Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
but that opens the door to the argument "How mentally stable does one have to be to be a properly consenting person?"
This is a good question, and there’s no one answer, but in general, the patient should be deemed to have capacity to consent. That needs to be assessed, and it can vary in a single patient t over time and for different things.
For example: someone with schizophrenia may be perfectly rational a lot of the time and be able to give consent for something. But if they’re at a point where they’re very unwell they may not be.
Example 2. Someone with, say, Down syndrome may be capable of consent for day to day medical treatment but incapable of deciding more serious or complex issues.

In trials, some patients are just blanket deemed to be vulnerable and while they must assent to the procedures they must also have a legally acceptable representative like a caretaker or guardian who must also consent. Both the assent and consent are required and the trial must still be explained to subject and caretake in acceptably and appropriate language.
Who’s vulnerable? Minors, always. Prisoners, wards of state or court, prisoners, (they are susceptible to coercion from the state) anyone with dementia, Parkinson’s and certain mental illness like schizophrenia, the mentally retarded. That’s not an exclusive list, anyone with reduced capacity mentally could be deemed incapable of consent.
Even regular joes can be - extreme fatigue or illness can also have you deemed incapable. I’ve no idea on the legal side past how to make what I do ethical, so I don’t know if it could be argued that a lot of these people were simply incapable of consent or not. BUT that is very clearly why the push for child consent and gillick competence is so strong. The lower that bar is the easier it is to get away with all this.
 
I'm no lawyer, let alone a lawyer specializing in medical malpractice, but would any of these people have a case?
A case? They have, surely. Plenty of pictures and accounts here show enough proof to get them for malpractice in most countries.

However not a single lawyer wants to touch these cases involving gender doctors. Most of these doctors publicly opted out of malpractice insurance, so there is hardly any money to be gained from these fuckers, and people of gender don't usually have money to pay the lawyers out of pocket for such a big case. The only solution would be a lawyer accepting to work for free on a big ass case that will most likely last for years and not many are willing to do it.
 
Plenty of pictures and accounts here show enough proof to get them for malpractice in most countries.

However not a single lawyer wants to touch these cases involving gender doctors

There is another reason. Let’s pretend there a cashed up troon with a good lawyer. The law in Australia (and it’s roughly the same in the US, UK etc) is
  1. the standard of care fell short of what would be reasonably expected of a medical practitioner in the circumstances; and
  2. the failure to provide the expected standard of professional care caused the patient to suffer harm or loss.
How do you prove the first limb? You need a doctor to testify. Doctors don’t like testifying generally as expert witnesses against other doctors. There are a few reasons for that: lawyers are the enemy, there but for the grace of God, and will other doctors still talk to them.

Now, if this were a routine surgery, and the surgeon clearly fucked up and had a bad rep, another surgeon with expertise in that type of surgery might be happy to do it, because it could get a cowboy out of the theatre and protect patients. A senior surgeon with a great reputation is more likely to do it, because they have professional eminence, less patience for incompetence, and can better withstand any sniping from the ranks. They of course also look and perform better on the stand.

But who would give expert testimony against one of our favourites here on the standard of care that could be reasonably expected of a medical practitioner in the circumstances? Other butchers are not going to do it, because it could open the floodgates against them. The most likely candidate would be an expert in urinogenital surgery who wasn’t doing SRS. All they can say is that Jesus, they wouldn’t have performed Lovecraftian hookups on their worst enemy, and would you look at that fistula, it’s a piss fountain. They cannot say what a normally competent surgeon doing that surgery would be expected to do, partly because they don’t do that surgery themselves, but mostly because there are no gold standard techniques. What would a reasonably competent surgeon do? Who knows? You could be the God Emperor of urinogenital surgery and still be ripped apart by a defence lawyer on the stand. All that makes building the case and getting it over the line a lot harder.

The only exception is someone like Sibhididoodah as a mastectomy is a routine surgery with accepted techniques, so finding an expert could be easier, but good luck suing her. Apart from the lack of insurance, she’s a fool if she hasn’t locked assets away in trusts and companies to minimise her exposure - and she doesn’t strike me as a fool. A sociopath, but not a fool.
 
View attachment 6701036
Sort of passes as Tracy Turnblad
Not the one true Tracy Turnblad, Ricki Lake. :semperfidelis:
This troon had a designer coochie installed, and he isn't convinced he got his money's worth:

Please_halllppp1.jpg



Bro, you don't have a clit. You have a mutilated dick head.
Why do they even try this shit? Surely extricating the dickhead with the dangling nerves has got to fuck up the functionality? Is it just to tell them they tried and it'll totally work like it was originally installed?

I think I think about this too hard sometimes.
 
Since my post from the other day was eaten in the Great Destiny Cocksucking Rollback of 2024, allow me to repost this botched pooner I stumbled upon while browsing piercing aftercare on Amazon.

View attachment 6706540
Funny how you can tell from this pic that the tattoo is woefully small even though it covers her entire chest. On a man that'd be a sternum blaster at best.

Someone hasn't changed her display name.
View attachment 6706541
Exclamation point count: 4. Very masc, broseph.

That nipple held on for dear life, bless its heart.
View attachment 6706546
The other side is worse. Random dog ear, potentially missing nipple.
View attachment 6706556

Was it worth it, lil pooner?
It is like having a badly dented/scratched panel of a car, and then spray-painting it with random graffiti, thinking it would be cool when it just makes it look even more ridiculous.

Bonus points for when the skin sags from damage/age and then you can you can have Potato Medusa like the Potato Jesus meme!
 
It’s already a thing.
Here’s a tranny using the name “PlasticDani” (lul) who did just that. And here’s an archive. And, because they’re difficult to see on the archival website, here’s the photos he posted:
And a comment from a supporter:

It’s not possible and it’s not cool.

You know what does have a function, you obnoxious troon? Your endocrine system, and yet you still fucking jettisoned that.

* Wastes money on fOoT fEmInZaTion sUrGerY
* Has YUGE weird ugly MALE TOENAILS
--Winning!
 
Sam lux is forced to speak in his real voice after botched tracheal shave
View attachment 6709119
:story:
I've seen this guy a few times lol. The amount of makeup and filters he uses to try to hide his ghastly Troon countenance is off the fucking charts, then you see him without makeup and he's one of the most ugly weird looking motherfuckers you'll ever run across.
The dude looks like ET crashed in the Shire and fucked a Hobbit, absolutely bizarre little man.
 
A pooner who had her entire reproductive system scooped out and a non-functional rot burrito stitched onto her crotch is now wondering why sitting up is causing her unbearable pain:

Pooner_sits_how.jpg


"How do you sit on this?" is indeed a suitable question, because her new undercarriage has been transformed into something nameless.

No pictures of the 'dog, sadly, but we already know that blisters have begun to form "at the base of the phallus":

Pooner_sits_how2.jpg


 
A pooner who had her entire reproductive system scooped out and a non-functional rot burrito stitched onto her crotch is now wondering why sitting up is causing her unbearable pain:

View attachment 6711648

"How do you sit on this?" is indeed a suitable question, because her new undercarriage has been transformed into something nameless.

No pictures of the 'dog, sadly, but we already know that blisters have begun to form "at the base of the phallus":

View attachment 6711666

“Hey doods, why is my groin turning black?”
 
:story:
I've seen this guy a few times lol. The amount of makeup and filters he uses to try to hide his ghastly Troon countenance is off the fucking charts, then you see him without makeup and he's one of the most ugly weird looking motherfuckers you'll ever run across.
The dude looks like ET crashed in the Shire and fucked a Hobbit, absolutely bizarre little man.
he stops passing when he uses filters, ringlight and stands so close in the camera that you cannot tell that he has gigantic shoulders. also usual manhands.

Trans Supermodels Walk Victoria's Secret + Camila Cabello vs Sabrina Carpenter 9-3 screenshot.png
 
A pooner who had her entire reproductive system scooped out and a non-functional rot burrito stitched onto her crotch is now wondering why sitting up is causing her unbearable pain:

View attachment 6711648

"How do you sit on this?" is indeed a suitable question, because her new undercarriage has been transformed into something nameless.

No pictures of the 'dog, sadly, but we already know that blisters have begun to form "at the base of the phallus":

View attachment 6711666

"My fellow doods, I thought I would be soooo euphoric after yeeting my teets but I'm soooo tired instead dood!"
yeeteet.png
It's a lot harder than I'd expected it to be, way more than hysto was. I've got phallo scheduled for December, and it's the works - vnectomy, ul, rff - and I'm sitting here wondering if I can handle it. And it's not that any one thing is too horrible, just the whole process is so fucking tiring. And I mean, I know bottom is way more important to me than top, and I think it'll be a way more euphoric feeling afterwards. I'm just so fucking exhausted.

Any words of wisdom or just encouragement?
She's an old pooner btw, at least 41 considering she mentioned being 38 3 years ago, and trying to run off to Germany.

And I found the first post where she mentions "questioning" if she should poon out despite her shitload of health issues.
badhealth.png
I made this really interesting connection the other day. I've got shitty lungs, breathe at about 50% capacity, and have for a long time. I have had issues with acne, skin tags, and hidradenitis (dermal cysts in certain areas). I've also had issues with IBS. All inflammatory conditions that started around the time I hit puberty.

When I went on mirena, about a year after I had it put in, those things all went away. Mirena is progesterone-only and localized, so I had no period and no ovulation cycle.

Within the last year, all those things have come back with a vengeance.

Guess what also ran out this last year? Yep - my mirena is due to be removed.

Has anyone else noticed a correlation like this, or is this all in my head?
TL;DR she thought the uterus was the cause of her poor health and yeeting it would fix everything.
 
Last edited:
“Hey doods, why is my groin turning black?”
Once it turns black, there is no going back?

Blisters? Pooner logic would say that it makes the rotdog specially-textured for her partner's pleasure.

I often wonder at what is left when they have to remove the whole mess when gangrene sets in. Are a lot of pooners/troons left with a mere crater of scar tissue where their genitals used to be because it all had to be removed from necrosis setting in? Once the tissue starts to die, it seems that there would be not much left to work with and keloid scarring would seem like a given due to the body's reaction in trying to wall off the dead tissue.
 
There is another reason. Let’s pretend there a cashed up troon with a good lawyer. The law in Australia (and it’s roughly the same in the US, UK etc) is
  1. the standard of care fell short of what would be reasonably expected of a medical practitioner in the circumstances; and
  2. the failure to provide the expected standard of professional care caused the patient to suffer harm or loss.
How do you prove the first limb? You need a doctor to testify. Doctors don’t like testifying generally as expert witnesses against other doctors. There are a few reasons for that: lawyers are the enemy, there but for the grace of God, and will other doctors still talk to
Can vouch for this. My partner went through a medical malpractice suit in Australia where malpractice insurance is mandatory. To get a lawyer to take his case on, we had to go through the AHPRA process which then gave us a verdict (after about 2 years) of standard of care below that expected of a medical practitioner, plus unsatisfactory performance. Then the case was made, because a tribunal had already consulted expert witnesses. Only then could the suit be started. Unfortunately my partner died about one year into the process. That killed the two major heads of damage being, loss of income and pain and suffering. In Australia these heads of damage disappear on the death of the petitioner. All that really remains are medical costs, and these go to whoever paid them. So either the government via Medicare, or the insurer. There’s nothing in there for the lawyers.
I realise the US is different, but medical malpractice suits are hard AF. In the case of GRS, given zero standards of care, plus informed consent, these mentally ill patients basically sign their rights away. Going after the surgeons is pretty fruitless in the absence of malpractice insurance, and holding assets offshore. If the lawyers can’t get the big bucks then they won’t take a case on.
 
Sounds like the system has such a rigged game, the only way to win is to not play.
Lawyers are expensive. People with major medical issues are the least likely to be able to pay them, because medical costs have probably bankrupted (or close to) them. That means the lawyers take on “No win, no pay” cases where they take a percentage of the payout. If the estimated payout won’t be large enough to defray their costs (with a substantial added bonus), then they just won’t take them on.
 
Back