Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

Did you have to though? I mean Schmorky hasn't been around her for a long time you could have just let it go.
It's probably a good idea to let your kids know that there are predatory people and they can be family or close friends, yea. My cousin is about that age and she uses Tumblr, so she knows through information osmosis that there are diaper fetishists and she thinks they're kinda fucking hilarious. We're just in a new society where laughing at people on the Internet is the new norm. Nbd.
 
Did you have to though? I mean Schmorky hasn't been around her for a long time you could have just let it go.
I had to, dude's into kiddie fucking, wanted to make absolute sure nothing happened when I was in another room or wasn't looking. Had to make sure he didn't touch them or do any shit like he lusts for in his sexually deviant RP sessions with poo poo pee pee baby diaper furs. I never left the kids alone with shmorky, but it was better safe than sorry, I didn't want them coming up with repressed memories a decade later about how Yarnwig McFurryfuck checked their undies for poo poo
 
Well, it might look bad that they commisoned a pedophile to do animation for them.

First off, it's not like he was associated with them at the time. I mean, look at what happened with Subway and Jared. He was actually employed with them and figured prominently into their advertising. After he got arrested, Subway dropped everything related to him, and life moves on.

The "Oh no, Shmorky's a bad guy and everyone who ever associated with him is tainted" seems like small potatoes compared to that.
 
Did you have to though? I mean Schmorky hasn't been around her for a long time you could have just let it go.
Dude when an adult a child used to interact with just goes away, they ask questions. If lowtax didn't tell her and he randomly appeared in her life when she was 15-16, she would be at a serious risk.
 
Did you have to though? I mean Schmorky hasn't been around her for a long time you could have just let it go.

IMO It is better to inform kids about weirdos they can encounter on the internet than shield them from it, or offer only vague fear mongering of the bad men that will snatch you in the night. It is surprisingly common, and surprisingly easy for young kids to wind up in situations with people like Shmorky.
 
i went to nap off a migraine and came back to some great caps and discussion. i'll be updating the imgur and sli.mg albums...eventually :V
It's great that people who worked with him are stepping out but I fully understand while others are not. I highly doubt people like Rebecca Sugar or Jhonen Vasquez will come out and say anything because they probably know that's all their lives will become for a while if they do and I'm sure they have things they would rather focus on. Same goes with smaller groups of people like Mega64, I mean yeah Shmork animated them something for their show like 10 years ago but I doubt they want to get involved either. I just feel bad for everyone who is getting balled up with him. Either way, I don't think that Shmork is going to come back from this anytime soon.
i have to agree, a lot of the people that had dealings with Shmork like KC Green the Game Grumps are just good people that are probably seething as much as @Lowtax is, just silently. unfortunately the internet's currently very politically charged by the far left, which uses the tactics that they think everyone else uses (doxxing, mass witch-hunting) to silence people who speak out. they do a lot of bitching about harassment but they treat people who even mildly associate by proxy like a gangrenous limb that needs to be pre-emptively lopped if there's even one mis-step. i'm far more terrified of Tumblr than i ever was about places like KiwiFarms, because Tumblr was far more likely to dox at the drop of a hat. i saw someone who was a hard-left feminist try to dox and deport a CSA victim back to his country of origin, which he escaped due to said CSA, because he disagreed with her (she was 17 at the time of doing it and faced no charges; she currently resides on FA trying to get money out of furries). those people fucking terrify me.
Yeah, I think it's easy to forget that interacting with people online doesn't mean you "know" them in any real sense of the word. We live in an age where you can collaborate with people on major projects without ever spending a minute around them in real life or even having a phone call with them.

The commission stuff was plausible to many people because a lot of artists of various kinds have done work they didn't like doing to pay the bills. You need a certain level of financial stability before you can pick and choose your jobs, and most people never attain that level of success.

The pieces of the puzzle may have been there all along, but no-one really had access to all of them to put them all together.
i couldn't have said it better myself; artists will tolerate a lot of things to keep warm and fed, and even if they don't, it's very easy for people like Shmorky to just hide the problem under a quilt until the temporary guest leaves. a lot of people don't really want to think that if they scratch the surface, something will be there glaring back at them under the paint.
If KC was to make a statement it would be like stepping into a minefield. If someone who was particularly whacko was to see that KC had associated with Shmorky, who's to say that there won't be a callout made about him associating with a pedophile? People have been called out for less.
pretty much. like i said, spaces dominated by identity politics and far-left ideology act as though any association is a sin, which is why they have a bad habit of painting KF as a whole as bad if it just so happens one angry idiot runs around loose. they don't understand that people don't actually like to enable people in doing something bad if they can help it, or that people are independent from one another and act with their own unique motives, but they love doing this cultish thing of "cut out anyone that challenges our beliefs gooble gobble gooble gobble one of us one of us"
Hey, don't be so pessimistic; even Tumblrs hate Shmorky now!

However, did Shmorky know that carefully was only 16/17 at the time of the ERPs? Not that it'd make him any less of a scumbag if he didn't know, but I just wanted that cleared up so no one tries to defend him with "but he didn't KNOW she was underage!"

I've already seen screenshots of people saying "the age of consent is 16, so it was legal," which 1.) isn't the full truth; 2.) is still creepy as hell since he was twice her age. On the internet, you have to be at least 18 to legally participate in ERPs, or even look at porn. It's why porn sites always have that "by accessing this site, you agree that you are 18 years or older" notice.

People can and have gotten into real trouble for even accidentally ERPing with a minor.
thanks for the nice cap for my "people being human" subfolder. c: been wanting to flesh that one out.

yes, Shmorky knew she was 16. he outright avoided anything penetrative until @carefully turned 18. he manufactured that situation very carefully.
 
IMO It is better to inform kids about weirdos they can encounter on the internet than shield them from it, or offer only vague fear mongering of the bad men that will snatch you in the night. It is surprisingly common, and surprisingly easy for young kids to wind up in situations with people like Shmorky.
I'm 100% open and honest with my kids in every aspect of life. I figure I'd rather have them hear shit from me, when I can explain it to them in terms they understand and in non-loaded terms that the Nazi SASS brigade would spin. I told both my kids that I'll treat them honestly and like adults as long as they do the same to me, and we've had zero issues with this. I'd rather have them learn about the fucked up shitbag deviants on the internet from me than stumble upon them by themselves and not be able to comprehend what's going on because they're unprepared or unable to digest the fucked up shit they're spewing out. They're going to learn about it sooner or later, and I'd rather have them do it in the open, with me, where I can answer their questions and prepare them for the hellish nightmare apocalypse world of garbage they're inheriting from us.
 
thred.png


This thread
 
I'm 100% open and honest with my kids in every aspect of life. I figure I'd rather have them hear shit from me, when I can explain it to them in terms they understand and in non-loaded terms that the Nazi SASS brigade would spin. I told both my kids that I'll treat them honestly and like adults as long as they do the same to me, and we've had zero issues with this. I'd rather have them learn about the fucked up shitbag deviants on the internet from me than stumble upon them by themselves and not be able to comprehend what's going on because they're unprepared or unable to digest the fucked up shit they're spewing out. They're going to learn about it sooner or later, and I'd rather have them do it in the open, with me, where I can answer their questions and prepare them for the hellish nightmare apocalypse world of garbage they're inheriting from us.

How do you monitor their internet interactions? I mean I saw goatse for the first time at 13 on SA. You worried about that kind of stuff happening to them?
 
how did you explain the golden Don winning the election

did you remind them women can't be president
Yes, I actually explained to them how Hillary lost it all due to her smug elitist attitude and marginalizing the middle white class. Explained to them how I dont support Trump, but understand completely how people could, particularly over the far left seemingly demonizing white males for so long.
 
There's also always a vanishingly slim chance that shmorky will turn up at Lowtax's house, dry leaves and twigs tangled in his disheveled yarn wig, cape stained brown, with mud for once. Better that the kids know shmorky is a danger.
 
How do you monitor their internet interactions? I mean I saw goatse for the first time at 13 on SA. You worried about that kind of stuff happening to them?
I don't monitor their internet interactions at all. I do not believe in filtering or censoring anything from them. I believe in preparing them for the world they're about to live in, and instead of concentrating on blocking things I find disagreeable, teaching them how to deal with things they find disagreeable. I tell them, don't trust an adult just because they're older than you. Question everything. Also DARE is a joke.
 
These days when I see goatse it's like seeing an episode of Goosebumps being rerun on TV. Something you used to think was scary, but is now just kind of whimsical and nostalgic. I must've been 12 or 13 when I first saw it too. This shmorky stuff is far more horrifying. Goatse is a victimless crime by comparison.
 
Back