UK British News Megathread - aka CWCissey's news thread

https://news.sky.com/story/row-over-new-greggs-vegan-sausage-rolls-heats-up-11597679

A heated row has broken out over a move by Britain's largest bakery chain to launch a vegan sausage roll.

The pastry, which is filled with a meat substitute and encased in 96 pastry layers, is available in 950 Greggs stores across the country.

It was promised after 20,000 people signed a petition calling for the snack to be launched to accommodate plant-based diet eaters.


But the vegan sausage roll's launch has been greeted by a mixed reaction: Some consumers welcomed it, while others voiced their objections.

View image on Twitter


spread happiness@p4leandp1nk

https://twitter.com/p4leandp1nk/status/1080767496569974785

#VEGANsausageroll thanks Greggs
2764.png



7

10:07 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See spread happiness's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Cook and food poverty campaigner Jack Monroe declared she was "frantically googling to see what time my nearest opens tomorrow morning because I will be outside".

While TV writer Brydie Lee-Kennedy called herself "very pro the Greggs vegan sausage roll because anything that wrenches veganism back from the 'clean eating' wellness folk is a good thing".

One Twitter user wrote that finding vegan sausage rolls missing from a store in Corby had "ruined my morning".

Another said: "My son is allergic to dairy products which means I can't really go to Greggs when he's with me. Now I can. Thank you vegans."

View image on Twitter


pg often@pgofton

https://twitter.com/pgofton/status/1080772793774624768

The hype got me like #Greggs #Veganuary


42

10:28 AM - Jan 3, 2019

See pg often's other Tweets

Twitter Ads info and privacy


TV presenter Piers Morgan led the charge of those outraged by the new roll.

"Nobody was waiting for a vegan bloody sausage, you PC-ravaged clowns," he wrote on Twitter.

Mr Morgan later complained at receiving "howling abuse from vegans", adding: "I get it, you're all hangry. I would be too if I only ate plants and gruel."

Another Twitter user said: "I really struggle to believe that 20,000 vegans are that desperate to eat in a Greggs."

"You don't paint a mustach (sic) on the Mona Lisa and you don't mess with the perfect sausage roll," one quipped.

Journalist Nooruddean Choudry suggested Greggs introduce a halal steak bake to "crank the fume levels right up to 11".

The bakery chain told concerned customers that "change is good" and that there would "always be a classic sausage roll".

It comes on the same day McDonald's launched its first vegetarian "Happy Meal", designed for children.

The new dish comes with a "veggie wrap", instead of the usual chicken or beef option.

It should be noted that Piers Morgan and Greggs share the same PR firm, so I'm thinking this is some serious faux outrage and South Park KKK gambiting here.
 
View attachment 6706161

Britain Dubbed 'Illegal Immigrant Capital Of Europe' As Oxford Study Finds 1 In 100 Residents Are Undocumented

I think Keir's initial approach to tackling gangs that smuggle in immigrants was complete bollocks. When you take down one, another one pops up, It's just impossible to stop them and avoid the root cause(s). Every time I've ordered from Uber/Deliveroo It's been some random English name and then a very confused-looking middle eastern/African man who points at the phone because they can't speak English. There are many issues to tackle that this government needs to do, but one of them is punishing business that employ these cunts and start pushing more incentive and projects for British citizens to start working, and I don't just mean delivery companies, I mean in general- but this is just one issue.

Thoughts?
Yay we're number 1 in something again.
 
It instructed schools to advise parents they must "affirm" the child's gender to prevent that child's suicide. Malicious crap and it was some Scottish group that produced it. I'd have to dig.
If it's not them they'll be involved somewhere. They've been enjoying fairly free rein in Scotland and have made it through the pedo scandal disgustingly unscathed.
Thoughts?
Caught something similar on the news earlier, the illegal issue is only part of the issue but there's no easy fix. As you say criminalising organisations employing them would help but before anything successful can happen the UK will need to leave the ECHR.

It's amusing that they are being treated like some sort of strange loophole when they come across the Channel when the answer is simple. Straight back to France with every single one of them. Treat them like people trying to enter legally from France who have none of the necessary paperwork to enter the country and send them right back.

It won't happen but killing the Channel as an access method would soon see things shift.
 
View attachment 6706161

Britain Dubbed 'Illegal Immigrant Capital Of Europe' As Oxford Study Finds 1 In 100 Residents Are Undocumented

I think Keir's initial approach to tackling gangs that smuggle in immigrants was complete bollocks. When you take down one, another one pops up, It's just impossible to stop them and avoid the root cause(s). Every time I've ordered from Uber/Deliveroo It's been some random English name and then a very confused-looking middle eastern/African man who points at the phone because they can't speak English. There are many issues to tackle that this government needs to do, but one of them is punishing business that employ these cunts and start pushing more incentive and projects for British citizens to start working, and I don't just mean delivery companies, I mean in general- but this is just one issue.

Thoughts?
All the talk regarding the gangs is ultimately just copium for the electorate, in particular that portion of the electorate that continue to cling on to the boomer sensibilities of the long since dying post-war consensus, the types that do think there's too many foreigners now, but are still scared of being called racist. Therefore going after faceless criminals with vague threats is politically far safer than actually tackling the real problem which is the factors that are pulling people to the UK in the first place, plus the numbers crossing the channel via those gangs are actually significantly less than the likes of Rakesh overstaying his student visa or Abdul claiming half his village are his immediate family on his work visa.

Ultimately the only way to reduce migration, legal or otherwise, is to eliminate the pull factors. Putting feasibility aside, the fastest immediate solutions a, so far non-existent, British nationalist party could do would be;

  • Crack down hard on companies using illegal migrant labour, making the financial penalties a percentage of total company value rather than a flat rate, and make it high enough to genuinely impact their ability to survive.
  • Actually deport people when they're refused and/or commit a crime, and if that's not possible then detain them even indefinitely (ECHR be damned, don't even need to leave it, just ignore it).
  • Restrict benefits to UK, Irish, and EEA citizens.
  • End the industrial complex which has sprung up around immigration, ie. the cunts making billions from housing refugees in their commercial properties and all the companies getting tender to provide services to those facilities.

It wouldn't outright fix the problem, and you'd still have to deal with Ahmed the 3rd generation proud Brummie and his horde of 14 little nig-nogs, but it would at least help plug the tidal wave currently overwhelming your shores.
 
Last edited:
My theory: Scotland is a small and irrelevant country attached to a much more relevant and influential one (England) and a far more influential bloc (EU, still is really, bear with me.)
If you want to shoehorn a law that’s insane through, you’re going to have a much easier time corrupting a small country. We know that Whitehall, while pozzed, still has some pockets of sanity and resistance. So you target Scotland instead. You do this by positioning yourself in opposition to the oppressor (England.)
‘Look they don’t want this, let’s stick two fingers up to them and show them how progressive we are! ‘ objection can be opposed with ‘you are just like the English.’
The law passes
Now you have a precedent. And now the tactic changes. Now the media starts astroturfing stuff like, ‘needing to align with the laws that far more progressive places like Scotland have been doing forever.’
You corrupt one little place and then you insist everyone else catch up with them.
Malta was another early adopter.
And that’s why it’s always Scotland
Interesting perspective. I always just assumed that trannies flocked to Scotland because 'A man in a dress' was the Scottish stereotype so they figured they would be more accepted there.
 
My theory: Scotland is a small and irrelevant country attached to a much more relevant and influential one (England) and a far more influential bloc (EU, still is really, bear with me.)
If you want to shoehorn a law that’s insane through, you’re going to have a much easier time corrupting a small country. We know that Whitehall, while pozzed, still has some pockets of sanity and resistance. So you target Scotland instead. You do this by positioning yourself in opposition to the oppressor (England.)
‘Look they don’t want this, let’s stick two fingers up to them and show them how progressive we are! ‘ objection can be opposed with ‘you are just like the English.’
The law passes
Now you have a precedent. And now the tactic changes. Now the media starts astroturfing stuff like, ‘needing to align with the laws that far more progressive places like Scotland have been doing forever.’
You corrupt one little place and then you insist everyone else catch up with them.
Malta was another early adopter.
And that’s why it’s always Scotland
Spot on. There is a small but convincing body of research/journalism (this thing kinda straddles the line) which outlines how small jurisdictions with easy access to media are specifically targeted by pressure groups for exactly this sort of astroturfed change. Scotland, Malta and New Zealand are the countries always brought up in this context.

It is acknowledged that this is why there has been a sudden explosion in astroturfed 'pro life' protest groups in Scotland, running off American money. They have seen it work (...almost?) for the trannies and now they think they can make it work here. The fact abortion is a reserved matter is going to be a fairly impassable hill though.
 
Anyone else remember when delivering take aways was how an old dude with a car earnt a bit of extra cash rather than boat monkeys on bicycles choking up high streets?
I've managed to find a few local takeaways (the Chinese, the chippie, and this really nice pizza place) which still have white drivers/delivery people. The Chinese is a guy and his wife, and the chippie has sometimes been a dad with his kid, which is odd but I guess beats random black man who can't find your house very well so parks mid-way off the path and stands in the middle of the road to try and find it.
I also remember a time a while back when I actually had an Eastern European guy deliver my stuff via JustEat, I was shocked. He even waited extra for me as they forgot my order or something, so were late in making it, but he didn't give up and cancel like most of the ethnic lot do, and gave me regular updates. He got a great tip that day, hope he's still doing okay now.
 
Farmer-harmer compares himself to Churchill and Atlee.

We going to war, boys.

Sir Keir insisted it is "deeply in our self-interest" to support Ukraine against Russian president Vladimir Putin because "the future of freedom in Europe is being decided today".

The UK is now "determined to fight harder on the world stage for our national interests and ready to dig deeper to defend them", he said, because a win for Putin would damage "our own security, stability and prosperity".

"So we must continue to back Ukraine and do what it takes to support their self-defence for as long as it takes," he said.

We must support their self-defence? Hmm. Not quite sure you know what self-defence is, you beady-eyed retard.

_________________________

New jag concept has dropped:

Of foucking course it would be gayer than Liberace and pink

1733201658987.png


1733201781565.png
Gay japanese transformer/fag-coffin for one.
 
My theory: Scotland is a small and irrelevant country attached to a much more relevant and influential one (England) and a far more influential bloc (EU, still is really, bear with me.)
If you want to shoehorn a law that’s insane through, you’re going to have a much easier time corrupting a small country. We know that Whitehall, while pozzed, still has some pockets of sanity and resistance. So you target Scotland instead. You do this by positioning yourself in opposition to the oppressor (England.)
‘Look they don’t want this, let’s stick two fingers up to them and show them how progressive we are! ‘ objection can be opposed with ‘you are just like the English.’
The law passes
Now you have a precedent. And now the tactic changes. Now the media starts astroturfing stuff like, ‘needing to align with the laws that far more progressive places like Scotland have been doing forever.’
You corrupt one little place and then you insist everyone else catch up with them.
Malta was another early adopter.
And that’s why it’s always Scotland
See also: Canada.
New jag concept has dropped:

Of foucking course it would be gayer than Liberace and pink

1733201658987.png


1733201781565.png
Gay japanese transformer/fag-coffin for one.
Lady Penelope called, she wants FAB 1 back.
 
Looks like they've mashed together a bunch of elements from older, more successful Jaguar designs without understanding why any particular part worked, and then hit the smooth and sharpen buttons a few times, then slapped some grills on it.

Interior by IKEA™.

Jaguar died under Ford's ownership. It's been a shambling corpse ever since, and only got worse under Tata, who turned it from a sleek, speedy predator to Crumbs the Jaguar.
 
Farmer-harmer compares himself to Churchill and Atlee.

We going to war, boys.



We must support their self-defence? Hmm. Not quite sure you know what self-defence is, you beady-eyed retard.

_________________________

New jag concept has dropped:

Of foucking course it would be gayer than Liberace and pink

View attachment 6708596

View attachment 6708603
Gay japanese transformer/fag-coffin for one.
It looks like a car you’d be gifted in a Cyberpunk 2077 mod if that mod had a competition for sucking Claire’s girl dick.
 
Farmer-harmer compares himself to Churchill and Atlee.

We going to war, boys.



We must support their self-defence? Hmm. Not quite sure you know what self-defence is, you beady-eyed retard.

_________________________

New jag concept has dropped:

Of foucking course it would be gayer than Liberace and pink

View attachment 6708596

View attachment 6708603
Gay japanese transformer/fag-coffin for one.
Funnily enough, I could totally see Paris Hilton or Belle Delphine climbing out of it, or whoever the It girls of the day are this year. Whoever drives this vehicle I would expect to be comprised primarily of silicon, collagen and peroxide; wear a skirt no longer than 5" and call her boyfriend(s) daddy reflexively.
 
My theory: Scotland is a small and irrelevant country attached to a much more relevant and influential one (England) and a far more influential bloc (EU, still is really, bear with me.)
If you want to shoehorn a law that’s insane through, you’re going to have a much easier time corrupting a small country. We know that Whitehall, while pozzed, still has some pockets of sanity and resistance. So you target Scotland instead. You do this by positioning yourself in opposition to the oppressor (England.)
‘Look they don’t want this, let’s stick two fingers up to them and show them how progressive we are! ‘ objection can be opposed with ‘you are just like the English.’
The law passes
Now you have a precedent. And now the tactic changes. Now the media starts astroturfing stuff like, ‘needing to align with the laws that far more progressive places like Scotland have been doing forever.’
You corrupt one little place and then you insist everyone else catch up with them.
Malta was another early adopter.
And that’s why it’s always Scotland

Spot on. There is a small but convincing body of research/journalism (this thing kinda straddles the line) which outlines how small jurisdictions with easy access to media are specifically targeted by pressure groups for exactly this sort of astroturfed change. Scotland, Malta and New Zealand are the countries always brought up in this context.

It is acknowledged that this is why there has been a sudden explosion in astroturfed 'pro life' protest groups in Scotland, running off American money. They have seen it work (...almost?) for the trannies and now they think they can make it work here. The fact abortion is a reserved matter is going to be a fairly impassable hill though.

And then, presumably, because Scotland is part of the UK, they can weasel word it and say, "They've accepted X in the UK..."

When really only Scotland has accepted X, and England, Wales and Northern Ireland are not too keen, but because Scotland counts as being 'in the UK', the statement is technically correct.

Devious fuckers.
 
It looks like a car you’d be gifted in a Cyberpunk 2077 mod if that mod had a competition for sucking Claire’s girl dick.

fuck that is a stupid addition to the story. Claire has no troonery , no mannish features but the only thing that makes him a dude is a tiny bit of flavour text in a bio some where.
now on the one hand I kinda like the half arsed pandering to the nutters , on the other hand it had been picked up by the nutters and it seems so forced by them.
 
Back