Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
DickMain said:
Seeing as Chichton hated the gays I can't imagine somebody like Patrick could exist within his works on a fundamental level.
Click to expand...
So here's an interesting hypocrisy nugget from the SFF Twitter crowd. We know they vehemently hate J.K. Rowling for publicly saying that she doesn't think men can turn into women, even if they try super hard. J.K. Rowling supports gay rights and has never said anything anti-gay. But Frank Herbert, Orson Scott Card, and Michael Crichton were all publicly homophobic. So why aren't fat non-practicing writers like Pat calling for their heads? Has the blue wall of consistency crumbled?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dead Gay Muppet Gangbang, The Axolotl Throttle, ConSluttant and 17 others
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a trotter stamping on a human face—for ever"
long live pig brother.png
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: UncleTusky, semitooth, Catch The Rainbow and 49 others
PS2 Nishiki said:
For a guy who fights for "freedom and democracy", he sure does sound undemocratic.
Click to expand...
Every revolutionary, in their heart, wants to be a dictator. That is ironically how they're made. People like Patrick think they can run the entire world if only given the chance and the reality is that chance is given to them every day: You run your OWN world and your own house. How you do with that relatively simple set of tasks is indicative of how you'd do with a much larger and more complex system.

I don't wanna say "Clean your room" but....look, fellas, it's not bad advice.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UncleTusky, semitooth, Wright and 45 others
Law said:
So here's an interesting hypocrisy nugget from the SFF Twitter crowd. We know they vehemently hate J.K. Rowling for publicly saying that she doesn't think men can turn into women, even if they try super hard. J.K. Rowling supports gay rights and has never said anything anti-gay. But Frank Herbert, Orson Scott Card, and Michael Crichton were all publicly homophobic. So why aren't fat non-practicing writers like Pat calling for their heads? Has the blue wall of consistency crumbled?
Click to expand...
Pat doesn't read books or interviews with other authors and when he does he doesn't really understand the subtext.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Axolotl Throttle, Pobblebonk, Caverlock and 11 others
'Ole Dente said:
Every revolutionary, in their heart, wants to be a dictator. That is ironically how they're made. People like Patrick think they can run the entire world if only given the chance and the reality is that chance is given to them every day: You run your OWN world and your own house. How you do with that relatively simple set of tasks is indicative of how you'd do with a much larger and more complex system.

I don't wanna say "Clean your room" but....look, fellas, it's not bad advice.
Click to expand...
Pat would rather "clean his wife."
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: ConSluttant, Pobblebonk, Caverlock and 10 others
Law said:
But Frank Herbert, Orson Scott Card, and Michael Crichton were all publicly homophobic. So why aren't fat non-practicing writers like Pat calling for their heads?
Click to expand...

Card has definitely gotten a lot of grief from the usual corners of the internet that would seethe over someone saying the bad words.

Crichton's got dragged over his thoughts on global warming.

No idea about Herbert, but his politics aren't as clean cut and easy to put into a box, so that probably has broken a lot of their tiny little minds.

Also, I don't think any of them are on Twitter (given that 2/3 of them are dead...) which is the only reading these screeching harpies tend to do.

Plus there's what @cigarettesalsa said about Pat. His concept of being well read is using 3 different shades of red in his coloring book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Axolotl Throttle, Pobblebonk, Caverlock and 7 others
Judge Holden said:
1733169779456.png
Click to expand...
To save our democracy, of course.

Edit:
If someone says they would expand SOCTUS while also appointing all their own people they are a retard. The more people on the court the faster it would go back to a neutral/even-split because the chance one person lives 50 years is a lot higher than the chance 13 people live 50 years. Packing the court was specifically to add more of your guys and end up with a majority (ex. 6-3 turns into 6-7) but seeing brain dead leftists not even understand that is always funny.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ConSluttant, lowly kiwi merchant, Caverlock and 7 others
Law said:
So why aren't fat non-practicing writers like Pat calling for their heads? Has the blue wall of consistency crumbled?
Click to expand...
I think it’s because Rowling is a personal betrayal. She’s on social media and sticks to her beliefs instead of caving to pressure from the dangerhairs so it’s extra triggering. Besides, the people most violently upset by Rowling all grew up on Harry Potter. They loved those stories and now have to disown them to stay current in their cult.

I like the grifter that is offering to replace the book covers and rebind them so you don’t see Rowling’s name. You can’t just read other stories, but if you don’t see her name on the cover then it’s okay.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: The Axolotl Throttle, Pobblebonk, The Motorizer and 15 others
Law said:
So here's an interesting hypocrisy nugget from the SFF Twitter crowd. We know they vehemently hate J.K. Rowling for publicly saying that she doesn't think men can turn into women, even if they try super hard. J.K. Rowling supports gay rights and has never said anything anti-gay. But Frank Herbert, Orson Scott Card, and Michael Crichton were all publicly homophobic. So why aren't fat non-practicing writers like Pat calling for their heads? Has the blue wall of consistency crumbled?
Click to expand...
I've narrowed it down to:
A) Pat is such a fake fan and person he isn't aware of any of that
B) He's fat
C) He has no original thoughts and no one else has made a big stink about it
D) all of the above
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Irene and 22 others, Pobblebonk, The Motorizer and 13 others
Judge Holden said:
Thanks to him reposting like an attention hungry fat faggot (with bitch tits) on threads we have elaboration
View attachment 6706756
Click to expand...
>Expand the supreme court
>strip every republican from the bench

I know his IQ is in the pooper, but I love how he doesn't realizes that doing either one of these would make the other action moot. You don't have to strip the Republicans of their position if there are 13 seats. You don't have to assign 13 seats if all the justices align with your views.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: BScCollateral, Niggggger, Haloperidol and 22 others
Law said:
But Frank Herbert, Orson Scott Card, and Michael Crichton were all publicly homophobic. So why aren't fat non-practicing writers like Pat calling for their heads? Has the blue wall of consistency crumbled?
Click to expand...
They've all been heavily criticized, but Herbert and Crichton are dead, and Card does not give a shit and has been hated by rabid lefties for at least a couple decades.

He's old enough news and was never a liberal, so I guess the hate for him is less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Axolotl Throttle, Oliver Onions, Caverlock and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back