

Is it over?

  • Yes, I am sad and need a Ben backrub :(

    Votes: 329 31.8%
  • No, we will be back, autism too strong

    Votes: 522 50.5%
  • Cams down until we roll into Bloodgames 2

    Votes: 182 17.6%

  • Total voters
    1,033
Is it possible to have some nuance in this conversation? I'm not a fan of the faggot either but is there any evidence he's a pedo? And by pedo, I mean sexually attracted to kids and acting on it in some way, not "he made a dress for a boy and stuff". Do you guys actually believe the fish are now okay with kiddy diddling? No? Would they sympathize if someone in the house said they wanted to fuck kids? Probably not. Why call them pedo apologists etc. then?

They are not evil, they aren't defending pedophilia, they're just brainwashed and oblivious, which isn't a good thing but completely understandable imo, considering they've probably never had to think about these things on their own before.
 
Is it possible to have some nuance in this conversation? I'm not a fan of the faggot either but is there any evidence he's a pedo? And by pedo, I mean sexually attracted to kids and acting on it in some way, not "he made a dress for a boy and stuff". Do you guys actually believe the fish are now okay with kiddy diddling? No? Would they sympathize if someone in the house said they wanted to fuck kids? Probably not. Why call them pedo apologists etc. then?

They are not evil, they aren't defending pedophilia, they're just brainwashed and oblivious, which isn't a good thing but completely understandable imo, considering they've probably never had to think about these things on their own before.
Fuck them idc about understanding their nuance anymore.

LVKE NVKE
 
Is it possible to have some nuance in this conversation? I'm not a fan of the faggot either but is there any evidence he's a pedo? And by pedo, I mean sexually attracted to kids and acting on it in some way, not "he made a dress for a boy and stuff". Do you guys actually believe the fish are now okay with kiddy diddling? No? Would they sympathize if someone in the house said they wanted to fuck kids? Probably not. Why call them pedo apologists etc. then?

They are not evil, they aren't defending pedophilia, they're just brainwashed and oblivious, which isn't a good thing but completely understandable imo, considering they've probably never had to think about these things on their own before.
There isn't. There is no actual conviction.

And it's unclear (at least to me) what each fish has been shown specifically. Burt in particular seems to have been shown the last amount of stuff, but again it is unclear.
 
Is it possible to have some nuance in this conversation? I'm not a fan of the faggot either but is there any evidence he's a pedo? And by pedo, I mean sexually attracted to kids and acting on it in some way, not "he made a dress for a boy and stuff". Do you guys actually believe the fish are now okay with kiddy diddling? No? Would they sympathize if someone in the house said they wanted to fuck kids? Probably not. Why call them pedo apologists etc. then?

They are not evil, they aren't defending pedophilia, they're just brainwashed and oblivious, which isn't a good thing but completely understandable imo, considering they've probably never had to think about these things on their own before.
Drag is inherently sexual. Making drag costumes for children is sick. Doing drag time story hour for children is sick. And it's people like yourself who say "oh it's not so bad" is how these people weasel their way into innocent children's lives.
 
There isn't. There is no actual conviction.

And it's unclear (at least to me) what each fish has been shown specifically. Burt in particular seems to have been shown the last amount of stuff, but again it is unclear.
Sam took Binx, Payton, and Symbal aside privately in the confessional. He also showed the Sicilian, Luke, and Kwuan together in the Penthouse the news article. That was last night. I don't know what else was shown in the meantime, but he made a compelling case.
 
Fishtank is never going to be totally fair. If you want a fair competition you're watching the wrong show. That said, blatant unfairness bothers me and others. I've sperged about that in the past but the main issue is that Production needs to be careful about not making it completely unfair to the point where they're just picking a winner. In season 1, they did pretty well. Obviously Josie was held on to in the second half because they didn't want to get rid of her. Ultimately the final winner of the 1v1 was decided more or less fairly. I had more problems with S2 where Tay was set up for failure. But even this wasn't too bad because, though they were pushed by production, it was ultimately Shinji and TJ who decided to do what they did.

Now a lot of people are talking about just giving it to Luke (or Mizzy lol). For me this would cross a line. I get why people have turned against the remaining three Oldfish and I agree. But just handing it to Luke would throw any pretense of Fishtank being a genuine competition out the window. Brandon is obviously a creep but Production, choosing to go through Luke, totally shit the bed with their approach to stirring that pot.

We understand how children doing drag is setting them up for grooming. But not everyone does because, on the surface, it can seem like it's just fun and games. A photo of a child doing drag (like the one in Brandon's costume) is not nearly enough for someone with limited knowledge of what goes on with Desmond and the others to conclude how child drag is pedo enabling. It's absolutely no surprise that Normies reacted as they did. Even the picture of the child with the naked man can be written off as something Brandon himself had nothing to do with (Payton just said this in the confessional). Bad apples in child drag doesn't mean it's all bad, they might say (as Binx basically did). There's a (correct) counter argument that, if photos like that are being taken, Brandon should know the dangerous situations he is enabling and not support child drag. But that's an extra step which needs to be argued by someone who is persuasive and has extensive knowledge of the sketchiness that goes on with child drag.

But without that argument and a persuasive takedown of child drag, the jump that Luke/Production (and now also TTS) make from a) Brandon making a drag outfit for a kid to b) Brandon being an open pedophile comes off as absurd to the normie Fish (new and old). They're overstating their case to Normies. Do I think Brandon is a pedo? Probably. He's definitely a creep. But most people who are fine with child drag are not pedos. They're just naive and lack information. That's certainly the case with all the Fish supporting Brandon. I absolutely do not give the same benefit of the doubt to Brandon as he is actively involved in child drag so ignorance is not an excuse. Plus it looks like he has an online history of association with groomers/grooming victims.

Production fucked this up. Hopefully the remaining Oldfish can redeem themselves. But instead of laying a clever trap or making a strong argument against child drag, they just got angry and threw a grenade into the house. Now everyone hates everyone except Luke. They do have time so we'll see. This morning is interesting to say the least.

But even if Binx/Payton/Burt can't fix this in the audiences' eyes, I still think giving it to Luke would be a mistake. Legally it's something I assume they could get away with but as a fan of the show I wouldn't like it. (I assume most here will disagree).
 
Last edited:
Is it possible to have some nuance in this conversation? I'm not a fan of the faggot either but is there any evidence he's a pedo? And by pedo, I mean sexually attracted to kids and acting on it in some way, not "he made a dress for a boy and stuff". Do you guys actually believe the fish are now okay with kiddy diddling? No? Would they sympathize if someone in the house said they wanted to fuck kids? Probably not. Why call them pedo apologists etc. then?

They are not evil, they aren't defending pedophilia, they're just brainwashed and oblivious, which isn't a good thing but completely understandable imo, considering they've probably never had to think about these things on their own before.
You're being an obtuse faggot
 
If you watched the entire thing yesterday and honestly believe it's all a ruse, you are thick as a brick. Sam was genuinely seething and couldn't wait to get rid of him.
You make it sound like you think Sam being genuine is proof of something.
If anything it's proof of Sam's comedic genius. And it's been on display for the past x number of years. Did you even watch Fishtank Season 1? Did you even see how he fucked with people constantly? In and out of character in an instant, torturing Josie and Letty for 3 days before gaslighting them into thinking they've just been scammed, insulting the audience, before the final reveal. Yet somehow you think his being "genuinely seething" towards Brandon is a smoking gun. That kind of edgy humor has been his trademark for a fucking decade! They hired Brandon for the show so they could humiliate him live on Fishtank in front of an audience of thousands. And test the fish at the same time (Binx failed her mission, fish failed the test).
 
Sam took Binx, Payton, and Symbal aside privately in the confessional. He also showed the Sicilian, Luke, and Kwuan together in the Penthouse the news article. That was last night. I don't know what else was shown in the meantime, but he made a compelling case.
Which news article? I've also heard that a printout of him in an outfit was shown with his penis showing next to a kid. But it's unclear if him and the kid were in the same photo or exactly what the story is.
 
You make it sound like you think Sam being genuine is proof of something.
If anything it's proof of Sam's comedic genius. And it's been on display for the past x number of years. Did you even watch Fishtank Season 1? Did you even see how he fucked with people constantly? In and out of character in an instant, torturing Josie and Letty for 3 days before gaslighting them into thinking they've just been scammed, insulting the audience, before the final reveal. Yet somehow you think his being "genuinely seething" towards Brandon is a smoking gun. That kind of edgy humor has been his trademark for a fucking decade! They hired Brandon for the show so they could humiliate him live on Fishtank in front of an audience of thousands. And test the fish at the same time (Binx failed her mission, fish failed the test).
Oh I'm sure the fact that Breezy and Brandon were friends was all part of the ruse too? You watch this show knowing how incompetent the wiggers are and how last minute this idea was, and you think they scoured their socials and knowingly let on a groomer and two friends just for laughs?
Retard alert.
 
Which news article? I've also heard that a printout of him in an outfit was shown with his penis showing next to a kid. But it's unclear if him and the kid were in the same photo or exactly what the story is.
It was a website that published the photo of the drag kid, Brandon claimed in front of everybody that it was not a porn site and that there was noting sexual on the site. Sam pulled the site Brandon was talking about up and showed the fish that the kid picture is right next to pictures of dudes with their cocks out. The site and screenshots were posted in the thread last night so I'd go check it out if I were you.
 
Which news article? I've also heard that a printout of him in an outfit was shown with his penis showing next to a kid. But it's unclear if him and the kid were in the same photo or exactly what the story is.
It was from the wayback archives, from the house of mann or whatever, their drag house. I think the kid was posing with one of the other drag performers and he had his dick out or in some kind of mesh fabric. Sam was describing it, I have it recorded but I can't clip remotely (at work atm). Basically the drag house had a store, and they had pictures of harnesses, pasties, underwear, and the child was featured in some of that. I'm going to guess an adult was wearing some of the adult stuff they sell, and the kid was wearing whatever the kid was wearing, and the dick was visible.

Right by the kid's head. It was enough to upset both Binx and Simbal. But Simbal was like, "It's not my job to handle this." and Binx said that it was more important to eliminate stronger players in the house like Simbal rather than Brandon so she wasn't going to worry about it rn and Sam was just looking at her like she was a demon creature. That was basically all of their responses. "Oh well, not my problem, let's eliminate the other main characters."

Except Burt, Burt didn't really know anything, because Burt probably would have gone psycho and ripped off Brandon's arms and I think that's why they didn't include him in the reveal of the information. Burt is a bit of a wildcard.
 

A casual display of athleticism from the alpha of the house.
chainluke.png
After 15 minutes of TTS attacking them and Airsoft Fatty telling them they must be a chained together for a challenge they've got to puzzle out, they're explaining to Luke that TTS told them to team up with him. Luke's asking Burt to help identify the handwriting of the people who voted for him, and the first one Luke got out was Burt's handwriting. :story:
 
Payton will defend him till the end. Burt is just a schizo coomer. Binx is just trying to play both sides.

The other people deserve a mulligan since Brandon was lying and being extremely manipulative. I feel like he would have convinced most people with that story. He made it sound like he just has an amazon store and had absolutely no clue who was buying from him and for what reason. Production is sort of fucking retarded for not completely putting him on blast and exposing everything.
 
Back